Accusations of witchcraft and subsequent trials were rampant throughout history, particularly during the early modern period. Those accused were often considered a threat to society and were subjected to various tests and trials in order to prove their guilt. These "proofs" of witchcraft were rarely based on concrete evidence, but rather on superstitious beliefs and unfounded accusations. **It is important to note that these proofs hold no validity and were often used to justify persecution and discrimination.** One common proof of witchcraft was the trial by water. It was believed that witches, being in league with the Devil, would float on water due to the lack of baptism.
It was believed that witches, being in league with the Devil, would float on water due to the lack of baptism. This test involved binding the accused and throwing them into a body of water. If they sank and drowned, they were considered innocent, while floating indicated their guilt and association with dark forces.
Amelia aierwood fledgling witch
$25.00 per image supplied on a CD. Commercial rates please enquire.
Change text from Montage.Master resource file entry litDownloadImage.Text
Any review must be authorised before becoming visible to others
Your review has been successfully saved for approval
Social Media Sharing
Share Url
QR Code
No results found, did you mean?
Please check your login details or go to the information desk ×Purchase
This item is not currently available Agree to a loan of this eBook to you. 0 Agree to a loan of this eBook to you. Download to your device Opening this file requires a PDF reader If a new web page has not opened, please check your browser blocking settings. You have already checked out this title Already on-loan to your account. Your request has been submitted successfully
Unable to loan the eBook.
Please contact the library regarding your account status.
You need to login first The eBook has been sent to your Device. Open this file in Adobe Digital Editions (PC or Mac) or Bluefire reader (iOS or Android) If a new web page has not opened, please check your browser blocking settings. Download to your device Read Online Opening this file requires Adobe Digital Editions or Bluefire reader software Read online via the Odilo web eReader Overdrive Help Agree to a loan of this eAudioBook to you. Listen online Listen to this MP3 streamed to your device If a new web page has not opened, please check your browser blocking settings. Agree to a loan of this eMagazine to you. Discover More 0 0
**This test, however, had no scientific basis and resulted in the deaths of many innocent individuals. It was essentially a lose-lose situation for the accused.** Another proof of being a witch was the use of spectral evidence. This involved testimony from witnesses claiming to have seen the accused engaging in acts of witchcraft in their dreams or visions. These testimonies were often unreliable and based on hearsay. **Spectral evidence was a highly subjective form of proof that could easily be manipulated or fabricated by those seeking to accuse someone of witchcraft.** Additionally, the presence of physical marks or witch's marks on the body was considered proof of being a witch. These marks were believed to be the Devil's brand or the spot where a familiar spirit would suckle. **These marks could be as simple as a mole or birthmark, which, in reality, have no connection to witchcraft.** Lastly, confessions obtained through torture or coercion were seen as proof of witchcraft. Accused witches were subjected to various forms of torture, including the infamous ducking stool, stretching, and even the use of The Rack. These methods were employed to extract confessions and information about other alleged witches, reinforcing the notion of a larger witchcraft conspiracy. **However, confessions obtained under such circumstances cannot be considered reliable or accurate, as they were the result of immense physical and psychological pressure.** Overall, the "proofs" of witchcraft were based on irrational beliefs, superstitions, and unfounded accusations. These methods often led to the persecution and execution of innocent individuals. **It is a chilling reminder of the dangerous power of fear and the devastating consequences that unjust trials can have on society.**.
Reviews for "The Spanish Inquisition and its witch hunt: uncovering the evidence"
1. Emma - 1 star - I found "Proofs of being a witch" to be deeply disappointing. The writing was lackluster and the plot felt predictable. The characters were one-dimensional and I struggled to connect with any of them. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural. Overall, I was left feeling unsatisfied and would not recommend this book to anyone looking for a compelling witch story.
2. John - 2 stars - I was really looking forward to reading "Proofs of being a witch" as I am a fan of supernatural stories, but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The pacing was off, with the story being slow and uneventful for long stretches. The main character lacked depth and I found it difficult to sympathize with her. Additionally, the plot was rather predictable and didn't offer any surprises. I wanted to enjoy this book, but in the end, I was left feeling underwhelmed.
3. Sarah - 2.5 stars - "Proofs of being a witch" started off promising, but as I continued reading, the storyline became convoluted and confusing. The author introduced too many characters and subplots without properly developing them, leading to a disjointed narrative. The dialogue was often unnatural and stilted, making it difficult to fully engage with the story. While there were some interesting ideas in the book, they weren't explored or explained in a satisfactory manner. Overall, I wanted to like this book, but the execution left much to be desired.
4. Michael - 1 star - I regret purchasing "Proofs of being a witch". The writing was amateurish and riddled with grammatical errors. The plot was all over the place and lacked coherence. The characters were uninteresting and their motivations were unclear. The book felt like a rough draft that needed significant editing and revising. I was left feeling frustrated and disappointed, and I would advise others to steer clear of this book.