The witch online freed is a concept that refers to the idea of witches gaining freedom and power through the use of the internet and online platforms. In previous times, witches and magic have been oppressed and misunderstood, often leading to persecution and fear. However, with the rise and widespread use of the internet, many witches have found solace and empowerment in online communities and resources. The internet has allowed witches from all over the world to connect and share knowledge, experiences, and spells. Online platforms such as social media, forums, and websites have become a haven for witches to express themselves and practice their craft without fear of judgment or persecution. This freedom to connect with others who share similar beliefs and practices has been instrumental in helping witches validate and flourish in their identities.
Witches are women long believed to be evil by nature. They are able to cast spells, and often have black cats for pets and fly around on broomsticks. They are also associated with Halloween.
This is the personal blog of JACK HENSELEIT , author of middle-grade horror series The Witching Hours and junior fiction pirate series Cross Bones with illustrator Chris Kennett. On their way home from a fishing trip, the Scooby gang Scooby, Shaggy, Fred, Daphne and Velma stop to ask for directions, only to discover a strange zombie shambling along the roadside.
This freedom to connect with others who share similar beliefs and practices has been instrumental in helping witches validate and flourish in their identities. Moreover, the internet has provided witches with a vast array of resources to enhance their knowledge and skills. Online platforms offer a wealth of information, from historical texts and grimoires to instructional videos and blogs.
Tag: Hanna-Barbera
Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! is a really, really good cartoon. It’s funny and scary, with so many twists and turns in every episode that it can’t help but be entertaining. Over the course of the first season, the Scooby gang encountered ghosts, phantoms and evil robots – but it was in the thirteenth episode that Scooby and his friends met their very first witch.
On their way home from a fishing trip, the Scooby gang – Scooby, Shaggy, Fred, Daphne and Velma – stop to ask for directions, only to discover a strange zombie shambling along the roadside. They flee, but later stop in the township of Swamp’s End to ask about the creature. The owner of the general store, Zeke, tells them the local legend of the swamp witch, who brought the zombie to life with her voodoo magic. He recounts the time he and his brother Zeb first saw the witch, repeating her wicked spell:
“Smoke of darkness, demon of evil: take the form of the living, and come forth from the flame!”
And so the Scooby gang begin their search for clues, sniffing around a series of typically creepy locations. Zeb’s abandoned shack yields a pin-pricked voodoo doll; a boat ride into the swamp results in a sighting of the witch herself, flanked by her zombie henchman. When the gang sneak inside the witch’s house, the witch appears and casts a spell, causing Daphne to vanish; Velma and the boys track her to a decaying river boat, left rotting in the swamp.
What happens next? Well, I don’t want to spoil it for you. But I can only imagine how surprised you’ll be when you find out who the zombie and witch really are!
“Which Witch is Which?” first aired on December 6, 1969. It has all the classic ingredients for a great episode of Scooby-Doo: a Gothic setting, beautiful painted backdrops, a spooky local legend, meaningful clues, villainous jump-scares, and slightly naff animation. Perhaps the only disappointing feature is the design of the witch herself; the purple costume is adequate, but not as scary as most other early-season ghosts. (More suspects would also have been good.)
Because this is Scooby-Doo – original, no-nonsense, no-magic Scooby-Doo – the swamp witch doesn’t actually have any real powers. Daphne’s vanishing is carried out with smoke pellets and a trapdoor; the flying effect is achieved with a sheet and a balloon; the zombie is just a man in a mask. Some of the other details, however, are harder to explain. How much time went into the set-dressing for the witch’s house, given that it includes a self-portrait? Are those real skulls lining the path to the witch’s home? And who made the creepy warning signs that are spread throughout the swamp? I guess all hard-boiled criminals know that the devil is in the details.
There’s a lot to love about Scooby-Doo, but I’ve always loved those painted backdrops the most. I mainly like the haunted houses (not seen in this episode), but the decaying River Queen is also a wonderfully unique setting. In my own writing, I’m always sending my characters into stereotypically spooky scenarios, and I suspect that I developed the knack for this from watching old Scooby episodes. Looking at the end credits, I think Walt Peregoy is the man chiefly responsible for the delightfully creepy background art. Thanks Walt!
Final Musings
— Scooby-Doo has been running for a long time (from 1969 to the present day), but the only seasons I recommend are the original two runs of Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!, which aired in 1969 and 1970. Don’t be fooled by the alleged “third” season – it’s from 1978, by which time the animation had already lost a lot of its warmth. Some people like Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated, which aired from 2010-2013, but that incarnation includes a lot of real magic, which in my opinion breaks a cardinal rule of the show. The most recent version of the show – Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! – has an ultra-modern animation style which I don’t entirely appreciate, but I have to admit that it’s made me laugh a few times. It’s actually really funny.
— Despite my aforementioned cardinal rule, I also really like Scooby-Doo Meets the Boo Brothers, a direct-to-video movie from 1987. Yes, it has some real ghosts in it, and yes, it also includes Scrappy-Doo, but none of the “mystery” ghosts are real, and the treasure hunt theme is really well executed. The bicycle-riding civil war general is probably my favourite Scooby villain of all time.
