kite surfibg

The Nubia Red Magic 6S Pro is a powerful gaming smartphone that offers impressive performance and a host of gaming-focused features. This device boasts a 6.8-inch AMOLED display with a 165Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth and fluid visuals during gaming sessions. Under the hood, the Red Magic 6S Pro is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ chipset, which provides excellent performance and efficient power consumption. It also comes equipped with up to 18GB of RAM and up to 512GB of UFS 3.1 storage, allowing for seamless multitasking and ample space for game installations.

Hmmm. I don't know of any card that matches that description. The
closest I can think of is Rootwater Matriarch--"Tap: Gain control of target
creature as long as that creature has any enchantments on it"--but that
ability doesn't require the Matriarch to stay tapped to maintain control.
This makes a big difference, because destroying the Matriarch wouldn't do
any good; the only thing that will stop the control effect is removing all
enchantments from the creature. (Well, causing the creature to leave play--
phasing it out, for example--will work too.) On the other hand, if it were
a tap-and-hold effect--if it were "Gain control of target creature as long
as that creature has any enchantments on it and Rootwater Matriarch remains
tapped"--then destroying the Matriarch _would_ cause the control effect to
end.
As for the other part of your question: There's no connection between
the controller of a creature and the controller of any enchantments on that
creature (with certain obvious exceptions, like Control Magic). Stealing
control of a creature will not give you control of any enchantments on the
creature, and losing control of the creature will not cause you to lose
control of any enchantments. So, even though you control the creature, the
Giant Strength will still be controlled by your opponent. But that doesn't
do your opponent much good, because he can't just decide to "turn off" the
Giant Strength's +2/+2; Giant Strength's ability is continuous--it doesn't
give the controller any choices. And, yes, the Giant Strength will still
be there; enchantments don't pop off just because the thing they're
enchanting changes controllers. (The only exception to this: If the
change in controllers means that the enchantment now has an invalid target--
if it says "Play only on a creature you control", for example--then it will
be buried, just as any enchantment with an invalid target would be.)
--
\o\ If you're interested in books and stories with transformation themes, \o\
/o/ please have a look at . Thanks! /o/
\o\ FC1.21:FC(W/C)p6arw A- C->++ D>++ H+ M>+ P R T++++ W** Z+ Sm RLCT \o\
/o/ a cmn++++$ d e++ f+++ h- i++wf p-- sm# /o/

If for some reason the enchantment _cannot_ phase out--and the only reason that could happen with the current cardset would be if Spatial Binding had been used on it--then the enchantment will indeed get buried if the thing it s enchanting phases out, since it now has an invalid target. The closest I can think of is Rootwater Matriarch-- Tap Gain control of target creature as long as that creature has any enchantments on it --but that ability doesn t require the Matriarch to stay tapped to maintain control.

1 storage, allowing for seamless multitasking and ample space for game installations. One of the standout features of the Red Magic 6S Pro is its active cooling system, which includes an internal fan and a liquid cooling chamber. This advanced cooling setup helps dissipate heat quickly, keeping the device cool even during extended gaming sessions.

Enchantments - Phasing and Control

Возможно, адреса электронной почты являются анонимными для этой группы или вам требуется разрешение на просмотр адресов электронной почты ее участников, чтобы увидеть исходное сообщение.

In article <35C912. @Xnbnet.Xnb.Xca>,
Beautiful wrote:
>Q 1: If an enchantment is placed on a creature with phasing, does the
>enchantment get destroyed when it phases out?

No. There are special rules for local enchantments; they pay no
attention to the normal phasing schedule. Local enchantments always phase
out when the thing they're enchanting phases out; and they always phase in
when the thing they're enchanting phases in--and never phase in before
then.
To give an example: Let's say that I cast a Pacifism on your Shivan
Dragon. If something causes the Dragon to phase out during your turn, then
the Pacifism will automatically phase out. At the start of my next untap
phase, the Pacifism will not phase in--even though it's a phased-out card
that I controlled when it left play, and so would normally phase in at this
time--because the thing it's enchanting (the Dragon) hasn't yet phased in.
And at the start of your next untap phase, when the Dragon phases back in,
the Pacifism phases back in right along with it.
If for some reason the enchantment _cannot_ phase out--and the only
reason that could happen with the current cardset would be if Spatial Binding
had been used on it--then the enchantment will indeed get buried if the
thing it's enchanting phases out, since it now has an invalid target.
One other wrinkle that can come up because of this rule: If a local
enchantment somehow finds itself phased out without its target being phased
out along with it, then the enchantment will never phase back in--it will be
"stuck in phaseland" for the rest of the game. For example, this can happen
if I play an enchantment on a token creature, and the token creature then
phases out. The token goes to phaseland, and the enchantment goes right along
with it; but the token then immediately disappears from the game, because
tokens can't exist outside of play. So my enchantment is now in phaseland
without its target, and will be stuck there for the rest of the game.

