I am no witch scholastic. I am not the type of person who excels academically or has a natural knack for scholarly pursuits. I may not have a talent for learning or understanding complex concepts easily. However, this does not mean that I lack intelligence or potential. There are different ways in which individuals can excel and demonstrate their intelligence. For me, it may be in practical skills, creativity, or interpersonal interactions.
Exciting News! Cherry Magic Thailand Trailer Finally Released! Revealing Character Names and Additional Cast
A new trailer for the "boys' love" (BL) series features Thai actors Tay Tawan and New Thitipoom. The trailer was released on Wednesday (12/7) and confirms their character names and additional cast members.
In the 4-minute preview of the Thai version of "Cherry Magic! Thirty Years of Virginity Can Make You a Wizard?!", Tay Tawan portrays Karan, while New Thitipoom plays Achi.
Joining them are other actors who also participate in this drama, including Junior Panachai as Jinta, Mark Jiruntanin as Min, Jan Ployshompoo as Pai, and Sing Harit as Rock.
In "Cherry Magic," Achi, a 30-year-old virgin office worker, suddenly gains the ability to read the minds of people he touches.
Achi will discover that Karan, his co-worker, has feelings for him, and they will fall in love with each other.
"Cherry Magic" was originally developed as a TV series in Japan, with Eiji Akaso as Adachi and Keita Machida as Kurosawa, followed by a film in 2022.
After the release of this trailer, the hashtag #CherryMagicTH became one of the trending topics on Twitter with 168 thousand tweets at the time of writing this article.
Tay Tawan and New Thitipoom are part of the group known as the "holy trinity" of Thai boys' love series, alongside Off Jumpol and Gun Atthaphan for "Theory of Love," as well as Singto Prachaya and Krist Perawat for "Sotus" and "Sotus S."
For me, it may be in practical skills, creativity, or interpersonal interactions. I may have a talent for art, music, or problem-solving that may not be recognized or valued in a traditional educational setting. Being a witch scholastic implies being deeply knowledgeable and proficient in the academic domain.
It often brings to mind someone who easily grasps complex theories, excels in examinations, and consistently achieves high grades. While all these accomplishments are admirable, they don't define a person's worth or intelligence. Intelligence is a multifaceted trait, encompassing various abilities and skills. Some individuals may excel in intellectual pursuits, while others may excel in emotional intelligence, physical prowess, or creativity. It's essential to recognize and value these diverse talents and abilities rather than measuring intelligence solely based on academic performance. In a world that places immense focus on academic achievements, it is important to remember that intelligence comes in various forms. We should not judge or label individuals based on their academic performance alone. Instead, we should embrace and celebrate the unique skills and talents that each person possesses. Therefore, while I may not be a witch scholastic, I am someone who has different strengths and talents that contribute to the world in my own way. I may not be at the top of the class academically, but I am intelligent in my own right and have the ability to make a meaningful impact in various aspects of life..
Reviews for "Succeeding without Fitting the Scholarly Mold"
1. John - 2 stars - I am no quitch scholastic was a real disappointment for me. The plot seemed promising at first, but it quickly lost its momentum and became confusing. The characters were flat and lacked depth, making it difficult to connect with any of them. The writing style was also quite tedious, with long-winded descriptions that added nothing to the story. Overall, I found this book to be a struggle to finish and would not recommend it.
2. Sarah - 3 stars - While I didn't hate I am no quitch scholastic, I found it to be underwhelming. The pacing was slow, and there were multiple instances where the story became repetitive. The protagonist was unrelatable and lacked growth throughout the book. Additionally, the dialogue felt forced and unnatural. I appreciate the author's attempt to create a unique and intriguing world, but it fell short in execution. I believe there are better fantasy novels out there that deliver on the promises this book failed to fulfill.
3. Michael - 2 stars - I am no quitch scholastic was a confusing and convoluted read. The plot was scattered and lacked coherence, making it difficult to follow along. The world-building was also poorly developed, leaving me feeling lost and disconnected from the story. The characters were one-dimensional and lacked any real depth. The writing style was cumbersome, with excessive use of unnecessary adjectives. Overall, I found this book to be a frustrating and unsatisfying read. I would not recommend it to others.