Harnessing the Power of Black Magic for Unmatched Speed: A Detailed Test

The black magic rad speed test is a method used to assess the speed and performance of a black magic rad system. This test is essential in determining the efficiency and effectiveness of this system in various applications. The black magic rad system uses advanced technology and algorithms to enhance the performance of devices and networks. It provides high-speed connectivity and seamless data transmission, making it a popular choice for individuals and businesses alike. To conduct the black magic rad speed test, various factors are taken into consideration. These factors include the internet speed, latency, download and upload speeds, and the overall performance of the system.

Aerojet 9* - Ventus Blue 60x
Aerojet LS 3W - Kai'Li White 70x
King Tec 3H - MMT Hy 80X
King Tour 4-PW - MMT 105 TX
Snakebite 48*, 54*, 60* - KBS Hi Rev 2.0
Vintage Nova-40 - UST All-In
Ball: PV1X

Aerojet 9 - Ventus Blue 60x Aerojet LS 3W - Kai Li White 70x King Tec 3H - MMT Hy 80X King Tour 4-PW - MMT 105 TX Snakebite 48 , 54 , 60 - KBS Hi Rev 2. HZRDUS im10 60g LTDx 4h 21 degree KBS PGI 85 King Tec 5 hybrid Recoil ESC 480 F4 Forged TecX, KBS taper lite King Cobra SB wedges - 50 versatile , 55 versatile , 60 wide low , KBS HiRev 2.

These factors include the internet speed, latency, download and upload speeds, and the overall performance of the system. The test begins by measuring the internet speed, which is crucial in determining the overall performance of the black magic rad system. It assesses the speed of the internet connection and determines whether the system can handle higher data transfer rates.

Cobra RADSPEED Drivers

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

moolman

Member

Picked up the Radspeed driver yesterday at a an area pro shop. I have already cut the shaft and changed out the grip. Dialed in the swing weight nicely for me. Hit it on my launch monitor about 10 times and seems nice.

Not sure how much difference I will see with my Cobra Speedzone versus this one, but thought I would upgrade anyway. I have four different shafts that fit so this will be fun to see which one dials in the best.

My guess is I will stick with the Tensei AV that I keep using with my SZ since I keep coming back to it. I will state that the Motore X F3 is not bad, but I haven't put it through the enough paces yet.

I'm testing the Tense from last year and the MotoreX F3 from this year, I can't tell a difference at all in flight or distance. When I use my low launching shaft which is a Matix black, it's definitely lower. I'm not using a launch monitor, only eyeing it while playing.

hedley_lamarr08

Paradym Super Hybrid/Apex CB tester

I play 45.75 now in a Ping G410 Plus and don’t mind it at all. I’m thinking the RDX or Motore F3 would match well with a XB head since it’s likely going to be lower spinning head anyways. I am kind of afraid of the standard RADSpeed at 9 degrees.

Driver: Callaway Rogue ST Max 8 degrees with UST Mamiya LIN-Q Red 8F5 at 44.5 inches
Hybrid: Callaway Paradym Super Hybrid 16*
Hybrid: Cobra King Tec 3H with UST LINQ concept 100F5
Hybrid: Titleist TSR3 4H with Mitsu 1k 85g S
Irons: Callaway Apex CB 2023 5-11
Wedges: Vokey 54 F grind
Wedge: Vokey 58* K grind
Bag: BagBoy ZTF
Putter: Bettinardi Queen B #6
Rangefinder: Shotscope LX
Ball: Callaway Chromesoft X LS

Mward is always right and is a hero to me (he wrote this)

HarlettoScara

Well-known member

Joined Jan 30, 2014 Messages 7,310 Reaction score 14,035 Location Aberdeen, Scotland Handicap 8.7 WHS

There is a reason tour players played shorter shafts no question. I tried doing tour length last year and it was too awkward for me, maybe I didn't give it enough time though. There is just a comfort level at a certain length I guess.

Me too. I went Tour Length last year, and it just didn't feel right for me for some reason, even though it wasn't that much shorter I could definitely feel it. Will be back to standard this year for sure.

