Tor and the Fight for Internet Freedom: An Inside Look

By admin

Tor, which stands for "The Onion Router," is a free and open-source software that allows users to browse the internet anonymously. It operates by routing internet traffic through a network of volunteer-operated servers called "nodes." Each node in the network only knows the IP address of the previous and next node, which ensures that the user's original IP address remains hidden. The Tor network is known for providing a high level of privacy and security for internet users. It prevents anyone, including internet service providers, government agencies, or websites, from identifying or tracking a user's online activity. This anonymity is achieved through the use of encryption and multiple layers of routing, likened to the layers of an onion, which makes it difficult to trace the origin of the data.


Ethnographer V. Vasilyev and a Yakut above-the-ground burial in Yenisey region, Siberia, 1905

As soon, however, as a member of the household dies In the new home, the dziadys ought to be celebrated; and If the family has moved into a house where the dziadys were previously observed, It is necessary for them to Inquire as to the way In which this was done, since any deviation from the usual ceremony, as In the serving of the dishes, may rouse the anger of the forefathers and bring misfortune. Wooden buildings the so-called continae in which the faithful Baltic Slavs used to assemble for amusement, to deliberate, or to cook food have been observed in the 20th century among the Votyaks, the Cheremis, and the Mordvins but especially among the Votyaks.

Slavic pagan death rites

This anonymity is achieved through the use of encryption and multiple layers of routing, likened to the layers of an onion, which makes it difficult to trace the origin of the data. Due to its strong privacy features, Tor has been widely used by individuals who value anonymity, such as journalists, activists, and whistleblowers. It has also become a tool for those living in countries where internet censorship and surveillance are prevalent, allowing them to access blocked websites and communicate freely.

Communal banquets and related practices

The custom of communal banquets has been preserved into modern times in Russia in the bratchina (from brat, “brother”), in the mol’ba (“entreaty” or “supplication”), and in the kanun (a short religious service); in the Serbian slava (“glorification”); and in the sobor (“assembly”) and kurban (“victim” or “prey”) of Bulgaria. Formerly, communal banquets were also held by the Poles and the Polabs (Elbe Slavs) of Hannover. In Russia the love feasts are dedicated to the memory of a deceased person or to the patron saint of the village and in Serbia to the protecting saint from whom the rod or pleme (“clan”) took its name. Scholars no longer have any doubts of the pre-Christian nature of these banquets. The Serbian slava is clearly dedicated to a saint held to be the founder of the clan. These saints are patrons or founders and are all men who have died. When the Serbs celebrate the slava of the prophet Elijah or of the archangel Michael, they do not set out the “dead man’s plate” (the koljivo, boiled wheat), because Elijah and Michael are not considered dead. In certain localities in Serbia, even the women given in marriage to another clan, the so-called odive, have to be present at the slava. They return with their children (according to the ancient matrilineal conception of the offspring), but not with their husbands, who belong to another clan and celebrate another slava. More akin to the ancient pagan feasts of the Baltic is the Serbian seoska slava, or “slava of the village,” in which the whole community participates and consumes in common the flesh of the victims prepared in the open air. Such feasts are votive. In Russia sometimes the animals (or their flesh) are first brought into the church and perfumed with incense. Even at the beginning of the 20th century, there were small villages in Russia where cattle were butchered only on the occasion of these festivities, three or four times a year. The Homily of Opatoviz (attributed to Herman, bishop of Prague) of the 10th–11th centuries emphatically condemns the love feasts as well as the veneration of statues and Slavic worship of the dead and veneration of saints as if they were gods. As in the Christian era the saints entered the line of ancestors, so perhaps in pagan antiquity ancient divinities (Perun, Svarog) were taken over as tribal progenitors. The Slavs did not record genealogies, and the founders of their clans were mainly legendary. The social unit sought to assure for itself the favour of powerful figures of the past, even of more than one, representing them in several forms on the same pillar or giving to their statues supernumerary bodily parts that would express their superhuman powers. A hollow bronze idol, probably ancient Russian, was found at Ryazan, Russia. The idol has four faces with a fifth face on its breast.

