Using the grasping rune bag to tap into your intuition and inner wisdom

By admin

A grasping rune bag is a type of bag often used by practitioners of magic and rune casting. It is typically made of a durable fabric or leather material and is designed to hold a set of rune stones or runes. The bag is specially crafted with an opening or flap that allows easy access to the runes inside. The purpose of a grasping rune bag is to securely hold and protect the runes while also allowing for easy transportation and use. The bag serves as a container to keep the runes safe from damage or loss, ensuring that they can be used for divination or magical purposes whenever needed. The runes themselves are small, flat stones or tiles that are marked with ancient symbols known as "runes.


'#BTSofTheWitches': Last Wednesday, the former child star's onscreen nemesis - Octavia Spencer - shared her own on-set snap of her character The Grandmother lounging on a couch

The Grand High Witch was a total collaboration between costumes, hair and make-up, the writers, my dialect coach, the effects department, stunts, director Bob Zemeckis and myself, Hathaway recently told People. The hotel setting becomes a tug of war between the three screenwriters as it often explores different tones and goes through the motions, resulting in the film having little to no identity.

Anne Hathaway mighty witch queen

The runes themselves are small, flat stones or tiles that are marked with ancient symbols known as "runes." These symbols are typically engraved or painted onto the surface of the rune, representing different concepts or meanings. Rune casting is a practice that involves selecting and interpreting specific runes to gain insight, guidance, or answers to particular questions or situations.

'The Witches' Review

Reimagining Roald Dahl's beloved story for a modern audience, Robert Zemeckis's visually innovative film tells the darkly humorous and heartwarming tale of a young orphaned boy who, in late 1967, goes to live with his loving Grandma in the rural Alabama town of Demopolis. As the boy and his grandmother encounter some deceptively glamorous but thoroughly diabolical witches, she wisely whisks him away to a seaside resort. Regrettably, they arrive at precisely the same time that the world's Grand High Witch has gathered her fellow cronies from around the globe — undercover — to carry out her nefarious plans.

Beloved director and uncanny valley aficionado Robert Zemeckis has been on a losing streak lately, directing failure after failure for the last… When was Flight? 2012? Yeah, let’s say 8 years. Now he’s back with a feature adaptation of Roald Dahl’s beloved book The Witches. The film was originally set for a theatrical release, but in a last-ditch effort by WarnerMedia, they shifted its release to HBO Max. That was a smart move because this film would’ve bombed if it was sent to theaters.

Anne Hathaway, honey, you are trying your best. Hathaway delivers a fun, over-the-top performance as the Grand High Witch. Despite doing a weird Russian accent, she tries her best to make the weak material work. She clearly had a fun time as the big, bad witch queen and relishing in the character’s nastiness.

If there’s an area in The Witches that impresses me thoroughly, it’s the production design. Since this film takes place in the late ‘60s, all of the interior locations, especially the hotel, aesthetically pop. It all fits the era perfectly. The same can be said for the wardrobe and costume designs.

Nicolas Roeg’s 1990 adaptation of The Witches was fun and memorable for three reasons: Anjelica Huston, creative horror sequences, and most importantly, the use of practical effects. When you’re working alongside the Jim Henson Company, you know the production is going to be special and an effort will be made to create a realistic and terrifying experience. When you ask someone like Robert Zemeckis — a filmmaker who has become a CGI addict — to remake The Witches, it’s not surprising that it results in a weak, dull, and weightless CGI fest that feels like it was made 10 years too late.

The CGI in Zemeckis’s movies are either really good or absolutely god awful. There’s no inbetween. The Witches falls into the latter category. Once the film reaches its second act, it becomes over-reliant on the use of CG effects, which look more cartoonish than anything else. The animation isn’t completely rendered and it comes off as either disturbing or weightless. Instead of being a family horror flick, The Witches aims for an adventure-based angle. Most of the “action” sequences are CGI-heavy and involve things like mice scurrying.

As much as I’m riffing on the CGI, I have to give credit where credit is due: for someone who can be considered the master of uncanniness, Zemeckis does not disappoint. What’s a Robert Zemeckis movie without a little nightmare fuel? It’s his signature trademark. There are brief moments of horror that are actually terrifying. The witches are designed to be visually repulsive and it works. Granted, they don’t even look like witches. Imagine if Mileena and Baraka from Mortal Kombat procreated and had bald children with huge, fanged teeth. However, the majority of the horror truly comes from the transformation sequences as kids are turned into mice, especially since it was rushed and done poorly.