— There’s a big new Scooby-Doo film planned for 2018, but it’s going to be 3D animated, and they’re calling it S.C.O.O.B., so I’m not terribly optimistic. A Hanna-Barbera Cinematic Universe sounds fascinating though, even if it does turn out to be a train wreck.
— Whilst writing this, I Googled Walt Peregoy. Apparently Walt also did the backgrounds for Disney’s Sleeping Beauty – amazing! Further thanks go to Ron Dias, Daniela Bielecka, Gary Niblett and Rolly Oliva, who are the other background artists listed in the season one credits.
— Ah, I just realised there’s a witch in episode three of season one. Darn. Well, it’s too late now; I’m not changing my introduction. This witch lives in a lighthouse, although she isn’t the main ghost. The episode is called “A Clue for Scooby-Doo.”
— There’s another witch in the ersatz “season three” of Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!, in the episode “To Switch a Witch.” The whole episode has a nice witchy theme – it’s set in Old Salem – but the design of the witch (below) does nothing for me whatsoever. But the mystery is okay, and the graveyard setting is adequate.
— I have three young cousins who love all incarnations of Scooby-Doo. When I babysit them, we watch the classics. The correct way to watch Scooby-Doo with children is to sit behind them and wait for the monster to appear; when it does, grab them suddenly and scream. (The show comes pre-edited with helpful jump scares.) Keep doing this until they either beg you to stop, or get smart and sit behind you instead.
— My favourite haunted house episodes are “Hassle in the Castle” (season one, episode two) and “Haunted House Hang-Up” (season two, episode five). The latter is particularly good for jump-scaring young cousins.
Seriously, I could talk about Scooby-Doo all day. But I’ll stop now. Sorry.
This is the personal blog of JACK HENSELEIT, author of middle-grade horror series The Witching Hours and junior fiction pirate series Cross Bones (with illustrator Chris Kennett). My new book Family Road Trip Games is available in Australia NOW!
— Ah, I just realised there’s a witch in episode three of season one. Darn. Well, it’s too late now; I’m not changing my introduction. This witch lives in a lighthouse, although she isn’t the main ghost. The episode is called “A Clue for Scooby-Doo.”
Witches can now easily access and learn from a wide range of practitioners, traditions, and magical practices that were previously inaccessible without travel or extensive research. This democratized access to information has allowed witches to expand their understanding of magic and explore different paths and techniques. In addition to knowledge and connection, the internet has given witches a platform to share their work and showcase their talents. Many witches now have online shops where they sell handmade magical items, herbal products, and spell kits. They can promote and advertise their services, such as tarot readings or spell casting, to a global audience. This online visibility has helped witches gain recognition and support, not only financially but also in terms of acceptance and respect for their craft. However, the concept of the witch online freed is not without its challenges. As with any online community, there are debates and disagreements within the witchcraft community regarding ethics, practices, and cultural appropriation. Some argue that the commercialization and commodification of witchcraft on the internet dilute its true essence and spiritual significance. Others express concerns about the accuracy and legitimacy of information shared online, as anyone can claim to be an expert or provide misleading guidance. Overall, the witch online freed is a testament to the power of the internet in liberating and empowering individuals who practice witchcraft. It has given witches a sense of community, access to knowledge, and a platform to express themselves and their craft. While there are challenges and complexities that come with this freedom, the internet continues to shape and redefine the practice of witchcraft in the modern age..
Reviews for "The Digital Grimoire: How Witches Are Creating and Sharing Spells Online"
1. John - 2/5
I was really looking forward to watching "The Witch Online Freed," but I was left disappointed. The plot was confusing and poorly executed. I had a hard time following the story and connecting with the characters. The acting felt forced and lacked depth. Overall, it was a letdown and not worth the hype.
2. Emily - 1/5
"The Witch Online Freed" was one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. The dialogue was cringe-worthy and unrealistic. The special effects looked cheap and unconvincing. The whole film felt like a disjointed mess with no clear direction. I honestly couldn't wait for it to be over. Don't waste your time on this one.
3. Mark - 2/5
I had high hopes for "The Witch Online Freed," but unfortunately, it fell short. The pacing was off, making the movie feel sluggish and dull. The scares were predictable, and the jumpscares felt forced. The story felt rushed and lacked depth. Overall, it was a forgettable horror film that failed to deliver on its promises.
4. Sarah - 2/5
"The Witch Online Freed" had an interesting premise, but it failed to live up to its potential. The acting was mediocre, and I couldn't connect with any of the characters. The plot felt convoluted and lacked coherence. The movie relied too heavily on jump scares, which became repetitive and lost their impact. It's a shame because it had the potential to be a great horror film, but it ultimately fell flat.
5. David - 3/5
"The Witch Online Freed" had its moments, but overall, it didn't live up to my expectations. The storyline was intriguing, but it lacked proper execution. The pacing was uneven, making it hard to stay engaged throughout the entire film. The acting was average, with some performances standing out more than others. It had some decent scares, but they were overshadowed by the flaws in the overall production.