The magic paint toy is a popular choice among children for its ability to create vibrant and colorful designs with just a few simple strokes. This toy consists of a brush or pen-like tool that is filled with a special ink or paint that becomes visible only when it comes into contact with a special surface. The magic paint toy often comes with a set of blank templates or coloring sheets that are made of this special surface material. When the child uses the brush or pen to draw on the template, the ink or paint creates a beautiful and colorful design that appears magically. The toy also provides the option to erase or undo any mistakes, allowing children to experiment and get creative without the fear of making permanent marks. One of the main advantages of the magic paint toy is its mess-free nature.
One of the main advantages of the magic paint toy is its mess-free nature. Unlike traditional painting materials like watercolors or acrylics, the ink or paint used in magic paint toys is usually water-based and does not leave any stains or marks on clothing or furniture. This makes it a great choice for parents who want to encourage their child's creativity without creating a big mess that needs to be cleaned up afterwards.
On the despicable physician witch-hunt by the medical establishment
In a quaint time, some years ago, the idea that a physician could lose their ability to practice medicine because of a stance on a politically controversial matter of the day would be frankly ridiculous. Those days are well behind us. It is absolutely clear and evident that physicians who want to continue practicing their craft need to keep their mouths tightly shut about anything that is remotely controversial or political. Generally speaking, I have come to realize that its a mistake for physicians to be overtly political because for a significant segment of the population this interferes with the therapeutic relationship. But we’ve crossed well beyond that particular rubicon to medical organizations sanctioning physicians because they may not agree with the prevailing consensus on certain medical topics of the day.
The gist of the argument is that when in a public health emergency, physicians better toe the line or risk damaging the health of the public. This is an incredibly dangerous road for medical organizations to travel because this stance actually does put the public’s health in danger. Consider the issue of masks. Anthony Fauci famously advised everyone not to wear masks… until he was for wearing masks. The public health community almost universally opposed travel restrictions… until they were vociferously for travel restrictions. The CDC said there was no link between vaccines and myocarditis before they finally acknowledged the link. The list of flip-flops by the establishment with no intervening, earth shattering change in the science is a mile long. Challenging consensus is very much how medicine progresses. These oracles of objectivity and science will of course never be threatened… because they are in power. The powerful decide what you can and cannot believe, and when you can transition from one accepted belief to another accepted belief. The medical establishment could not be more like the medieval church which famously declared Galileo’s idea of heliocentrism as “formally heretical” if they tried. I imagine there is some secret society in a dungeon in some major US city where people in masks cast ballots while chanting to decide when they’re going to say the science now says 2 year old’s need to be masked in daycare (except when sleeping and eating lunch together).
Thanks for reading Anish’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
The current targets for mischief in medicine is, of course, the outgroup that isn’t at these meetings that, god forbid, have independent thoughts about medicine. It is no accident that the most popular physicians that have challenged the orthodoxy during the time of COVID are the ones targeted by the establishment. The high profile names of physicians who have broken from the consensus position include Dr. Simone Gold, Dr Peter Mccullough, Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik. Prior to the pandemic most of these individuals were employed in academic settings, and in good repute at their places of work.
But none of these physicians have been spared by organized medicine for the thought crime of breaking with the consensus on COVID. In this particular case, these physicians believe in early treatment of COVID with a combination of drugs that includes ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and have also raised concerns about adverse events related to vaccines. I’m not going to try to adjudicate whether these two drugs actually work early in the treatment of COVID or not, because that isn’t the point. The point is that well respected, smart, senior physicians have reviewed the evidence, and decided that this drug regimen would help patients. Unless someone can demonstrate that there’s clear evidence of harm being meted out by the prescription of these relatively benign drugs, I think it absolutely crazy that medical organizations would attempt to prevent them from practicing medicine. But that is exactly what is being attempted.
Pierre Kory’s recent substack details the letter written to him by the American Board of Internal medicine that essentially amounts to him being hauled in front of a kangaroo court to face sanction.
Pierre Kory’s Medical Musings My Rather Public Reply To The Threat Made Against Me By The American Board Of Internal MedicineA month ago, I received a letter from the American Board of Internal Medicine accusing me of spreading misinformation and threatening to revoke my certification based on their new policy “against misinformation.” I initially laughed and tossed it into a pile of papers, dismissing it as just the latest in a string of (non-evidence based) attacks on me f…
Read more a year ago · 358 likes · 94 comments · Pierre Kory, MD, MPAThe sanction being discussed in this particular letter is to strip him of his board certification status in critical care which he has paid and passed the requisite tests for. Hospitals typically require this particular certification in order to practice in an ICU so it effectively means Dr. Kory would be unable to take care of critical care ICU patients because of his feelings on the benefits of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for COVID19. How completely ridiculous!
