The mermaid witch Katee Roberts is a fictional character that combines the traits of a mermaid and a witch. Katee Roberts is known for her captivating beauty and her mystical powers. As a mermaid, she possesses a fishtail instead of legs and can swim effortlessly through the ocean depths. She has the ability to communicate with marine creatures and is often seen surrounded by a variety of sea animals, which she considers her friends. In addition to her mermaid abilities, Katee Roberts is also a powerful witch. She has the skill to cast spells and perform magical rituals.
Payment via Chrono24's secure Escrow Service
The steel bezel is a hallmark of the Explorer II, so as much as people would have loved to see a ceramic bezel, it just wouldn t have felt right and might ve been potentially problematic from a spelunking perspective. It s always hard if not downright impossible to know what Rolex is going to release, but when the brand has an anniversary to celebrate especially a 50th the guessing becomes a little easier.
She has the skill to cast spells and perform magical rituals. Her spells are primarily focused on water and emotions, allowing her to control the tides and manipulate people's feelings. Katee Roberts uses her witchcraft to maintain balance in the underwater world and to protect the creatures that live within it.
ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX
An update to the Rolex Explorer II in 2021, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of the watch's creation, seems like a reasonable move by Rolex.
Any possibility of reducing its diameter to return to 40mm or similar?
if that were the case I would wait to make the purchase decision. Call me naive.
cuhrioso |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by cuhrioso |
It’s hard to see that coming. Rolex has been increasing sizes on everything over the last few years. Seems like it’s all trending that way. I’d guess we see a ceramic bezel Explorer II as a revamp before we see a size change.
Derwreck12 |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Derwreck12 |
An update to the Rolex Explorer II in 2021, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of the watch's creation, seems like a reasonable move by Rolex.
Any possibility of reducing its diameter to return to 40mm or similar?
if that were the case I would wait to make the purchase decision. Call me naive.
It's a sports watch and 42 is just about perfect and rightly sits between Sub41 and SD43. There is no point it making smaller than even OP41 now. So, don't keep your hopes and it doesn't look a possibility. They may add a ceramic bezel(it doesn't need one) with updated movement and that's about it. Size is perfect for sports watch! It was not a great seller at 40mm and was too small!
Maxy |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Maxy |
I don't see them reducing the size of Explorer 2. My prediction is a 40mm explorer and a 42mm explorer 2, both with updated movements. Ceramic bezel on the E2.
I'm on the list at an AD after putting down a 50% deposit on the Explorer 2. I'm hoping my place in line doesn't come up until after next year's update. I'm going to rotate a SD43 and the polar explorer 2 every few days, alternating black and white faces. Very excited.
Smobews |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Smobews |
why does everyone seem to think a ceramic bezel for the explorer ii? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it would look great, but I feel like that would look too similar to the GMT-II line, no? Obviously anything could happen, but I'm betting on that not happening. As a side note, I have a polar explorer 16570 with the 3186 movement and I love it!
joeflipperhead |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by joeflipperhead |
myporsche |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by myporsche |
An update to the Rolex Explorer II in 2021, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of the watch's creation, seems like a reasonable move by Rolex.
Any possibility of reducing its diameter to return to 40mm or similar?
if that were the case I would wait to make the purchase decision. Call me naive.
if they increased the Sub their most iconic watch ---- why do you think they'd decrease the Exp2 ?brucethemanlee |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by brucethemanlee |
really love my 216570 with black dial. A non-rotating black ceramic bezel with the same shape and fonts would be quite nice.
173rdabn |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by 173rdabn |
faimag |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by faimag |
All I can say is that I would love it!
I sold my 42mm E2 ‘cos it felt too big for my wrist. 40mm would be perfect! Although, 41mm seems to be the new thing now.
__________________IG: @watch_idiot_savant
Verdi |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Verdi |
why does everyone seem to think a ceramic bezel for the explorer ii? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it would look great, but I feel like that would look too similar to the GMT-II line, no? Obviously anything could happen, but I'm betting on that not happening. As a side note, I have a polar explorer 16570 with the 3186 movement and I love it!
