Little Einsteins is a popular children's television show that combines animation and live action to teach children about music and art. One episode of the show, titled "Quincy and the Magic Instruments," is available to watch online. In this episode, Quincy, one of the main characters, finds a magic wand that brings musical instruments to life. The video takes children on a musical journey as they join Quincy and his friends on a mission to find all the magic instruments that have been scattered throughout the world. As they search for the instruments, the characters encounter various challenges and obstacles, teaching children problem-solving skills and the importance of teamwork. Throughout the episode, children are exposed to different types of instruments and learn about their sounds and how they are played.
Frand inquired, "Where do I make a donation to the new scholarship fund?". "The first time I lectured on that theory," the professor bragged, "not one student fell asleep in my class."
Results showed that observing the two canvas styles did not elicit differential motor activation in the early time window for either muscle, not supporting the emotional reaction hypothesis. Capitalize the first work in a line of poetry even if it doesn t begin a new sentence --unless the poet did not capitalize it as in the second example below.
Throughout the episode, children are exposed to different types of instruments and learn about their sounds and how they are played. The video also incorporates classical music, introducing children to composers such as Mozart and Bach. Overall, Little Einsteins Quincy and the Magic Instruments video online provides an educational and entertaining experience for young children, fostering their love for music and encouraging their creativity and imagination.
Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks
Perceiving art is known to elicit motor cortex activation in an observer's brain. This motor activation has often been attributed to a covert approach response associated with the emotional valence of an art piece (emotional reaction hypothesis). However, recent accounts have proposed that aesthetic experiences could be grounded in the motor simulation of actions required to produce an art piece and of the sensorimotor states embedded in its subject (embodied aesthetic hypothesis). Here, we aimed to test these two hypotheses by assessing whether motor facilitation during artwork perception mirrors emotional or motor simulation processes. To this aim, we capitalized on single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealing a two-stage motor coding of emotional body postures: an early, non-specific activation related to emotion processing and a later action-specific activation reflecting motor simulation. We asked art-naïve individuals to rate how much they liked a series of pointillist and brushstroke canvases; photographs of artistic gardens served as control natural stimuli. After an early (150 ms) or a later (300 ms) post-stimulus delay, motor evoked potentials were recorded from wrist-extensor and finger muscles that were more involved in brushstroke- and pointillist-like painting, respectively. Results showed that observing the two canvas styles did not elicit differential motor activation in the early time window for either muscle, not supporting the emotional reaction hypothesis. However, in support of the embodied aesthetic hypothesis, we found in the later time window greater motor activation responses to brushstroke than pointillist canvases for the wrist-extensor, but not for the finger muscle. Furthermore, this muscle-selective facilitation was associated with lower liking ratings of brushstroke canvases and with greater empathy dispositions. These findings support the claim that simulation of the painter's movements is crucial for aesthetic experience, by documenting a link between motor simulation, dispositional empathy, and subjective appreciation in artwork perception.
Keywords: Artwork perception; Embodied aesthetics; Empathy; Motor simulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
.
Reviews for "Why Little Einsteins Quincy and the Magic Instruments is a Must-Watch for Young Music Lovers"
1. Joe - 1 star - I was really disappointed with "Little Einsteins: Quincy and the Magic Instruments". The video seemed to lack any sort of engaging storyline and the animation quality was subpar. The characters were flat and uninspiring, and the whole video felt like a cheap attempt at cashing in on the Little Einsteins franchise. I would not recommend this video to anyone looking for quality children's entertainment.
2. Emily - 2 stars - I found "Little Einsteins: Quincy and the Magic Instruments" to be quite boring and repetitive. The plot was predictable and the songs were not catchy or memorable. Additionally, the animation style was not visually appealing and seemed outdated. Overall, I was not impressed with this video and would not watch it again.
3. Sarah - 1 star - "Little Einsteins: Quincy and the Magic Instruments" was a huge letdown. The video lacked any educational value and the music was grating to the ears. The characters appeared obnoxious and annoying, and the whole video was poorly executed. As a parent, I would not recommend this video as there are far better options available for children's entertainment.
4. Mike - 2 stars - I was not a fan of "Little Einsteins: Quincy and the Magic Instruments". The video was incredibly repetitive, with the same concepts and activities being used over and over again. The animation quality was lackluster, and the voice acting felt forced and unnatural. The characters lacked depth and the video overall felt like a cash grab rather than a genuine attempt at creating quality children's content.
5. Jessica - 1 star - "Little Einsteins: Quincy and the Magic Instruments" was extremely disappointing. The storyline was unoriginal and lacked any depth, and the characters were one-dimensional and uninteresting. The songs were forgettable and did not hold my child's attention. Overall, I would not recommend this video as there are much better options available for children's entertainment that offer both education and entertainment value.