Harnessing the Power of Rune Double Bounce in Spellcasting

Rune Double Bounce is a term used in the game of RuneScape, which is a popular multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG). It refers to a mechanic in the game's combat system that allows players to maximize their damage output by timing their attacks effectively. The double bounce mechanic requires players to utilize a specific combination of ability rotations and timing to achieve optimal damage. By chaining specific abilities together, players can trigger additional damage bonuses or effects, increasing their overall damage output. Mastering the rune double bounce technique involves understanding the different abilities and their interactions, as well as practicing the timing required to execute the sequence effectively. It requires players to have a good understanding of the game's combat system, including cooldowns, ability rotations, and enemy mechanics.

The 24-year-old, however, refused to buckle, snatching a 4-0 lead in the fourth, with Rune’s unforced errors at that stage climbing to 52 and the Dane essentially giving up on the set.

Rune was 2-1 up in the third at 40-all when he clearly failed to get to the ball in time and the second bounce was visible to all but chair umpire Kader Nouni. OT - it appears to be bad sportsmanship rather than cheating as clarified just above and given Rune s own less than stellar record on gamemanship, I m inclined to think it was despite thegreenmile having a good point that we should give them the benefit of the doubt on a double bounce.

It requires players to have a good understanding of the game's combat system, including cooldowns, ability rotations, and enemy mechanics. The rune double bounce technique is especially useful when facing powerful enemies or engaging in PvP combat. By effectively chaining together abilities, players can quickly deplete their opponent's health and gain an advantage in battle.

Is Rune a cheater?

Good for you I suppose, because I sometimes don't lol, and no, I don't believe they can all be 100% sure every time. I know they are pros and I'm just a Sunday Club hack, but there it is.

You know, I would love some to hear some pros talk about double bounces on full stretch and their experiences with them

Jonesy

Legend

CoolCoolCool

Hall of Fame

Rattie

Legend

I will always give players the benefit of the doubt when it comes to double bounces on the full stretch, it can be very difficult to tell (this jist from personal experience) and I refuse to believe that every time this happens, every player is showing poor sportsmanship, when not conceding the point.

The Fedfather

Legend

It's hard to call it cheating. He didn't do it behind the umpire's back or anything. It's unsportsmanlike, for sure, if that's something you're big one. The fault is on the ignorance of the idiot who made the call. Never again shall I be able to appreciate the dulcet tones of Kader Nouni in quite the same way.

The rules are that double-bounce means that Rune should've lost the point fair and square. Rune knows the rule and he knows the stakes at play. Because of errors on the officials' part an opportunity for Rune to use an unfair advantage appeared and he knowingly took it. That's cheating.

Tennfan123

Legend

ibbi

G.O.A.T.

The rules are that double-bounce means that Rune should've lost the point fair and square. Rune knows the rule and he knows the stakes at play. Because of errors on the officials' part an opportunity for Rune to use an unfair advantage appeared and he knowingly took it. That's cheating.

Players don't call the game, umpires and linespeople do. He could have been a decent person and admitted what happened, but that doesn't make him a cheater. I know we deal only in absolutes and extremes here, but not informing those responsible that they screwed up doesn't make you a cheater. If you shoot a 2 in the NBA and they call it a 3 and you know they're wrong and don't correct them you didn't cheat, you're dishonest.

If you expect him to pull up from his slide in the split second before the ball hits the ground the second time and he makes contact with it then you're not particularly reasonable either.

junior74

Talk Tennis Guru

It's not a players job to call out mistakes, should they? Sure. It's the right thing to do and makes you likable but it's not your job. He's probably going to get a lot of backlash over this story but he got the result he needed so I doubt he'll care.

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.

Is this a serious comment? Novak is an extremely good loser, but you've been on the forum long enough to know he's not exactly regarded as being above all sorts of gamemanship by the non-Nolefamily (no need to repeat here).

