Marveling at the Vibrant Blooms of Orlando's Village Courtyards

Magic Village Yards is a luxurious resort located in Orlando, Florida. Situated just minutes away from the famous theme parks like Disney World, Universal Studios, and SeaWorld, it offers an ideal vacation for families and friends. The village-style resort boasts beautiful townhouses with modern amenities and elegant decor. Each spacious townhouse features multiple bedrooms, fully equipped kitchens, cozy living areas, and private patios. The contemporary design and comfortable furnishings create a warm and inviting atmosphere for guests. Magic Village Yards offers a range of amenities to enhance the stay of its guests.

If, however, you are a bit older and you remember the time that you had the choice between 4 MB and 8 MB and people were still able to do all their computer stuff, including internet, in a graphical environment, then you thoughts are more in the line of: what the fuck are these lazy and incompetent programmers doing these days? And this is coming from someone who earns a living as a developer.

Either MacOS uses RAM several times more effective than Linux, or Activity Monitor is showing incorrect numbers to make impression that Mac apps take less memory than apps on competing operating systems. Lowered stealth ability Most attachments increase the effective size of the Box, which also increases visibility - and stems and whips can be dead giveaways.

Magic Village Yards offers a range of amenities to enhance the stay of its guests. The resort has a clubhouse that houses a fitness center, a swimming pool, and a Jacuzzi. It also provides concierge services, 24-hour front desk assistance, and complimentary shuttle services to the nearby theme parks.

Magic flight launch box markdown

Yeah totally agree I found typora very standing out between all markdown editors because of that feature.

> The important feature worth mentioning is that it directly renders the Markdown, giving a WYSIWYG feel while still being backed by a plain-text (markdown)

Exactly. It has a little bit of an IA Writer feel except that you no longer need a preview window thanks to this feature.

http://www.inkcode.net/qute does it quite similar (on a paragraph basis instead on a word basis) and it's open-source

What I’d really love is a way to get the GitHub flavored markdown rendering engine in an offline local editor. Any that do this?

I decided to give it a try, and it's almost a 100MB to download. Due to being unsigned, Mac OSX blocked running this web app. Why isn't there a demo online that I can try in my web browser? Isn't this supposed to be a simple electron app?

Anyways, I went to the trouble of unblocking it. This involved going to OSX's settings dialog and finding the Security & Privacy window to unblock.

The text rendering is awful. It's blurry and smudged on my non-retina display due to not using subpixel smoothing. Here's a screenshot comparing Atom (top) to Mark Text (bottom): https://imgur.com/UEJbsl4

Highlighting and pasting text is totally unpredictable. Try pasting in 10 * characters and you'll see that it's almost impossible. How are you supposed to do this? Sometimes it replaces * with \*, sometimes not. And sometimes it replaces it with - ??

I tried to copy paste a few paragraphs of text a few times, and once it turned into this strange highlighted text that when I started a new paragraph, deleted all of my newlines. What's going on?

This editor does not seem ready yet.

> I went to the trouble of unblocking it. This involved going to OSX's settings dialog and finding the Security & Privacy window to unblock.

The "right" way to do this is right-click on the application, and choose "Open". This allows a one-time bypass on a per-application basis.

Interesting. I didn't know that using "Open" was any different than double clicking. Thanks for the tip.

I think the theory is that when the user right-click and select “open”, this is more of a conscious choice. Because of this extra effort, you get the option to go around the default security.

I find this to be a good trade off between running any unsigned binary and complete lockdown. It’s enough of a barrier to make you stop and think, but doesn’t take too much effort to get past.

Perhaps this has been fixed; running macOS 10.15.1, I didn’t have to do anything special to run it—just double clicked.

• The premise of the app is that you type or paste in Markdown syntax, and see the corresponding rendered output in the editor (except when the cursor is inside that area). As asterisks have a special meaning in Markdown, you should expect to see bold text (rather than the asterisks) when you type or paste something like asterisk-asterisk-foo-asterisk-asterisk.

• The intended meaning of ten asterisks in a row is hard to predict from the Markdown syntax definition. Their rendering as two bold asterisks seems to be not what the majority of Markdown converters do, but according to Babelmark it is consistent with a few, including the original Markdown.pl: https://johnmacfarlane.net/babelmark2/?text=Asterisks+on+the. (Of course, it is best to avoid any such edge cases where Markdown converters differ; CommonMark notwithstanding.)

If you're unhappy about your OS preventing you from running applications that you want to run, you might want to consider switching to another OS.

Similarly if you’re unhappy that a developer hasn’t signed their releases so you can be sure it hasn’t been tampered with, you might want to consider switching to another app.

Phrasing isn't flattering to an open source app given away for free, with no tracking.

