The Glamour of Magix 1978: Iconic Looks from the Cast

By admin

The Magix 1978 cast is a group of talented individuals who came together to create a magical experience for audiences. This cast consists of actors, singers, dancers, and musicians who worked tirelessly to bring the story to life. The cast members all brought their unique skills and talents to the table, creating a dynamic and captivating performance. Each member of the cast had a specific role to play, whether it be a lead character or a supporting role. The actors in the cast brought the characters to life, delving into their emotions and motivations. They worked on their lines and expressions, ensuring that each performance was believable and engaging.

Magix 1978 cast

They worked on their lines and expressions, ensuring that each performance was believable and engaging. The singers in the cast brought the music to life with their powerful voices. They rehearsed their songs tirelessly, working on their vocal technique and emotional connection to the music.

Magic

A washed up and socially insecure magician adopts ventriloquism for his performance. As he feels his dreams of success on the verge of completion he panics and begins to lose his grip on reality, finding that it is near impossible for him to tell where the dummy ends and he begins.

To make up for our insecurities with our more critical audiences, we often embody what we believe to be the voice in the back of our heads weighing down fear and insecurity into how we present ourselves, encompassing all that you had once feared into an identity. However if you are completely reliant on that identity you encompass in order to get through day to day insecurities it becomes unhealthy. Our main character Corky is a character study on what happens when a man is completely consumed then controlled by his own fear of failure.

Hopkins' performance between himself and the dummy are some of the most investing scenes to watch, most notably the "five minutes" scene.

Published onethink Oct 13 2022

Magic is often categorised as a horror movie and then found wanting. I thought of it more as a thriller, but then found it wanting. In a long prologue we see Corky (Anthony Hopkins) failing as a magician, but then reviving his career as a ventriloquist, sharing his act with Fats. Ben Greene (Burgess Meredith) becomes his agent and the big time beckons. Corky is offered his own TV show, but he refuses a necessary medical check…it’s that old ventriloquist chestnut, the dummy has taken on its own life. There isn’t anything supernatural (although I once thought I saw Fats’ eyes move in the background when he was sitting by himself), rather Corky is cracking up and doesn’t want anyone to know. Corky is introverted and shy and socially uncertain, Fats is outspoken and foul mouthed and, it turns out, homicidal: maybe Fats is Corky’s id. or, at least, a hidden part of his personality. Another irresponsible Hollywood depiction of mental illness, but it’s a strong situation…and ventriloquist dummies are always creepy. Corky takes refuge in his home town where Peggy Ann Snow (Ann-Margret) rents out cabins…and Corky used to have a teenage crush on Peggy Ann. She is now in an unhappy marriage and they are drawn together. Then Ben turns up and realises Corky is ill and promises to get medical help, but Fats urges Corky to do away with Ben…and this leads to a further killing. While Corky collapses into homicidal mania he tries to maintain a romance with Peggy Ann, separating insanity and normality. A final crisis comes when he becomes a threat to Peggy Ann. But however strong the situation is, Richard Attenborough is a careful and pedantic film director, not one who can build tension or suspense. And, although I like Anthony Hopkins, his theatricality is a barrier to any close empathy: he tends to feel like an Actor rather than a character. Magic is O.K., but I wish someone without Richard Attenborough’s good taste was in charge.

Published rich1206 Oct 28 2020

Sir Anthony Hopkins is Corky Withers a magician and a ventriloquist that has a very close relationship with his dummy named Fats. After a while it seems like it might be the dummy controlling the person, and not the other way around. For a while it seems like Corky may have a split personality and the evil part of his personality is the doll. But maybe that's not the case? This was okay, but a little bit of a disappointment considering the people involved. Ann Margaret is wonderful and beautiful as ever, so that's enough reason to see it.

Published blair23 Apr 26 2020

Anthony Hopkins is great and Burgess Meredith is scene stealing in this ridiculous but effective thriller about a man and his ventriloquist dummy. _Magic_ may not be the subtlest at what its doing but it is provocative enough to hold your attention for more than an hour and a half.

Published TheFinnishBolshevik Sep 30 2011

This living doll thing has been done many times and this really isn't that different but its still a pretty good and entertaining movie.

Corky is an unsuccessful magician who figures out a new gimmick, a ventriloquist dummy. His new show is a huge hit and a manager gets interested of him. Corky gets cold feet and goes to meet a girl he had a crush on as a teenager to the countryside to avoid attention. The doll is a real burden though, its constantly talking like it has a life of its own.

Anthony Hopkins does a decent job as Corky and the film is fairly interesting. It has its flaws like the slow start which I actually didn't mind and general lack of violence compared to the stuff that I usually watch but it makes up for it in other things and balances out.

