The Magic Touch: How to Choose the Right Kitty Litter Compound

Magic kitty litter compound is a revolutionary product that has taken the pet care industry by storm. It is a specially formulated compound designed to enhance the effectiveness of traditional kitty litter, providing a more efficient and convenient solution for pet owners. The magic kitty litter compound is made up of a combination of natural and synthetic materials that work together to absorb and neutralize odors, as well as control moisture. It is highly efficient at trapping and locking away unpleasant smells, making the litter box a more pleasant place for both cats and their human companions. One of the key advantages of the magic kitty litter compound is its high absorbency. It quickly absorbs liquid waste, such as urine, and forms clumps that are easy to scoop out.

In 1959, The Salem Auto Museum and Americana Shops opened in this building. Some readers may recall this interesting museum that housed a
number of vintage automobiles as well as a recreation of an old Salem street with 14 shops on the second floor. I recall spending time there in the late 1960s, examining the interesting collection of vintage cars. The owners, Arthur Jannell and Phil Budrose, had put a lot of work into their exhibits.

Changes to the colony s charter and leadership, skirmishes with French colonists and their Indigenous allies, a smallpox epidemic, and extreme weather heightened concerns. It was also heavily involved in the 300 year remembrance of the witch trials in 1992 as well as the dedication of the Salem Witch Trials Memorial by Elie Wiesel.

It quickly absorbs liquid waste, such as urine, and forms clumps that are easy to scoop out. This not only makes cleanup easier for pet owners, but it also helps to extend the life of the litter, making it last longer between changes. In addition to its absorbency, the magic kitty litter compound is also designed to minimize dust.

The Salem Witch Trials of 1692

The Salem witch trials are a defining example of intolerance and injustice in American history. The extraordinary series of events in 1692 led to the deaths of 25 innocent women, men and children. The crisis in Salem, Massachusetts took place partly because the community lived under an ominous cloud of suspicion. A remarkable set of conflicts and tensions converged, sparking fear and setting the stage for the most widespread and lethal outbreak of witchcraft accusations on this continent.

Centuries after this storied crisis, the personal tragedies and grievous wrongs of the Salem Witch Trials continue to provoke reflection, reckoning and a search for meaning. Today, the City of Salem attracts more than one million tourists per year, many of whom are seeking to learn more about these events. The Peabody Essex Museum (PEM) holds one of the world’s most important collections of objects and architecture related to the Salem Witch Trials. From 1980 to 2023, PEM’s Phillips Library was the temporary repository of the state’s Supreme Judicial Court collection of Witch Trial documents. These legal records, which were returned to the Judicial Archives following the expansion and modernization of the Massachusetts State Archives facility, are available to researchers around the world on our website here thanks to a comprehensive digitization project undertaken by the museum. Through exhibitions, research, publishing and public programming, PEM is committed to telling the story of the Salem Witch Trials in ways that honor the victims and amplify the teachings of wrongful persecution that remain relevant to today.

The Salem Witch Trials Walk

This self-guided audio tour takes you inside the galleries and outside the museum to learn more about the infamous events of 1692. PEM curators and experts share a behind-the-scenes perspective of some of the most compelling stories in Salem in this 1 hour tour. Included with admission.

History and Origins of the Salem Witch Trials

English colonial settlers arrived in 1626 at Naumkeag, a traditional Native American fishing site, to establish a Massachusetts Bay Colony outpost. Most were Puritans who sought to purify the Church of England from Roman Catholic religious practices and build a utopian society. The settlers renamed the place Salem, after Jerusalem, the “city of peace.”

Over successive decades, waves of colonists arrived, changing the power dynamics in governance, land ownership and religion. By the 1670s, tensions between rural Salem Village (now Danvers) and the prosperous Salem Town flared. Contentions multiplied when Salem Village formed its own church and appointed a controversial minister. Changes to the colony’s charter and leadership, skirmishes with French colonists and their Indigenous allies, a smallpox epidemic, and extreme weather heightened concerns.

In January 1692, young girls in Salem Village reported that unseen agents or forces afflicted them. The minister suspected witchcraft. In the 17th century, a witch was understood as a person who agreed to serve the devil in opposition to the Christian church. On February 29, four men and four girls traveled to Salem Town to make complaints against three women. The next day interrogations began.

