Magic sizing is a product that has been commonly used in laundry routines to make clothes look and feel better after they have been washed and dried. However, it seems that many people are finding it increasingly difficult to find and purchase this product in stores. One possible reason for the discontinuation of magic sizing could be a decrease in consumer demand. With the rise of modern fabrics and technologies in laundry detergents, people may be finding that they no longer need to use a separate product like magic sizing to achieve the desired results. Additionally, the increased availability and popularity of alternative products like fabric softeners and wrinkle releases may be contributing to the decline in demand for magic sizing. Another possibility is that the manufacturer of magic sizing has decided to discontinue the product due to production or business reasons.
Some of my friends don’t like listening to sad music because they relate to it too much. I’ve heard, “the song is different once you’ve been in a relationship.” I know they don’t mean anything by it, but I start to doubt my emotional capacity and insights, even though I don’t usually feel insecure about my lack of relationship experience. I start thinking that I don’t know what love is, so what could I possibly contribute to conversations about relationships? I know making handmade presents, brewing coffee for someone else, recommending a book that reminds you of someone, anticipating what someone wants to eat before they know what they want. It’s cliché to say “food is my love language,” but it is. To know what someone will enjoy means knowing them. To know what you crave means knowing yourself. Knowing does not always mean loving, but sometimes it does.
I think slowing down is the most wholesome form of care we can pursue in a world that never seems to slow down, granted that our circumstances allow us to do so without further stressing ourselves out. Russell Cobb s 2005 story about Carlton Pearson, Heretics, was adapted into a movie, Come Sunday , which we produced with Endgame Entertainment for Netflix.
Another possibility is that the manufacturer of magic sizing has decided to discontinue the product due to production or business reasons. It is not uncommon for companies to discontinue certain products if they are not performing well in the market or if they are not generating enough revenue. This could be the case with magic sizing, as the demand for these types of products may be declining overall.
Mathematics World Mourns Maryam Mirzakhani, Only Woman to Win Fields Medal
Maryam Mirzakhani, the first woman and first Iranian to win the Fields Medal, often described as the rough equivalent of a Nobel prize for mathematicians, died of metastatic breast cancer on July 14* at the age of 40. She had been a professor at Stanford University since 2008.
The loss feels personal to many women in mathematics. “My mailbox is full of messages from other women,” says Ingrid Daubechies, a math professor at Duke University. “Women mathematicians all over the world are e-mailing each other, trying to comfort each other. It is heartbreaking that we had to lose a gifted mathematician and wonderful role model so soon.”
Born in Tehran, Mirzakhani studied mathematics at Sharif University of Technology there before coming to the U.S. to get a PhD at Harvard University in 2004. As she told Quanta Magazine in 2014, she did not grow up wanting to become a mathematician. As a child, she loved to read and make up stories and thought she might be a writer. But despite some discouraging classes in middle school, she eventually discovered a passion for mathematics and proved brilliant at it.
Mirzakhani worked on a variety of problems related to hyperbolic geometry, which describes surfaces that are curved like a Pringles potato chip or the curly ends of a leaf of kale. Unlike chips or vegetables, however, these surfaces close up like donuts, usually with multiple holes. If that is hard to visualize, there’s good reason: The surfaces Mirzakhani studied were not bound by the constraints of the real world.
Mathematicians often understand these surfaces by studying curves that sit on them. Simple loops are a particularly important class of such curves. (In this context “simple” refers to a loop that does not intersect itself.) In her thesis Mirzakhani solved a problem that sounds straightforward but which is actually extremely difficult to answer: On a given hyperbolic surface, how many simple loops are there of less than a given length?
Her thesis advisor, Curtis McMullen, a mathematics professor at Harvard, recalls that a few weeks after finding a solution she came to him with a surprising announcement, she had used her work to find a new proof of the Witten conjecture, an important result in string theory.
More recently, she had, along with University of Chicago mathematician Alex Eskin and University of California, San Diego, mathematician Amir Mohammadi, written monumental papers culminating in a “magic wand” theorem, not about individual hyperbolic surfaces but about whole spaces of them. This work has applications to the classical physics problem of understanding the motion of a billiard ball as it bounces around a polygonal table.
When people talk about Mirzakhani’s work, they often use terms that seem dissonant: ambitious and humble; fearless and down-to-earth. Mirzakhani sometimes described herself as slow, but that should probably be taken with a grain of salt. She was an outstanding competitor in the International Mathematical Olympiad, earning a gold medal both years she competed for Iran’s national team, along with a perfect score the second year. Competitions such as the IMO tend to reward quick problem-solving, a skill that doesn’t always lead to a successful research career in a field that requires long-term planning and perseverance. “Maryam was one of the rare mathematicians who combined outstanding problem solving skills with the insight and curiosity of a mature scientist,” McMullen says.
