Stanley Jordan is an American jazz guitarist, pianist, and composer. He is well-known for his unique playing style, often referred to as the "Stanley Jordan Magic Touch." Jordan is adept at playing the guitar with both hands, simultaneously creating melodies, chords, and basslines. This technique, known as tap technique or touch technique, allows him to achieve a remarkably rich and full sound. Born in Chicago in 1959, Jordan began playing the piano at a young age and later picked up the guitar. He studied at Princeton University, where he made significant strides in developing his unconventional playing style.
SUMMER MAGIC is available on DVD and via Amazon Instant Video rental.
The movie doesn t have a particularly memorable plot, meandering through a series of vignettes and musical sequences, punctuated with some genuinely funny bits. At 110 minutes the film s saggy storyline could have been tightened up quite a bit, but the good cast nonetheless puts it over and provides a pleasant time.
He studied at Princeton University, where he made significant strides in developing his unconventional playing style. Jordan's mastery of the tap technique quickly became his signature sound. One of Jordan's notable achievements was his debut album, "Magic Touch," released in 1985.
Mondays with Hayley Mills: Summer Magic (1963)
Summer might be over but there’s still magic to be found in cinema. Summer Magic was originally planned as a vehicle for Disney darling Annette Funicello, but the success of starlet Hayley Mills made her too irresistible to pass up for this Meet Me in St. Louis throwback. A heartwarming tale of a small-town family making good, this is a great example of what Disney was crafting in the 1960s.
Margaret Carey (Dorothy McGuire) is a widow forced to move her children from Boston into the country. Margaret’s resourceful daughter, Nancy (Mills) ends up getting the family a deal on a large country fixer-upper, thanks to the home’s kindly caretaker (Burl Ives).
Summer Magic is the inverse of Meet Me in St. Louis, understandable considering the screenwriter is Sally Benson, the author of the stories that became that Judy Garland classic. Benson sticks to what she knows; where Judy Garland’s family was threatened with moving from St. Louis to the harsh world of New York, the Careys are content to move from Boston to the country. Both movies play out as vignettes, episodic moments from a quaint life, more pronounced here because we only ever see the Careys in the country. This does make the film feel a tad aimless. The Careys are embraced with open arms and quickly acclimate to their new surroundings.
Mills is at her most enthusiastic as Nancy Carey, a girl whose big ideas are as boundless as her imagination. Her English accent never entirely goes away, but her romantic yearnings and enjoyment are entertaining. Her relationship with Burl Ives’ Osh Popham is darling, especially in light of the Careys losing a father and husband, necessitating their move in the first place. Ives takes pity on the family, covering their expenses and letting them live in the house rent-free under the landlord’s nose. Popham is lonely and the beautiful rendition of the title song lets the adopted family, with Popham are replacement patriarch, come together.
This emphasis on adoption and familial creation drives the third act when a plot starts to take form. The Careys are tasked with caring for their cousin Julia (Gidget Goes Hawaiian’s Deborah Walley), a sentiment Nancy isn’t keen on, stating that in some cases adoption is an “unfortunate investment.” Cue the unfortunate investment herself, Cousin Julia. I wasn’t keen on Walley’s Gidget but she fares better as the snooty city cousin who requires baths and is a prim contrast to Nancy’s athleticism and intelligence. Their eventual reconciliation and undying love for each other plays false, conjured out of thin air, because there’s little impetus for it other than the presumed threat of Julia going home to her parents. After that, Nancy becomes a completely new character, competing with Julie over guys and singing a rousing song called “Femininity.”
Disney in-house songwriters, Richard and Robert Sherman are legendary….but Summer Magic isn’t their best work. The title song is lovely, and the opening track, a jaunty jig called “Flitterin'” sets the appropriate tone. The latter tracks, “Ugly Bug Ball” and the aforementioned “Femininity,” end the film on a jarring tone. Walt Disney wasn’t a fan of the former song until Robert Sherman explained the point of it. No offense to Robert, but I’m siding with Disney. The whole experience, song, set-up and ensuing scenes, play as if htey belong in a zany 1960s comedy, complete with a sitar; the video footage of bugs spliced in shows insects I’m fairly certain aren’t indigenous to Maine. One can’t complain against “Ugly Bug Ball” when played against the insufferable “Femininity.” I’ve never heard such an overtly sexist song in a Disney movie, at least not one which wears its heart on its sleeve. You can say the time period plays into it, but there’s no other song that even sounds like it, another lyrical interlude out of its time period. With lyrics like “hide who you are” and “compliment his masculinity,” it’d be easy to say this is the misguided advice of children, but it gets the girls what they want.
