Bind runes are a type of symbol or design that combines multiple runic characters into one cohesive image. They have been used by various cultures throughout history, notably the Norse and Germanic tribes. The purpose of bind runes is multifaceted and can vary depending on the specific context in which they are used. One of the main purposes of bind runes is to convey a specific meaning or intention. Each runic character used in the bind rune has its own individual symbolism and energy. When these characters are combined, they create a unique blend of energies and meanings.
Prince Phillip being pummeled with draconic hellfire by Maleficent as a dragon
Afterwards, Maleficent and her Goons go to the cottage, where they wait for Prince Phillip, who had arranged to meet Aurora whom he only knew to be Briar Rose, a peasant girl. Maleficent, with the help of her only loyal follower remaining, Pete, goes from world to world reviving her other followers and building an army of Heartless.
When these characters are combined, they create a unique blend of energies and meanings. By creating a bind rune with specific characters, individuals can harness the power of each individual rune to magnify and focus their intentions. In addition to expressing meaning, bind runes have also been used for protection and warding off negative forces.
Perspective by Jael
Actually, she’s not even a witch, according to the new Disney film. She is a fairy. The most powerful of all the fairies.
Disney’s Maleficent is the “true” story of Sleeping Beauty. I won’t spoil it for you, but basically King Stefan is Maleficent’s greatest enemy, and she curses his daughter with the classic curse we all know today. But as Sleeping Beauty grows in the forest, Maleficent watches her and becomes fond of her, but she cannot break the curse she has made, for “no power on earth shall break this curse”…not even hers. True love’s kiss comes not from the dashing young prince, but from Aurora’s “fairy godmother”: Maleficent.
Yes the story is mixed up and changed. Some were changed for the good, as I thought that some of the original story had holes, and those were patched up nicely. The Moors, as the kingdom of mystical animals is called, was pretty amazing. The conflict between the human kingdom and the Moors was well displayed. And the characterization was good throughout the movie. There was well-placed comic relief and interesting twists. Like Maleficent’s raven in the original Disney motion picture. Maleficent transformed the raven into different beings, like a human or a raven or a dragon or a wolf. I thought that was creative! Plus it didn’t isolate Maleficent so, as she was in the original. She lived in an old abandoned castle ruin with only a bird. But in this movie she actually socialized. Not only Diablo (her raven/human/whatever she wanted it to be), but the whole Moors was at her service. She actually had a kingdom of her own. This was much more believable to me, for sure.
Then and now. The 1959 Walt Disney Sleeping Beauty captured Maleficent as a horned witch who could transform into a dragon and wants to be the ruler of the kingdom. No one can trump classics. But one can add to a classic story. That’s what Disney did for this film. Angelina Jolie adds more to our beloved villain. Backstory. Meaning to her maliciousness. Jolie is a brilliant actor. And my favorite scene is just her in a swamp. Stefan had cut off her wings while she slept. She wakes up in agony, pain, shock, anger, fright, all of the above and more. Her scream is terrifying and emotional. You can nearly feel the throbbing pain sealing the gashes on her back. Jolie puts on an amazing performance.
I only wish I had a clip to show you, but for the life of me I couldn’t find one. Anyways, that’s probably my favorite part of the movie.
Here’s a fun story. Did you know that the actress for 5-year-old Aurora was actually Jolie’s daughter? Yep. Turns out the original casting for 5-year-old Aurora was too scarred of Maleficent’s costume. So they had to get Vivienne Jolie-Pitt to play the part instead. I mean, she’s a cute kid; I think she worked out just fine. But behind-the-scene-stories are always fun.
Yes, I do have a lot of critique, because Sleeping Beauty is a classic fairy tale. Think about it: if our children grow up watching a remake of a fairy tale that isn’t at all like the original, they will never experience the TRUE story with the OLD-FASHIONED animation and the actual story where good and evil have a fine-line boundary. The whole movie, we are on Maleficent’s side. That’s not necessarily a good thing, since she’s evil most of the movie.
I know, I know. Its a new thing coming out in movies, where we are on the bad-guy’s side and they turn good in the end. I’m just not used to it. Yet. But that’s why my number one critique in this movie is that King Stefan and the human world is portrayed as TOO evil. It is gradual, but eventually the humans are just evil.Heck you’d think Stefan is freaking Voldemort by the end. He’s Princess Aurora’s father for heaven’s sake! I understand his motives for wanting the Moors and Maleficent destroyed, but I think he becomes a little too obsessed with it. I can’t help but think it had to do with making Maleficent look like the “good guy” near the end. Granted, it did make a fine line between good and evil…but just in the wrong way. I think it could have been done differently.
