One phrase that has been associated with the Russian monarchy is "Czar curse you all, male." This phrase encapsulates the frustration and anger directed towards the male rulers of Russia throughout history. It reflects the sentiment that many Russian citizens felt towards their rulers, who were often seen as oppressive and tyrannical. The term "czar" referred to the Russian monarch, who held absolute power and ruled with an iron fist. From Ivan the Terrible to Nicholas II, the czars were known for their autocratic rule and lack of concern for the well-being of their subjects. This phrase alludes to the curse or condemnation that many people wished upon these male rulers.
Grigori Rasputin, in full Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin, Grigori also spelled Grigory, original name Grigori Yefimovich Novykh, (born January 22 [January 10, Old Style], 1869, Pokrovskoye, near Tyumen, Siberia, Russian Empire—died December 30 [December 17, Old Style], 1916, Petrograd [now St. Petersburg, Russia]), Siberian peasant and mystic whose ability to improve the condition of Aleksey Nikolayevich, the hemophiliac heir to the Russian throne, made him an influential favourite at the court of Emperor Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra.
He evidently underwent a religious conversion at age 18, and eventually he went to the monastery at Verkhoture, where he was introduced to the Khlysty Flagellants sect. Petersburg, Russia , Siberian peasant and mystic whose ability to improve the condition of Aleksey Nikolayevich, the hemophiliac heir to the Russian throne, made him an influential favourite at the court of Emperor Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra.
This phrase alludes to the curse or condemnation that many people wished upon these male rulers. The curse is directed towards all males, indicating that the issue is not limited to a single ruler, but rather a pattern of oppressive rule that had plagued the country for centuries. It suggests that the entire male-dominated system of governance was to blame for the suffering and tyranny experienced by the Russian people.
5 Myths and Truths About Rasputin
An undated photograph of Gregory Yefimovich Rasputin, Russian mystic who is perceived as having influenced the latter days of the Russian Emperor Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, and their only son Alexei.
Universal Images Group / Getty Images December 29, 2016 9:30 AM ESTT he life and death of Grigory Efimovich Rasputin is shrouded in mythology, making him an almost larger than life figure in Russian history. A sexual deviant, mystic healer, political saboteur and renegade monk, the mysterious Rasputin was both reviled and revered during his lifetime, and became a scapegoat for various dissident groups of the time period. Friday marks the 100-year anniversary of his controversial death on Dec. 30, 1916.
Here, we take a look at five myths and truths about the legendary Siberian holy man:
Myth 1: He had mystical powers
Born to peasants in a small village in Western Siberia, the young Rasputin turned to religion early in his life. Even as a child, rumors among the local populace were that Rasputin had certain mystical gifts. Despite marrying and fathering several children, Rasputin abandoned family life in search of Orthodox Christian religious devotion and piety. Following years of wandering and religious teaching, Rasputin ended up in St. Petersburg, the seat of royal power. Through various connections, Rasputin became known to Tsar Nicholas and his wife, the Tsarina Alexandra.
Desperate to find a cure for their ailing son’s hemophilia, one night they called upon Rasputin. After his session with the young boy, the bleeding seemed to stop for some time. Some historians, such as Pierre Gilliard, have speculated that the bleeding likely stopped as a result of Rasputin’s insistence on disallowing the administration of aspirin (a known blood-thinning agent), and not any “mystical” powers he may have had. The Tsarina was amazed, and immediately enlisted the services of Rasputin as a close adviser.
Myth 2: He was a sexual deviant and the Queen’s lover
Tales of Rasputin’s sexual exploits began to spread early into his time with the royal court, as his eccentric behavior—like drinking heavily and visiting brothels—was seen to clash with his religious piety. According to some historians who believe Rasputin may have been a member of, or at least influenced by the Khlyst religious sect, such sinful behavior brought him closer to God. However, though he did frequently entertain in salons, there is no evidence to suggest Rasputin was a sex-crazed maniac who had a secret affair with Russia’s queen. Much like the rest of his life, his behavior in this realm has been exaggerated, and—following the February Revolution of 1917—embellished by his enemies in attempts to propagandize his life.
Myth 3: He was Russia’s secret ruler
Because of his constant presence in the royal court, whispers grew that Rasputin was acting as a puppet master over the royal couple. Alexandra’s growing dependence on Rasputin and his apparent healing abilities with her hemophilic son only exacerbated these rumors. Occasionally, the monk did offer military advice as well as medical help, but his ideas never proved beneficial for the Russian army or Tsar Nicholas personally. In fact, after Tsar Nicholas took personal control over his armies on Aug. 23, 1915, under the advice of Rasputin and the Tsarina Alexandra, the Tsar became the target of blame for Russia’s battlefield defeats. Meanwhile, with the Tsar away fighting, a vacuum of leadership was filled by the Tsarina.
