The water switch is a device that controls the flow of water in a plumbing system. It is typically used to turn the water supply on or off to specific fixtures or areas of a building. The switch can be manual, operated by hand, or automatic, activated by a sensor or remote control. The purpose of a water switch is to conserve water and prevent waste. By controlling the flow of water, it allows users to shut off the supply when it is not needed, such as during repairs or when a fixture is not in use. This helps to reduce water consumption and lowers utility costs.
First published on March 17, 2016 / 9:00 PM
Almost immediately, residents of Flint a majority-black city where 40 percent of people live in poverty started complaining about the quality of the water. An informational document from Michigan s Department of Environmental Quality MDEQ says the city addressed the problem by increasing chlorine levels in the water.
This helps to reduce water consumption and lowers utility costs. Water switches are commonly installed in bathrooms and kitchens, where they are used to control the flow of water to sinks, toilets, showers, and other fixtures. They are also found in commercial buildings, hotels, and public facilities, where they are used to regulate water usage and prevent vandalism.
Flint's water crisis started with the flip of a switch
FLINT, Mich. -- The Flint water crisis started with a flip of a switch -- quite literally.
The beginnings of the lead problem can be traced to shortly after April 25, 2014, when former Flint Mayor Dayne Walling flipped a switch -- moving the city's water supply from Detroit to its own system, where the main water source was the Flint River.
Water supply switch being flipped in April of 2014. CBS News
"Not a day or night goes by that this tragedy doesn't weigh on my mind," Michigan Governor Rick Snyder told members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Thursday.
Now, two years later, Snyder and EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy are both feeling the heat for the toxic lead poising that infiltrated not only Flint's water system, but possibly most importantly, the children living in the city.
"People realized that children were getting lead poisoned and potentially contracting these water-borne diseases because the law was not being followed," said Virginia Tech professor Marc Edwards, who uncovered that the water was creating a public health threat.
Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha first warned city officials in Flint to stop using the Flint River for water in September 2015. It wasn't until October 16, 2016, that the city officially switched back to using Detroit's water.
"Lead should never touch a child," said Dr. Hanna-Attisha, a pediatrician in Flint. "So if it's detected in a child, it's almost too late."
And the switch back may have been too late for some children, who had already been exposed to lead.
"You see the results at five years of age, when they need early intervention services and special education. You see the impact at 10-years, when they're having ADHD-like symptoms," Dr. Hanna-Attisha said. "And you'll see the impact when they're like 15-years-old, and they're having trouble with the criminal justice system."
First published on March 17, 2016 / 9:00 PM
© 2016 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
"What has become clear in recent weeks is that the staff believed they were handling the situation in accordance with the proper protocol for a water provider using a new source, but the federal Lead and Copper rule has a particular provision for communities over 50,000 people; that the system operator must continue treating with full corrosion control even as they test the water. "What the staff did would have been the proper protocol for a community under 50,000 people. None of the DEQ staff in this division had ever worked on a water source switch for a community over 50,000 people — it's uncommon for big communities to switch sources. "It's increasingly clear there was confusion here, but it also is increasingly that DEQ staff believed they were using the proper federal protocol here and they were not."
In addition to water conservation, water switches also contribute to the safety and maintenance of plumbing systems. By shutting off the water supply to a specific area, they allow for repairs or maintenance work to be carried out without interrupting the service to other areas of the building. This makes it easier and more efficient to address plumbing issues and prevent water damage. Some water switches are equipped with features such as timers or flow control valves, which allow users to set specific durations or limits for the water supply. This can be useful in situations where water usage needs to be closely monitored, such as in public restrooms or shared facilities. Overall, the water switch is an important component of plumbing systems that helps to conserve water, promote efficiency, and maintain the integrity of the plumbing infrastructure. Its use in both residential and commercial settings is crucial in managing water resources and preventing unnecessary waste..
Reviews for "The Role of Technology in Advancing the Water Switch"
1. Sarah - 1 star - I was extremely disappointed with "The water switch". The plot was confusing and lacking coherence. I couldn't connect with any of the characters, as their motivations and actions seemed unrealistic. Additionally, the writing style was convoluted and hard to follow. Overall, I found this book to be a complete letdown and I would not recommend it to anyone.
2. John - 2 stars - "The water switch" had an interesting concept, but it failed to deliver. The pacing was incredibly slow and I found myself struggling to stay engaged. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, which made it difficult to connect with the story. The ending was also unsatisfying and left many loose ends. Unfortunately, this book didn't live up to the hype for me.
3. Emily - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "The water switch", but it fell short for me. The characters were not well-developed and their actions often lacked justification. The world-building was also lacking, leaving me confused and disconnected from the story. The writing style was not engaging and I found myself skimming through paragraphs. Overall, this book was a disappointment and I wouldn't recommend it to others.