Captain Crunch is the advertising mascot who has epaulettes on his outfit. Captain Crunch is a character that appears on boxes of Captain Crunch cereal, which is a brand of sweet breakfast cereal made by Quaker Oats Company. The character is depicted as a captain of a ship and wears a blue naval uniform with gold epaulettes on his shoulders. The epaulettes are decorative shoulder pieces that traditionally signify rank or status in military uniforms. The presence of epaulettes on Captain Crunch's outfit highlights his authority and leadership as the "captain" of the cereal brand. The use of a mascot like Captain Crunch is a common marketing technique used by companies to create a memorable and recognizable character associated with their product.
The Kingsman and Statesman agents altogether in their respective standard agency ensemble. [Image Credit: 20th Century Fox]
Even though I enjoyed the first film just as much for its plot as for its wardrobe choices, I would say that personally, I found this second film in the series to be less entertaining on both counts. As before, if you re looking for a review of the film in terms of watchability, we will briefly touch on that toward the end of the post, but our focus today is on the clothes themselves.
The use of a mascot like Captain Crunch is a common marketing technique used by companies to create a memorable and recognizable character associated with their product. By creating a relatable and likable mascot, companies hope to attract and engage consumers, ultimately leading to increased sales and brand loyalty. In the case of Captain Crunch, the use of a naval-themed character with epaulettes adds to the overall branding and storytelling of the cereal, presenting it as a fun and adventurous choice for breakfast.
“Manners Maketh Man” Men’s Style Review of “Kingsman: The Golden Circle”
When you buy something using the affiliate links on our site, we may earn a small commission.
The Kingsman films would seem at first glance to be right up the alley of a classic menswear enthusiast; black tie, sharp suits, and other menswear ensembles abound, and the cover for the Kingsman organization is even a tailoring shop on Savile Row. But what we’ll be examining today is whether 2017’s Kingsman: The Golden Circle (the second film in the series) truly adheres to the tenets of classic men’s style.
Table of Contents Expand Collapse- Styles of the Kingsman Agents
- Styles of the Villains
- Styles of the Statesman Agents
- Other Noteworthy Characters
- How Would We Characterize the Style of Kingsman: The Golden Circle?
- What About the Film’s Overall Watchability?
- Conclusion
- Outfit Rundown
This review is the second in a series analyzing the style of the ongoing Kingsman film franchise; we covered 2014’s Kingsman: The Secret Service in the first installment. As before, if you’re looking for a review of the film in terms of watchability, we will briefly touch on that toward the end of the post, but our focus today is on the clothes themselves.
.
Reviews for "Iconic Epaulettes: How One Brand's Mascot Became an Advertising Legend"
1. Jordan - 2 stars - While I appreciate the effort to create a unique advertising mascot, I found the presence of epaulettes on their outfit to be excessive and unnecessary. It feels like a contrived attempt at adding some sort of military aesthetic to the mascot, but it simply doesn't fit with the overall brand or message. It came across as forced and distracting, taking away from the actual product being advertised. I think a simpler and more relatable mascot design would have been more effective.
2. Samantha - 1 star - I cannot fathom the reasoning behind adding epaulettes to the outfit of an advertising mascot. It lacks any logical connection to the product or service being advertised and instead creates confusion. The presence of epaulettes may even give off an impression of authority or military affiliation, which is wildly irrelevant and potentially misleading. It feels like a design choice made solely for the sake of being different, without any consideration for the overall brand identity. It's a poor design decision that ultimately detracts from the effectiveness of the advertisement.