The spell of venesection, also known as bloodletting, is an ancient medical practice that involves making incisions or puncturing veins to drain blood from the body. This procedure dates back to several thousand years ago and has been used by various cultures throughout history. In ancient times, bloodletting was believed to be a remedy for various ailments and diseases. This practice was based on the theory of balancing the body's humors, which were believed to be the four essential fluids of the body: blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile. Imbalances in these humors were thought to cause illness, and bloodletting was used to restore balance. During the procedure, a physician or healer would use a lancet or a sharp instrument to make a small incision or puncture a vein.
VitalSource is a leading provider of eBooks.
This reprinted material is available as a set or in the following groupings or as individual volumes Prehistory and Historical Ethnography Set of 12 0-415-15611-4 800. This reprinted material is available as a set or in the following groupings or as individual volumes Prehistory and Historical Ethnography Set of 12 0-415-15611-4 800.
During the procedure, a physician or healer would use a lancet or a sharp instrument to make a small incision or puncture a vein. The amount of blood extracted was determined by the ailment being treated and the patient's overall health. The bloodletting was often accompanied by rituals and prayers, as it was considered a sacred and spiritual practice.
The History of Witchcraft and Demonology
Originally published between 1920-70, The History of Civilization was a landmark in early twentieth century publishing. It was published at a formative time within the social sciences, and during a period of decisive historical discovery. The aim of the general editor, C.K. Ogden, was to summarize the most up-to-date findings and theories of historians, anthropologists, archaeologists and sociologists. This reprinted material is available as a set or in the following groupings or as individual volumes:
* Prehistory and Historical Ethnography
Set of 12: 0-415-15611-4: £800.00
* Greek Civilization
Set of 7: 0-415-15612-2: £450.00
* Roman Civilization
Set of 6: 0-415-15613-0: £400.00
* Eastern Civilizations
Set of 10: 0-415-15614-9: £650.00
* Judaeo-Christian Civilization
Set of 4: 0-415-15615-7: £250.00
* European Civilization
Set of 11: 0-415-15616-5: £700.00
The practice of bloodletting was not without risks. Excessive blood loss could lead to weakness, dizziness, and even death. Infections were also common, as hygiene practices were not as advanced in ancient times. Despite these risks, bloodletting remained a widely used medical practice for centuries. However, with the advancement of medical knowledge and the development of more effective treatments, the use of bloodletting gradually declined. In the 19th century, the introduction of evidence-based medicine and scientific reasoning led to the debunking of the theory behind bloodletting. It was eventually abandoned as a medical treatment in most parts of the world. Today, bloodletting is considered an archaic and obsolete medical practice. It serves as a reminder of the evolving nature of medical science and the importance of evidence-based medicine. While it played a significant role in the history of medicine, the spell of venesection is no longer employed as a legitimate medical treatment..
Reviews for "Venesection and the Humoral Theory: Examining the Historical Context"
1. Paul - 2 stars - I found "Spell of Venesection" to be incredibly dull and confusing. The plot was convoluted, with random events and characters introduced without any clear purpose. The writing style itself was pretentious and overly flowery, making it difficult to follow along and engage with the story. Overall, this book was a disappointing read and I would not recommend it.
2. Emily - 1 star - "Spell of Venesection" was a complete waste of time. The plot was nonexistent and the characters lacked depth or development. I found myself constantly confused, trying to piece together what was happening. The writing was overly descriptive, bogging down the story and making it a chore to read. I was highly disappointed and cannot understand the positive reviews I've seen for this book.
3. Steve - 1 star - I struggled to finish "Spell of Venesection". The writing was overly verbose and pretentious, trying too hard to be deep and profound. The characters were unlikable and lacked any real substance. The plot meandered aimlessly and I found myself losing interest with each passing page. I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone seeking an enjoyable reading experience.
4. Sarah - 2 stars - I was excited to read "Spell of Venesection" based on the intriguing synopsis, but unfortunately, it fell flat for me. The storyline was confusing and hard to follow. The characters lacked depth and were difficult to connect with. The writing style was overly descriptive and at times unnecessarily verbose. Overall, this book didn't live up to my expectations and I wouldn't recommend it to others.