The screenplay has a bizarre barrage of writers involved. It’s written by Kenya Barris, Guillermo del Toro and Zemeckis. For some reason, you can smell all the pieces that each writer contributed. For starters, it’s a period piece set in America and focuses on an orphaned Black kid who loses his parents in a car crash and must live with his grandmother. This is definitely Barris’s department because it has the classic Black southern atmosphere. Agatha is written to be the generic but caring grandmother who applies God to everything and cooks stereotypically Black meals for Charlie, like fried chicken and cornbread. Of course the only thing that prevented me from rolling my eyes to the back of my skull was Spencer’s committed and charming performance. That woman can make gold out of water.

The hotel setting becomes a tug of war between the three screenwriters as it often explores different tones and goes through the motions, resulting in the film having little to no identity. While its ending actually remains faithful to the source material, the majority of the film is dull and uneventful. It lacks excitement and even the violent climax feels anticlimactic.

Watching this poor adaptation made it clear why Zemeckis has taken a nosedive in the past decade. The man is too preoccupied filming each project in a gimmicky style that belongs in the early 2010s. Remember when nearly every other movie that utilized CG effects was being released in 3D so that it could provide more of a cinematic experience with objects popping out towards you instead of being good, memorable movies? One of the leaders of that pack was Robert Zemeckis. Can somebody please take his CGI toy box away and tell him that the 2010s are over? This style of filmmaking has completely run its course. He did a great job with The Walk, but outside of its IMAX 3D experience, it wasn’t memorable at all. As heartbreaking as it is to say, the more he relies on CGI for his projects, the weaker his effectiveness as a filmmaker gets. If there’s anything The Witches (2020) is good for, it's to introduce kids to the ‘90s film and teach them the effectiveness of practical effects and how that technique of production is far more grand, timely, and realistic than this weightless CGI trash.

Nicolas Roeg’s 1990 adaptation of The Witches was fun and memorable for three reasons: Anjelica Huston, creative horror sequences, and most importantly, the use of practical effects. When you’re working alongside the Jim Henson Company, you know the production is going to be special and an effort will be made to create a realistic and terrifying experience. When you ask someone like Robert Zemeckis — a filmmaker who has become a CGI addict — to remake The Witches, it’s not surprising that it results in a weak, dull, and weightless CGI fest that feels like it was made 10 years too late.
Grasping rune bag

When using a grasping rune bag, the practitioner typically holds the bag in one hand and uses the other hand to draw out the desired rune from the bag. The rune is then either placed on a specially-designed cloth or table or held between the fingers for interpretation and analysis. The grasping rune bag also adds an element of mystery and reverence to the process of rune casting. The act of grasping the bag and intuitively selecting a rune can help create a ritualistic atmosphere and focus the practitioner's mind on the task at hand. Overall, a grasping rune bag is an essential tool for practitioners of rune casting, providing a secure and convenient way to store and transport the runes while also adding a touch of ritual and reverence to the practice..

Reviews for "Exploring the unique powers of each rune in the grasping rune bag"

1. Jacob - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with the "Grasping rune bag". The bag itself feels very cheap and poorly made, and the runes inside are not of good quality either. The bag started falling apart after just a few uses and the runes started chipping and cracking. I would not recommend this product to anyone looking for a durable and reliable rune bag.
2. Emily - 1 star - The "Grasping rune bag" was a complete waste of money. The bag came with a strong plastic smell that wouldn't go away, even after airing it out for days. The runes inside were also very flimsy and felt like they would break with minimal use. Additionally, the bag had a difficult time keeping all the runes inside, with some falling out through the loose stitching. Overall, I was extremely dissatisfied with this purchase.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - I bought the "Grasping rune bag" expecting a high-quality product, but I was sorely disappointed. The bag itself looks great, but the material is really thin and doesn't hold up well. The runes inside were also smaller than expected and lacked the intricate detailing shown in the product images. I ended up returning it because it just didn't meet my expectations in terms of both durability and aesthetics.
4. Michael - 2 stars - The "Grasping rune bag" turned out to be a letdown for me. The bag had a strange chemical smell that lingered even after multiple washes. The runes inside were also of poor quality, with some of them appearing faded and others having visible scratches. Considering the price of this product, I expected much better craftsmanship and material quality. I would not recommend purchasing this rune bag.

The role of the grasping rune bag in Norse mythology and folklore

Creating your own personalized grasping rune bag: A step-by-step guide