OT - it appears to be bad sportsmanship (rather than cheating as clarified just above) and given Rune's own less than stellar record on gamemanship, I'm inclined to think it was despite @thegreenmile having a good point that we should give them the benefit of the doubt on a double bounce.

Wander

Hall of Fame

Here's my point of view:

Rune is not an "active" cheater (in the sense that he would do something like intentionally pointing the umpire to the wrong mark or whatever), but he wants to win so bad that he would never give away a point the umpire is awarding him, even if he knew that the call was incorrect. This makes him a "passive" cheater, which in my experience is extremely common in pro tennis. I've seen many, many of these double bounce cases and from the top of my head it's difficult to recall a single case where the player admitted that it was a double bounce when the umpire was ready to give them the point.

That's not to say that it never happens, but usually the players stay quiet and take the free point whether they know it was a double bounce or not ( and can we really know??). Rune is no different.

I'm not saying I like this behaviour, but I don't think this is on the same level as - let's say - opportunistically begging for an umpire to default your opponent for accidentally hitting a ball kid.

The Fedfather

Legend

Players don't call the game, umpires and linespeople do. He could have been a decent person and admitted what happened, but that doesn't make him a cheater. I know we deal only in absolutes and extremes here, but not informing those responsible that they screwed up doesn't make you a cheater. If you shoot a 2 in the NBA and they call it a 3 and you know they're wrong and don't correct them you didn't cheat, you're dishonest.

If you expect him to pull up from his slide in the split second before the ball hits the ground the second time and he makes contact with it then you're not particularly reasonable either.

So what if players don't call the game? He knew that he lost the point and went on to act like he won it. That's lying and that's cheating. Nothing extreme about calling a spade a spade.

TheNachoMan

Legend

ChaelAZ

G.O.A.T.

Wander

Hall of Fame

I do think this is a rule change they should implement at the very least at all the biggest tournaments. They could do it very easily and tradition is the only reason they don't.

The Guru

Legend

Is this a serious comment? Novak is an extremely good loser, but you've been on the forum long enough to know he's not exactly regarded as being above all sorts of gamemanship by the non-Nolefamily (no need to repeat here).

OT - it appears to be bad sportsmanship (rather than cheating as clarified just above) and given Rune's own less than stellar record on gamemanship, I'm inclined to think it was despite @thegreenmile having a good point that we should give them the benefit of the doubt on a double bounce.

Yeah I'm sorry but the he's faking injuries crowd are just morons. People that complain about MTOs I mean fine I guess but if you're losing concentration from MTOs you're a mental weakling.

Zardoz7/12

Hall of Fame

tomatitotarifa

Rookie

If you find a wallet with money and contact information about the owner, and keep it, you are not technically a thief, but you are definitely not an honest person.

LaVie en Rose

Hall of Fame

Is this a serious comment? Novak is an extremely good loser, but you've been on the forum long enough to know he's not exactly regarded as being above all sorts of gamemanship by the non-Nolefamily (no need to repeat here).

OT - it appears to be bad sportsmanship (rather than cheating as clarified just above) and given Rune's own less than stellar record on gamemanship, I'm inclined to think it was despite @thegreenmile having a good point that we should give them the benefit of the doubt on a double bounce.

Novak concedes more than any player. Fedfalfan trolls : he does it to get under opponent skin and soften him, he does it for popularity

80s New Wave

Semi-Pro

Here's my point of view:

Rune is not an "active" cheater (in the sense that he would do something like intentionally pointing the umpire to the wrong mark or whatever), but he wants to win so bad that he would never give away a point the umpire is awarding him, even if he knew that the call was incorrect. This makes him a "passive" cheater, which in my experience is extremely common in pro tennis. I've seen many, many of these double bounce cases and from the top of my head it's difficult to recall a single case where the player admitted that it was a double bounce when the umpire was ready to give them the point.

That's not to say that it never happens, but usually the players stay quiet and take the free point whether they know it was a double bounce or not ( and can we really know??). Rune is no different.

