Could this be mafic? Mafic rocks are a type of igneous rock that have a high content of magnesium and iron minerals. They are also characterized by their dark color, usually ranging from black to dark green. Mafic rocks are known to have a low silica content, which means that they solidify at higher temperatures compared to other types of igneous rocks. When examining a rock to determine if it is mafic, there are a few key characteristics to look for. One important indicator is the color of the rock. Mafic rocks are typically very dark in color, due to the presence of the minerals rich in magnesium and iron.
That said, this isn’t a “baby’s first Soulslike” either. There are over 20 bosses to face through the story, and each one is a challenge. I didn’t struggle much, but nor was it a walk in the park. As you develop Hilda’s abilities, you’ll also travel back and forth to the Shelter, a hub where you can collect new missions, buy items, upgrade your gear, or chat to various NPCs. The story is pretty decent, and Hilda is an easy character to warm to. She isn’t obnoxious, cocky, or overconfident; she’s just very earnest and determined to free Aphes and learn what happened to her father’s missing Legion.
There are also bombs and throwing knives, among other things, to equip, and attributes and skill points to spend on an expansive skill tree tied to the weapons you re using. There are also bombs and throwing knives, among other things, to equip, and attributes and skill points to spend on an expansive skill tree tied to the weapons you re using.
Mafic rocks are typically very dark in color, due to the presence of the minerals rich in magnesium and iron. If a rock appears to be black or dark green, it could be an indication that it is mafic. Another characteristic to consider is the density of the rock.
Asterigos: Curse of the Stars review – Stuck in the middle
When I watched the official trailer a little over a year ago, my interest peaked at this title which presented itself as a fun, combative action-adventure game with Greek and Roman mythology inspired themes and visuals. Sometime later the gameplay overview was released, and more details of the combat system were revealed. Showcasing elemental weaknesses and the ability to wield different weapon types had me hoping for a great build crafting adventure similar to the Souls’ games.
After finishing the game, it is heavily noticeable that Asterigos has a big issue on committing to what kind of game it wants to be. Taking inspiration and admiration of Greek and Roman mythology, Asterigos has tons of potential yet doesn’t realize it. What holds this game back is uniquely one of this game’s best qualities. It is stuck in the middle of being a mythology themed adventure filled with mystery and intrigue, and a Souls-like game filled with an emphasis on exploration and combat. With the intro out of the way, let’s talk about what works and doesn’t with Asterigos: Curse of the Stars.
In Asterigos, you play as a young and optimistic warrior of the Northwind Legion named Hilda. You meet her as she is embarking on a mission to locate her father and his troops as they haven’t reported back to headquarters in three and a half months. Immediately, you get the sense of a young yet determined drive within her. Due to discovering some left behind clues, Hilda learns that her father is somewhere in Aphes.
Aphes is a city that has been cursed with something that I’m not going to spoil here. The heart of the story is the mystery and allure of the curse that happened upon this city, and Hilda’s quest to overcome it. The characters, however, are something that definitely needed more time in the oven. Most of them were uninteresting and bland when it came to both personality and design. With this being stylized after Greek and Roman mythology, I think it would have been much better to implement the gods from those mythologies. Their interactions and personality conflicts would have worked much better. A big reason most games use the gods as characters and add their own twist is because it works.
Trending:Gameplay wise, Asterigos’s combat feels and plays fantastic. Nonetheless, it feels like it is trying to go two different paths, yet not fully committing to either. The game tries to cater to the RPG path of heavy narrative and skill trees, and the “not going to hold your hand” attitude, or self-discovery of the story, many Souls-like games have. That isn’t to say that’s a bad thing as you can cater to two different audiences but weakens the game in doing so. It would have been a better experience to fully commit to one genre, instead of what feels like putting half of their effort into two genres.
The different weapons in combat felt balanced and exclusive. A phenomenal feature is you are able to equip two different weapons at the same time, allowing for unique attack combinations and techniques. I used the daggers and spear combination almost the entire playthrough as, in my opinion, they were the most fun and effective. I love mobility in games, and they allow for great engagement both in attack and defense.
One design I would have loved to see would be more rewarding in combat for combining attacks and builds. Yes, there is a skill tree, where you level up to earn points to unlock new skills but build crafting and tactical fighting took a back seat. The skill tree seems to be a way to time-gate skills that don’t need to be. In most RPG’s the better and more valuable skills are the last to be unlocked for obvious reasons. Here, all of the skills felt the same in terms of lethality, so it’s not very enticing to try different builds with different weapons and abilities when all feel and have the same potency. Having advertised the ability to imbue weapons with different elements to take advantage of enemy weakness, not only did I not notice any difference in damage given, but there also wasn’t a clear tutorial or explanation on how the whole system works.
One of the main draws of the soul’s genre is self-exploration of the world and unique boss fights. Asterigos dips its toe into each of those but keeps it to a casual level. Player exploration and discovery are one of the core designs, however the city was both not linear enough and too big to not include a mini or area map. This is my biggest frustration with the game, along with having to use the stamina meter to run when out of combat. It’s completely unnecessary when you base one of your core designs around exploring every corner of the world to find items and quests.