Summer Magic is a warm throwback to simplicity and country living, themes repeated often during this decade. Hayley Mills’ average All-American sweetness enchants and Burl Ives is a cuddly father figure. The songs aren’t anything special, but if you enjoy Meet Me in St. Louis, you’ll enjoy this quasi-continuation/sequel.
Ronnie Rating:
Interested in purchasing today’s film? If you use the handy link below a small portion is donated to this site! Thanks!
Rent It
Buy It
Interested in Learning More About Us??
Follow Ticklish Business on Twitter, Facebook, Letterboxd and Instagram. We also have special video content available on our YouTube channel.
Interested in supporting us? Check out our Patreon Page! Perks include giveaways, early access and additional bonus content!
Our podcast episodes are available wherever you listen to podcasts, including: Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Podbean.
Interested in purchasing today’s film? If you use the handy link below a small portion is donated to this site! Thanks!
The album received critical acclaim and marked a turning point in his career. Jordan's ability to play complex arrangements with ease and fluidity was captivating for both jazz enthusiasts and general music fans. The "Magic Touch" technique allows Jordan to create intricate harmonies, melodies, and rhythm patterns simultaneously. By tapping on the guitar's fretboard with both hands, he can produce a wide range of sounds and textures. Jordan's playing combines elements of jazz, rock, classical, and even flamenco music, further showcasing his versatility and creativity. Throughout his career, Stanley Jordan has continued to push the boundaries of traditional guitar playing. His unique approach and innovative techniques have inspired many musicians and guitarists worldwide. Jordan's ability to create a full sound with just one instrument has been compared to that of a full band. His virtuosity and musicality have earned him recognition and respect from the music community. In addition to his solo performances and recordings, Jordan has collaborated with numerous renowned artists, including pianist Herbie Hancock, bassist Marcus Miller, and guitarist Kevin Eubanks. He has also explored various musical genres, experimenting with electronic music and fusion projects. Stanley Jordan's "Magic Touch" has left a lasting impact on the world of guitar playing. His innovative techniques and musicality continue to inspire and astound audiences. Jordan's ability to effortlessly create complex and melodic arrangements has solidified his place as one of the greatest guitarists of his generation..
Reviews for "Breaking Down Stanley Jordan's Magic Touch Style: Chords vs. Soloing"
1. Jessica - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "Stanley Jordan's Magic Touch." I love magic shows, but this one fell short for me. The tricks were predictable and didn't have the wow factor I was expecting. Jordan's delivery was also lacking, as his stage presence seemed a bit awkward. Overall, I felt like I wasted my money on this show and would not recommend it to others.
2. Ryan - 1 star - "Stanley Jordan's Magic Touch" was a complete letdown. The tricks were nothing special and lacked any real originality. Jordan seemed more like a beginner magician rather than a seasoned professional. I found myself bored throughout the entire show and couldn't wait for it to be over. Save your money and find a better magic show to attend.
3. Lisa - 2 stars - I was really excited to see "Stanley Jordan's Magic Touch," but it didn't live up to my expectations. The tricks were generic and lacked any real creativity. Jordan's performance felt rushed and unpolished, leaving me feeling unsatisfied. I was hoping for a magical experience, but instead, I left feeling underwhelmed.
4. Jason - 1 star - "Stanley Jordan's Magic Touch" was a complete waste of time and money. The tricks were basic and didn't capture my interest at all. Jordan's stage presence was lackluster, and he failed to engage the audience. I wouldn't recommend this show to anyone looking for a truly magical experience. Disappointing from start to finish.
5. Samantha - 2 stars - I attended "Stanley Jordan's Magic Touch" with high hopes, but I left feeling let down. The tricks didn't leave me in awe like I expected, and Jordan's performance felt amateurish. It lacked the finesse and showmanship I've seen in other magicians. The overall experience fell flat for me, and I walked away feeling like I wasted my time and money.