Story Magic Dress Up dolls are a popular toy among children. These dolls come with various outfits and accessories that allow children to create their own stories and adventures. The dolls are made from high-quality materials and have intricate details, making them visually appealing to children. Each doll comes with a set of clothes and accessories that can be mixed and matched to create different looks. This encourages children to use their creativity and imagination as they dress up the dolls in different outfits. The Story Magic Dress Up dolls also come with a storybook that tells the tale of the characters.
The Salem witch trials stand as one of the infamous moments in colonial American history. More than 150 people -- primarily women -- from 24 communities were charged with witchcraft; 19 were hanged and others died in prison. In his introduction to this compact yet comprehensive volume, Richard Godbeer explores the beliefs, fears, and historical context that fueled the witch panic of 1692. The documents in this collection illuminate how the Puritans' worldview led them to seek a supernatural explanation for the problems vexing their community. Presented as case studies, the carefully chosen records from several specific trials offer a clear picture of the gender norms and social tensions that underlie the witchcraft accusations. The final documents cover recantations of confessions, the aftermath of the witch hunt, and statements of regret. A chronology of the witchcraft crisis, questions for consideration, and a selected bibliography round out the book's pedagogical support.
His first book, The Devil s Dominion Magic and Religion in Early New England 1992 won the American Historical Association Pacific Coast Branch Award for the Best First Book. Examination of Dorcas Hoar as recorded by Samuel Parris , May 2, 1692 ; Sarah Bibber against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr.
The Story Magic Dress Up dolls also come with a storybook that tells the tale of the characters. This adds another layer of storytelling and imagination, as children can act out the story with the dolls and create their own versions of the plot. The storybooks also provide inspiration for children to come up with their own stories and adventures for the dolls.
The Salem witch hunt : a brief history with documents
Introduction : explaining the Salem witch hunt. Putting Salem into a larger context ; Puritanism and the supernatural world ; Dangerous women ; Malevolent neighbors ; The witch panic of 1692 ; The afflicted girls ; Trying a witch ; The collapse of the trials - The documents. 1. Signs and assaults from the supernatural world. The arrival of a comet and the death of a star preacher ; Samuel Sewall finds reassurance in a rainbow ; The death of Cotton Mather's infant son ; Strange afflictions in the Goodwin household ; The horseshoe controversy in Newberry, Massachusetts ; Mary Rowlandson's account of the Indian attack on Lancaster ; Cotton Mather on the Quaker threat ; The Dominion of New England ; Cotton Mather on the recent history of New England --^
2. Beginnings. John Hale's account, 1702 ; Deodat Lawson's account, 1692 ; Samuel Parris on the outbreak of witchcraft accusations in Salem village, March 27, 1692 ; Samuel Parris's statement to his congregations about Mary Sibley's use of countermagic, March 27, 1692 --^
3. Witches on trial. Sarah Good. Arrest warrant for Sarah Good, February 29, 1692 ; Examination of Sarah Good (as recorded by Ezekiel Cheever), March 1, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Sarah Good, March 1, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against Sarah Good, March 1, 1692 ; William Allen, John Hughes, William Good, and Samuel Braybrook against Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba, March 5, 1692 ; Abigail Williams against Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba, May 23, 1692 ; Indictment against Sarah Good for afflicting Sarah Bibber, June 28, 1692 ; Sarah Bibber against Sarah Good, June 28, 1692 ; Sarah Gadge and Thomas Gadge against Sarah Good, June 28, 1692 ; Joseph Herrick Sr.^
and Mary Herrick against Sarah Good, June 28, 1692 ; Samuel Abbey and Mary Abbey against Sarah Good, June 29, 1692 ; Henry Herrick and Jonathan Batchelor against Sarah Good, June 29, 1692 ; Samuel Sibley against Sarah Good, June 29, 1692 ; Death warrant for Sarah Good, Rebecca Nurse, Susannah Martin, Elizabeth How, and Sarah Wilds (July 12, 1692) and officer's return (July 19, 1692) - Tituba. First examination of Tituba (as recorded by Jonathan Corwin), March 1, 1692 ; Second examination of Tituba (as recorded by Jonathan Corwin), March 2, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Tituba, March 1, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against Tituba, March 1, 1692 ; Indictment against Tituba for covenanting with the devil, May 9, 1693 - John Proctor.^
Elizabeth Booth against John Proctor, April 11, 1692 ; Abigail Williams against John Proctor, May 31, 1692 ; Physical examination of John Proctor and John Willard, June 2, 1692 ; Mary Warren against John Proctor, June 30, 1692 ; Petition of John Proctor, July 23, 1692 ; John DeRich against John Proctor and others, August 4, 1692 ; Samuel Sibley against John Proctor, August 5, 1692 ; Petition for John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor, August 5, 1692 ; Petition for John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor, August 5, 1692 - Bridget Bishop. Examination of Bridget Bishop (as recorded by Ezekiel Cheever), April 9, 1692 ; William Stacy against Bridget Bishop, May 30, 1692 ; Sarah Churchill and Mary Warren against Bridget Bishop and others, June 1, 1692 ; Physical examinations of Bridget Bishop and others, June 2, 1692 ; John Bly Sr.^