One of the biggest highlights of Asterigos are the boss fights. Each boss fight felt different and scaled really well in size compared to Hilda. Some changed attacks and styles after reaching certain damage thresholds, which is on par with the genre. Unfortunately, aside from the final boss, the fights throughout the story didn’t have the difficulty I’ve come to expect. Most games in the soul’s genre use bosses as a big difficulty spike to make them feel truly like bosses and to test players ability on learning attack patterns. If you’re going to have item use and combat be based on a genre known for difficulty spikes in boss fights, I think a game should fully commit. All the same, I truly believe Asterigos’ best feature is what it advertises so much – fun and customizable combat.
On to the last topic, let’s talk about some foundational aspects. One of the first things I check in games are accessibility features, along with visual and audio customizations. First up is accessibility, and there were only four different button configurations to choose from. In a game where a core component is dodging and the timing of attacks, I would have liked more options along with these base configurations. I think a custom toggle, where one could map any action to any button would have been a nice option to have available.
Trending:Moving on to visuals, I was disappointed in not only the visual options available, but also throughout the game as well. In the menu options, there was only a gamma adjustment and subtitle font size changer. I reviewed Asterigos on a PS5, and was surprised not to see a performance/resolution slider on as it seems to be the standard for most games that are released on last gen and current gen. The game would benefit from that slider in that it perfectly could coincide with my opinion of it catering to two genres. A low frame rate and high resolution would have been great for having the beautifully detailed worlds and characters RPGs are known for. While vice versa, in almost all Souls games, a high frame rate is essential for dodging and blocking attacks.
The one word I would use to describe the graphics is inconsistent. Many of the cutscenes were of good quality rich with detail and lore, however in-game dialogue isn’t meeting that same high watermark; most of the time characters beside Hilda would not have mouth movements when speaking. There are also recurring instances, like trees and houses looking normal but bushes and items in the streets looking like they lost all texture. Enemy textures and animation are also low quality in a lot of areas, with frame rates and details dropping to poor levels. Enemy density is extremely low, with you only encountering two to three different enemy types in each large section of the map, and some enemies would look and move like they belonged in the PS2 era. Luckily, once you engage in combat the visuals settle in, and you can focus on fighting and such.
Combat is fun, enemies do have pretty dumb AI and can’t really handle ranged which is partly what makes the staff so strong, they generally lack deadly ranged attacks to punish you if you stay at a distance even against bosses. Some attacks have impact, you can be knocked down by tough foes but there is nothing like poise. Lock on can be spotty at times, particularly for vertical foes. There’s enough enemy variety to keep the game entertaining, while combat is fluid and feels like half Bloodborne, half Kingdoms of Amalur Reckoning.
Mafic rocks are generally denser than other types of rocks, such as felsic rocks. This is because the high content of magnesium and iron minerals in mafic rocks increases their overall density. If a rock feels heavier than others of a similar size, it could suggest that it is mafic. The presence of certain minerals can also provide clues about whether a rock is mafic. Mafic rocks often contain minerals such as pyroxene and olivine, which are rich in magnesium and iron. These minerals can be identified through visual inspection or by using specialized tools, such as a microscope or X-ray diffraction. It is important to note that not all dark rocks are mafic. Some dark-colored rocks, such as basalt, are mafic, while others, such as shale, are not. So, while color and density can be helpful indicators, it is also necessary to analyze the mineral composition of the rock to make a more accurate determination. In conclusion, when examining a rock to determine if it is mafic, it is important to consider the color, density, and mineral composition of the rock. Mafic rocks are typically dark in color, dense, and contain minerals rich in magnesium and iron. By carefully analyzing these characteristics, it is possible to make an informed judgment about whether a rock is mafic or not..
Reviews for "Beyond the Ordinary: Could This Be Real-Life Magic?"
1. Emily - 2 stars - I was really excited to read "Could this be magic" based on the synopsis, but I was ultimately disappointed. The characters lacked depth and felt one-dimensional, making it difficult to connect with them. Additionally, the plot was predictable and offered no surprises. I found myself losing interest halfway through the book and struggled to finish it. Overall, I was hoping for more magic and originality, but unfortunately, it fell short for me.
2. Michael - 1 star - "Could this be magic" was a complete letdown. The writing was amateurish and filled with clichés. The dialogue felt forced and unrealistic, making it hard to believe in the story and its characters. The pacing was slow, and I found myself constantly checking how much I had left to read. The story lacked originality and failed to offer anything new or exciting. I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for a captivating and well-written fantasy novel.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - I had high expectations for "Could this be magic," but it failed to deliver. The story felt disjointed and lacked coherence, making it difficult to follow the plotline. The world-building was underdeveloped, leaving me with many unanswered questions. The characters were forgettable and lacked depth, making it hard to care about their journey. Overall, I didn't find anything magical or captivating about this book, and I was left feeling unsatisfied.