Perhaps “deep” would be a better word than “slow.” She was not satisfied with gleaning just enough understanding to make an argument work. She wanted to understand everything at a deep level, to probe every nook and cranny of whatever mathematical wonderland she was exploring. “She would immerse herself in this world. Then, when she had thoroughly acquainted herself with it, she could start to address the challenges,” McMullen says. “I think that’s what she meant by being slow.” Where some mathematicians see a direct route to a proof and push toward it through any difficulties, Mirzakhani could often find ways to work around obstacles by looking at things differently.
This approach, along with her intellectual courage, meant she had a strong vision for future work in her area of math. Alex Wright, a mathematician at Stanford, had been working with Mirzakhani for several years at the time of her death. Their collaboration began when he was a graduate student and she invited him to speak in a seminar. “It was remarkable how much time she spent with me and how accessible I found her to work with,” he says. “I was amazed at how deeply she had thought about the area. What I realized was that she was okay with thinking about something for years without any certainty that it would be possible to figure it out,” Wright says. “Essentially, I’ve been working on her vision ever since that visit.”
Mirzakhani has already made an impact in her field, and it is sure to grow as her work is more fully digested by other researchers. “Her work opens new frontiers of research that are just starting to be explored,” McMullen says. “She approached new mathematics with fearless ambition.” She wanted to know what was next, where the field was going. Her incisive questions shaped the field as well, and will continue to shape it.
Mirzakhani was not the first outstanding woman mathematician, but she was the first, and so far only, to be recognized with the Fields, which, unlike the annual Nobel, is awarded only once every four years and only to mathematicians 40 years old or younger. Up to four mathematicians receive the prize in any award year. “It was bound to happen,” says Daubechies, who served as president of the International Mathematical Union, the organization that awards the Fields Medal, from 2011 to 2014. She was the first woman to lead the IMU. “There are excellent young women mathematicians. Many times they have been on the short, short list, but it had so far not happened. I was very, very happy that it happened on my watch.”
Just getting to the International Congress of Mathematicians in Seoul where the award was presented was a challenge for Mirzakhani. Although she kept it private at the time, she was in the midst of her first bout with cancer. “We were so happy that we managed to make it possible for her to come,” Daubechies says. Mirzakhani’s cancer eventually recurred, and despite aggressive treatment, it metastasized to her liver and bones, eventually killing her. She continued to work until shortly before her death, and her colleagues say she approached her illness both realistically and with hope.
Mirzakhani is survived by family members including her husband Jan Vondrák and their daughter Anahita.
*Stanford originally reported, incorrectly, that Mirzakhani died on June 15. They have corrected that date, and as a result, so have we.
Born in Tehran, Mirzakhani studied mathematics at Sharif University of Technology there before coming to the U.S. to get a PhD at Harvard University in 2004. As she told Quanta Magazine in 2014, she did not grow up wanting to become a mathematician. As a child, she loved to read and make up stories and thought she might be a writer. But despite some discouraging classes in middle school, she eventually discovered a passion for mathematics and proved brilliant at it.
Regardless of the reason for its discontinuation, it can be frustrating for those who rely on magic sizing for their laundry routine. It may require some experimentation with alternative products or methods to achieve the same desired effects. However, with the wide range of laundry products available on the market today, there are likely to be suitable alternatives that can be used to achieve similar results. In conclusion, the discontinuation of magic sizing may be due to a decline in consumer demand or business reasons. While it may be frustrating for those who relied on this product, there are likely to be other options available to achieve similar results in the laundry routine..
Reviews for "How Will the Removal of Magic Sizing Affect Laundry Routines?"
1. Jane - 1 star
I was extremely disappointed when I found out that Magic Sizing has been discontinued. I have been using this product for years and it was always my go-to for keeping my clothes wrinkle-free. I have tried other brands since, but none of them even come close to the results I got with Magic Sizing. I really hope they bring this product back soon because I don't know how I will manage without it.
2. Mike - 2 stars
I used to use Magic Sizing regularly, but I found it to be a bit too heavy and sticky for my liking. It would leave a residue on my clothes and make them feel stiff. I also noticed that it would sometimes cause my clothes to attract more lint and dust. I understand that not everyone had the same experience, but personally, I was not a fan of Magic Sizing and I have switched to using other products that suit my preferences better.
3. Sarah - 1 star
I cannot believe they discontinued Magic Sizing! This was the only product that actually worked for me. I have tried other brands, but none of them can compare to the effectiveness of Magic Sizing. It was so easy to use and it always made my clothes look clean and fresh. Now I have to go through the hassle of finding a new product that can match the results of Magic Sizing. I am extremely disappointed.
4. John - 2 stars
I used to use Magic Sizing on my dress shirts, but I found that it would sometimes cause the fabric to become stiff and uncomfortable. It also had a strong chemical smell that would linger on my clothes. I have since switched to using a different brand that is more gentle on the fabric and doesn't have an overpowering scent. I can understand why some people liked Magic Sizing, but it just didn't work well for me.