A magic square is a square grid of numbers where all the rows, columns, and diagonals add up to the same sum. In a 7x7 magic square, there are 49 cells arranged in 7 rows and 7 columns. The sum of each row, column, and diagonal in a 7x7 magic square is equal to the Magic Constant. The Magic Constant for a 7x7 magic square can be calculated by the formula: Magic Constant = (n^3 + n) / 2 where n is the size of the magic square side. In this case, n is equal to 7. Thus, the Magic Constant is calculated as (7^3 + 7) / 2 = 175.
It’s matte. After trying out several different prototypes, we've found that a matte surface is best. We quickly found that there were some disadvantages with a glossy surface. The first disadvantage was that a glossy surface led to increased sweat on our hands. The second disadvantage was that you have very little grip and the mouse tends to slip off. Also, if it was a polished glossy surface, each small scratch could be seen, and micro scratches inevitably happen in your day-to-day usage.
Unlike other common iMac mouses like the Logitech MX Master, our case transforms every Magic Mouse into an ergonomic device for left and right-handed users. Whether dragging and dropping, selecting large volumes of data or casually gaming, this mouse provides a low-cost, effective solution for multiple computing needs.
Thus, the Magic Constant is calculated as (7^3 + 7) / 2 = 175. To construct a 7x7 magic square, we start by placing the number 1 in the center cell of the first row. Then, we move diagonally up and to the right, placing the next number (2) in the next cell.
Apple’s Magic Mouse gets the absolute perfect upgrade with this ergonomic accessory
The only thing the MouseBase doesn’t do is fix that horrendous charging problem.
For probably over a decade now, Apple’s one overarching design philosophy has been sleekness. Jony Ive famously made design decisions that enforced this, much to the end-consumer’s detriment. MacBooks in 2014-15 used glue instead of screws to hold components together because it made devices thinner. The disastrous butterfly keyboard was the result of a pursuit of sleekness too. The point I’m making is that to an extent, making a product sleek is a great thing. There are times, however, when it’s not… The Apple Magic Mouse is one such product.
Designed to be sleek over ergonomic, the Magic Mouse is ridiculously tough to work with. Its smooth design doesn’t have the curves or grooves you’d need to rest your hand comfortably, and gripping the device isn’t an entirely great experience either. However, one small product hopes to rectify that. Dubbed the MouseBase, this little add-on is designed to fit your Magic Mouse (v2) in it comfortably, giving it a more ergonomic design. It lets you plug the Magic Mouse right in without any moving parts, screws, or adhesives, giving you a much more comfortable right-handed grip that lets you intuitively and effectively grab and maneuver your mouse without triggering your carpal tunnel.
Designer: Smash Engineering
Made from plastic and weighing just 4.2 ounces (119 grams), the MouseBase fixes the Magic Mouse’s second most annoying problem. The ergonomic design of the MouseBase blends almost perfectly with the Magic Mouse, making it look rather cohesive, and creating a surface flow that welcomes your eyes as well as your hands. The base, however, cleverly also elevates and tilts the mouse ever so slightly, making it more ergonomically sound. It does so, however, without affecting the mouse’s tracking abilities. This is thanks to the MouseBase’s patented mirror technology that retains the Magic Mouse’s usability and precision.
Although it doesn’t solve the Magic Mouse’s charging problem (which remains unsolvable, apparently), it doesn’t inhibit the charging ability either. The MouseBase’s open-bottom design lets you easily plug a lightning cable into the device when not in use. Sure, that solution will always remain the most inelegant UX design direction in history, but at least the MouseBase solves the other big problem with the Magic Mouse’s visually-appealing-yet-tactile-nightmare form factor. My only real complaint? That there’s no left-handed version of this… yet.
Made from plastic and weighing just 4.2 ounces (119 grams), the MouseBase fixes the Magic Mouse’s second most annoying problem. The ergonomic design of the MouseBase blends almost perfectly with the Magic Mouse, making it look rather cohesive, and creating a surface flow that welcomes your eyes as well as your hands. The base, however, cleverly also elevates and tilts the mouse ever so slightly, making it more ergonomically sound. It does so, however, without affecting the mouse’s tracking abilities. This is thanks to the MouseBase’s patented mirror technology that retains the Magic Mouse’s usability and precision.
If a cell is already occupied, we move one row down and continue in the same direction. This process is continued until all cells are filled with numbers from 1 to 49, creating a 7x7 magic square. Each row, column, and diagonal will add up to the Magic Constant of 175. The 7x7 magic square follows a specific pattern, known as the Siamese Method, which ensures that the Magic Constant is achieved. This method guarantees a unique solution for any given size of the magic square. In conclusion, a 7x7 magic square is a square grid of numbers where all the rows, columns, and diagonals add up to the same sum, which is the Magic Constant of 175. It follows a specific construction method to ensure this property and provides a unique solution..
Reviews for "Mastering the techniques of solving a 7x7 magic square"
1. John Doe - 2/5 stars - The "Magic Square 7x7" game was a huge disappointment for me. The concept seemed interesting at first, but the execution fell flat. The graphics were outdated and the gameplay was slow and repetitive. It lacked any kind of excitement or challenge, making it feel more like a chore than a game. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone looking for a fun and engaging gaming experience.
2. Sarah Thompson - 1/5 stars - I found "Magic Square 7x7" to be extremely boring and frustrating. The puzzles were too easy and quickly became monotonous. The lack of variation in the gameplay made it feel like I was just going through the motions without any real sense of accomplishment. Furthermore, the interface was clunky and unintuitive, making it difficult to navigate through the game. Overall, this game was a complete waste of my time and I would not recommend it to anyone.
3. Alex Miller - 2/5 stars - "Magic Square 7x7" had a promising concept, but it fell short in many areas. The controls were unresponsive and the game had multiple glitches and bugs that hindered the overall experience. Moreover, the level design was uninspiring and lacked creativity. There was no real sense of progression or difficulty, as each level felt repetitive and unchallenging. I was left feeling underwhelmed and disappointed after playing this game.
4. Emily Peterson - 3/5 stars - While "Magic Square 7x7" had some redeeming qualities, it overall failed to captivate me. The game mechanics were confusing and poorly explained, making it difficult to understand how to play. The graphics were also lackluster and could have been improved to enhance the gaming experience. Although the puzzles did become slightly more challenging as I progressed, the lack of variety and repetition made the game lose its appeal quickly. It's not the worst game out there, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone looking for a truly engaging and immersive gaming experience.