This.edyu |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by edyu |
image0.jpeg (128.4 KB, 899 views) |
fullsizeoutput_158.jpeg (144.8 KB, 897 views) |
911991 |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by 911991 |
I do not think it wears like the 40mm at all; for me it wears much larger. How big is your wrist? The 16570 wears perfectly on me, but the 216570 has a much greater lug-to-lug (or end-link-to end-link) distance, and it just hangs off both sides of my wrist- that really makes it unwearable for me.
I'm one of those hoping for a return to 40mm for the 50th anniversary and a green GMT hand to mark the occasion. If they disappoint, then it will be a Polar 16570 for me.
__________________�Own time or time will own you.� �Brian Norgard
Dr.Stu |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Dr.Stu |
Scholar |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Scholar |
cuhrioso |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by cuhrioso |
I think it'll be a new white 39 with 3230 and same Explorer II but with a new 3235 derived caliber, but I'd not be shocked with a new 41mm Explorer II
Toivonen |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Toivonen |
why does everyone seem to think a ceramic bezel for the explorer ii? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it would look great, but I feel like that would look too similar to the GMT-II line, no? Obviously anything could happen, but I'm betting on that not happening. As a side note, I have a polar explorer 16570 with the 3186 movement and I love it!
If they put a ceramic bezel on it, I think the general profile of it will be closer to a Daytona than a GMT. The Daytona has that smooth outer edge, where as the GMT has the gnarling for grip.
Even though the SS bezel on the current Explorer 2 looks awesome, it is the Achilles heel of the watch. Once you get a big nasty scratch on it, there is no going back.
Smobews |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Smobews |
Smobews |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Smobews |
I would bet 42mm, probably a ceramic bezel (unfortunately). I would love to see a dark green (forest green) matte dial for 50th anniversary.
__________________
Rolex: 114060, 116600, 116610LV, 116660 JC, 116710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 326934 x 2, 16520, 16660 x 2, 16800, 16030
Tudor: BB Pro, Pelagos LHD, P01
VC: 4500v
Lamontsanders |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Lamontsanders |
scorpinrolex.jpg (95.8 KB, 776 views) |
GONZO2LR |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by GONZO2LR |
Hard to know what they will do. come out with a green dial explorer ?
New movement is probably a safe bet along with minor case refinements. Which of the latter is anybody’s guess till a reliable leak or reveal!
Tanalasta |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Tanalasta |
LyijyS |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by LyijyS |
This for sure will NOT be the case. they all pulled out of Basel and I doubt there will even be a Baselworld 2021 . not sure if this was a woosh or not
joeflipperhead |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by joeflipperhead |
You realize no one on here has any real idea, right? Any answer you get in this thread is nothing more than a complete guess.
I don’t say this to be rude; I say this because your post implies your purchase decision will be based on what people guess could happen to the Exp II next year.
Do you like the 42mm or not? If no, wait and see what happens. If yes, buy now and sell to upgrade or just add the new watch. Simple as that.
I love the watch and have gone back and forth on whether I like the size, but I haven’t gotten to the point of actually buying yet. It is a really great looking watch (the white dial six digit). Find a used watch place and try on the current 42mm vs the previous 40mm. I thought the 40mm wore too small for my taste, but it is also a great looking watch.
ZeGerman11 |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by ZeGerman11 |
An update to the Rolex Explorer II in 2021, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of the watch's creation, seems like a reasonable move by Rolex.
Any possibility of reducing its diameter to return to 40mm or similar?
if that were the case I would wait to make the purchase decision. Call me naive.