I'm not saying I like this behaviour, but I don't think this is on the same level as - let's say - opportunistically begging for an umpire to default your opponent for accidentally hitting a ball kid.

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.

Shaolin

G.O.A.T.

Wander

Hall of Fame

BauerAlmeida

Hall of Fame

You people kill me. Where is it written in a professionally officiated sport that a player needs to call things o themselves? Have you ever seen a footballer/soccer player call handling, or offsides, or a penalty on themselves?

Or a baseball player say "yeah, he tagged me out" or "no, no. that wasn't a ball, it was a strike. Nice pitch".

Get off your couch and enter the real world.

I remember Klose and Nedved giving up a goal and penalty respectively by telling the referee, so yes.

And in tennis, I remember Nalbandian giving Federer a point, I believe it was AO 2004, before hawk eye was a thing.

BauerAlmeida

Hall of Fame

The real crime is that there was no call on the bounce. Looks like something a competent chair umpire should see as it wasn't exactly close. I wouldn't call it cheating as the players don't make the calls as this is more poor sportsmanship.

Razer

Legend

Some of the couch potatoes who say he should have shown better sportsmanship don't realize that in sports at the highest level players are like gladiators to win and they are not charlatans/showmen who are there to divert their mind to point out double bounces in between the heat of the game. The game is so fast that maybe Rune did not even realize a double bounce or maybe he did get a doubt that it was, but in his mind he is busy thinking about how to win, in that moment in his mind it is not about who is right and who is wrong, he is gonna take what the umpire gives him and if he is wronged then only shall he question the umpire. He is not gonna fight for his opponent's case with the umpire, that is not how his mind would work. A viewer can think like that but not a player, his focus in on winning within what the rule allows him. So if the umpire did not spot it then so be it, player doesn't have to worry about the point.

veelium

Hall of Fame

I will always give players the benefit of the doubt when it comes to double bounces on the full stretch, it can be very difficult to tell (this jist from personal experience) and I refuse to believe that every time this happens, every player is showing poor sportsmanship, when not conceding the point.

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster

Curtennis

Hall of Fame

I will always give players the benefit of the doubt when it comes to double bounces on the full stretch, it can be very difficult to tell (this jist from personal experience) and I refuse to believe that every time this happens, every player is showing poor sportsmanship, when not conceding the point.

Did you watch? Rune new damn well what happened. I’m not even saying he should have conceded it. But to claim he didn’t know seems absurd.

smalahove

Hall of Fame

Wtf? Those of you thinking Rune’s actions are ok need to rewatch the point in question. After hitting the ball after the second bounce, Rune stops playing. Then there’s a delay and then Cerundolo makes a wtf-gesture before smashing the ball away. It’s that gesture (and something not really audible) that gets him the let.

Rune @knows@ and his body language is unequivocal. A lot of pro players cheat, and more would if they weren’t penalized. No true champion cheats, only losers - even with trophies.

That’s a double combo of cheating and gamesmanship from Rune. If you think this is condoned in other sports you’re not looking. In golf you’d be penalized for this after the tournament f.inst. even if it means losing the trophy.

The Green Mile

Bionic Poster

Did you watch? Rune new damn well what happened. I’m not even saying he should have conceded it. But to claim he didn’t know seems absurd.

Only the four second clip in this thread.

Rune in his presser says he didn't realize, until he saw it on the TV after the point was over. I'm not a fan of Rune, but I for sure understand where he's coming from lol, it's fricking difficult to tell a lot of the time.

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.

Yeah I'm sorry but the he's faking injuries crowd are just morons. People that complain about MTOs I mean fine I guess but if you're losing concentration from MTOs you're a mental weakling.

Agree to disagree on the MTO part. Breaks, MTOs and toilet, work for a reason, you lose your rhytm.
Anyway, not in the mood for a longer discussion today.

Just wanted to point out that Novak is not a saint in this regard - neither with TTW, the crowd or his peers (still to win an SE award right? )

I highly admire how he handles his rare defeats though

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.