>Q 2a and 2b: I can't remember the exact cards, but here's the
>situation. I have a creature in play that my opponent can't get rid
>of. He has a creature in play with the ability to gain control of a
>target enchanted creature. He places a Giant Strength on my creature so
>that it is enchanted, then taps his creature to steal it. As long as
>his creature remains tapped, he controls my creature. I don't have any
>untap spells, so I decide to destroy his tapped creature. First off,
>does destroying his creature return control of my creature to me?
>Secondly, if so, does my creature still have the enchantment that my
>opponent placed on it prior to stealing it?

Hmmm. I don't know of any card that matches that description. The
closest I can think of is Rootwater Matriarch--"Tap: Gain control of target
creature as long as that creature has any enchantments on it"--but that
ability doesn't require the Matriarch to stay tapped to maintain control.
This makes a big difference, because destroying the Matriarch wouldn't do
any good; the only thing that will stop the control effect is removing all
enchantments from the creature. (Well, causing the creature to leave play--
phasing it out, for example--will work too.) On the other hand, if it were
a tap-and-hold effect--if it were "Gain control of target creature as long
as that creature has any enchantments on it and Rootwater Matriarch remains
tapped"--then destroying the Matriarch _would_ cause the control effect to
end.
As for the other part of your question: There's no connection between
the controller of a creature and the controller of any enchantments on that
creature (with certain obvious exceptions, like Control Magic). Stealing
control of a creature will not give you control of any enchantments on the
creature, and losing control of the creature will not cause you to lose
control of any enchantments. So, even though you control the creature, the
Giant Strength will still be controlled by your opponent. But that doesn't
do your opponent much good, because he can't just decide to "turn off" the
Giant Strength's +2/+2; Giant Strength's ability is continuous--it doesn't
give the controller any choices. And, yes, the Giant Strength will still
be there; enchantments don't pop off just because the thing they're
enchanting changes controllers. (The only exception to this: If the
change in controllers means that the enchantment now has an invalid target--
if it says "Play only on a creature you control", for example--then it will
be buried, just as any enchantment with an invalid target would be.)
--
\o\ If you're interested in books and stories with transformation themes, \o\
/o/ please have a look at . Thanks! /o/
\o\ FC1.21:FC(W/C)p6arw A- C->++ D>++ H+ M>+ P R T++++ W** Z+ Sm RLCT \o\
/o/ a cmn++++$ d e++ f+++ h- i++wf p-- sm# /o/

In total I ordered 5 dip powders and I love them. They are extremely easy to use, looks amazing, and lasts a long time. I’ve gotten so many compliments on my nails!

To enhance the gaming experience, the Red Magic 6S Pro also features a built-in physical shoulder trigger buttons, providing users with additional control options. These trigger buttons can be customized to suit individual gaming needs, giving players a competitive edge. In terms of camera capabilities, the Red Magic 6S Pro sports a triple rear camera setup, including a 64-megapixel primary sensor, an 8-megapixel ultra-wide-angle lens, and a 2-megapixel macro lens. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of photography prowess, it still offers decent image quality for everyday use. Lastly, the Red Magic 6S Pro runs on Red Magic OS based on Android 11, providing a smooth and customized user interface. It also includes a large 5,050mAh battery with support for 66W fast charging, ensuring minimal downtime between gaming sessions. Overall, the Nubia Red Magic 6S Pro is a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize performance and a tailored gaming experience. With its powerful hardware, advanced cooling system, and customizable trigger buttons, this device offers a competitive edge in the world of mobile gaming..

Reviews for "kite surfibg"

kite surfibg