During the infamous witchcraft trials in colonial America, one of the defendants was Sarah Good. These trials took place in the early 1690s in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, specifically in the town of Salem. Sarah Good was accused of practicing witchcraft and faced a trial that would ultimately decide her fate. Sarah Good was a poor, outcast woman who had a reputation for being eccentric and different from the rest of the community. This made her an easy target for those looking for someone to blame for the strange occurrences happening in Salem. The trials themselves were fueled by paranoia and fear, with many people accusing their neighbors and even family members of being witches.
A gentle and beguiling tale of a young witch’s travels, based on a best-selling light novel series.
Ever since she was a little girl reading books of magic and adventure, Elaina has dreamed of following in the footsteps of her childhood idol, the witch Nique, and living a life of travel. Meanwhile, a request sent to the United Magic Association takes Saya on an adventure that reunites her with a good friend from before she became a witch, while a trip links Fran s and Elaina s pasts and presents.
The trials themselves were fueled by paranoia and fear, with many people accusing their neighbors and even family members of being witches. Throughout her trial, Sarah Good maintained her innocence, proclaiming that she was not a witch and denying any involvement in the accused acts of witchcraft. However, her claims fell on deaf ears as the court was determined to make an example of those accused of witchcraft.
Wandering Witch 01 (Manga): The Journey of Elaina (Wandering Witch: The Journey of Elaina)
Title: Wandering Witch 01 (Manga): The Journey of .
Publisher: Square Enix Manga
Publication Date: 2020
Binding: Soft cover
Condition: Good
Seller's business information:
AJB Capital Incorporated7 William Russell Lane, Richmond Hill, ON, L4C 5S6, Canada Terms of Sale:
Shipping Terms:
Payment Methods
accepted by seller
Shop With Us
- Advanced Search
- Browse Collections
- My Account
- My Orders
- View Basket
Sell With Us
- Start Selling
- Join Our Affiliate Program
- Book Buyback
- Refer a seller
About Us
- About AbeBooks
- Media
- Careers
- Forums
- Privacy Policy
- Your Ads Privacy Choices
- Designated Agent
- Accessibility
Find Help
Other AbeBooks Companies
- AbeBooks.co.uk
- AbeBooks.de
- AbeBooks.fr
- AbeBooks.it
- AbeBooks Aus/NZ
- AbeBooks.ca
- IberLibro.com
- ZVAB.com
- BookFinder.com Find any book at the best price
Follow AbeBooks
- BookFinder.com Find any book at the best price
By using the Web site, you confirm that you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by the Terms and Conditions.
© 1996 - 2023 AbeBooks Inc. All Rights Reserved. AbeBooks, the AbeBooks logo, AbeBooks.com, "Passion for books." and "Passion for books. Books for your passion." are registered trademarks with the Registered US Patent & Trademark Office.
A gentle and beguiling tale of a young witch’s travels, based on a best-selling light novel series.
The supposed evidence against her included testimony from witnesses who claimed to have been victims of her spells and the so-called "spectral evidence," which was testimony from alleged victims who claimed to have seen Sarah Good's spirit tormenting them. Sarah Good's trial was plagued with biases, unfair proceedings, and a lack of due process. The court seemed set on convicting her, and they succeeded. She was found guilty of witchcraft and sentenced to death. On July 19, 1692, Sarah Good, along with several others, was executed by hanging. The witchcraft trials in Salem were a dark moment in American history, characterized by mass hysteria, unfounded accusations, and the devastating loss of innocent lives. Sarah Good's case exemplifies the injustice and cruelty that took place during this period. Despite her protests of innocence, Sarah Good was unable to escape the hysteria and paranoia that led to her unjust conviction and tragic demise..
Reviews for "Guilty or Innocent: Deconstructing Sarah Good's Trial"
1. John Doe - 1 star
This play was a complete disappointment. The acting was wooden, the dialogue was awkward, and the plot was poorly developed. The portrayal of Sarah Good as a defendant in the witchcraft trials felt shallow and one-dimensional. The whole production lacked substance and failed to captivate the audience. I would not recommend wasting your time or money on this performance.
2. Jane Smith - 2 stars
I had high hopes for "Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant," but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The acting was mediocre at best, with many of the performers struggling to deliver their lines convincingly. The storyline felt disjointed and lacked cohesion, making it difficult to follow. The production also suffered from poor pacing, leaving me bored and disengaged throughout. Overall, while it had potential, this play failed to deliver a compelling and coherent narrative.
3. Anthony Thompson - 2.5 stars
While "Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant" had some interesting moments, it ultimately failed to impress. The play felt overly long and dragged in several scenes, making it hard to maintain interest. The performances were somewhat lackluster, lacking the emotional depth required to bring the characters to life. Additionally, the set design and costumes were underwhelming, failing to create an immersive experience. This play had potential, but it fell short in execution.
4. Samantha Lewis - 1 star
I found "Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant" to be a baffling and poorly thought-out production. The dialogue was cringe-worthy, filled with clichés and predictable lines. The acting was subpar, with exaggerated and over-the-top performances that felt forced. The entire play lacked originality and failed to offer any fresh perspective on the witch trials. I walked away feeling disappointed and unentertained. Overall, I cannot recommend this play to anyone seeking a meaningful or well-executed theatrical experience.
5. Michael Anderson - 2 stars
"Witchcraft trials with Sarah Good as a defendant" had an interesting premise, but it failed to deliver on its potential. The play suffered from weak writing, with dialogue that often felt stilted and unnatural. The performances were hit-and-miss, with some actors shining and others falling flat. The pacing was inconsistent, fluctuating between slow and rushed, which made it challenging to fully invest in the story. While there were moments of promise, this play ultimately left me unsatisfied and wishing for more depth and cohesiveness.