LTDx LS 10.5 degrees. Tensei AV Raw White 65
LTDx Max 3 wood. HZRDUS im10 60g
LTDx Max 5 wood. HZRDUS im10 60g
LTDx 4h 21 degree KBS PGI 85
King Tec 5 hybrid Recoil ESC 480 F4
Forged TecX, KBS $taper lite
King Cobra SB wedges - 50 (versatile), 55 (versatile), 60 (wide low), KBS HiRev 2.0
Agera

DataDude

Putting Blues

Joined Dec 26, 2017 Messages 22,239 Reaction score 23,677 Location Elk Run Golf Club Hole 17 Tee Handicap 15.2

I have been playing a 44.5" Driver for 2 years now. It's a comfortable length for me. It also presents the head a little more upright which helps with the right miss. I am leaning RADSPEED XB also. I will take forgiveness all day.

TSR2 10* HZRDUS Black
Apex UW AD-BB
Apex Pro 26* MMT
ZX4 MKii 6 Aerotech Steelfibre
ZX5 MKii 7-PW Recoil
620CB PW Tensei White
Vokey SM8 Black 52:12 & 58:12 Tensei White
BB8W 34"

2021 Morgan Cup presented by
2019 Experience
2018 TEEM

Luchnia

You will never conquer golf.

I have been playing a 44.5" Driver for 2 years now. It's a comfortable length for me. It also presents the head a little more upright which helps with the right miss. I am leaning RADSPEED XB also. I will take forgiveness all day.

44.5 seems to be the magic number for me as well. Even if I have a long driver shaft while testing I tend to move my hands down further so that tells me something about where the "comfort" length needs to be.

From what I can tell by observing others on the golf course chase balls after hitting with the driver most are playing drivers much to long for them. Often it is an ego thing. I want 'em in the fairway!

Radspeed Driver
Cobra Radspeed 3, 5, 7 wood
Mavrik MAX 5-SW
Newport Select 2
Maltby M+ Series Wedge 56

jdtox

Lord Tox

I play 45.75 now in a Ping G410 Plus and don’t mind it at all. I’m thinking the RDX or Motore F3 would match well with a XB head since it’s likely going to be lower spinning head anyways. I am kind of afraid of the standard RADSpeed at 9 degrees.

Aerojet 9* - Ventus Blue 60x
Aerojet LS 3W - Kai'Li White 70x
King Tec 3H - MMT Hy 80X
King Tour 4-PW - MMT 105 TX
Snakebite 48*, 54*, 60* - KBS Hi Rev 2.0
Vintage Nova-40 - UST All-In
Ball: PV1X

GraniteRoost

Flying Rocks

Regular 9* head, weight back is a fun beast. I had some of my longest drives this winter demoing that setup.

2022 Morgan Cup Team Hackers
D: Cobra LTDx w/ Velocity
3W: Cobra LTDx w/ RDX Blue
2H: King Tec w/ MMT 80
4-PW: King Forged Tec w/ Recoil 110
Wedges: King Snakebite Black 48 & 54 Versatile, 59* WideLow w/ Recoil 110
Putter: King Vintage Sport 60

jdtox

Lord Tox

Regular 9* head, weight back is a fun beast. I had some of my longest drives this winter demoing that setup.

Were the numbers good though or were you getting golf galaxy simulator roll? In the real world I saw quite a few low launching knuckleballs.

Aerojet 9* - Ventus Blue 60x
Aerojet LS 3W - Kai'Li White 70x
King Tec 3H - MMT Hy 80X
King Tour 4-PW - MMT 105 TX
Snakebite 48*, 54*, 60* - KBS Hi Rev 2.0
Vintage Nova-40 - UST All-In
Ball: PV1X

GraniteRoost

Flying Rocks

Were the numbers good though or were you getting golf galaxy simulator roll? In the real world I saw quite a few low launching knuckleballs.

Maybe borderline on having enough spin and launch. Just a little touchy, but overall one of the better combos I tried within RadSpeed. I think if I overdrew one in the real world it may not have worked out. I recall averages of 10.5-11.5 launch, ~2000-2100 spin, and about 265-270 carry.

