Recently, a baseball card with a curse word on it has been causing quite a stir. The offensive language on the card has drawn the attention of collectors, fans, and the sports community at large. The baseball card in question features an image of a renowned player along with their personal statistics and other relevant information. However, what sets this particular card apart is the inclusion of a profanity at the bottom. The curse word, clearly visible to anyone who sees the card, has sparked controversy and debate among collectors and enthusiasts. Many collectors view baseball cards as valuable and rare items that should be cherished and respected.
Thirty years ago, it was a big deal, perhaps the biggest, for weeks and weeks and weeks. It was a furor that caused my mom to grab her 11-year-old in one hand and her pocketbook in another. It was on local news broadcasts and in national newspapers. Bill Ripken’s baseball card had a swear on it, and nothing was going to be the same.
This was just before I wandered away from baseball cards, never to return, and there s at least a tiny part of this whole ordeal that whispered, This stuff ain t for you, kid. While introducing his brother at the March of Dimes Man of the Year Award luncheon in New York, Ripken impressed Tony Petitti, who was in attendance and would go on to be the first president of the network.
Many collectors view baseball cards as valuable and rare items that should be cherished and respected. They argue that the profanity on this particular card diminishes its collectible value and tarnishes the reputation of the player featured on it. These collectors believe that such language has no place on a baseball card and that it sets a bad example for young fans.
Billy Ripken Obscenity Bat: He Finally Talks 20 Years Later
Had Billy Ripken not received a shipment of less than ideal Louisville Slugger R161 models that year.
Had Billy Ripken not decided to use one of those bats for batting practice that year. Had Billy Ripken not elected to mark that bat in a unique way that year.
Had the photographer, taking the picture for his Fleer baseball card, not asked him to pose for a shot in between batting practice with that bat.
Had the folks at Fleer caught what was written on the bat. it's extremely unlikely that we'd be talking about the 20th anniversary of any moment in the baseball career of Billy Ripken.
After all, the son of Cal Sr., once his manager, and the brother of Cal Jr., his teammate, was known more for his glove in a 12-year Major League Baseball career than for his bat. His batting average was .247 and he knocked in a total of 220 RBI.
But in January of 1989, Billy Ripken, scheduled to be a five cent common in the 1989 Fleer set, ignited the hobby already entering its prime with the debut of the very first Upper Deck set. Packs of Fleer hit hobby stores right after New Year's and, within two weeks, everyone had to have their hands on card No. 616, Billy Ripken.
Source: snopes.com Billy Ripken CardIt was the bat that he designated to use only in batting practice. It was the bat that had "F--K FACE" written on the knob, the obscenity in its full four-letter glory.
ESPN's Tim Kurkjian, then working for the Baltimore Sun, got to Ripken and Fleer first. Fleer's president Vincent Murray claimed that hadn't seen it before and that the company was doing all it could to correct the error immediately. Ripken told Kurkjian he was angry and disappointed.
"It appears I was targeted (by teammates)," Ripken told Kurkjian. "I know I'm kind of a jerk at times. I know I'm a little off. But this is going too far."
What ensued was absolute chaos and—as the "error" card's price rose to nearly $500—there were some amazing stories. A kid, who happened to be a fan of Ripken, had purchased a huge lot of No. 616's from a dealer for $50. When the curse was found, the new worth of the cards was closer to $20,000. There was the story of one kid who sued another kid for convincing him to sell his Billy Ripken for $1, without knowing the curse was on the bat. And the tale of the Geraldo show entitled "Men who write bad things in public places," when an audience member claimed it was he who wrote the obscenity on Ripken's bat.
For nearly 20 years, Billy Ripken hasn't told the whole story. That is, until he revealed to me how it all went down:
"I got a dozen bats in front of my locker during the 1988 season. I pulled the bats out, model R161, and noticed--because of the grain patterns--that they were too heavy. But I decided I'd use one of them, at the very least, for my batting practice bat."
"Now I had to write something on the bat. At Memorial Stadium, the bat room was not too close to the clubhouse, so I wanted to write something that I could find immediately if I looked up and it was 4:44 and I had to get out there on the field a minute later and not be late. There were five big grocery carts full of bats in there and if I wrote my number 3, it could be too confusing. So I wrote 'F--k' Face on it."
