Is the Mac Magic Extension Mascara Safe for Swimwear?

The mac magic extension mascara is known for its ability to create long, voluminous lashes. Many people wonder if this mascara is truly unaffected by water, as its name suggests. To put it simply, the mac magic extension mascara is not completely waterproof but is water-resistant. This means that it can withstand light splashes of water or tears without smudging or running. However, if you were to fully immerse your face in water or swim with this mascara on, it is likely to smudge or come off. It is important to keep in mind that this mascara is not marketed as a waterproof product, so if you know you will be in a situation where water exposure is likely, you may want to consider using a different mascara or opting for a waterproof formula.

Executed August 19, 1692
John Proctor, age 60- vocally skeptical of accusers and proceedings, was arrested after coming to his wife Elizabeth's defense.
John Willard, age 35- deputy constable, accused after refusing to arrest those he believed to be innocent.

The child she was pregnant with, a son, would be named Ammi Ruhamah after a biblical phrase meaning our people have found mercy, because he had essentially saved his mother s life. For good reasons, Tolkien along with Lewis has been credited with reinventing the genre known as high fantasy, which is patterned after the Norse and Celtic myths that Tolkien, as one of the leading experts in Anglo-Saxon and Middle English literature at the time, was steeped in professionally.

It is important to keep in mind that this mascara is not marketed as a waterproof product, so if you know you will be in a situation where water exposure is likely, you may want to consider using a different mascara or opting for a waterproof formula. Overall, while the mac magic extension mascara is not fully unaffected by water, it does have some water-resistant properties that make it suitable for everyday wear..

The Lord of the Rings, the concept of 'white magic' and the thinking Christian

A little bit of background on the title before I get into my question. I have grown up in a conservative Reformed family where we have been very cautious in regards to magic in movies. [and other places too.] in fact, it was only a couple of years ago that we 'approved for the most part' Star Wars. Harry Potter I have never and don't want to read or watch---because of the presence of the occult, sorcery, and wizards --good or evil.

The real question I have is on the Lord of the Rings. I have never read the books, [aside from the Hobbit], or seen any of the movies. However, I have been told by many friends the plot, who the characters are, what they do, and how generally 'awesome' the movies are. Never really doubted what they said.

So, just the other night, we decided to start the first one. I guess I became confused because what I was told about the movie didn't seem to correspond with what I saw. I was never told about all the 'dark magic' in the movie; or the strange propensities of the ring, or the wraith-like figures that were chasing Frodo [neither dead or alive]--True: there was a great storyline, but. I guess I felt like I didn't hear the whole story about everything. I guess if I had heard what exactly the movies entailed [and I realize that they are probably a little more scary then the books--which may be perfectly fine], I probably would not have watched it. That's my conscience, and of course I'm not condemning someone's perfectly good Christian liberty. But could someone explain their reasoning for watching a movie like LOTR under "Christian Liberty" so I could learn more about your position?

Also: I have heard different things about Toliken making this to be Christian fiction[having Christian elements and whatnot] and also that it is not 'christian'. So, I guess you could call me confused.

Rufus

Puritan Board Junior

JML

Puritan Board Junior

I too always thought it strange that the same person could approve of the Lord of the Rings yet disapprove of Harry Potter. In my pre-reformed days I saw some of both movies and truthfully don't see much difference between them. Either magic and sorcery is wrong or it isn't. Clearly the Scriptures say that it is. Somehow though, some justify it in one set of movies and condemn it in the other.

Philip

Puritan Board Graduate

Tolkien is rolling over in his grave. He didn't intend for it to be allegory of any kind. He (unlike his good friend C.S. Lewis) did not like allegory, and instead thought in terms of the Christian themes that influenced and drove the work. He was a Roman Catholic and wrote The Lord of the Rings beginning in 1937. Much of the imagery he uses is influenced (directly or indirectly) by his experiences in the trenches of WWI and the world crisis that he saw unfolding. Calling him an occultist is another thing he would have taken great offense at, given that this was his critique of fellow Oxford fantasist and theologian, the Anglo-Catholic Charles Williams.

