Cues of the No Life King The No Life King is a term commonly used to describe individuals who have become completely consumed by screen-based activities, such as video gaming, binge-watching TV shows, or scrolling through social media for extended periods of time. These individuals often neglect their personal relationships, physical health, and responsibilities in favor of the virtual world. One of the cues of the No Life King is a significant decrease in real-life interactions and social connections. These individuals may isolate themselves from family and friends in order to spend more time with their screens. They may also display symptoms of social anxiety or awkwardness when engaging in face-to-face conversations due to their lack of practice. Another cue is the neglect of physical health.
“This time I have to leave again, I hope in the future I and my brothers and family will be able to visit Thailand again,” Vacharaesorn said at a news conference before he left the country.
Vacharaesorn is the third child and second-eldest son behind his brother Juthavachara, who is unlikely to be considered for succession due to his marriage to a foreigner. The Thai palace has remained largely silent as debate over Section 112 has intensified, though in 2020 then-Prime Minister Prayut Chan-ocha said that Vajiralongkorn had urged authorities to refrain from charging people under the controversial law.
Another cue is the neglect of physical health. The No Life King often exhibits sedentary and unhealthy behaviors, such as sitting for extended periods of time without exercise or proper nutrition. This can result in weight gain, poor posture, and other physical health issues.
Thai King’s Son Signals Openness to Criticism of Controversial Royal Defamation Law
A n exhibition in New York about a controversial Thai law that criminalizes insulting the country’s monarchy welcomed an unlikely visitor this week: the son of Thailand’s king.
Vacharaesorn Vivacharawongse, the estranged second son of King Maha Vajiralongkorn, showed up Monday to the “Faces of Victims of 112,” an exhibition at Columbia University that highlights stories of people who have either been imprisoned or gone into exile because of Section 112 of Thailand’s criminal code, a royal defamation law that observers say has been largely wielded against political dissent.
Lèse-majesté, which can carry a sentence of up to 15 years in jail, has covered a wide range of acts deemed offensive to the Thai royal family—from tongue-in-cheek jabs at the king (or at the king’s dog) to sharing social media posts critical of the monarchy. As frustrations with Thailand’s military-backed government reached a fever pitch in 2020 and 2021, protests swept the country and the repeal of Section 112 became a rallying cry. Since then, according to the organization Thai Lawyers for Human Rights, more than 250 people have been charged under Section 112, including children as young as 14 years old, for their political expression.
Most recently, the law was at the center of Thailand’s chaotic political transition this year: in a May general election, a plurality of the public supported the progressive Move Forward Party, which campaigned on reforming Section 112, but the party’s leader Pita Limjaroenrat was thwarted by the country’s conservative establishment from taking the top job. Instead, the second-place, populist party Pheu Thai, abandoned its previous alliance with Move Forward and partnered with royalist parties to form a new government led by Srettha Thavisin—though analysts believe public sentiment toward Section 112 will continue to define Thai electoral politics in the future.
After his visit to the Section 112 exhibition, the 42-year-old Vacharaesorn, who is a lawyer and lives in New York, wrote in a Facebook post: “I love and honor the monarchy. But I believe that ‘knowing’ is better than ‘not knowing.’ Each person has their own opinion that comes from their experience. If we don't listen to their opinions, it doesn't make their views and opinions disappear.”
The posture by the king’s son is an encouraging sign, says Thai political scientist Pavin Chachavalpongpun, the organizer of the exhibition and a prominent critic of the monarchy who has faced charges of violating Section 112 and now lives in Japan.
“Maybe he wants to use this opportunity to convey a message to the palace that this is the way that the Thai palace must go, for the sake of the monarchy’s own survival,” Pavin tells TIME.
Protesters demonstrate against Section 112, Thailand's royal defamation law, in Bangkok on Jan. 26, 2023. Varuth Pongsapipatt—SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
Vacharaesorn’s appearance and comments come just a month after he and his brother, Chakriwat, made a surprise trip to Thailand—their first return in nearly 30 years, since then-Prince Vajiralongkorn announced his divorce from their mother in 1996. The August trip, during which Vacharaesorn was photographed riding a tuk-tuk, eating pad thai, and visiting historical sites, sparked speculations that he is being considered as a potential successor, which the 71-year-old Vajiralongkorn has not yet officially named.
