The Himalayan Magic Mandala is a sacred and mystical symbol that holds great significance in the Himalayan region. Mandala, which means "circle" in Sanskrit, is a representation of the universe and serves as a tool for meditation and spiritual growth. The Himalayas, known as the "abode of the gods," is a mountain range in South Asia that stretches across several countries, including India, Nepal, Bhutan, and Tibet. It is believed to be the dwelling place of gods, enlightened beings, and various mythical creatures. The Himalayan Magic Mandala is intricately designed with geometric patterns and symbols that have deep spiritual meanings. It is often created using colored sand, as it is a temporary form of the mandala, representing impermanence and the transient nature of life.
But he actually did one better: like a magic 8-ball, he issues pronouncements that we can feel free to apply anytime, anywhere, to any situation, regardless of what Jesus might or might not really think about the issue.
I used to think that people who reasoned this way just weren t that smart but this kind of reasoning is so common that there must be something else going on since there can t possibly be that many less-than-smart people in the world. Jesus never said anything about gay marriage but he did talk about loving one s enemies and the Bible says, God is love, so you have no foundation for denying them the right to marry except that you re narrow-minded and bigoted.
It is often created using colored sand, as it is a temporary form of the mandala, representing impermanence and the transient nature of life. The process of creating a Himalayan Magic Mandala is a highly ritualistic and meditative practice. It requires immense concentration, patience, and attention to detail.
Jezus magic 8 ball
One of my Facebook friends posted a news article about the Westboro Baptist Church protesting Billy Graham. Someone (one of my friend’s friends) made the following comment:
Jesus never opened his mouth on controversial topics like abortion or gay marriage. They start from a fallacious premise that silence equals acceptance.
This comment points out what I’ve been saying for years (and something that anyone really ought to be able to recognize as bad logic). The problem is this: They argue that because Jesus (or Moses, or Paul) didn’t talk about something or talk about something very much, such silence equals tacit approval.
The biggest problem with this logic is that it is nothing more than an argument from silence, arguments which are notoriously weak. In the case of the two examples cited above, it is not unreasonable to suppose that Jesus would have been silent on these matters. Abortion was known in the Roman Empire (it was illegal but rarely prosecuted unless the husband did not know or had objected to it; it also carried little shame with it) but it was forbidden among the Jews because the Mosaic Law forbade it (though not as murder). Gay marriage is a phenomenon unknown until the 21 st century so expecting Jesus and Paul to issue prohibitions against it would be like expecting them to talk about TV or pirating digital media. There was no such thing as “healthcare” as we know it in the first century so expecting a statement from the NT on this is also anachronistic.
I realize that the Bible may very well speak in principle to these and other issues. But arguing from principle is not the same as being able to say, “The Bible says _____ about ______.”
I note here that Christians (especially what have been termed “progressive Christians”) combine such arguments from silence with positive statements in Scripture that seem, to them at least, to solidify their arguments.
Jesus never said anything about gay marriage but he did talk about loving one’s enemies and the Bible says, “God is love, so you have no foundation for denying them the right to marry except that you’re narrow-minded and bigoted.
See what happened there? It started with an argument from silence and then shifted to two truths that have little (if anything) to do with the issue at hand. “God is love” must mean that we simply approve any behavior that someone claims to be innate and therefore not responsible for. (Funny how they don’t apply this argument across the board. Equally funny how the command to love one’s enemies doesn’t apply to those who are “narrow-minded and bigoted.”)
I used to think that people who reasoned this way just weren’t that smart but this kind of reasoning is so common that there must be something else going on since there can’t possibly be that many less-than-smart people in the world.
Apparently first-century Jesus should have been so concerned about the issue that concerns me today in the 21 st century that he should have spoken to crowds that had no inkling that one day gay marriage would be an issue in a country on the other side of the world and thus spoken on it definitively, leaving no room for wondering whether he was for it or against it.
But he actually did one better: like a magic 8-ball, he issues pronouncements that we can feel free to apply anytime, anywhere, to any situation, regardless of what Jesus might or might not really think about the issue.
Not finding what you're looking for?
Save jesus magic 8 ball to get e-mail alerts and updates on your eBay Feed.
The creation starts with a visualized blueprint and is then carefully drawn on a flat surface. The sand is meticulously poured through a funnel-like tool called a chak-pur, which allows the artist to control the flow. The creation of the mandala involves the use of various symbolic elements. The center of the mandala, known as the "bindu," represents the unity of all things and is often depicted as a powerful deity or a sacred symbol. The outer circles and patterns symbolize the interconnectedness of all beings and the eternal cycle of life and death. Once the mandala is completed, it is considered a sacred offering to the gods and is often used in rituals and ceremonies. However, the true essence of the mandala lies not in its physical form but in its impermanence. Traditionally, the mandala is destroyed shortly after its completion, symbolizing the impermanence of all things and the importance of letting go. The Himalayan Magic Mandala holds deep spiritual and transformative power. It is believed that by meditating on the mandala, one can attain inner peace, clarity, and a deeper understanding of oneself and the universe. The mandala serves as a visual representation of a spiritual journey, guiding individuals towards self-discovery, enlightenment, and transcendence. The Himalayan Magic Mandala is not merely a work of art but a spiritual tool that carries immense energy and symbolism. It is a powerful reminder of the interconnectedness and impermanence of all things, serving as a gateway to a higher state of consciousness. Through the practice of creating and meditating on the mandala, one can tap into the mystical energy of the Himalayas and unlock the secrets of the universe..
Reviews for "Connecting with Higher Consciousness through the Himalayan Magic Mandala"
1. John - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "Himalayan Magic Mandala". The story was confusing and the characters were underdeveloped. The whole concept of a magical mandala in the Himalayas had so much potential, but it fell flat. The writing style also felt clumsy and forced, making it hard to connect with the story. Overall, it was a lackluster experience.
2. Emily - 1 star - I couldn't even finish "Himalayan Magic Mandala". The plot was all over the place, and the pacing was incredibly slow. The author seemed to focus more on describing the scenery rather than developing a coherent story. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, making it hard to engage with the characters. I found myself constantly skipping pages, hoping it would get better, but it never did. Definitely not for me.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - "Himalayan Magic Mandala" had such an interesting premise, but it was poorly executed. The writing was convoluted and lacked clarity. The protagonist felt one-dimensional, and their motivations were unclear. The story lacked a clear direction and failed to keep my interest. The book also seemed to drag on unnecessarily, with unnecessary details and subplots that added little to the overall narrative. It's a shame because I really wanted to enjoy this book, but it didn't deliver.
4. Michael - 2 stars - I found "Himalayan Magic Mandala" to be a confusing and disjointed read. The storyline jumped around too much, making it hard to follow. The characters were poorly developed, and I couldn't connect with any of them. The narrative lacked coherence, and the ending felt rushed and unsatisfying. Overall, I was left feeling disappointed and unfulfilled by this book.