For good reasons, Tolkien (along with Lewis) has been credited with reinventing the genre known as "high fantasy," which is patterned after the Norse and Celtic myths that Tolkien, as one of the leading experts in Anglo-Saxon and Middle English literature at the time, was steeped in professionally.

The themes that he drew on, though, were directly influenced by his faith as a Catholic. For example, several of the characters in The Lord of the Rings take on a suffering servant role in different ways. In addition, if you read carefully the background material for Tolkien's mythos, one finds out that Wizards like Gandalf (for instance) are indeed akin to angelic messengers, sent to help the "Children of Eru," while beings such as Sauron are demonic and their works are always corrupt. In addition, Tolkien includes themes of depravity, redemption, and providence as parts of the mythology.

As for the subject of magic: Tolkien's work (read closely) is rather ambivalent about the subject. Elves, for instance, are given special gifts that they can use, as are dwarves, and there are mentions of enchantments, and of course the various angelic and demonic beings have their power under the jurisdiction of God (again, much of this is found in the apppendices or the posthumously-published Silmarillion). But whenever mortals attempt to use powers like this (such as the nine rings given to lords of men), it turns to evil. Power is this thing that, for Tolkien, always corrupts, and the desire for power, even to do good, always becomes evil.

So what is a Christian to do with this? Take it for what it is supposed to be: mythology. I am more bothered by the King Arthur legends (which I love, by the way) than by The Lord of the Rings. I'd say read the books and decide for yourself, but keep in mind that in Tolkien's mythos, "magic" is always power innate to the person and its moral value is reflective of the person, and in those cases where mortals attempt to take power, it is always presented as evil and unnatural.

There is a lot of darkness, but there is also light. Tolkien's vision in this work is that no matter how dark evil gets, good will be brought forth: evil brings about its own destruction and the result is good. Sauron never conquers forever; Gandalf returns from the dead; the King returns to his kingdom. The imagery of creation, fall, redemption, and consummation is deliberate on Tolkien's part. The imagery is dark because Tolkien lived in a dark time, because he isn't naive about the reality of evil---but he's also confident that in the darkest hour, when it looks like Satan has won, that that is when the great eucatastrophe takes place, and evil is defeated.

So would I say the books are Christian? No---books can't be Christians, only people can. Tolkien was, I think, a believer, and his work is permeated with Christian imagery and themes. I say this as someone who has read much of Tolkien's work as well as many of his letters, drafts, and scholarly achievements (he was a professor of Anglo-Saxon at Merton College, Oxford).

“Yea, & in our Land (in this, & some neighboring Places) how many, what Multitudes, of Witches & Wizards has the Devil instigated with utmost violence to attempt the overthrow of Religion?”
-Samuel Parris, sermon notes dated September 11, 1692

.

Reviews for "The Mac Magic Extension Mascara: The Ultimate Solution for Water-Related Mishaps."

- Emma - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with this mascara. The claim that it is unaffected by water is simply not true. I tried it on a rainy day and it smudged all over my eyelids within minutes. I also wore it to the gym and it completely ran down my face with just a little bit of sweat. The formula also didn't give me much length or volume, so overall, I was not impressed.

- Sarah - 2 stars - I had high hopes for this mascara, but it didn't live up to the hype. The waterproof claim is false as it easily smudged when my eyes started to water. The formula also clumped my lashes together, making them look spidery instead of long and separated. I also found it difficult to remove at the end of the day, even with a good makeup remover. I won't be repurchasing this product.

- Jessica - 1 star - This mascara was a complete waste of money for me. Not only did it smudge and run when I got caught in a light rain shower, but it also flaked off throughout the day, leaving black specks under my eyes. The applicator was also poorly designed, making it difficult to coat every lash evenly. I expected more from a high-end brand like MAC, but this mascara definitely did not deliver.

Hit the Beach with Confidence: The Water-Resistance of the Mac Magic Extension Mascara.