In the realm of folklore and legends, witches have captivated the imaginations of people for centuries. Their portrayal has varied over time, leading to different perceptions and interpretations. The question of "which one is the witch" becomes intriguing when considering the different perspectives and factors involved. Throughout history, witches have been portrayed in different ways. In some tales, they are depicted as beautiful and mysterious, capable of casting spells and harnessing dark powers. These portrayals often highlight the external appearance of the witch, leading to the assumption that physical attributes can determine their identity.
Help Us Improve Grammar Monster
But what happened in Salem was also highly anomalous, says bestselling author and witch expert Katherine Howe, who edited and annotated the Penguin Book of Witches. While Howe says that most often witch accusations were a case of women policing the behavior of other women when they failed to fulfill gender norms, The Witch does provide a window into the fears and hardships which shaped Puritan life, with details pulled straight from the primary sources.
These portrayals often highlight the external appearance of the witch, leading to the assumption that physical attributes can determine their identity. However, this is a superficial approach that fails to capture the essence of a witch. The concept of witchcraft goes beyond appearances and physical attributes.
The Surprising True History Behind The Witch
T he new movie The Witch, in theaters Friday, draws on both reality and fairy tale to create the story of a Puritan family’s terrifying encounter with the title character. Filmmaker Robert Eggers spent years researching the period, from daily 17th-century life and the way people really spoke, to the true history of early American witch trials.
You may think you know about that last part: in Salem, Mass., in 1692, a group of young girls claimed they were bewitched, sparking a frenzy that eventually resulted in the hangings of 19 people.
But what happened in Salem was also “highly anomalous,” says bestselling author and witch expert Katherine Howe, who edited and annotated the Penguin Book of Witches. The extent and intensity of the incident in Salem have helped it remain famous, but Howe says that fame gives us a skewed view of the history of witches in the U.S.
A more typical witch trial “would usually be one woman, or occasionally two, often who’d had a bad reputation for quite some time,” Howe says. “It was actually kind of hard, believe it or not, to try somebody as a witch.” According to one calculation, the conviction rate—excepting Salem and confessions—was under one in five. And though Salem is noted for the youth of the accusers, Howe says that more often “accusers were women who were peers of, often longstanding acquaintances of or neighbors of, the woman being accused.” Suspected witches and their accusers were also more likely to be middle-aged. When children got involved, it was usually as the object of a witch’s interest.
One element that the prevailing wisdom does get right, however, is that most people believed to be witches at the time were women—though not because gender was part of the definition of a witch. Part of the reason, as historian Elizabeth Reis has written, was physical: Puritans believed that the Devil had an easier time gaining access to women’s physically weaker bodies. But, perhaps more importantly, there were social reasons for women to be more frequently accused. The stereotypes of the time held that women were predisposed to sin: they were seen as more sexual, more tempted by material goods and more in need of a guiding authority, “specifically in the form of the church or a father or husband,” Howe says.
It followed that those accused of witchcraft were those who failed to fit in with the strict Puritan expectations for women, for example by remaining childless at a time when most gave birth many times. “That’s something you see articulated in the film,” Howe adds: though the mother expresses anxiety that “her daughter is constantly at risk for moral imperfections,” that concern is “not an anxiety that is ever articulated about the son.”
There are other elements of real history that Howe says are reflected in the Witch, like the “real scarcity” of the period—when minor hardships attributed to witches, like food going bad, posed a real problem—and the threat perceived in the nearby wilderness. As Cotton Mather wrote in his 1693 book on the Salem witch trials, The Wonders of the Invisible World, “The New-Englanders are a People of God settled in those, which were once the Devil’s Territories.” This sharp divide between wilderness and civilization was especially important in the Puritan’s morally black-and-white universe, where, Howe says, “either you were Christian or you were devilish.”
While Howe says that most often witch accusations were a case of “women policing the behavior of other women” when they failed to fulfill gender norms, The Witch does provide a window into the fears and hardships which shaped Puritan life, with details pulled straight from the primary sources.
More Must-Reads From TIME- The Families of Israelis Held Hostage By Hamas Speak Out
- A Photographer Captures Grief in Gaza
- Jim Jordan’s Dilemma Is What Happens When Bullying Backfires
- One Year Later, Where's the Adderall?
- For Many, India's Coal Damage Is Done
- The Human Toll of Poland’s Strict Abortion Laws
- The 100 Best Mystery and Thriller Books of All Time
- Want Weekly Recs on What to Watch, Read, and More? Sign Up for Worth Your Time
Contact us at [email protected].
A more typical witch trial “would usually be one woman, or occasionally two, often who’d had a bad reputation for quite some time,” Howe says. “It was actually kind of hard, believe it or not, to try somebody as a witch.” According to one calculation, the conviction rate—excepting Salem and confessions—was under one in five. And though Salem is noted for the youth of the accusers, Howe says that more often “accusers were women who were peers of, often longstanding acquaintances of or neighbors of, the woman being accused.” Suspected witches and their accusers were also more likely to be middle-aged. When children got involved, it was usually as the object of a witch’s interest.
It is rooted in the knowledge and understanding of natural and supernatural forces. Witches are believed to possess a deep connection with the spiritual world, enabling them to access and manipulate these forces. Their abilities are not limited to physical manifestations but extend to their understanding of the unseen and their mastery of the metaphysical. With this understanding, it becomes apparent that identifying a witch solely based on appearance is flawed. The true essence of a witch lies in their knowledge, intuition, and connection to the supernatural. It is their understanding of the mystic that sets them apart, making it challenging to determine "which one is the witch" solely by external factors. Furthermore, the perception of witches has often been influenced by societal and cultural beliefs. In some cultures, witches are revered and respected as wise healers and herbalists. They are seen as individuals who possess deep wisdom and are sought out for their knowledge and guidance. In contrast, other cultures have demonized witches, associating them with evil and dark forces. This variation in cultural perception further complicates the question of identifying a witch. Depending on the cultural context, the characteristics and qualities attributed to witches can vary widely. The notion of "witch" is subjective and strongly influenced by the prevailing beliefs, values, and superstitions of a given society. In conclusion, the question of "which one is the witch" is a complex and multifaceted one. While physical appearances may play a role in some portrayals, the true essence of a witch lies in their understanding of the supernatural and their connection to the spiritual world. Moreover, the perception of witches varies across different cultures and societies. To truly determine a witch, one must look beyond surface-level attributes and consider their knowledge, intuition, and cultural context..
Reviews for "From Fairy Tales to Salem: Tracing the Origins of Witchcraft Myths"
- Jane Doe - 1 star - I was really disappointed with "Which one is the witch". The plot was confusing and hard to follow, and the characters were underdeveloped. It felt like a rushed and poorly executed story. I had high hopes for this book, but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. I wouldn't recommend it to others.
- John Smith - 2 stars - I found "Which one is the witch" to be a bit boring and unoriginal. The concept of a witch hiding among a group of people is not new, and this book didn't bring anything fresh or exciting to the table. The writing style was also lackluster, making it difficult for me to stay engaged. Overall, it was a forgettable read for me.
- Sarah Johnson - 2.5 stars - While "Which one is the witch" had an interesting premise, I felt like it lacked depth. The characters were one-dimensional, and their motivations were unclear. The story felt rushed, and the ending was wrapped up too quickly, leaving me with unanswered questions. It had potential, but it needed more development to truly capture my attention.