The Bamberg witch trial proceedings were a series of trials that took place in the city of Bamberg, Germany, during the early 17th century. These trials were part of the larger wave of witch trials that occurred throughout Europe during this time period. The trials in Bamberg were particularly notable due to their severity and the significant number of people who were accused and executed as witches. It is estimated that over 1,000 people, mostly women, were accused of witchcraft in Bamberg between 1612 and 1632. The trials were conducted by a number of judges and officials, including the prince-bishop of Bamberg, Johann Georg Fuchs von Dornheim. The proceedings typically began with the arrest and interrogation of an accused individual.
This value starts at 1600, decreases every time the enchanted weapon is used, and tries to increase by 1 every frame (60 per second), meaning it takes 26.66 seconds for the exhaustion bar to rejuvenate back to maximum damage from being fully empty. The decrease upon use is determined by the use time of the weapon; the value will decrease by the weapon's use time multiplied by 2.25, with a lower cap of 10. For example, Sacrifice's use time of 8 would decrease the value by 18 on each usage; Helium Flash's use time of 40 will decrease the value by 90 on each usage. The value cannot become a negative number.
The amount of damage healed back when hit is determined by this formula log D D 2 3 177,000, where D is the total damage that the player has dealt to enemies using the enchanted weapon until that point. Bloodthirsty uses the alchemical symbol for the sun because of its high gravity, which is similar to how the enchantment causes the weapon to deal more damage up close.
The proceedings typically began with the arrest and interrogation of an accused individual. These interrogations often involved the use of torture to extract confessions. Once an individual had confessed or implicated others, they would be brought to trial.
Enchantment
Enchanting is a game mechanic unlocked after defeating Supreme Witch, Calamitas, which allows the player to apply enchantments to their items, granting them unique additional qualities. It changes the name of an item by adding a prefix to the item's name (before any modifier the item may have), such as "Aflame Strong Photon Ripper." Hovering the cursor over an item with an enchantment in an inventory slot will show the enchantment details beneath the item's description. This description is colored #8B0000 . Additionally, the name of an enchanted item will visually pulse outwards approximately once per second.
Unlike modifiers, enchantments are qualitative in nature; rather than solely providing stat boosts, enchantments usually cause effects to occur upon use of the item. Each enchantment has an upside and a downside — there are no enchantments that are solely beneficial.
The trials were often perfunctory, with little evidence presented and little opportunity for the accused to defend themselves. Many of those accused were convicted and sentenced to death. The accused were often accused of a variety of crimes, including participating in satanic rituals, causing harm to others through witchcraft, and having sexual relations with the devil. These accusations were often based on hearsay, superstition, and a general fear and mistrust of women. The Bamberg witch trials eventually came to an end in 1632, largely due to the intervention of outside forces. The arrival of Swedish troops in the city and the subsequent chaos of the Thirty Years' War led to a decrease in the number of trials and an eventual end to the witch hunts. The Bamberg witch trial proceedings are a stark reminder of the hysteria and injustice that characterized the witch trials of the early modern period. They serve as a cautionary tale of the dangers of mass hysteria, prejudice, and the abuse of power. It is important to remember the lessons of history and to strive for a more equitable and just society..
Reviews for "The Bamberg Witch Trial Proceedings: Examining the Role of Torture in Gaining Confessions"
1. Robert - 2/5 - The Bamberg witch trial proceedings were nothing short of a disappointment to me. For starters, the book lacked any sort of clear structure or organization. The author jumped from one topic to another without any logical progression or connection. Secondly, the writing style was dry and dense, making it difficult to stay engaged with the content. Lastly, I found the overall tone of the book to be too scholarly and detached. It was like reading a dry textbook rather than a compelling narrative. Overall, I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for an enjoyable reading experience.
2. Sarah - 1/5 - I regretted picking up the Bamberg witch trial proceedings. The book was excessively detailed about the legal aspects of the trials, without providing any real insight into the lives or experiences of the accused. It felt too academic and far removed from the human aspect of the witch trials. Additionally, the writing was convoluted and monotonous, making it a chore to read through. I was hoping for a more engaging and compassionate exploration of the topic, but this book failed to deliver. I would suggest looking for alternative sources if you're interested in learning about the Bamberg witch trials.
3. Michael - 2/5 - The Bamberg witch trial proceedings were a tedious read. The author seemed more interested in showcasing their extensive knowledge of legal jargon and historical minutiae rather than crafting a coherent and engaging narrative. The book lacked a clear objective or central argument, leaving the reader feeling lost and disinterested. Furthermore, the excessive footnotes and references disrupted the flow of the text, making it difficult to stay engaged with the material. Overall, I found the Bamberg witch trial proceedings to be a disappointing and unfulfilling read.
4. Emily - 3/5 - While the Bamberg witch trial proceedings provided a comprehensive look into the legal aspects of the trials, I found it to be a challenging read. The writing style was dense and academic, making it hard to follow at times. Additionally, the book lacked any personal stories or anecdotes, leaving me feeling disconnected from the subject matter. However, the author did provide a thorough analysis of the legal procedures and their historical context, which would be valuable to those studying the topic in-depth. Overall, I appreciated the research that went into this book, but it didn't deliver in terms of readability and emotional connection.