And another big critique I have is the narrator. At the end, you learn that Sleeping Beauty is the narrator of the whole story. I’m not exaggerating: that ruined the whole movie for me. Honestly, since Maleficent was portrayed as the good guy, it would have been really cool if Maleficent would have narrated the story. That way the whole movie could have been a bias point of view of the way things happened and AND–wait for it–there would still be value in the old Disney animation classic. To me, since Sleeping Beauty narrated Maleficent, that means the old classic told it wrong. But if Maleficent had been Maleficent’s actual biased point of view, we could have 2 different sides of the story and, admit it, that’d be pretty cool.
But alas it didn’t happen that way. Other small critiques I have matter less to the story as it did to director’s preference. They could have picked another Aurora, as Elle Fanning looked a little too young and too ditsy to be a 16-year-old princess. I liked the way they did Maleficent–good acting, good lines, good characterization–but I think sometimes they were making her a little too baddass and sexy. That must be a culture thing.
Oh and just a question for those who have seen it…
If King Stefan and the humans hated the Moors creatures so much…why did he trust these three fairies to bless his newborn daughter of whom he was so protective? Just a thought.
From Maleficent’s marvelous, dominant wings, to Princess Aurora’s trustful, intriguing smile, Maleficent is certainly one of the modern Disney movies I would see again. You can’t say that of all live-action Disney films of the past few years. Disney did a decent job of keeping the classic fairy tale alive and spicing it up with a few new twists. I would certainly recommend it.
From the Moors and back,
The Kingdom Keepers and Wayne set up a plan to trick Maleficent into getting back the plans. Finn, Philby, and Maybeck find her hiding in the freezing Utilidors in the park, in the computer room, since she can only survive and use her powers in cold areas. Finn tricks her into opening the door, pretending to be giving her the pen, and Philby grabs the plans. The 3 run off with the Stonecutters Quill and the plans, while an angry, tricked Maleficent is kicked backwards into the computers. Getting a super electric charge, she blasts through the Utilidors to capture the kids. While the rest of the Kingdom Keepers escape the park, Finn stays back and manages to use his DHI state to free Jez from Maleficent's spell. Finn then escapes down a garbage chute with the pen and plans while Maleficent gives chase. Finn escapes while Disney Imagineers trap Maleficent in a net.
The specific arrangement and combination of runic characters can create a powerful symbol that is believed to repel evil or negative energies. Bind runes were often inscribed on weapons, amulets, or other objects that were carried or worn for protection. Furthermore, bind runes can also be used for healing and spiritual purposes. Each runic character is associated with different aspects of health, wellbeing, and spirituality. By combining these characters, individuals can create a bind rune that is believed to promote healing and balance in specific areas of their life. Overall, the purpose of bind runes is to create a powerful symbol that conveys a specific meaning, intention, or energy. They can be used for protection, healing, or simply as a way to enhance one's connection to the spiritual realm. Bind runes are a fascinating aspect of ancient traditions and continue to be utilized by individuals seeking to harness the power of runic symbols..
Reviews for "Enhancing Your Connection with Nature through Bind Runes"
1. John - 1 star
I found "What is the purpose of bind runes" to be highly confusing and lacking in clarity. The author jumps from topic to topic without providing sufficient background information or explanation. As a result, I was left feeling frustrated and unsatisfied. I believe this book would benefit from a more organized structure and clearer explanations of the concepts discussed. Overall, I cannot recommend this book to others looking to understand the purpose of bind runes.
2. Emily - 2 stars
"What is the purpose of bind runes" failed to meet my expectations. While it did provide some basic information on the topic, I felt that it lacked depth and failed to explore the subject matter fully. The examples given were limited, and the author did not delve into the historical context or cultural significance of bind runes. I was left wanting more information and a deeper understanding of the subject. In addition, the writing style was dry and not engaging, making it difficult to stay focused while reading. Overall, I was disappointed with this book and would not recommend it to others.
3. David - 1 star
I found "What is the purpose of bind runes" to be a complete waste of time. The author's explanations were confusing and convoluted, leaving me more confused than before I started reading. The lack of clear examples and practical applications made it difficult for me to grasp the purpose and significance of bind runes. Additionally, the book did not provide any historical context or cultural background, making it feel disconnected from its subject matter. I would not recommend this book to anyone seeking a comprehensive understanding of bind runes.
4. Sarah - 2 stars
"What is the purpose of bind runes" was a disappointment for me. The book lacked structure and organization, making it difficult to follow the author's train of thought. It also failed to provide practical examples or step-by-step instructions on how to create bind runes, which was what I was hoping for. Furthermore, the writing style was dry and academic, making it a dull read. I think this book could have been more engaging and informative with better organization and more practical guidance.