The concept of net liberum of radmamagical effects refers to the principle that individuals and entities should have the freedom to explore and engage in the use of radmamagical effects without undue restrictions and limitations. Radmamagical effects are defined as the transformative and powerful effects that can be achieved through the manipulation of radmamagic, a form of magic that draws upon the energy and properties of radiation. This principle acknowledges the potential benefits and risks associated with radmamagic, recognizing that it can be a powerful tool for development, innovation, and self-expression. By promoting the net liberum of radmamagical effects, society can foster a more dynamic and inclusive environment that enables individuals to explore their creativity and harness the potential of radmamagic. However, it is important to emphasize that while the principle of net liberum of radmamagical effects promotes freedom and exploration, it should also be accompanied by responsible and ethical practices. The risks associated with radmamagical effects, such as radiation exposure and unintended consequences, should be carefully assessed and mitigated.
The risks associated with radmamagical effects, such as radiation exposure and unintended consequences, should be carefully assessed and mitigated. Adequate safeguards and regulations should be in place to ensure the safe and responsible use of radmamagic. Furthermore, the net liberum of radmamagical effects should not be interpreted as a license for unrestricted and unchecked actions.
Oh Falchion, My Falchion
Hello readers.
I am playing a level 6 ranger who uses a great sword. Now, at a later level (once i qualify for improved crit and blinding crit) I am going to switch to a falchion. Now I LOVE the crit range on the falchion. However, I am NOT in love with the 2d4 damage. The ranger gets the spell Lead Blades which allows for an increase in the size of the weapon by one (doesn't stack with multiple casts) so that brings me up to 2d6, and with the two crit feats boosting me up to crit with a 15, and blinding the enemy I'm doin some major damage. However, I am not satisfied. Yes I plan on spending about 32 grand on making the weapon a plus one, with icy burst (cold damage plus another extra cold damage on a crit) and thundering so it takes sonic damage on a crit as well. Yet, as I am a damage whore. I would like to know a way to improve its damage EVEN MORE! *devilish insane cackeling* (PLEASE do not say just have the arcane caster cast Enlarge Person on you after lead blades im aware of that option)
swap thundering for another burst. Try corrosive for less resistance.
I think 2d4 jumps to 1d10 with the size bump, 2d6 is two bumps if I'm not mistaken
tetrasodium wrote:I think 2d4 jumps to 1d10 with the size bump, 2d6 is two bumps if I'm not mistaken
Nope it's 2d6, http://www.d20pfsrd.com/equipment---final/weapons#table-tiny-and-large-weap on-damage
Use a nodachi instead (Ultimate Combat, page 131). 1d10 damage (bumps to 2d8), 18-20/x2 crit, and the brace quality just to make sure you know that eastern stuff is always better than western stuff!
ProfPotts wrote:Use a nodachi instead (Ultimate Combat, page 131). 1d10 damage (bumps to 2d8), 18-20/x2 crit, and the brace quality just to make sure you know that eastern stuff is always better than western stuff!
the curve blade is also a viable option.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Use a nodachi instead (Ultimate Combat, page 131). 1d10 damage (bumps to 2d8), 18-20/x2 crit, and the brace quality just to make sure you know that eastern stuff is always better than western stuff!
Isnt the nodachi an exotic weapon? Rangers don't get exotic weapon proficiency
I take that back I looked it up. Lol I correct my mistake. Thank you, that sounds even better. It's like the falchion plus brace and extra damage
get a Dancing, Thundering Nodaci AND your other uber-Nodaci. make them Blind AND permanently Deafened on a crit
FWIW, I remember a discussion about Lead Blades and Enlarge size bonuses not stacking. I could be wrong. You could also invest in some Vital Strike feats, if you wish and work on trying to get Deadly Stroke although that's a little feat intensive.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I refuse to believe in a real world scenario a +1 icy burst thundering falchion out damages a +4 falchion. You can give me all the math you want but all the times you miss by 1,2, or 3 or can't overcome DR silver, cold iron, or adamantine in a real game session would have me grinding my teeth.