The eastern Finns and the Ugrians venerated their dead in the same way, similarly representing them as polycephalic (multiple-headed), and also held communal banquets in their honour. Wooden buildings (the so-called continae) in which the faithful Baltic Slavs used to assemble for amusement, to deliberate, or to cook food have been observed in the 20th century among the Votyaks, the Cheremis, and the Mordvins but especially among the Votyaks. Such wooden buildings also existed sparsely in Slavic territory in the 19th century, in Russia, in Ukraine, and in various locales among the South Slavs.

If it is supposed that, as among the Finns and the Ugrians, each clan venerated its own divine ancestor in a separate building, this would explain why many sacred enclosures would contain more than one contina—three at Carentia (the island of Garz at the mouth of the Oder River) and four at Szczecin.

The system of idolatry of the Baltic area was essentially manistic (pertaining to worship of ancestors). It is not irrelevant that until the 19th century there survived here and there throughout the Danubian-Balkan region the custom of reopening graves three, five, or seven years after interment, taking out the bones of the corpses, washing them, wrapping them in new linen, and reinterring them. Detailed descriptions of this procedure have come particularly from Macedonia and Slovenia. Among East and West Slavs only faint echoes of the custom of a second interment survive in folk songs. In the former guberniya (province) of Vladimir, east of Moscow, as late as 1914, when a grave was to be dug, a piece of cloth was taken along with which to wrap the bones of any earlier corpse that might be unearthed in the process of digging. Such corpses would then be reinterred with the newly deceased. In protohistoric times the tumuli (mounds) of the mortuaries of the Krivichi, a populous tribe of the East Slavs of the northwest, the so-called long kurgans (burial mounds), contained cinerary urns buried in the tumulus together and all at one time. Such a practice could occur only as the consequence of collective and simultaneous cremation. There must, therefore, have existed a periodic cremation season or date, as for the opening of the tombs in Macedonia and as has been verified elsewhere in comparing the South Asian areas of second interment, in preparation for which the corpses are temporarily exhumed. The cremations by the Krivichi are of exhumed bones. In the Volga region today the Mordvins still burn the disinterred bones of the dead in the flames of a “living fire” ignited by friction.

Considering the religious past of the Slavs, it is not surprising that manism was strong enough to epitomize and overwhelm all or practically all of their religious views. The seasonal festivals of the Slavs turn out to be almost entirely dedicated to the dead, very often without the participants realizing it, as in the case of the Koljada (Latin Kalendae)—the annual visit made by the spirits of the dead, under the disguise of beggars, to all the houses in the village. It is possible that the bones of the disinterred were kept for a long period inside the dwellings, as is still sometimes done in the Tyrol of Austria, and that the sacred corner—now occupied by the icon—was the place where they were kept.

The spirits of the departed are not only venerated but also feared, especially the spirits of those who were prematurely deprived of life and its joys. It is believed that such spirits are greedy for the good things thus lost and that they make attempts to return to life—to the peril of the living. They are the prematurely dead, the so-called unclean dead. Particularly feared are maidens who died before marriage and are believed to be addicted to the kidnapping of bridegrooms and babies. One annual festival in particular, the Semik (seventh Thursday after Easter) was dedicated to the expulsion of these spirits. They are called rusalki in Russia, vile or samovile in Serbo-Croatia and Bulgaria.

The dead person who does not decompose in the grave becomes a vampire, a word and concept of Slavic origin. To save the living from a vampire’s evil deeds, it is necessary to plant a stake in the grave so that it passes through the heart of the corpse or else to exhume the corpse and burn it. Since the classes of unclean dead are believed to have been constantly increasing (in Macedonia, for example, it is believed that all those born in the three months between Christmas and Lady Day are unclean), then all of the dead—once objects of veneration and piety—will at some point be in danger of rancor, fear, and eventual disregard. A Christian clergy that has lent its presence at the exhumation and destruction of vampires has thereby contributed unwittingly to the preservation of this last phase of Slavic paganism into modern times.

