The pagan feast of Lupercalia was an ancient Roman festival celebrated on February 15th. It was a fertility festival dedicated to Faunus, the Roman god of agriculture, and the founders of Rome, Romulus and Remus. The festival was renowned for its rituals which involved purification, fertility, and the marking of young men. During Lupercalia, priests called the Luperci would gather at the Lupercal, a sacred cave on the Palatine Hill where it was believed that Romulus and Remus were nursed by a she-wolf. The Luperci would sacrifice goats and a dog, and then the priests would smear the foreheads of young men with the sacrificial blood. This act was believed to bring fertility and ensure protection against evil spirits.
This act was believed to bring fertility and ensure protection against evil spirits. The festival included the Luperci running through the streets of Rome, wielding strips of goatskin called februa. These strips were used to lightly strike women and crops as a form of purification and to promote fertility.
The Truth About the Connection Between Valentine's Day and the Ancient Roman Festival of Lupercalia
L ong before Valentine’s Day was celebrated, a festival that had nothing to do with love took place around the same time of the year. It was called Lupercalia, and it occurred on February 15 each year in ancient Rome. Instead of flowers and chocolates, the festival was marked by more ominous rituals.
Centuries later, that coincidence of the calendar has led to frequent speculation that the Lupercalia festival is one of the earliest ancestors of Valentine’s Day. The ancient festival’s association with fertility rituals has only added to that idea. But in fact, the relationship between Lupercalia and Valentine’s Day remains unclear — and some historians argue that there is no relationship at all.
What is known about Lupercalia is that it started with an act of sacrifice. Priests of the god Lupercus, called the Luperci, would take off their clothes and slaughter goats in the Lupercal, the cave that Roman legend held to have been the location where city founders Romulus and Remus were nursed by a wolf. The Luperci would then cut the goat’s skin into strips and run around the Palantine Hill in Rome, striking women with the goat’s skin.
“The festival was to enable or facilitate fertility,” says Kresimir Vukovic, a postdoctoral fellow at the Catholic University of Croatia who has studied Lupercalia. “If you were struck by a Lupercus, one of the priests, it was considered that you would give birth to more children,” he explains. “I don’t think it was a sadistic beating, it was a symbolic beating.”
Vukovic says that mosaics and reliefs from the period depicted instances of women, sometimes stripped naked, accepting the blows — which he says is unsurprising, “given the sexual aspect of the festival.”
The most plausible theory for the whipping was that it served as an initiation, he says, as ritualized “sexual play” that marked a boy’s transition into adulthood. Nevertheless, the historian emphasizes that modern scholars have different theories about the practice and that there’s even evidence that the Romans themselves were puzzled by the naked priests’ behavior.
One presumed aspect of the festival is the idea that there would have been a matchmaking lottery associated with Lupercalia, a supposition that is often cited as further evidence of the connection between the ancient festival and Valentine’s Day. But Vukovic says there is no record of men being paired randomly with women for participation in the ritual, and that the math on that idea wouldn’t make sense anyway. “The number of women must have been much greater than that of the men,” he says, noting that there most likely would only have been around two dozen Luperci at the celebration.
In his book America’s Favorite Holidays: Candid Histories, Bruce David Forbes echoes the same opinion regarding matchmaking during Lupercalia. “Although there probably was wild partying, there is no reliable evidence that it involved a ritualized time when men drew the names of women, or that it involved the pairing of lovers,” he writes.
Without this ritual at the Roman festival, there appears to be little correlation between the Lupercalia and Valentine’s Day. Nor is there conclusive evidence that the date of Lupercalia influenced Pope Gelasius I when, in the 5th century, he made February 14 into a day that would honor the Christian martyr Saint Valentine. Though pagan holidays were sometimes co-opted by the Church, this doesn’t appear to have been one of those times.
“There is a calendar overlap, but there’s no indication that one was replaced by another,” Vukovic says.
The earliest historical record of the Lupercalia was from the 3rd century BCE, while the last record was from the end of the 5th century CE — around the same time Pope Gelasius I created a day for Saint Valentine. But even though they weren’t far apart chronologically, the supposed symbolic overlap between the two took centuries more to develop, as Valentine’s Day hadn’t yet acquired the romantic meaning it has today. “The earliest record of Valentine’s Day as a celebration of love and fertility so far as I know is from the 14th century (CE),” Vukovic says. “There is a big gap between the two.”
Forbes’ book presents a similar observation, noting that “throughout the next eight or nine hundred years, there is no substantial evidence of romantic couples in Europe doing anything special annually on or around February 14.” While the author makes references to a letter in which Pope Gelasius I criticized the Lupercalia, he writes that there is no indication of Gelasius making a concerted effort to replace it.
Instead of Valentine’s Day having its roots in Lupercalia, it appears that the two events have little in common besides sharing a calendar date in mid-February. Long gone are the days of goat sacrifices — and those mid-February days are no longer anything special when it comes to fertility.
More Must-Reads From TIME- The Families of Israelis Held Hostage By Hamas Speak Out
- A Photographer Captures Grief in Gaza
- Bed Bugs Aren't Just a Problem in Paris. Here's Why
- One Year Later, Where's the Adderall?
- For Many, India's Coal Damage Is Done
- The Human Toll of Poland’s Strict Abortion Laws
- The 100 Best Mystery and Thriller Books of All Time
- Want Weekly Recs on What to Watch, Read, and More? Sign Up for Worth Your Time
Contact us at [email protected].
In his book America’s Favorite Holidays: Candid Histories, Bruce David Forbes echoes the same opinion regarding matchmaking during Lupercalia. “Although there probably was wild partying, there is no reliable evidence that it involved a ritualized time when men drew the names of women, or that it involved the pairing of lovers,” he writes.
Women would often voluntary participate in this striking, as it was believed to increase their chances of conceiving or having a healthy pregnancy. Despite its pagan origins, Lupercalia was eventually Christianized and merged with the feast of Saint Valentine. This led to the association of love and fertility with Valentine's Day, which is celebrated on February 14th, the day before Lupercalia. Overall, the pagan feast of Lupercalia was an important festival in ancient Rome, centered around purification, fertility, and the marking of young men. Though its practices may seem peculiar today, they represented the beliefs and customs of the ancient Romans and their connection to their gods and the founding of their city..
Reviews for "The Lupercalia Festivities: Feasting and Revelry in Ancient Rome"
1. Sarah - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with the Pagan feast of lupercalla. The plot was confusing and all over the place, making it difficult to follow and understand what was going on. The characters were poorly developed and lacked depth, making it hard to connect with them or care about their journey. Additionally, the writing style was disjointed and lacked cohesive storytelling. Overall, I found this book to be a struggle to get through and did not enjoy it.
2. John - 1 star - This book was a complete waste of time. The premise sounded interesting, but the execution was poor. The pacing was incredibly slow and dragged on, making it hard to stay engaged. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, and the interactions between the characters were dull and uninteresting. The descriptive language was also lacking, failing to paint a vivid picture of the world or events taking place. I would not recommend the Pagan feast of lupercalla to anyone.
3. Emily - 2 stars - I had high hopes for the Pagan feast of lupercalla, but unfortunately, it fell short. The story lacked originality and felt like a rehashed version of other fantasy novels I've read before. The twists and turns were predictable, leaving little room for surprise or excitement. The world-building was also lacking, with little detail or depth to the magical elements and settings. Ultimately, I found this book to be forgettable and would not recommend it to avid fantasy readers.