Some of the couch potatoes who say he should have shown better sportsmanship don't realize that in sports at the highest level players are like gladiators to win and they are not charlatans/showmen who are there to divert their mind to point out double bounces in between the heat of the game. The game is so fast that maybe Rune did not even realize a double bounce or maybe he did get a doubt that it was, but in his mind he is busy thinking about how to win, in that moment in his mind it is not about who is right and who is wrong, he is gonna take what the umpire gives him and if he is wronged then only shall he question the umpire. He is not gonna fight for his opponent's case with the umpire, that is not how his mind would work. A viewer can think like that but not a player, his focus in on winning within what the rule allows him. So if the umpire did not spot it then so be it, player doesn't have to worry about the point.

Very similar situation last year in Miami SF, first set 5-5 deuce on Hurkacz's serve IIRC, Alcaraz conceded the point.

I Am Finnish

Bionic Poster

smalahove

Hall of Fame

aldeayeah

G.O.A.T.

big ted

Legend

Only the four second clip in this thread.

Rune in his presser says he didn't realize, until he saw it on the TV after the point was over. I'm not a fan of Rune, but I for sure understand where he's coming from lol, it's fricking difficult to tell a lot of the time.

Some of the couch potatoes who say he should have shown better sportsmanship don't realize that in sports at the highest level players are like gladiators to win and they are not charlatans/showmen who are there to divert their mind to point out double bounces in between the heat of the game. The game is so fast that maybe Rune did not even realize a double bounce or maybe he did get a doubt that it was, but in his mind he is busy thinking about how to win, in that moment in his mind it is not about who is right and who is wrong, he is gonna take what the umpire gives him and if he is wronged then only shall he question the umpire. He is not gonna fight for his opponent's case with the umpire, that is not how his mind would work. A viewer can think like that but not a player, his focus in on winning within what the rule allows him. So if the umpire did not spot it then so be it, player doesn't have to worry about the point.

To maximize the effectiveness of the rune double bounce technique, players often modify their ability bars to include the most efficient abilities for damage output. This may involve choosing abilities with low cooldowns or high damage potential. Overall, rune double bounce is a complex and advanced technique in RuneScape that requires skill, precision, and knowledge of the game's combat system. With practice and mastery, players can become formidable forces in battles, dealing significant damage and outmaneuvering their opponents..

Reviews for "Rune Double Bounce as a Tool for Manifestation: Creating Your Desired Reality"

1. Sara - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with Rune Double Bounce. The gameplay felt clunky and unresponsive, making it frustrating to play. The controls were difficult to master, and I found myself constantly hitting the wrong buttons. The graphics were also lackluster, with outdated visuals that didn't match the gameplay. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this game to others.

2. Michael - 1 star - Rune Double Bounce is a complete mess. The level design is confusing and inconsistent, making it hard to progress. The difficulty curve is all over the place, with some levels being ridiculously easy and others requiring precise timing that feels almost impossible. The lack of checkpoints made it even more frustrating, as I constantly had to replay long sections just to get back to where I died. Save your money and skip this game.

3. Emily - 2 stars - I wanted to like Rune Double Bounce, but the game mechanics just didn't click for me. The bouncing mechanics felt clunky and unreliable, leading to many frustrating deaths. The lack of clear objectives and direction made it confusing to know what I was supposed to do next. Additionally, the repetitive music quickly became annoying and made me lose interest in the game. Overall, I was disappointed with this game and don't see myself playing it again.

4. Jack - 2 stars - Rune Double Bounce had potential, but it fell flat for me. The platforming mechanics were poorly executed, with frustratingly imprecise jumps and inconsistent collision detection. The lack of checkpoints and punishing difficulty made the game feel unnecessarily challenging and not enjoyable. The graphics and art style were decent, but they couldn't make up for the frustrating gameplay. I wouldn't recommend this game to anyone looking for a fun and polished platforming experience.

The Role of Rune Double Bounce in Divination and Fortune Telling