There are other rites associated with second interment of which the Slavs have forgotten the purpose, such as the cemetery pyres—fires lit on top of the tombs—or the assiduous watering of graves. In Polynesia and South America where second interment is practiced, these same acts have the purpose of fostering decomposition of the corpses in order to hasten exhumation.

Numerous other ritual acts are performed by the Slavs, for the most part related to this complex of beliefs. In 19th-century Russia, if a man encountered the procession of naked women who were plowing a furrow around the village at night in order to protect it from an epidemic, he was inevitably killed. It was a chthonic (underworld) being to which, in those same times, human sacrifices were offered in Russia (more rarely in Poland and Bulgaria), since the victims were often buried alive. In most cases they were either voluntary victims or chosen by lot from among the devotees. Since such acts were punished by the law of the state, the sacrifices were performed in secrecy and are difficult to document.

An above-the-ground burial found in a Russian forest
Tor black mavuc

However, Tor has also been associated with illegal activities and the dark web due to its anonymity features. The dark web refers to a part of the internet that is hidden and not indexed by traditional search engines. It operates within the Tor network, and while it is often associated with illegal marketplaces and activities, it is also a space where individuals can share information and communicate without fear of surveillance. It is important to note that while Tor provides anonymity, it does not guarantee complete security. Users should still take precautions to protect their personal information and use additional security measures such as encryption and strong passwords. Additionally, some websites may block or restrict access to Tor users, as they are unable to ascertain the true identity of the user. In conclusion, Tor is a powerful tool that allows users to browse the internet anonymously and securely. While it has been associated with both positive and negative use cases, it ultimately provides individuals with the freedom to access information and communicate without fear of surveillance or censorship..

Reviews for "The Darknet and Tor: Exploring the Underbelly of the Internet"

1. John - 1 star - I cannot believe I wasted my time reading "Tor black mavuc". The plot was confusing and poorly developed, with characters that were one-dimensional and uninteresting. The writing style was also lackluster, with grammatical errors and awkward sentence structure throughout. The author seemed to rely on shock value rather than actual storytelling, resulting in a book that was overly graphic and offensive. Overall, I would not recommend this book to anyone.
2. Emily - 2 stars - "Tor black mavuc" had an intriguing concept at the start, but it quickly fell flat. The pacing was incredibly slow, and it felt like nothing was happening for the majority of the book. The characters were also difficult to connect with, as their motivations and actions were inconsistent. Additionally, the writing style was overly descriptive and convoluted, making it hard to stay engaged in the story. I was disappointed with this novel and would not suggest it to others.
3. Sarah - 1 star - I found "Tor black mavuc" to be incredibly boring and unoriginal. The plot followed a predictable and cliché storyline, without any unique twists or surprises. The characters were stereotypes and lacked depth, making it difficult to care about their fates. The writing was also subpar, with awkward dialogue and excessive use of adjectives that distracted from the narrative. Overall, this book did not capture my interest and I would not recommend it to fellow readers.
4. Mark - 2 stars - I was disappointed with "Tor black mavuc" as it promised to be an exciting thriller, but it fell short. The plot was filled with holes and inconsistencies, and the ending was unsatisfying. The characters were also underdeveloped, with their motivations and actions lacking clarity. The writing style was decent, but it failed to make up for the weak storyline. I would recommend readers to skip this novel and opt for a more captivating thriller instead.
5. Jessica - 1 star - "Tor black mavuc" was a complete waste of time. The story was tedious and uninteresting, with no real substance or depth. The dialogue felt forced and unrealistic, and the book was filled with unnecessary and explicit scenes that added nothing to the overall plot. The pacing was slow, and I struggled to finish this book. I would strongly advise readers to avoid "Tor black mavuc" and find a more engaging read.

Tor and Government Surveillance: Are We Really Anonymous?

How Tor Works: Understanding the Inner Workings of the Onion Router