Notable Figures of the Witch Trials: The Accused and the Accusers

Learn more about the individuals who were involved in the Salem witch trials, both the accused and the accusers.

Historical research reveals a picture of Bridget Bishop (1632–1692) as a witty and independent, though quarrelsome, resident of Salem. Widowed twice, she was married to sawyer Edward Bishop. Attorney General Thomas Newton decided to put Bishop on trial first, perhaps looking for a strong case to set the tone for subsequent hearings. Accused and acquitted of witchcraft 12 years earlier, she may have been an easy target by association. Multiple accusers claimed Bishop’s specter was responsible for damages and afflictions. Their testimonies were the result of longstanding suspicions or misattributed gossip about Sarah Bishop—a different person entirely. No witchcraft allegedly perpetrated by Bishop was ever proven by the required testimony of two witnesses. Instead, the court relied on the spectral evidence claimed by the accusers, the only ones who could “see” the invisible world of demons. Tragically, this injustice against Bishop set the pattern for the remainder of the trials.

What little is known about Tituba is through her involvement in the witch trials. Documents refer to her as “Indian,” but it is likely that she was from an Indigenous community in the Caribbean, Florida, or South America. Reverend Samuel Parris enslaved Tituba and brought her to Boston and then Salem Village when he returned north from Barbados in 1680. Betty Parris, Parris’s daughter, and her cousin Abigail Williams identified Tituba as the perpetrator of their January and February afflictions, the first accusations of 1692. Tituba’s testimonies on March 1–2 confirmed for locals that a witchcraft conspiracy existed. In addition to confessing — undoubtedly under pressure — she accused Sarah Osburn and Sarah Good and said there were seven more witches, quickly widening the scope of the crisis. The court left Tituba to languish in prison until May 1693 when a grand jury rejected the charges brought against her. Shortly after, an enslaver, whose name is not known, paid her jail debts and released her to their ownership. The remainder of her life is a mystery.

George Jacobs Sr. (1620–1692) was born in London and was living in the Salem colony by 1649. As a country farmer suffering from arthritis, he used two canes to walk. He did not attend church regularly and had a reputation for a violent temper and defiant spirit. These facts — along with his son’s friendship with the Porter family, enemies of the powerful Putnam family —made Jacobs an easy target for early accusers. His granddaughter Margaret, who confessed to the charge of witchcraft, accused him. Then Mercy Lewis, a servant of Thomas Putnam, testified that Jacobs “did torture me and beat me with a stick which he had in his hand . . . coming sometimes with two sticks in his hands to afflict me.” His son and wife also contributed. In August, the court sentenced him to death.

Rebecca Nurse (about 1621–1692), Mary Esty (born about 1634–1692), and Sarah Cloyce (about 1641–1703) were sisters from the Towne family of Topsfield, Massachusetts. All three women were married with large extended families. Elderly Rebecca, a respected member of the church, was nearly deaf, which may have prevented her from defending herself fully in court. Dozens petitioned the court on her behalf. At first, the jury returned a not guilty verdict, but the judges asked them to reconsider. In a dramatic reversal, Rebecca was found guilty, condemned, and hanged. Mary put before the court two of the most eloquent, heartfelt petitions of the entire episode. The documents called for fair trials, exposed the flaws of the existing court, and proposed methods of getting to the truth behind the accusations. But they did not help her avoid execution. It is unknown how Sarah escaped the fate of her sisters. After months in prison, she was cleared. Sarah, her husband, and many members of the extended Towne family were among the first English settlers of Framingham.

Giles and Martha Corey: Both faced accusations by multiple people. In March, Giles testified against Martha claiming that she bewitched him and his farm animals. In September, when Giles refused to participate in his own trial, the court ordered him to be pressed under stones in order to extract a plea. He remained silent and died under the weight in the only death by pressing in Massachusetts history. Martha and seven other victims were hanged days later.

The Putnams, a well-established Puritan family, owned much of the land in Salem Village and supported the Reverend Samuel Parris. They were deeply involved in the witchcraft hunt, accusing and testifying against many community and extended family members.