and Rebecca Bly against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; Richard Coman against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; John Louder against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; Samuel Shattuck and Sarah Shattuck against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; Susannah Sheldon against Bridget Bishop and others, June 3, 1692 - Dorcas Hoar. Examination of Dorcas Hoar (as recorded by Samuel Parris), May 2, 1692 ; Sarah Bibber against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Mary Walcott against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Mary Gage against Dorcas Hoar and others, September 6, 1692 ; John Hale against Dorcas Hoar, September 6, 1692 ; Joseph Morgan and Deborah Morgan against Dorcas Hoar, September 6, 1692 ; John Tuck against Dorcas Hoar, September 6, 1692 ; Petition of John Hale, Nicholas Noyes, Daniel Epes, and John Emerson Jr. September 21, 1692 - George Burroughs.^
Benjamin Hutchinson against George Burroughs and others, April 22, 1692 ; Examination of George Burroughs (as recorded by Samuel Parris), May 9, 1692 ; Elizar Keyser against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Mercy Lewis against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; John Putnam Sr. and Rebecca Putnam against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Mary Walcott against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Simon Willard and William Wormall against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Abigail Hobbs, Deliverance Hobbs, and Mary Warren against George Burroughs and others, June 1, 1692 ; Mary Webber against George Burroughs, August 2, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against George Burroughs, August 3, 1692 ; Physical examination of George Burroughs and George Jacobs Jr. August 4, 1692 ; Hannah Harris against George Burroughs, August 5, 1692 ; Sarah Wilson and Martha Tyler against George Burroughs, September 15, 1692
Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2014-07-22 14:08:48.413044 Bookplateleaf 0002 Boxid IA1138801 Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II Containerid S0022 Donor bostonpubliclibrary External-identifier urn:oclc:record:1035757900
urn:lcp:isbn_9780312484552:lcpdf:994b6c2d-9505-4912-ac1c-2919ba9f61d6
urn:lcp:isbn_9780312484552:epub:7a7d1efb-2b85-4441-988f-33b6369c2eaa Extramarc University of Michigan Foldoutcount 0 Identifier isbn_9780312484552 Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t1bk58x29 Invoice 1213 Isbn 9780312484552
0312484550 Lccn 2010933562 Ocr_converted abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.20 Ocr_module_version 0.0.17 Openlibrary_edition OL25886620M Openlibrary_work OL17312854W Page-progression lr Page_number_confidence 88.16 Pages 230 Ppi 500 Republisher_date 20160114013944 Republisher_operator [email protected];[email protected] Scandate 20160107034612 Scanner scribe8.shenzhen.archive.org Scanningcenter shenzhen Source removed
The dolls are designed to be easy to dress and undress, with Velcro or snap closures on the clothes. This allows children to change the outfits quickly and easily, encouraging them to experiment with different looks and styles. In addition to the dolls and their outfits, Story Magic Dress Up sets often include additional accessories such as shoes, hats, and purses. These accessories provide even more options for children to customize their dolls' looks and create unique characters. Overall, Story Magic Dress Up dolls are a wonderful toy that combines dress-up play with storytelling and imagination. They provide endless opportunities for children to create their own stories and engage in imaginative play. Whether playing alone or with friends, these dolls are sure to bring hours of fun and creativity to any child..
Reviews for "Omstco Dolls: The Ultimate Tool for Creating Magical Stories"
1. Sarah - 1 star - This app is a complete waste of time and money. The dress-up options are extremely limited, with only a handful of outfits to choose from. The graphics are also very outdated and not visually appealing. Additionally, there are too many ads that constantly interrupt the gameplay. Overall, I was very disappointed with this app and would not recommend it to anyone.
2. Jason - 2 stars - While the concept of the app is interesting, the execution falls flat. The controls are clunky and unresponsive, making it difficult to navigate through the different dress-up options. The app also lacks creativity, as the outfits all look similar and there isn't much variety. Furthermore, the app is filled with in-app purchases, which is frustrating. Overall, I was not impressed with this app and would not play it again.
3. Amanda - 1 star - This app is a huge letdown. The dress-up dolls lack diversity, with only a few options for different skin tones and body types. The outfits are also very limited and not fashionable at all. The user interface is confusing and not intuitive, making it difficult to figure out how to change the doll's appearance. Additionally, the app constantly freezes and crashes, making it nearly impossible to enjoy the gameplay. Save your time and money and find a better dress-up app.