The sanctioned treatment for COVID of course is Paxlovid, even though the trial that lead to the approval of Paxlovid was in primarily unvaccinated patients and we have recent data from Pfizer to suggest Paxlovid is only very modestly beneficial to vaccinated patients. VP Kamala Harris, who has no known high risk factors, was apparently prescribed Paxlovid for having asymptomatic COVID. There is zero evidence that we are doing anything for the Vice President by giving her Paxlovid (if those details are accurate). Dr. Anthony Fauci took not just one course of Paxlovid but 2 courses back to back because he suffered rebound COVID. Which doctor prescribed him that, and why?
Now, I disagree with both Paxlovid prescriptions here because my review of the evidence to date suggests the benefits here are going to be very small, but I would never ever suggest a doctor who thought it was reasonable to try Paxlovid in these 2 clinical settings have their license or certifications revoked! Medicine is complicated, and maybe Dr. Faucii ends up being right about an extended course of Paxlovid, but in the meantime there’s going to be some differences of opinion that organized medicine needs to tolerate. The “public health emergency” moniker that gets thrown around as justification is also nuts because it has been more than 2 years now and if hospitals are still acting in emergency mode, why is COVID +ve Mr. Jones [made up name] in hallway bed 3?
Going after high profile ‘contrarian’ physicians sends a message to the entire community of physicians to get in line. And it will work because the financial costs of losing certification are not small for physicians, and many of the professional organizations that grant certifications have a monopoly over the process. If something good is to emerge from this embarrassing episode, it would be to once and forever legislatively dismantle the medical certification monopoly in the interest of public health.
Anish Koka is a Cardiologist. Follow him @anish_koka
Thanks for reading Anish’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Pierre Kory’s recent substack details the letter written to him by the American Board of Internal medicine that essentially amounts to him being hauled in front of a kangaroo court to face sanction.
Furthermore, the magic paint toy is an excellent tool to develop fine motor skills and hand-eye coordination in young children. As they use the brush or pen to draw and color within the lines of the templates, they are practicing their control and precision. This can have a positive impact on their overall motor skills development and can even help improve their handwriting skills in the long run. In addition to the templates provided with the toy, some magic paint sets also offer blank sheets or canvases, allowing children to create their own designs from scratch. This encourages their imagination and creativity, and gives them the freedom to express themselves artistically. It can be a great way for children to explore their artistic abilities and develop a love for art at a young age. Overall, the magic paint toy is a fun and engaging activity for children that allows them to create beautiful designs with minimal effort. It promotes creativity, develops fine motor skills, and offers a mess-free painting experience. It is no wonder that this toy is a popular choice among children and parents alike..
Reviews for "Mabic Paint vs. Regular Paint: Which is Better for Kids?"
1. Megan - 2/5 stars - I was really excited to try the Mabic paint toy, but I was left disappointed. The colors were not as vibrant as I expected and the paint did not spread smoothly on the paper. It was difficult to control the flow of the paint and it often leaked out of the pen. The pen itself was also uncomfortable to hold for long periods of time. Overall, I found the Mabic paint toy to be lackluster and not worth the price.
2. Alex - 1/5 stars - I had high hopes for the Mabic paint toy, but it fell flat in nearly every aspect. The colors were dull and lacked pigmentation, making my artwork look washed out. The pen was difficult to use and often clogged, resulting in uneven paint distribution. Additionally, the paint took forever to dry, causing smudging and ruining my work. I would not recommend the Mabic paint toy to anyone looking for a quality art experience.
3. Emily - 2/5 stars - The Mabic paint toy was a letdown for me. The colors appeared vibrant in the advertisements, but in reality, they were dull and lacked depth. The pen itself was flimsy and difficult to control, resulting in messy and uneven artwork. The paint also took a long time to dry, making it frustrating to work with. Overall, I was not satisfied with the Mabic paint toy and would not purchase it again.
4. Jason - 1/5 stars - The Mabic paint toy was a disappointment. The colors were not true to what was depicted on the packaging and the paint consistency was too watery, resulting in a lack of control and precision. The pen itself was poorly constructed and easily broke during use. Additionally, the paint had an unpleasant odor that lingered even after drying. I would not recommend the Mabic paint toy to anyone looking for a quality art tool.