However, you are right on the usability. It's worthwhile to file a bug to sign the app, and if possible, fund the certificate

I would prefer if I didn't have to do that. Somehow other apps don't, and this was the first time I had to unblock something.

I'm sure once the project have enough regular sponsors to pay the annual $100 fee for notarization by Apple they will gladly do it. Until then enjoy foss and support if you want/can.

For instance https://qgis.org just started notarizing for MacOS Catalina, but it's easier with the huge userbase & sponsors.

Can anything running on Electron be classified as simple? Just saying. (yes, I am that guy in this case)

I like the idea behind it though.

I think that this argument is, frankly, over. Electron is the way to build cross-platform apps that don't merit separate UI code for each platform.

Electron wins because Electron apps are able to deliver consistently decent UX, something that never happened with Swing or GTK+ or WxWidgets or whatever.

Sure, it eats RAM. It turns out that I care about that so much less than I thought I would. I'm rarely using 100% of my system's RAM these days, so I'm willing to burn a couple hundred MB on widgets continuing to be sensibly drawn and laid out when I resize the window.

It sure is nice having a powerful developer machine with 16 or 32 gb of RAM. Just remember there are a lot of people out there running on 4gb laptops or even less. These days, the OS, web browser, and Slack alone are already enough to max it out and start swapping.

If you want to keep your RAM usage light, go ahead and use vim. Other people choosing to use different apps is consuming their computer's memory, not yours.

I'm also not sure you can just assume that an Electron app will be a giant memory hog compared to the alternatives. I just decided to go and give it a quick look-see. Right now I've got both vscode and IntelliJ IDEA open at the same time. (For my purposes, they're at feature parity, except that I don't like vscode's Java plugin). IntelliJ, a non-Electron cross-platform app, is consuming 3 GB of RAM. vscode, an Electron app, is using 50MB. That's 1/60 as much. Meld, a GTK+ app that doesn't do nearly as much, consumes 100MB just sitting idle, which is twice as much as the Electron app does.

I'll come out and say it: I suspect that, deep down, this argument is not really about memory or anything like that. It's really a proxy war about JavaScript. Which, I get it, I hate JavaScript too. I resolutely avoid working on things with UIs at work, probably to the detriment of my career, just to avoid programming in JavaScript. But I've also got to concede that Electron has accomplished something that everyone else has consistently failed at: Delivering decent cross-platform GUI applications. And it's pointless to complain about people using X technology when it has no truly viable alternatives.

Qt, Gtk+, WxWidgets. There are lots of ways to skin this cat.

Then write an alternative using different technologies. Those writing electron apps now are not obliged to do this for you.

It does not make sense if 4 Gb mean that you can only run a browser and Notepad.

If, however, you are a bit older and you remember the time that you had the choice between 4 MB and 8 MB and people were still able to do all their computer stuff, including internet, in a graphical environment, then you thoughts are more in the line of: what the fuck are these lazy and incompetent programmers doing these days? And this is coming from someone who earns a living as a developer.

There were a lot of hours spent and features unimplemented those days in want of RAM. Now we don't have to do that- we can do more, and we can do stuff way faster as developers.

If you spend a half hour over the entire life of your machine even considering RAM, you might as well double it for $30.

Using RAM is good. It's fast, it's cheap, and anybody with 8 gigs has it in abundance

May I ask what unimplemented features you're referring to? I think one of the biggest issues the older crowd has with Electron apps is not only that they eat up 500MBs of RAM, but also that they only have a tiny subset of the features contained in apps that ran fine with 500KBs.

Many (most?) consumer level machines have soldered RAM these days. They may or may not have an available expansion slot.

Older Intel chipsets don't support more than 4 Gb. New chipsets and motherboards also have a limitation, typically about 16 or 32 Gb. Doesn't it look artificial? What is the reason for it? Of course, to make sure that the consumer won't be able to use them for too long without paying for a new one.

Most current entry level AMD and Intel motherboards support 32 or 64 GB RAM (in fact, I couldn't find one that supported less). These are rarely over $100. Boards supporting 128GB of RAM start around $120-150.

Seems reasonable for 2019.

Thats not really what I was responding to - they were saying current chipsets and motherboards are artificially limited to 16/32GB, which isnt true. Of course there are are specific systems like laptops that are limited to less than that.

Also, in laptops you cannot upgrade the motherboard.

No? ~$100 is remarkably cheap for a new motherboard, especially if you are complaining about needing 32+GB of RAM, which costs substantially more than $40. If you want something like a $35 Raspberry pi, buy one and accept its limitations.

The Windows tablet/notebook (hybrid) being sold as their latest product by a company I'm doing business with at the moment has 4GB. It's a shame, because Electron would totally fit what their business runs on those tablets, which is a Javascript-based graphical environment.

