In today's fast-paced digital world, it is not often that we come across ancient artifacts that have been preserved and can offer us a glimpse into our past. However, rune stones are one such treasure that continues to captivate both historians and collectors alike. These ancient stones, adorned with inscriptions in various scripts, hold great historical and cultural significance. They provide us with valuable information about the languages, religions, and traditions of the early Germanic peoples. Recently, a collection of rune stones has been discovered, and they are now up for auction. This is an incredibly rare opportunity for both collectors and enthusiasts to own a piece of history.
On to things we can test then and display brightness - a bit of an issue on the vanilla Red Magic 6, which only managed 444 nits and clearly improved for the Red Magic 6S Pro, where we measured at 529 nits on the slider.
On to things we can test then and display brightness - a bit of an issue on the vanilla Red Magic 6, which only managed 444 nits and clearly improved for the Red Magic 6S Pro, where we measured at 529 nits on the slider. Display test 100 brightness Black, cd m 2 White, cd m 2 0 1023 0 1001 0 943 0 922 0 840 0 822 0 806 0 805 0 725 0 694 0 634 0 588 0 529 0 514 0 511 0 504 0 498 0 492 0 489 0 479 0 458 0 457 0 444 0 439 0 437.
This is an incredibly rare opportunity for both collectors and enthusiasts to own a piece of history. The stones range in size and design, with some featuring intricate carvings and others displaying simplistic yet elegant inscriptions. They have been meticulously researched and authenticated, ensuring their legitimacy and value.
nubia Red Magic 6S Pro review
A great display is essential for a great gaming experience, and the Red Magic 6 already had a solid panel. It was a 6.8-inch, FHD+ one with a maximum and industry-leading 165Hz refresh rate and a snappy 500Hz touch sampling rate to match.
Nubia claims the main display upgrade in the Red Magic 6S is the touch sampling rate. The Red Magic 6S Pro advertises 720Hz, particularly for multi-finger input. This definitely sounds like a hefty boost from the previously advertised 500Hz, even if it's just with a single-finger input.
However, it is one of those specs that is hard to measure, harder still to compare and almost impossible to translate into actual latency within the entire input and output chain of the devices. That is to say, the time from touching to screen all the way to getting a change in the image on screen as a response.
Since we can't realistically test this particular display upgrade in any meaningful way, it is a case of "more means better" and we just have to take Nubia's word that things have been improved even further, without needlessly digging too deep into what are likely PR-motivated numbers and stats.
On to things we can test then and display brightness - a bit of an issue on the vanilla Red Magic 6, which only managed 444 nits and clearly improved for the Red Magic 6S Pro, where we measured at 529 nits on the slider.
That's still a far cry from modern flagship territory, and not particularly close to the advertised 700 nits. Though, to be fair, the latter figure was likely achieved on a smaller screen test area.
| Display test | 100% brightness | ||
| Black, cd/m 2 | White, cd/m 2 | ||
| 0 | 1023 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 1001 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 943 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 922 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 840 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 822 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 806 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 805 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 725 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 694 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 634 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 588 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 529 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 514 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 511 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 504 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 498 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 492 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 489 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 479 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 458 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 457 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 444 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 439 | ∞ | |
| 0 | 437 | ∞ | |
The extra brightness could be due to some software improvements in brightness behavior, which were much needed on the original Red Magic 6 we tested. Though, the Red Magic 6S Pro still seems to lack a max auto mode for bright conditions. On the flip side, the higher number could hint that the Red Magic 6S is using a different panel.
Color accuracy was a problem on the vanilla Red Magic 6, and once again, our tests on the Red Magic 6s Pro didn't come anywhere close. Instead, the Red Magic 6S Pro consistently hits double-digit deltaE values for both sRGB and DCI-P3 color spaces, regardless of the selected color mode. And the vast selection of available modes on the phone (including ones that clearly mention a certain color space) plus the custom white point adjustment options are all sort of a slap in the face since no combination managed to turn out even remotely color-accurate output.
Display settings
Still, in "normal" and "vibrant" modes, colors look nice and punchy on the Red Magic 6S Pro and its lack of a punch-hole selfie camera, plus powerful stereo speaker setup all add up to a very pleasurable multimedia consumption experience.
Unfortunately, HDR is a bit of a mixed bag. On the one hand, the OS reports support for HDR10, HDR10+ and HLG, which is great, but Netflix didn't want to offer HDR content. That, however, is likely down to the Red Magic 6S Pro being absent from certain support lists, since we are reviewing an early unit. We even had to sideload the Netflix app, since it was blocked in Google Play Store.
Widevine and HDR capabilities
By the way, the early nature of our unit is one of the reasons why we won't be focusing on software too much. But, we digress.
Battery life
The Red Magic line has, unfortunately, been struggling a bit in the battery life department. The Red Magic 5S was hit pretty hard by the lack of good automatic refresh rate switching. Once set to its maximum of 144Hz, basically everything was running at 144Hz all of the time, essentially wasting energy. As for the vanilla Red Magic 6 - its battery was tanked by bad standby battery endurance.
We are very glad to say that the swap to the Snapdragon 888+ or perhaps some other software change has managed to address the standby endurance, and the Red Magic 6S Pro performs very much in line with the other Snapdragon 888+ device we recently tested - the ROG Phone 5s Pro.
In fact, all battery endurance tests fall in line pretty nicely with those on the Asus, as long as we correct the numbers to account for the different battery capacity - 5,050 mAh on the Red Magic 6S Pro and 6,000 mAh on the ROG Phone 5s Pro.