Updated, sure, smaller, I doubt it. Maybe refined.breitlings |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by breitlings |
I think they would widen the bracelet � la new sub before they�d take the case size down. For the ceramic bezel - not gonna happen IMO. Steel bezel is part of the identity of the watch and a ceramic bezel would not fit the narrative of climbing mountains and exploring caves (potentially knocking it into a rock and shattering the ceramic).
afmars |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by afmars |
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Onikage |
MILGAUSS88 |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by MILGAUSS88 |
i don�t see it happening.. maybe a green arrow and explorer 2 text as an anniversary addition?!
i have a feeling the bezel will go ceramic, as that seems to be the trend, referring to the daytona atleast..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
chris242 |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by chris242 |
I expect we'll see some green accents, and at some point possibly a ceramic bezel (perhaps with a finish similar to the current steel bezel). What I'd really like to see is a Triplock crown, for aesthetic reasons and to bring it into line with the other pro/sports watches.
__________________Psmith |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by Psmith |
Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 | > |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) |
Display Modes |
Linear Mode |
Switch to Hybrid Mode |
Switch to Threaded Mode |
*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.
It’s hard to see that coming. Rolex has been increasing sizes on everything over the last few years. Seems like it’s all trending that way. I’d guess we see a ceramic bezel Explorer II as a revamp before we see a size change.
Despite her magical abilities, Katee Roberts is known for her kind and compassionate nature. She uses her powers for the greater good, helping those in need and fighting against those who seek to harm the ocean and its inhabitants. Her love for the sea and its creatures is evident in her actions and her dedication to preserving its beauty and ensuring its survival. The character of Katee Roberts serves as a symbol of the connection between nature and magic. She embodies the idea that humans have a responsibility to protect and cherish the natural world, using their abilities to make a positive impact. Katee Roberts is a reminder of the power that comes from embracing both strength and kindness, and the importance of caring for our environment. Overall, the mermaid witch Katee Roberts is a captivating character with a unique blend of mystical abilities. Through her actions and persona, she emphasizes the need for compassion, protection, and the preservation of our natural world..
Reviews for "The Mysteries and Legends Surrounding Katee Robert's Mermaid Witch"
1. Sarah - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "The Mermaid Witch" by Katee Robert. The storyline was so predictable and cliché. I could see every twist and turn coming from a mile away. The characters were also underdeveloped and lacked depth. I couldn't connect with any of them, and their actions felt forced and unrealistic. The writing style was also lackluster, with repetitive phrases and bland descriptions. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this book if you're looking for an engaging and original story.
2. Mark - 1 star - "The Mermaid Witch" was a complete waste of time for me. The plot was incredibly slow and dragged on without any sense of direction. The author seemed more focused on the romance aspect rather than developing a cohesive and captivating fantasy world. The protagonist was extremely unlikable and lacked any strong characteristics. The dialogue was also cringe-worthy and lacked depth. I struggled to finish this book and was left incredibly unsatisfied. I would not recommend it to anyone interested in well-written fantasy novels.
3. Emily - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "The Mermaid Witch" by Katee Robert but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The pacing of the story was inconsistent, with parts feeling rushed while others dragged on unnecessarily. The romance between the two main characters felt forced and lacked chemistry. The world-building was also underwhelming, with limited descriptions and little attention to detail. Overall, the book felt amateurish and lacked the depth and complexity I look for in a fantasy novel. I would not recommend it if you're looking for a truly immersive and well-crafted story.
4. John - 2 stars - I found "The Mermaid Witch" to be quite underwhelming. The writing style was simplistic and lacked sophistication. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, making it difficult to believe in the characters' interactions. Additionally, the plot was predictable and didn't offer any surprising twists or turns. The romance was also quite lackluster and lacked the necessary emotional depth. Overall, I would not recommend this book for someone looking for a captivating and well-written fantasy novel.
5. Rachel - 1 star - I was highly disappointed in "The Mermaid Witch." The entire book felt like a collection of clichés and tired tropes. The characters were one-dimensional and lacked any real development. The plot was unoriginal and offered no surprises. The romantic aspect was forced and lacked any real chemistry. I struggled to finish this book and felt like I wasted my time. I would not recommend it to anyone looking for a fresh and engaging fantasy novel.