I might need to tinker with loft, I would like to see a another degree or two and spin closer to 2300. Maybe going 10* would be the sweet spot. Or RadSpeed 10.5 lofted down to 9.5. I tried XB @ 10.5 and was seeing enough more spin (~2700-2800) that I dropped back and was doing most of my comparisons with 9* heads setup standard for initial fitting explorations.

Again, all of this with weight back. No reason I would need to go weight forward.

2022 Morgan Cup Team Hackers
D: Cobra LTDx w/ Velocity
3W: Cobra LTDx w/ RDX Blue
2H: King Tec w/ MMT 80
4-PW: King Forged Tec w/ Recoil 110
Wedges: King Snakebite Black 48 & 54 Versatile, 59* WideLow w/ Recoil 110
Putter: King Vintage Sport 60

jdtox

Lord Tox

Maybe borderline on having enough spin and launch. Just a little touchy, but overall one of the better combos I tried within RadSpeed. I think if I overdrew one in the real world it may not have worked out. I recall averages of 10.5-11.5 launch, ~2000-2100 spin, and about 265-270 carry.

I might need to tinker with loft, I would like to see a another degree or two and spin closer to 2300. Maybe going 10* would be the sweet spot. Or RadSpeed 10.5 lofted down to 9.5. I tried XB @ 10.5 and was seeing enough more spin (~2700-2800) that I dropped back and was doing most of my comparisons with 9* heads setup standard for initial fitting explorations.

Again, all of this with weight back. No reason I would need to go weight forward.

Definitely seemed a bit touchy and not forgiving on heel side misses haha. In the regular head I wonder if the 10.5 is the way to go . I found better success with the XB to my eye though even though launch looked high just as it did last year. Definitely need some numbers and more testing is required for sure.

Aerojet 9* - Ventus Blue 60x
Aerojet LS 3W - Kai'Li White 70x
King Tec 3H - MMT Hy 80X
King Tour 4-PW - MMT 105 TX
Snakebite 48*, 54*, 60* - KBS Hi Rev 2.0
Vintage Nova-40 - UST All-In
Ball: PV1X

Shepx13

Cleveland Baseball Nut

Have we heard anything on if/when Cobra will start having demo days? I'd love to schedule a driver/fairway wood fitting with them if they decide to have them this year.

ritojr

Active member

Have we heard anything on if/when Cobra will start having demo days? I'd love to schedule a driver/fairway wood fitting with them if they decide to have them this year.

In my area at least they are started to schedule some for later in April with Cobra. Seems like its coming around

Radspeed XB Peacoat - Fujikura Ventus Velocore Red/Purple 6S
F6 Baffler - 16.5 Matrix Red Tie HQ4 S
F8 Hybrid Nardo Grey - 19 Matrix Red Tie HQ4 S
SpeedZone OL Hybrid - 21 - UST Recoil 780 ES SmacWrap Black
Sub 70 699 Pro - 5-AW - Project X Flighted 5.5
CBX2 54 and RTX-3 CB 58
Sub 70 Sycamore 005 Wide Blade CS
Chrome Soft X LS

sizzquatch

Member

Just came in today.
9°
X stiff HZRDUS blue
+4 wrap

I'll say that this HZRDUS is the one of whippiest feeling x I've come across.. have to wait a month or two to get out with it tho so we'll see how it goes

Attachments

GraniteRoost

Flying Rocks

@jdtox turns out I posted numbers from my RadSpeed tinkers earlier in this thread, and got a few recollections wrong from this AM. Linking below since we were discussing earlier. 14* launch in particular was more than I remembered.

I had a little get to know you session with RadSpeed and RadSpeed XB today. I liked the shape and setup of both. Pros for the XB are the gloss finish, and I think the slightly larger drawn back shape looks mean. I dig it. Pros for the RadSpeed are the combination of matte crown and players shape are super good. It was also pretty easy to control, which I was pleasantly surprised with.