Compared to the vanilla Red Magic 6, the 6S pro does a bit worse in calls, but not by much, within what we would consider the margin of error. Same goes for its web browsing test. It was done at the maximum 165Hz refresh rate. On the other hand, the Video test gets a notable endurance boost, which we also have an explanation for. While the vanilla Red Magic 6 only managed to drop down to 90Hz for this test, the Red Magic 6S Pro consistently triggered 60Hz refresh, effectively saving some battery in the process.
Overall, while 97 hours of total endurance is still not great, even for a gaming phone, we have to commend ZTE for fixing the standby power draw issues that have been plaguing the vanilla Red Magic 6 and the 6S Pro.
Our battery tests were automated thanks to SmartViser, using its viSerDevice app. The endurance rating denotes how long the battery charge will last you if you use the device for an hour of telephony, web browsing, and video playback daily. More details can be found here.
Video test carried out in 60Hz refresh rate mode. Web browsing test done at the display's highest refresh rate whenever possible. Refer to the respective reviews for specifics. To adjust the endurance rating formula to match your own usage patterns check out our all-time battery test results chart where you can also find all phones we've tested.
Charging
Like we mentioned, the Red Magic 6S Pro ships with a 30W charger even though the phone itself supports up to 66W of charging.
The 30W unit which we got manages a full top-off in about 1 hour and 10 minutes. Interestingly enough, the Red Magic 6S Pro was a bit slower to charge than its vanilla sibling. Frankly, we can't exactly say why, but it probably has something do to with an intermittent error message we kept getting while charging saying something along the lines of - "charging has stopped. Charging voltage is too high, replace charger", regardless of what charger or cable we used.
Once we got our good 100W PD charger and hooked that up to the Red Magic 6S Pro, charging was a lot speedier, which is great to see. Chances are that you might already have a 65W PD charger in your home, or alternatively, picking one up now would be a good investment going forward anyway.
30min charging test (from 0%)
- Xiaomi Black Shark 4
100% - Realme GT Master
100% - Realme GT Explorer Master
96% - Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
89% - nubia Red Magic 5S (55W)
87% - nubia Red Magic 6S Pro (66W)
75% - Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro
71% - Asus ROG Phone 5
70% - nubia Red Magic 6
63% - nubia Red Magic 6R
62% - Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G
54% - Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
50% - nubia Red Magic 6S Pro (30W)
49% - Asus ROG Phone 3
43% - Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G
43% - nubia Red Magic 5S (18W bundled)
33%
Time to full charge (from 0%)
Lower is better
- Xiaomi Black Shark 4
0:19h - Realme GT Master
0:30h - Realme GT Explorer Master
0:33h - Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
0:37h - nubia Red Magic 5S (55W)
0:39h - nubia Red Magic 6S Pro (66W)
0:53h - nubia Red Magic 6R
0:58h - nubia Red Magic 6
1:01h - Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro
1:03h - Asus ROG Phone 5
1:05h - Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G
1:11h - Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
1:21h - Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G
1:23h - nubia Red Magic 6S Pro (30W)
1:50h - Asus ROG Phone 3
1:50h
- 1. Introduction and hardware overview and what's different
- 2. Display and battery life
- 3. Benchmarks, thermals, high refresh rate gaming and gaming features
- 4. Final thoughts
- ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro specification
- User opinions and reviews
- Review comments (31)
Since we can't realistically test this particular display upgrade in any meaningful way, it is a case of "more means better" and we just have to take Nubia's word that things have been improved even further, without needlessly digging too deep into what are likely PR-motivated numbers and stats.
The auction is expected to attract a high number of bidders from around the world, as rune stones are highly sought after by both private individuals and museums. Many collectors view these stones as tangible connections to our ancestors and as invaluable educational tools. Furthermore, rune stones have become popular decorative items, adding a touch of mystery and antiquity to any home or office. It is important to note that while rune stones are undeniably fascinating artifacts, they also carry significant responsibilities. They must be treated with the utmost care and respect to preserve their integrity and historical value. Proper storage, display, and maintenance are essential to ensure their continued preservation for future generations to appreciate and learn from. In conclusion, the upcoming auction of rune stones presents a unique opportunity to acquire these ancient treasures. The stones not only hold immense historical value but also provide us with a deeper understanding of our cultural heritage. Whether you are a seasoned collector or someone simply intrigued by history, these rune stones are sure to captivate and inspire. So, mark your calendars and prepare to embark on a journey through time as you bid on these incredible artifacts..
Reviews for "Discover Ancient Scripts: Rune Stones Auction Sheds Light on Norse Language"
1. Emily - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "Rune stones for auction." The storyline felt flat and predictable, and the characters lacked depth. The auction setting had so much potential for intrigue and mystery, but it fell short. Additionally, the writing style was dry and lacked description, making it difficult to immerse myself in the story. Overall, I found the book to be quite underwhelming and would not recommend it.
2. Jacob - 1 star - "Rune stones for auction" was a complete waste of time. The plot was disjointed and confusing, with no clear direction. The author tried to incorporate too many subplots, resulting in a scattered narrative. The characters were incredibly underdeveloped, and their actions and motivations were often unclear. I really struggled to stay engaged with the story and found myself skimming through entire chapters. This book was a major disappointment, and I regret picking it up.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "Rune stones for auction," but unfortunately, it fell short. The pacing was incredibly slow, with long stretches of nothing happening. The author spent too much time on irrelevant details, which made it difficult to stay invested in the story. The romantic subplot felt forced and lacked chemistry, adding nothing to the overall narrative. I found myself getting bored and frustrated, and ultimately, the book failed to deliver the excitement and suspense I was expecting. I wouldn't recommend it to others unless they enjoy slow-paced and uneventful reads.