Published linoleumbandito Dec 29 2009

Dummy relies on the same suspensions of disbelief, well, at least the implausible device that women dig ventriloquists and their dummies. No, they do not. Dummy is the rom-com regurgitation of 'Magic'. Ventroliquism as vaudevillian Spanish Fly is plausible I guess, but the extent to which Fats is adored/respected by Ann Margret is totally unbelievable.

Regardless of that heap of corn, the strength of Magic's individual scenes makes it a stand-out. Hopkins' feverish attempts to pull off card tricks, his on-stage outburst and relationship with Merlin, the fishing fake-out followed by obvious shore reveal, the stone heart -- all of these weirdo, quietly intense scenes haunt the movie, and it's awesome.

Aesthetically, 'Magic' works. Sure it's implausible and rife with holes. But who cares really when you have scenes like these with performances like this from Hopkins and a creepy dummy that's really just a creepy Hopkins!

Plus, Burgess Meredith is a key player!! There's no reason not to see this!

Published Goregirl Jun 03 2009

Terrifying. hardly, surprising. hardly, . shocking. hardly, . worthwhile. hardly. This was quite a letdown and it took me several times to actually get through to the ending. The big issue is that the plot requires you to entirely suspend belief with no explanation and well I'm not quite willing to do that. First of all we meet the tragically uncharismatic magician who delves into lame card tricks. After he fails to impress he comes back with the same act. only we have an obnoxious ugly dummy saying lewd things. It never shuts up, not ever in fact it seems to be alive. In order to get his life in order he goes to an out of town resort where a girl he has a crush on lives. She's married but seems to give him play anyhow, the dummy doesn't like this. It argues with his puppeteer, it tells him what to do and or else he'll blackmail his master. I guess it really must be seen to be believed, but it's a long talky boring picture and although I generally like Anthony Hopkins, I do not believe that anyone would have a crush on him or even slightly enjoy his stupid act. Not a bad idea at least right?

Published

Votes are used to help determine the most interesting content on RYM.

Vote up content that is on-topic, within the rules/guidelines, and will likely stay relevant long-term.
Vote down content which breaks the rules.

This living doll thing has been done many times and this really isn't that different but its still a pretty good and entertaining movie.
Magix 1978 cast

Their performances were full of energy and passion. The dancers in the cast added another layer of excitement to the performance. They spent hours perfecting their choreography, practicing their moves until they were flawless. Their dances brought a visual element to the show, enhancing the overall experience for the audience. The musicians in the cast provided the essential musical accompaniment for the production. They worked on their instruments, honing their skills and practicing together to ensure that the music was cohesive and harmonious. Their music added depth and emotion to the performance, enhancing the audience's experience. Overall, the Magix 1978 cast worked together seamlessly, bringing their respective talents and passion to create a truly magical show. Their dedication and hard work paid off, resulting in a performance that captivated audiences and left a lasting impression..

Reviews for "The Interviews of Magix 1978: Insights from the Cast Members"

1. Jane - 2 out of 5 stars - I was really disappointed with "Magix 1978 cast". The acting was mediocre at best and the storyline was confusing. I found it hard to connect with any of the characters and the dialogue felt forced. Overall, it felt like a cheap production and I wouldn't recommend it to others.
2. Mark - 1 out of 5 stars - I couldn't even finish watching "Magix 1978 cast". The acting was so over-the-top and the plot was nonsensical. The whole thing just seemed like a poorly executed attempt at a period piece. Save yourself the time and skip this one.
3. Sarah - 2 out of 5 stars - "Magix 1978 cast" had so much potential, but it fell flat for me. The costumes and set design were impressive, but beyond that, there wasn't much substance. The characters felt one-dimensional and the writing lacked depth. I was expecting a captivating drama, but instead, I was left feeling bored and uninterested.
4. Michael - 2 out of 5 stars - I was really hoping to enjoy "Magix 1978 cast" since I'm a fan of period dramas, but it didn't live up to my expectations. The pacing was slow and the plot was predictable. The performances felt wooden and the chemistry between the actors was lacking. Overall, it was a forgettable experience.
5. Emily - 1 out of 5 stars - I found "Magix 1978 cast" to be incredibly dull and unoriginal. The story felt like a rehash of other period dramas I've seen before, without bringing anything new to the table. The performances were lackluster and the dialogue was uninspired. I would not recommend wasting your time on this film.

The Accolades of Magix 1978: Awards and Recognition for the Cast

The Fan Favorites of Magix 1978: Exploring the Cast's Popularity