I started off with RadSpeed 9*, 12g rear with a HZRDUS RDX Blue in 6.0, hit 4 shots, two of which were pretty nice. The other two were firmly warmups, I started hitting these dead cold. Mixing things up, I hit about 7 balls with XB in 10.5 loft and same shaft. that was too much loft and spin was high. This is where I should have hit XB in 9* but whiffed. I went back to RadSpeed because I was liking what I was seeing out the 9*, and plugged in a Riptide 50 CB in 6.0. This combo had plenty of speed but spin and carry were suffering, and I was not as sure of the feel and weight. I decided to plug in a RDX Blue 6.5, and the very first shot was the one I posted above in Post #878. The 6.5 gave me a little better timing and control, and dispersion and overall ease of use had me thinking that could be a gamable combo.

I would like to hit the XB with the RDX Blue 6.5, to see more what the XB has to offer. I didn't get a good idea of performance with just a few shots using the wrong loft. I will say that as a starting point, the RadSpeed is sweet. I liked the sound in the bay, it is tight and powerful. Easy enough to hit, and control.

Complete data for those into such things is below. There is a Srixon ZX5 mixed in there that I hit last. Ball speed at first glance looks down a tick but don't be fooled, I was getting tired. A very fun test session all around.

And best drive with RadSpeed @ 9*, almost ideally struck.

Picked up the Radspeed driver yesterday at a an area pro shop. I have already cut the shaft and changed out the grip. Dialed in the swing weight nicely for me. Hit it on my launch monitor about 10 times and seems nice.

In addition to measuring the internet speed, the black magic rad speed test also considers the latency or delay between data being sent and received. This factor is critical in applications where real-time data transmission is essential, such as online gaming and video conferencing. Furthermore, the test evaluates the download and upload speeds of the black magic rad system. It measures the time taken to download and upload data and assesses the system's performance in handling these tasks. By conducting the black magic rad speed test, individuals and businesses can determine whether the system meets their requirements. It provides valuable insights into the system's capabilities and identifies areas for improvement. Overall, the black magic rad speed test is a valuable tool in assessing the speed and performance of the black magic rad system. It plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal efficiency and effectiveness of the system in various applications and can help individuals and businesses make informed decisions about their network infrastructure..

Reviews for "The Art of Speed: A Comprehensive Black Magic Test"

1. Sarah - ★☆☆☆☆ - I was really disappointed with the "Black magic rad speed test." The app kept crashing every time I tried to run a test, and the results were completely inaccurate. It claimed that my internet speed was much higher than it actually was, which made me question the reliability of the app. Overall, it was a frustrating experience, and I would not recommend using this app for testing your internet speed.

2. John - ★★☆☆☆ - I had high hopes for the "Black magic rad speed test" app, but unfortunately, it didn't live up to my expectations. The user interface was confusing and unintuitive, making it difficult to understand how to properly run a speed test. Additionally, the results seemed inconsistent and unreliable. There are definitely better speed test apps available out there, so I would suggest looking elsewhere if you want accurate and user-friendly results.

3. Emily - ★☆☆☆☆ - I don't understand the hype around the "Black magic rad speed test." When I used the app, it took forever to load, and when it finally did, the results were all over the place. I couldn't trust the accuracy of the app, and it was a waste of my time. I would recommend finding a different speed test app that actually works and provides reliable results.

4. David - ★★☆☆☆ - I found the "Black magic rad speed test" to be quite disappointing. The app was slow and unresponsive, and it had limited features compared to other speed test apps I have used. The results didn't seem accurate, and I wasn't confident in their reliability. Overall, I would suggest trying out a different speed test app to get more accurate and trustworthy results.

5. Jessica - ★☆☆☆☆ - I had a terrible experience with the "Black magic rad speed test" app. It constantly froze and crashed on my device, making it impossible to run a proper speed test. When I did manage to get it working, the results were all over the place and didn't match with my actual internet speed. It was a frustrating and unreliable app, and I wouldn't recommend wasting your time with it.

Taking Speed to the Next Level with Black Magic: A Comparative Test