In the world of literature and storytelling, magic has always been an intriguing and captivating element. It has the power to transport us to enchanting realms, ignite our imagination, and create incredible adventures. However, when it comes to the portrayal of magic, there is a debate about whether it should be open to all or restricted to specific individuals or groups. The concept of magic being open to all suggests that anyone, regardless of their background or abilities, can harness this mystical power. This idea promotes inclusivity and equality, believing that everyone has the potential for greatness and can access the fantastical world of magic. It encourages readers and viewers to believe in their own potential and that they can overcome any challenges that come their way.
, Discard a creature card: Search your library for a creature card, reveal that card, put it into your hand, then shuffle.
By clicking Accept all cookies , you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. The Mtg Tournament rules require that the card has white or black borders no UN cards or World Champion cards , and the alteration cannot make the card marked.
It encourages readers and viewers to believe in their own potential and that they can overcome any challenges that come their way. Opponents of the open to all magic argument believe that magic should be exclusive to certain individuals or groups. They argue that magic should be earned through rigorous training, innate talent, or birthright.
Purple borders and Proxy types
As I try to get my team to work on our group project (which is like herding cats), I've been making various "proof of concept" cards. I've actually posted a few around on the boards here. One of the things to come out of this, however, was the realization that whatever form it eventually takes, our set would probably need a few reprints of real cards. So, I mocked a few up. When I did, I realized that I wanted to make it abundantly clear that my cards were not real cards. From interactions with my friends, I already knew that things like small print and a unique expansion symbol can be missed. I wanted something obvious.
The one that people have probably seen before is the purple border on the card. Borders already have some rules-significance, in that silver border cards immediately communicate the card comes from a joke set, and isn't legal in most formats, so I thought having a special "custom card" border colour would be a good tell. I wish I could say that this was some brilliant stroke inspired by purple-rarity cards being a special rarity. The truth is, I just played around with colours for a while, and the dark purple border ended up looking the best.
I started thinking that wasn't enough, though. So I added a second indicator, that I thought would be more noticeable.
. yeah. I put the word "Proxy" in the type line. Proxies are placeholders for real cards, so I figured that indicating a card was a proxy would mean it of course couldn't be a real card. Then I worried that it would be taken as a rules element, and to head off any questions of "What does the Proxy subtype do?" I made the text italic and parenthetical - like reminder text. My hope was that would make it clear that this was clarification, not rules. Since proxies are stand-ins for real cards, I only added this to reprints of real cards, though. It felt like calling a card that doesn't exist a proxy would be going too far.
When I got on these forums, though, I found that most people don't go to such lengths to distinguish their cards from the real thing. So here's my questions.
- Am I going overboard/being too paranoid?
- Is any of this a good idea?
- Do purple borders look good? (Because I've actually grown to like them.)
- Does having reminder text in the type line "work" from a mechanical standpoint - and if not, what specifically makes it not work, and what are the mechanical implications of it being there?
- Is there anything else I could do to ensure our set doesn't get mistaken for official cards?
Add to Deck
This perspective creates a sense of hierarchy, with magical abilities becoming a symbol of power and privilege. However, this viewpoint can reinforce existing social inequalities and perpetuate discrimination based on birthright or social status. By embracing the idea of magic being open to all, storytellers can create narratives that inspire and empower readers of all backgrounds. This approach can highlight the importance of perseverance, determination, and self-belief. It emphasizes that magic is not limited to a select few, but rather a potential within each individual. It encourages readers to tap into their own unique talents and abilities to create their own magical journey. Furthermore, an open to all magic approach allows for diverse representation in literature and media. It breaks away from the traditional narratives that often favor a specific demographic and opens up the possibility for characters from different races, genders, and backgrounds to access the world of magic. This inclusivity can help promote a more equal and fair representation of society, highlighting the importance of diversity and acceptance. In conclusion, the concept of magic being open to all expands the possibilities of storytelling and provides a platform for empowerment and inclusivity. It promotes the belief that anyone can tap into their own magical potential, encourages perseverance and self-belief, and allows for diverse representation in literature and media. By embracing this idea, we can create a world where magic is not limited by social hierarchies or predetermined abilities, but rather a realm of limitless potential for everyone..
Reviews for "Open Magic and Healing: Exploring the Connection between Mind, Body, and Spirit"
1. Sarah - 2 stars
I was really disappointed with "Open to all magic". I found the storyline to be very predictable and cliché. The characters lacked depth and development, making it difficult for me to feel connected to them. The writing style was also a letdown, as it felt amateurish and lacked polish. Overall, I was left underwhelmed and unable to fully immerse myself in the world of the book.
2. Mark - 2 stars
"Open to all magic" had an interesting premise, but it failed to deliver. The pacing was off, with the story dragging in certain parts and rushing through others. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, making it hard to believe in the interactions between the characters. Additionally, I found the world-building to be lacking, as the magical elements were not properly explained or explored. Overall, the book felt unfinished and lacked the depth and complexity I was hoping for.
3. Emily - 1 star
I couldn't finish "Open to all magic" as I found it incredibly boring and unengaging. The plot was lacking in intrigue and failed to hold my interest. The writing style was bland and lacked creativity, making it difficult to connect with the story. The characters felt one-dimensional and had no depth or personality. I was extremely disappointed with this book and would not recommend it to others.