A Closer Look at Alex Morales' Training Regime

Alex Morales is a professional athlete currently playing for the Orlando Magic. He is known for his exceptional athletic abilities and his contributions to the team. Morales has been a part of the Magic for several seasons and has consistently showcased his skills on the court. His dedication and hard work have earned him a place among the league's top players. As a professional athlete, Morales has faced numerous challenges and obstacles on his journey to success. However, he has always remained resilient and determined, never letting setbacks hinder his progress.

If an object or creature who is the effect of an ongoing spell, such as a monster summoned by monster summoning, is in the area, the character makes a dispel check to end the spell that conjured the object or creature (returning it whence it came) in addition to attempting to dispel spells targeting the creature or object.

Arcane Mark is a great example; its even better if you can get a few Arcane Marks to be just one caster level higher than other buffs on the target, as Dispel targets highest caster level spell first. Pump them too high and your enemy s dispel will just fail and ignore them; but make them too low and they will end up behind your real buffs in line.

However, he has always remained resilient and determined, never letting setbacks hinder his progress. He has worked tirelessly to improve his game and has become a valuable asset to the team. Morales' athleticism is evident in his speed, agility, and jumping ability.

Thread: Dispel Magic and "sacrificial" buffs

Recently, I've seen suggestions to protect one's buffs by essentially using other buffs as sacrifices. So I've been trying to wrap my head around it, but I either don't get it or misunderstand dispelling.
(Also, sorry for being unable to provide examples, but I currently can't post links due to an abysmally low post count, yay. A very recent version would be post #4 in Braininthejar2's
"protecting buffs from dispel".)

[edit] Yeah well, might quote, even though I can't link at this moment. Silly me.

You can 'dilute the pool' so to speak by placing worthless, but long term spells on the buff target.

Arcane Mark is a great example; its even better if you can get a few Arcane Marks to be just one caster level higher than other buffs on the target, as Dispel targets highest caster level spell first.

Now, going by the SRD the 3.5 version says

One object, creature, or spell is the target of the dispel magic spell. You make a dispel check (1d20 + your caster level, maximum +10) against the spell or against each ongoing spell currently in effect on the object or creature. The DC for this dispel check is 11 + the spell�s caster level. If you succeed on a particular check, that spell is dispelled; if you fail, that spell remains in effect. [. ]

When dispel magic is used in this way, the spell affects everything within a 20-foot radius.

For each creature within the area that is the subject of one or more spells, you make a dispel check against the spell with the highest caster level. If that check fails, you make dispel checks against progressively weaker spells until you dispel one spell (which discharges the dispel magic spell so far as that target is concerned) or until you fail all your checks. The creature�s magic items are not affected. [. ]

In other words, make the check, compare to spells on target(s), check if you've dispelled anything. So if you have a "sacrificial" buff active with a higher caster level (because those are targeted first) it works until the moment it's more likely to not be dispelled. Dispelling continues and moves on to your other buffs, which are slightly diluted and thus actually more lightly to be dispelled.
So I can see it working for area dispelling if and only if your sacrifice is actually dispelled, saving one of your other buffs. The odds are that your sacrifice stays on and one of the other buffs cast at lower caster level is dispelled instead, though.

Pathfinder version says

Targeted Dispel: One object, creature, or spell is the target of the dispel magic spell. You make one dispel check (1d20 + your caster level) and compare that to the spell with highest caster level (DC = 11 + the spell�s caster level). If successful, that spell ends. If not, compare the same result to the spell with the next highest caster level. Repeat this process until you have dispelled one spell affecting the target, or you have failed to dispel every spell.

For example, a 7th-level caster casts dispel magic, targeting a creature affected by stoneskin (caster level 12th) and fly (caster level 6th). The caster level check results in a 19. This check is not high enough to end the stoneskin (which would have required a 23 or higher), but it is high enough to end the fly (which only required a 17). Had the dispel check resulted in a 23 or higher, the stoneskin would have been dispelled, leaving the fly intact. Had the dispel check been a 16 or less, no spells would have been affected. [. ]

[Actually from Greater Dispel Magic] Area Dispel: When greater dispel magic is used in this way, the spell affects everything within a 20-foot-radius burst. Roll one dispel check and apply that check to each creature in the area, as if targeted by dispel magic. For each object within the area that is the target of one or more spells, apply the dispel check as with creatures. Magic items are not affected by an area dispel.

For each ongoing area or effect spell whose point of origin is within the area of the greater dispel magic spell, apply the dispel check to dispel the spell. For each ongoing spell whose area overlaps that of the greater dispel magic spell, apply the dispel check to end the effect, but only within the overlapping area. [. ]

Okay, some rule changes aside it seems similar enough: your sacrifice is either dispelled (then it worked, at least for normal Dispel Magic) or not, in which case the process continues. You even have an explicit example where the spell with the highest caster level isn't dispelled, i.e. you better hope for your sacrifice to be affected, which is slightly more unlikely in comparison to the intentionally weaker spells. I'm afraid you're kinda out of luck anyhow if hit by the greater version.

So, have I missed or misunderstood something? If not, I don't really see the point in weakening all but one spell in general in basically all respects.

Last edited by Arkain; 2018-03-31 at 12:39 AM .

Spoilers

These skills allow him to excel in various aspects of the game, such as scoring, rebounding, and defending. His presence on the court creates a sense of excitement among the fans, as they anticipate his next move. Off the court, Morales is known for his humility and team-oriented mindset. He is always willing to put the team's needs before his own and is constantly striving for the collective success of the team. His positive attitude and strong work ethic set a great example for his teammates and inspire them to give their best. In addition to his contributions to the Orlando Magic, Morales is also actively involved in community service projects. He understands the importance of giving back to the community and using his platform to make a positive impact. Through his philanthropic efforts, he has been able to support various charitable organizations and make a difference in the lives of others. Alex Morales' journey as a professional athlete is a testament to his dedication, hard work, and passion for the game. He continues to excel both on and off the court, leaving a lasting impression on his teammates, fans, and the broader community. As he continues to grow and develop as a player, there is no doubt that his impact will only continue to expand..

Reviews for "Alex Morales: An Inspiration to Young Athletes"

- Sarah - 1 star - I was really disappointed in "Alex Morales Professional Athlete Orlando Magic". The storyline was predictable and cliché, and the acting was subpar. The characters lacked depth and development, making it difficult to connect with them. Overall, it felt like a cheap knock-off sports movie with no originality or substance.

- John - 2 stars - "Alex Morales Professional Athlete Orlando Magic" was just okay. While the concept was interesting, the execution fell flat. The pacing was off, with unnecessary scenes dragging on while important moments were rushed through. I also found some of the dialogue to be cheesy and forced. It had potential, but it ultimately left me unsatisfied.

- Emily - 2 stars - I found "Alex Morales Professional Athlete Orlando Magic" to be underwhelming. The plot was formulaic and lacked any surprises or twists. The acting was mediocre at best, with wooden performances from most of the cast. The movie failed to make me care about the characters or their journey. Overall, it was a forgettable experience.

- Michael - 1 star - "Alex Morales Professional Athlete Orlando Magic" was a complete waste of time. The story was cliché and poorly written, making it difficult to stay engaged. The acting was amateurish, with unconvincing performances from the entire cast. It felt like a cheap production with no effort put into it. I would not recommend this movie to anyone.

The Rise of Alex Morales: How He Became a Key Player for the Orlando Magic