Glutton wrote:I refuse to believe in a real world scenario a +1 icy burst thundering falchion out damages a +4 falchion. You can give me all the math you want but all the times you miss by 1,2, or 3 or can't overcome DR silver, cold iron, or adamantine in a real game session would have me grinding my teeth.
The +4 falchion would be, at minimum, a 13% increase in expected damage per round when compared to the +1 icy burst thundering falchion. bringing DR into the mix just makes the difference bigger.
The DR issue is pretty easy to get past since the character is a ranger. Make it an adamentine falchion and use versatile weapon. By passes most DR (with the exception of alignment based ones) and you still get your fun burst effects.
+2 Burst and + 1d6 of for magic weapon is a losers gambit. It sound great to have weapon that 3d6 extra energy damage. But by time you can afford it the monster have DR and energy resistant to negate that stuff. You are better off with + 5 weapon than +1 weapon flaming, acid, cold, and electrical. Yes you will do 4d6 extra damage but, most monster will have 1 or 2 energy resistance or immunities. So that really on nets you + 2d6. And you or only over coming DR magic and what ever weapon type have ie (Slashing Piercing, Blunt). You are better off hitting more often with the +5 and +4 more on the Fist hit and +4 on the Second +4 and +4 and the third. You hit more often and there for do more damage plus you now can over come all DR but weapon type and /- vs DR/ magic only. BFN (Big Fat Number) is way more important that extra dice. The plus from STR, Magic, Favored Enemy, Weapon Specialization, Smite, Power Attack ect,
is way stronger than bonus dice. Minimum is way stronger that Maximum. Ie If I have 2d4+8 I will kill 30 hit point monster in 3 hit for sure vs 1d8+2d6+1 which will kill in 6 rounds the average is the same about the same but the hit rate in higher on the fist one.
If you do not hit and get through then Damage is irrelevant.
Plus if get weapon made out type A and magic and you need B and magic then that 4-7k wasted. Just stay on course do not play for the short term go for the long term efficiency.
It not as sexy but it works it just grinds them down fight in fight out.
| 1 |
Responsible oversight, transparency, and accountability should be integral parts of any framework governing radmamagic, to ensure that the potential harms and risks are minimized. In conclusion, the net liberum of radmamagical effects promotes the freedom to explore and engage in the use of radmamagic. It recognizes the transformative power of radmamagical effects in various fields and encourages innovation and self-expression. However, it also emphasizes the need for responsible and ethical practices, including the assessment and mitigation of risks. By striking a balance between freedom and responsibility, society can benefit from the incredible potential of radmamagic while minimizing potential harm..
Reviews for "Net Lbram: The Key to Unlocking Radmamagical Potentials within Yourself"
1. John - 2/5 - I was really disappointed with "Net lbram of radmamagical effects". The plot was convoluted and hard to follow, and the characters were poorly developed. The magical effects were underwhelming and did not live up to my expectations. Overall, I found it to be a lackluster experience.
2. Sarah - 1/5 - "Net lbram of radmamagical effects" was a complete waste of time. The story was confusing and felt like a jumbled mess. The character motivations were unclear, and I couldn't connect with any of them. The magical effects felt forced and didn't add any depth to the storyline. I struggled to finish it and would not recommend it to anyone.
3. James - 2/5 - I had high hopes for "Net lbram of radmamagical effects" based on the synopsis, but unfortunately, it fell flat for me. The plot lacked coherence and direction, making it difficult to stay engaged. The magical effects, although described as impressive, were not well-executed and failed to capture my imagination. Overall, I found the book to be a disappointment and wouldn't recommend it to others.
4. Emily - 2/5 - I found "Net lbram of radmamagical effects" to be confusing and disjointed. The story jumped around too much, and the characters were uninteresting and poorly developed. The magical effects were uninspiring and did not add any excitement to the narrative. I struggled to connect with the storyline and ultimately felt unsatisfied with the reading experience.