Here, the myth does approach the truth. Though the Tsarina was in charge, Rasputin did wield great power as her adviser. The mystic healer wasted no time in appointing his own church ministers and other public officials.
Myth 4: He was impossible to kill
Rasputin’s behavior and influence came to symbolize everything negative in Russian politics and society at the time. Even prior to his final assassination, other attempts on his life were made. In June of 1914, a beggar woman stabbed the monk in the stomach, claiming he was seducing the innocent. Rasputin made a full recovery, even though he had lost a lot of blood and was close to death after the incident.
Two years later, a group of nobles led by a man named Felix Yusupov plotted to get rid of the holy man once and for all. On Dec. 30, 1916, Yusupov invited Rasputin to dine at his home. After a heavy meal, complete with wine and dessert, all supposedly heavily laced with poison, the men looked on, as amazingly, Rasputin showed no symptoms that the poison was having an effect on him. The men proceeded to shoot Rasputin, who, according to legend still drew breath after a barrage of bullets and only died after he was thrown into an ice-cold river to drown. However, while Rasputin’s death was in fact plotted by Yusupov and other nobles, autopsy reports show that no poison was found in Rasputin’s system and that he seems to have died from a single bullet to the head.
Myth 5: He rose from the dead
Much like the tale of his murder, the aftermath of Rasputin’s death has been mythologized over the years. According to legend, after Rasputin’s poisoned and shot body was thrown into the ice-cold river, he was fished out by a group of passersby, who found that he was still alive when they dragged his body to the shore of the river. However, the truth is that after Rasputin’s already deceased corpse was thrown into the Malaya Nevka River, it took days for the police to find the body because the water had already frozen in the sub-zero Russian winter.
On March 15, 1917, Tsar Nicholas II abdicated the Russian throne as a result of the February Revolution. The following year, Bolsheviks eliminated the last vestiges of the Romanov dynasty. But myths about Rasputin endured—and, underneath those myths, there does reside some truth. Several historians have speculated that Rasputin’s influence did indeed play a role in the contempt for the royal household and everything it came to represent. The tale of Rasputin indeed shows that mythology can take a life of its own, and grow to become more important than the truth.
Albinko Hasic is a PhD candidate at Syracuse University.
More Must-Reads From TIME- The Families of Israelis Held Hostage By Hamas Speak Out
- A Photographer Captures Grief in Gaza
- Jim Jordan’s Dilemma Is What Happens When Bullying Backfires
- One Year Later, Where's the Adderall?
- For Many, India's Coal Damage Is Done
- The Human Toll of Poland’s Strict Abortion Laws
- The 100 Best Mystery and Thriller Books of All Time
- Want Weekly Recs on What to Watch, Read, and More? Sign Up for Worth Your Time
Contact us at [email protected].
The phrase also reflects a general feeling of helplessness and frustration among the population. The czar was seen as all-powerful, and his curse was believed to have significant consequences. By expressing this curse, the people were expressing their desperation and desire for change. Overall, the phrase "Czar curse you all, male" captures the deep-seated resentment and discontentment that many Russians felt towards their male rulers. It highlights the long history of autocratic and oppressive rule in Russia and the desire for a more just and equitable system of governance..
Reviews for "The Curse of the Czars: An In-Depth Analysis of Historical Tragedies"
1. Name: Sarah
Rating: 1/5
Review: I was highly disappointed with "Czar curse you all male." The plot was confusing and the characters lacked depth. The writing style was also very disjointed and difficult to follow. Overall, it was a frustrating reading experience and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
2. Name: Michael
Rating: 2/5
Review: While "Czar curse you all male" had an interesting premise, I found the execution to be lacking. The story seemed to drag on, with unnecessary details and subplots that didn't contribute much to the overall narrative. Additionally, the dialogue felt forced and unrealistic. Overall, I was disappointed with this book and expected more.
3. Name: Emily
Rating: 3/5
Review: "Czar curse you all male" had potential, but it ultimately fell short in my opinion. The pacing was slow, and I struggled to connect with the characters. The prose was also a bit too flowery for my taste, making it difficult for me to fully engage with the story. While it wasn't terrible, I wouldn't recommend it as there are better options out there.