Text editors don’t need all the widgets and controls. They basically need a context menu (and Electron’s menus are horrible as they provide none of the native OS accelerators and integrations), a open/save dialog (pretty please don’t use a custom UI here!), and maybe a menu/toolbar. The editor itself is custom code (whether html/css/js or native), and that’s where the performance benefits of native code shine best anyway.

That's right, now you just have to deal with open source OpenGL libraries or of course write it yourself.

Handle unicode, sub/superscripts, RTL text, typography nuances, LaTeX etc. by yourself.

Also do it in your free time because probably you won't make a living out of it.

So I totally understand why anyone would pick a browser engine where all of this is super easy to solve.

Of course, there's no middle ground between "using a whole browser engine" and "coding your UI in raw OpenGL".

Have you heard of, say, Qt?

It's just that when I hear a "simple markdown editor", I don't envision an app with a bundled web browser. I'm sure it looks great and all that.

When they say "simple markdown editor", they're pretty obviously not talking about implementation details. They're talking about it being easy to use.

As far as the argument goes, I'm not sure they're really separable. If you have an Electron app that markets itself as being simple (as in "easy to use"), and someone says, "No it isn't, because the stack it's built on is complex", their unstated major premise is that implementation details are more important than UI. Leaving it unstated doesn't mean it shouldn't be addressed head-on. One of a syllogism's legs can easily be both tacit and the crux of the argument at the same time.

I happen to have a Markdown file open in MacDown, a native application, right now. According to Activity Monitor, it's using 67.1 MB of RAM. I also downloaded Mark Text to take a look at it. So now I've got the same Markdown file open in that app, too. It's using 73.9 MB of RAM.

I will admit, that difference in memory consumption is equivalent to seven instances of vim, and I'll keep that in mind the next time I'm trying to get things done on a Raspberry Pi Zero. (As one does.)

But, on this 6-year-old computer, which does not have "over 8 or 16 GB of RAM", I'm still not sweating that 6.8 megabytes.

That is difficult to believe. I unpacked Linux version of the app, Electron binary is 120 Mb, resources.pak is 8 Mb, ICU library is 10 Mb. How can a whole Electron app take just 74 Mb? The numbers don't add up.

To test it myself, I started the program (with --no-sandbox because it requires root privileges otherwise) and measured memory usage using smem:

 $ sudo smem --userfilter=nobody -k --totals PID User Command Swap USS PSS RSS 23365 nobody /tmp/.mount_markteqQvqZF/ma 0 6.3M 14.2M 37.7M 23388 nobody /tmp/.mount_markteqQvqZF/ma 0 46.6M 59.4M 90.9M 23363 nobody ./marktext --no-sandbox 0 53.3M 76.3M 118.4M 23392 nobody /tmp/.mount_markteqQvqZF/ma 0 121.1M 142.3M 183.0M 

PSS (Potential Set Size) [1] numbers are additive unlike RSS, so we can sum them and get around 291 Mb of RAM. This counts pages, that are shared between several processes, only once.

Either MacOS uses RAM several times more effective than Linux, or Activity Monitor is showing incorrect numbers to make impression that Mac apps take less memory than apps on competing operating systems.

Wrapped web engine and the site does not an app make.

Can we focus on the actual product. I feel like this discussion comes up every time and it's not interesting.

And yes, Electron isn't simple. No one cares. The product itself is simple to use (presumably). When they said simple, they were not referring to implementation details.

I doubt you even need a desktop app for simple markdown editor. Just a browser tab is good enough https://markdown.site

I mean, in the long run, fossil fuel usage is going to make your family pretty miserable, so probably not.

I’m currently using Vnote https://github.com/tamlok/vnote/ after trying Typora and other Markdown editors. What I like about Vnote is it is based on Qt and has most of the functions from Typora plus Vim mode, a lot of keyboard shortcuts, good search capacity across different notebooks (which basically folders and sub folders containing markdown files), and some extensions like MathJax, Flowchart, Mermaid. Vnote (and Typora) supports defining folders for images or attachments (relative or absolute path). Even though it does not have a kind of webcliper extension for browser like Joplin, you can copy the content of a webpage and paste it directly into Vnote (also Typora), it can reformat the content as markdown and copy the associated images to the defined folder. I used Joplin before and still like it a lot but recently switched to Vnote and version-control the notes with git. For that, I can "sync" the content of my notebooks using git across different devices (for iOS, I use Working Copy as a git client and it can render the markdown notes with images). Vnote needs to store the structure of your notebook and other metadata such as tags in JSON files. You do need to have those JSON files otherwise Vnote will not display the tree of your notebooks. But basically you can use other editors to open Vnote notebooks because they are just folders and markdown files.