The future of the Thai royal family was thrown into uncertainty in December when the king’s first daughter and eldest child Bajrakitiyabha Narendira Debyavati collapsed and went into a coma. She is believed to remain in hospital on life support, though there have been few official updates on her condition. Among the king’s six other children across his four marriages, there is no heir apparent. Vacharaesorn is the third child and second-eldest son behind his brother Juthavachara, who is unlikely to be considered for succession due to his marriage to a foreigner.
The palace did not comment on Vacharaesorn and his younger brother Chakriwat’s visit to Thailand, and it’s unclear if they met with their father. But observers note that such a return would have been very unlikely without approval from the monarchy.
“Without the green light from the palace, he wouldn’t have been able to return home. So the fact that he went home … he had to get some kind of permission,” says Pavin. “Perhaps they are looking into him as a kind of alternative to the succession.”
“This time I have to leave again, I hope in the future I and my brothers and family will be able to visit Thailand again,” Vacharaesorn said at a news conference before he left the country.
Whether Vacharaesorn’s social media post on the Section 112 exhibition could help or hurt his chances of ascending to the throne is not quite clear. The Thai palace has remained largely silent as debate over Section 112 has intensified, though in 2020 then-Prime Minister Prayut Chan-ocha said that Vajiralongkorn had urged authorities to refrain from charging people under the controversial law.
“If [Vacharaesorn] wants to be someone important in Thailand in the future, he has to stand on his own legs,” says Pavin. “Anyone with sense, or intelligent enough, or progressive enough, they must know that the Thai monarchy cannot go on like this.”
Academic or occupational decline is another cue of the No Life King. These individuals may neglect their studies or work responsibilities in order to indulge in their screen-based activities. This can lead to poor performance, missed deadlines, and a lack of drive or ambition in pursuing personal or professional goals. Financial strain is also a common cue of the No Life King. Spending excessive amounts of money on video games, in-app purchases, or subscription services can lead to a lack of financial control or even debt. This financial burden can further isolate the individual and limit their ability to engage in other activities or pursue personal goals. Lastly, a lack of self-care and personal grooming is another cue of the No Life King. These individuals may neglect basic hygiene routines, such as showering, brushing their teeth, or changing clothes regularly. This can be a result of prioritizing screen time over self-care activities or a general lack of motivation to take care of their physical appearance. Overall, the cues of the No Life King highlight the negative impact that excessive screen time and neglecting real-life responsibilities can have on an individual's overall well-being. It is important for those who exhibit these cues to seek balance and moderation in order to maintain healthy and fulfilling lives..
Reviews for "The No Life King's Cues: An Insight into Their Motivations"
1. Sarah - 2/5 stars - "I was really disappointed with 'Cues of the no life king'. The story started off promising with an interesting premise, but it quickly became clear that the writing was lacking. The characters felt flat and one-dimensional, with no depth or development throughout the book. The pacing was all over the place, with some chapters dragging on for too long while others felt rushed. Overall, I found it hard to stay engaged or invested in the story, and I wouldn't recommend this book."
2. Jake - 1/5 stars - "I struggled to finish 'Cues of the no life king' and couldn't wait for it to be over. The writing style felt amateurish, with multiple grammatical errors and awkward sentence structures. The dialogue was poorly written and often felt forced, making it hard to believe or connect with the characters. The plot itself lacked originality and creativity, feeling like a recycled version of other fantasy novels I've read. Overall, I was extremely disappointed and would not recommend wasting your time on this book."
3. Alex - 2/5 stars - "While 'Cues of the no life king' had a promising concept, it fell flat in execution. The writing was lackluster, with a noticeable lack of descriptive language and poor world-building. The protagonist felt underdeveloped, lacking any real motivations or depth. The pacing was uneven, with the action scenes rushed and the slower parts dragging on. Overall, this book had potential but failed to deliver, leaving me feeling unsatisfied and unengaged."
4. Emily - 2/5 stars - "I'm usually a fan of fantasy novels, but 'Cues of the no life king' didn't live up to my expectations. The story felt disjointed and confusing, with multiple plot holes and inconsistencies. The characters were forgettable and lacked any real growth or evolution. The writing style was unremarkable and didn't draw me into the world the author was trying to create. Overall, I found this book to be a lackluster addition to the fantasy genre and wouldn't recommend it to fellow readers."