Jonathan Corwin (1640–1718) was a merchant and political figure who held various positions, including serving as magistrate during the 1692 pre-trial examinations. Corwin lived in the house now known as the Witch House on the corner of Essex and Summer streets. Corwin remained on the bench until October 1692 when the governor officially disbanded the court of oyer and terminer. We do not know much about how Corwin felt about the trials because he spoke little during the examinations and never made any public statements. He never apologized for his role in the trials. His brother-in-law magistrate John Hathorne served as magistrate and one of Corwin’s children was listed as afflicted in Tituba’s examination in March. His mother-in-law Margaret Thacher was accused of witchcraft, but the charges against her were ignored and no arrest warrant was issued.

Born in England, Samuel Sewall (1652–1730) and his family emigrated to Newbury, Massachusetts, in the 1660s. A Harvard graduate, Sewall initially trained to become a clergyman. He later pursued a career in business, politics, and public service after marrying the daughter of a wealthy Boston merchant. His wife’s first cousin was the Reverend Samuel Parris. He derived significant income from real estate holdings in New England. Sewall was one of nine judges appointed by Governor William Phips to serve on the court in Salem to “hear and determine” accusations of witchcraft. These judges were respected, educated, and affluent members of the community, but none had formal legal training. While fulfilling his role as judge, Sewall took part in proceedings that sent 19 innocent persons to their deaths. In the aftermath of the trials, Sewall’s troubled conscience led to a change of heart and, in January 1697, he made a public confession of guilt, remorse, and repentance for the part he played in the trials and apologized for his role in the proceedings. For the rest of his life, Sewall observed a day of fasting as evidence of ongoing contrition. Sewall continued his judicial career for many years culminating in 1718 with his appointment as Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Judicature. Sewall is also remembered for publishing the first anti-slavery tract in America in 1700.

Adult tickets are $13, Senior Citizen $11.50, and Children $10. Tickets are available at the door. You can buy Salem Witch Museum tickets online for same-day visitation here .

Dust can be an issue with traditional cat litter, as it can be harmful to both cats and humans when inhaled. The magic kitty litter compound is formulated to minimize dust production, making it a healthier and safer option for both pets and their owners. Furthermore, the magic kitty litter compound is typically infused with natural fragrances to mask any lingering odors. This ensures that the litter box area smells fresh and clean, even after multiple uses. Pet owners can choose from a variety of scents to suit their preferences, making the litter box area a more pleasant and inviting space. Overall, the magic kitty litter compound is a game-changer in the pet care industry. Its innovative formula offers a superior solution for maintaining a clean and odor-free litter box, improving the lives of both cats and their owners. With its high absorbency, low dust, and pleasant fragrances, it offers a convenient and effective option for pet owners to ensure the health and well-being of their furry friends..

Reviews for "A Cleaner, Happier Home: The Magic of Kitty Litter Compounds"

1. John - 1/5 stars - I was very disappointed with the magic kitty litter compound. It did not live up to its claims at all. It was supposed to absorb odors and clumps, but it didn't work effectively on either account. The litter was messy and didn't mask the smell of my cat's waste. I ended up having to clean my cat's litter box more frequently than before. I would not recommend this product to other cat owners.

2. Sarah - 2/5 stars - I was excited to try the magic kitty litter compound, but unfortunately, it didn't meet my expectations. While it did clump the waste, it wasn't as easy to clean as advertised. The clumps were often too delicate and broke apart when scooping, creating a bigger mess. Additionally, the litter didn't control odors very well, leaving an unpleasant smell in my home. I'll be switching back to my previous litter brand.

3. Emily - 2/5 stars - I bought the magic kitty litter compound hoping for an innovative solution to my litter box woes, but I was left disappointed. The litter did clump moderately well, but it was extremely dusty. Whenever my cat used the litter box, a cloud of dust would fill the air, and it was not only unpleasant but also a concern for my respiratory health. The dust would settle on nearby surfaces, requiring constant cleaning. The effectiveness of clumping was not enough to justify the inconvenience and health risks of the excessive dust.

The Scoop on Magic Kitty Litter Compounds