I am very happy to see the discussion about Mark Text on Hacker News. I am the author and main maintainer of Mark Text. I will seriously think about the suggestions for Mark Text which you comment here. I also welcome everyone to submit the issue and suggestion to Mark Text on GitHub https://github.com/marktext/marktext. Thank you everyone.

I appreciate Mark Text a lot, have been switching from Typora at the beginning of the year. I'm taking all my notes with it and find features like KaTeX and Mermaid very useful. Some remarks and questions from my side:

- How is the current status the Plugin system? It would be cool to try integrating features like Pandoc Citer from VSCode or LaTeX autocompletion, but I guess that would be too much for the core.

- Since you're already using pandoc, more available export formats or the option to define own exports via settings would be useful!

- Images are linked to their current path when added. I liked Typora's feature of automatically copying them into an asset folder a lot.

Overall, great work! I might learn Vue an Electron just for the sake of MarkText. Don't listen to the Electron critics - having a reusable rendering engine and the same features as in GitLab available locally is way better than saving some RAM.

I'm really interested by the sponsorship bits at the bottom; they're using both Open Collective and Patreon. It seems to me that one of the problems with going beyond the scratch-a-personal-itch level is how unsustainable it can be. I'd love to see that normalized, so that people who create a lot of value for others aren't economically penalized for choosing open source.

This website is completely unusable on mobile. It’s worse than a pre-smartphone site because it disabled zoom out so the content is just cut off.

I get that Electron is accepted as a way to do multi-OS apps. However, whenever possible, I find there are better OS specific apps. As I use Linux and Mac, I find the best app for each.

For example, on my work mac I use Ulysses, and sync to a cloud folder. Then on Linux, I use caret or typora with the same synced folder. Caret/typora aren't as nice as Ulysses (IMO), but as they all support markdown, all three are fully compatible. I'd rather not use an inferior app only because it's cross platform. Since the content is transferable between apps, and is synced outside the app, this seems like a pretty good compromise.

If I could buy a high quality markdown editor on Linux that rivaled Ulysses I would.

The "right" way to do this is right-click on the application, and choose "Open". This allows a one-time bypass on a per-application basis.

One unique aspect of Magic Village Yards is its partnership with KISSimmee Golf Club, allowing guests to indulge in their love for golf during their stay. The club offers an 18-hole championship golf course that provides a challenging and enjoyable experience for players of all skill levels. Magic Village Yards also offers a variety of dining options for its guests. The Villaggio Restaurant, located within the resort, serves a delectable menu of Italian cuisine in a stylish and elegant setting. Guests can enjoy authentic dishes prepared by experienced chefs using fresh and local ingredients. Beyond the amenities and services, Magic Village Yards provides a convenient location for exploring all that Orlando has to offer. With its close proximity to the theme parks, guests can easily access the world-famous attractions and entertainment options. From thrilling rides and shows to shopping and dining, there is something for everyone in Orlando. In conclusion, Magic Village Yards is a magical resort in Orlando, Florida that offers luxurious accommodations, convenient amenities, and easy access to the renowned theme parks of the city. It is a perfect choice for families and friends looking to create lasting memories and unforgettable experiences during their vacation..

Reviews for "Uncover the Hidden Gems of Orlando's Village Courtyards"

1. John Smith - 1 out of 5 stars - I was extremely disappointed with my stay at Magic Village Yards in Orlando, Florida. The resort was not as advertised. The rooms were outdated and not very clean. The staff was rude and unhelpful. The amenities were lacking and not as described. Overall, I would not recommend staying at this resort.

2. Mary Johnson - 2 out of 5 stars - My family and I had high expectations for our vacation at Magic Village Yards, but sadly, it did not meet them. The location of the resort was not convenient for attractions and shopping, as advertised. The rooms were small and cramped, and the furniture was worn out. The pool area was overcrowded and noisy, making it difficult to relax. The lack of on-site dining options was also a major inconvenience. We were left feeling underwhelmed by our stay.

3. David Brown - 1 out of 5 stars - I had a terrible experience at Magic Village Yards. The cleanliness of the resort was subpar, and we even found bugs in our room. The temperature control in the rooms was inconsistent, making it uncomfortable to sleep. The resort's Wi-Fi was slow and unreliable, making it difficult to stay connected. The customer service was poor, with long wait times and unhelpful staff. I will not be returning to this resort in the future.

4. Sarah Thompson - 2 out of 5 stars - I was not impressed with Magic Village Yards during my recent visit. The resort has a lackluster atmosphere and felt dated. The furniture and appliances in the rooms were worn out and in need of replacement. The housekeeping service was also inconsistent, leaving our room less than satisfactory. The noise levels from neighboring units were excessive, making it difficult to get a good night's sleep. I was disappointed overall with my stay at this resort.

The Enchanted Beauty of Orlando's Village Gardens