"After the season was over, in early January, I got a call from our PR guy Rick Vaughn. He said, 'Billy, we have a problem.' And he told me what was written on the bat and I couldn't believe it. I went to a store and saw the card and it all came back to me. We were in Fenway Park and I had just taken my first round of BP. I threw my bat to the third base side and strolled around the bases. When I was coming back, right before I got up to hit again, I remember a guy tapping me on the shoulder asking if he could take my picture. Never once did I think about it. I posed for the shot and he took it.
"I tried to deflect it as much as I could. It was fairly easy to say that somebody got me with a joke because people think you're the scum of the earth for doing something like this. The truth is that there's a lot of words like that that are thrown around in the clubhouse. They just don't get out there."
"I can't believe the people at Fleer couldn't catch that. I mean, they certainly have to have enough proofreaders to see it. I think not only did they see it, they enhanced it. That writing on that bat is way too clear. I don't write that neat. I think they knew that once they saw it, they could use the card to create an awful lot of stir."
"I have no idea where that bat is today. If I were to guess, I would say it probably got lost after someone used it in a game. Probably a guy like Brady Anderson because he choked up so he could use a heavier bat."
"Fleer sent me some of the cards out of the goodness of their heart. I autographed them and used them for my gifts to my groomsman in my wedding (which took place that offseason). I figured, at the time, it was better than giving them a set of cufflinks. I think I devalued the cards by signing them though."
"When people recognize me, I see the look on their face. They think of the card immediately and, before they even ask, I say, 'Yeah, it was me.' I don't know if it happens daily, but, to this day, it still happens a couple of times a week."
There were at least 12 different versions of the card in various states of blackout. First reports estimated that there were about 3,000 cards featuring the full obscenity, but it is believed that there were actually more than 100,000 of them that hit the market. A man named Donovan Ryan has maintained a web site called BillRipken.com, a site that talks just about the card and has been visited about 19,000 times.
Today, the Billy Ripken 1989 Fleer obscenity card sells for about $5. The 1989 Fleer card of his Hall of Fame brother still sells for less.
“I think part of what I had to go through in the minor leagues helped me get to the big leagues,” Ripken said. “I look back at 1986 in Charlotte, North Carolina, and think it was one of the best times I ever had.”
Conversely, there are those who argue that the inclusion of a curse word on the card adds an element of authenticity and uniqueness. They believe that baseball cards should reflect the real world and that the presence of profanity, though controversial, can be seen as an accurate representation of the player's personality or the competitive nature of the sport itself. The debate surrounding this baseball card raises questions about censorship, artistic expression, and the evolving norms within the sports community. Some argue that the card should be removed from circulation or altered to remove the offensive language. Others believe that removing or altering the card would be an infringement on artistic freedom and a disservice to the historical context in which it was produced. It is clear that this baseball card with a curse word has ignited a passionate discussion among collectors, fans, and sports enthusiasts. The controversy it has generated highlights the ongoing tension between tradition and modernity within the world of sports memorabilia. Time will tell how this particular issue is resolved and what impact it will have on future collectibles..
Reviews for "Vulgarity scandalizes collectors of rare baseball card"
1. Emily - 2/5 stars - I purchased the "Baseball card with curse word on bzt" as a gift for my nephew, thinking it would be a funny and unique addition to his baseball card collection. However, I was extremely disappointed when I received the product. The curse word on the card was so small and barely visible, making it difficult to even recognize what it was. Additionally, the quality of the card itself was subpar, with a flimsy feel and cheap print. Overall, I found this product to be a waste of money and would not recommend it.
2. John - 1/5 stars - I was really excited to add the "Baseball card with curse word on bzt" to my collection, but it turned out to be a huge disappointment. The curse word on the card was barely legible, and the overall design seemed poorly executed. Furthermore, the card felt cheap and low-quality, making it clear that it was not worth the price I paid. I would not recommend this product to any serious collector, as it definitely does not live up to its hype.
3. Sarah - 2/5 stars - I purchased the "Baseball card with curse word on bzt" with high hopes, but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The curse word on the card was barely noticeable, and I had to squint to even read it. Moreover, the card itself felt thin and flimsy, lacking the sturdy quality I usually expect from baseball cards. For the price I paid, I expected a much better product. I would not recommend this card to anyone looking for a unique or amusing addition to their collection.