The Ford family witchcraft has been a subject of fascination and speculation for many years. The family is known for their alleged involvement in witchcraft and the practice of dark magic. Dating back several generations, the Ford family has been linked to stories of spells, curses, and supernatural occurrences. The origins of the Ford family witchcraft can be traced back to the Salem witch trials in the late 17th century. It is believed that one of the family ancestors, Elizabeth Ford, was accused of practicing witchcraft and was executed during this time. Since then, the family has been associated with the occult and has gained a reputation for their magical abilities.
In 2001 Ford met Dana Dark, a gothic model and vocalist from Houston, and two others to begin recording ritual workings and the practice of the specific "luciferian" magick. The band recorded several albums from that point on, performing several live rituals. The group practiced magick as a Coven during this time period.
The knowledge and symbolism of the Horned God, Baphomet, the Adversary, Cain, Lilith, The Djinn, Hecate as well as the Rites of the Devil s Sabbat present a layered gateway to forbidden knowledge and the rational philosophy of Luciferianism. Only when reading accounts of the trials during last year s tricentennial did it dawn on me that Sarah Cloyce, accused witch, was the same woman as Sarah Towne Bridges, esteemed ancestor.
Since then, the family has been associated with the occult and has gained a reputation for their magical abilities. Throughout the years, several members of the Ford family have claimed to possess extraordinary powers and have been regarded as witches. These individuals are believed to be able to communicate with spirits, cast spells, and perform rituals to manipulate the natural world.
The Witch of Edmonton
The Witch of Edmonton by Thomas Dekker is a "Jacobean" play, meaning that it was written during the reign of James I of England. Dekker co-wrote this play with William Rowley and John Ford in 1621. Ford co-authored several plays, with six surviving, including The Witch of Edmonton. There are eight surviving plays written solely by Ford. Rowley’s contributions are not as well divided, but he wrote or co-wrote no less than 17 surviving plays. Nearly 20 plays by Dekker were published during his lifetime of 1572-1632. The Witch of Edmonton is classified as a tragicomedy, containing elements of both tragedy and comedy.
The Witch of Edmonton is based on real events in Edmonton, located outside of London, earlier in 1621. Though the play was penned and acted in 1621, it wasn’t published until 1658. Scholars suggest that John Webster may have been a fourth contributing playwright, because Dekker, Rowley, and Ford were working with him on Keep the Widow Waking at the same timeThe Witch of Edmonton was written, and originally, the poets listed were Rowley, Dekker, Ford, "et cetera."
Inspired by the story of Elizabeth Sawyer, a real woman executed for witchcraft on April 19, 1621, as well as Henry Goodcole’s pamphlet, The wonderful discoverie of Elizabeth Sawyer, Witch, written in 1621, The Witch of Edmonton takes a more sympathetic approach to the conviction and execution of Sawyer. Originally performed at the Cockpit Theatre by Prince Charles’ Men on December 29, 1621, The Witch of Edmonton shows how, after being shunned by neighbors, Sawyer sells her soul to the Devil to get revenge.
Elizabeth Sawyer is a poor elderly woman, and therefore lonely and ostracized by the rest of the village. Neighbors accuse her of witchcraft, unjustly. In order to get even with them, Sawyer becomes the witch they accused her being. Tom, a talking dog sent by the Devil, becomes her familiar. Together, Elizabeth and Tom drive one of the accusers to madness and suicide. Elizabeth’s other attempts at revenge are largely unsuccessful because so many of the other villagers are ready and willing to sell their souls to the Devil, as well. Subplots run alongside Sawyer’s that provide commentary on Dekker’s contemporary society.
One such subplot follows Frank Thorney. A farmer’s son, Frank secretly marries Winnifride. Winnifride is poor, but Frank loves her. He also thinks she’s carrying his baby. Frank’s father, who doesn’t know that Frank has married, insists instead that he marry another woman, Susan. Susan’s father is Old Carter, a wealthy farmer. Rather than confess the truth to his father, Frank marries Susan and becomes a bigamist. However, this doesn’t last long as he tries to flee Edmonton, disguising Winnifride as a male page. Susan finds out he’s left and pursues him, so he stabs her. When Tom reappears, the audience is meant to feel uncertain as to whether Frank wanted to stab Susan or whether the Devil made him do it.
Frank cuts himself, though not severely, so that he can feign having been attacked. He tries to accuse two men, Warbeck and Somerton, of killing Susan. Warbeck is Susan’s former suitor and Somerton wants to marry Katherine, Susan’s younger sister. While nursing Frank’s wounds, Katherine discovers a bloody knife among his things. She guesses that Frank is the one who killed Susan and tells her father. Tom appears again, joyful that he’s played a part in Frank’s ruin. With the truth revealed, Frank is sentenced to be executed along with Elizabeth Sawyer. Unlike Sawyer, Frank is forgiven. Winnifride goes to live with Old Carter’s family, so despite the fact that there are tragic elements, the play ends happily for some.
Sawyer is executed as a witch, though this doesn’t rid Edmonton of evil. For one thing, Tom isn’t destroyed—simply banished. He vows to go to London, where he plans to ruin more people. The play also presents the lord of the manor—Sir Arthur Clarington—in a less than favorable light. Elizabeth accuses him of lechery, and it comes to light that he’s had an affair with Winnifride. Elizabeth also accuses him of corruption. This shows a distrust of authority among English common people in the 1620s. The Witch of Edmonton doesn’t suggest that Elizabeth wasn’t a witch, but rather it places the blame not solely on her shoulders, but on those of all in society, granting sympathy to her conviction and execution.
Over the centuries, many families have felt disgrace and distress.
Legends and stories about the Ford family's witchcraft abilities have circulated throughout various communities over the years. Locals often seek their guidance and assistance in matters of love, health, and even curses. It is said that they possess the knowledge and skills to bring about both positive and negative outcomes through their magical practices. Despite the fascination and mystique surrounding the Ford family's alleged witchcraft, there are those who remain skeptical. Many view their practices as nothing more than superstition and folklore, attributing any perceived supernatural abilities to mere coincidence or trickery. Regardless of one's beliefs, the Ford family's witchcraft continues to capture the imagination of many. The stories and legends surrounding their magical abilities have become ingrained in the culture and history of the communities they reside in. Whether true or not, the Ford family's witchcraft will always be a subject of intrigue and speculation..
Reviews for "The Ford Family's Witchcraft Heritage: Camouflaged in the Shadows of Industry"
1. John Doe - 1 star
I found "Ford family witchcraft" to be a complete waste of time. The storyline was convoluted and confusing, making it difficult to follow and engage with the characters. The writing was also subpar, with weak descriptions and dialogue that fell flat. Overall, I was extremely disappointed with this book and would not recommend it to anyone.
2. Sarah Smith - 2 stars
I had high hopes for "Ford family witchcraft" based on the intriguing premise, but I was let down. The pacing was incredibly slow, with not much happening until the last few chapters. The characters were also one-dimensional and lacked depth, making it hard to care about their fates. Additionally, the ending felt rushed and unsatisfying. Unfortunately, I cannot say that I enjoyed this book.
3. Michael Johnson - 2 stars
"Ford family witchcraft" could have been an interesting story, but it fell short in execution. The writing style was often confusing, with jumbled sentences and awkward phrasing. The plot felt disjointed and lacked cohesion, leaving me disconnected from the narrative. While there were some promising ideas, the overall execution was underwhelming. I would not recommend this book to others looking for a compelling witchcraft tale.