The year 1995 marked a significant turning point in the understanding and perception of witchcraft as an institution. Throughout history, witchcraft has been associated with fear, persecution, and stereotypes, leading to the marginalization and oppression of many individuals. However, in 1995, efforts were made to challenge these misconceptions and create a more inclusive and understanding environment. One of the key developments in 1995 was the establishment of the Witchcraft and Human Rights Information Network (WHRIN), an organization dedicated to raising awareness and promoting human rights for those accused of witchcraft. WHRIN aimed to challenge the stigmatization of witchcraft and advocate for the rights and well-being of individuals affected by witchcraft accusations. Furthermore, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights released a report in 1995 highlighting the need to address witchcraft-related violence and discrimination.
The new UI is gesture based.
Ideally where the cable connects to the Video Assist and camera it should be very short with angled 90 degree connectors at both ends so that the cable doesn t stick out in the line of danger like this. It s been on the market since April 2016 so it doesn t match the spec of the latest 4K 60p capable competitors, nor can it cope with the wider-screen DCI flavor of 4K but, through a series of firmware updates, Blackmagic has been adding features to this sub- 1000 monitor recorder.
Furthermore, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights released a report in 1995 highlighting the need to address witchcraft-related violence and discrimination. The report noted that witchcraft accusations disproportionately affected women and vulnerable individuals, often resulting in violence, abandonment, and even death. The UN called for the recognition and protection of the rights of these victims and the implementation of measures to prevent further human rights violations.
Blackmagic Video Assist Review
Out of the blue Blackmagic sent me the new Video Assist, which isn’t quite yet shipping at B&H (pre-orders are available) or CVP but will be soon.
Here is an early look at the device and what it can do.
Ethics statement: as regular readers will know I always buy my own gear for use in my filmmaking and the EOSHD reviews come off the back of that quite naturally. This is a little bit different as Blackmagic decided to support my endeavours! They sent me a unit for free! I didn’t even ask for one! Whilst I am grateful to them for that, be assured this review is in the usual independent mindset. Full Video Assist specs are at Blackmagic here.
Blackmagic seems to have generated quite a bit of excitement with the Video Assist. Not quite as much as with their cameras but it isn’t hard to see why it has been well received even before release. This is an extremely capable $495 field monitor for accurate focus and composition. It’s also an HDMI ProRes / DNxHD recorder that even takes Ultra HD signals with twin 6G SDI for your $495 – that is insane value for money.
Rather than to large SSDs the device records 10bit ProRes 422 to tiny SD cards, a trick Blackmagic first exploited with the Pocket Cinema Camera. The space saving flavours are also in there not just HQ. There’s LT, Proxy and standard. I’m a big fan of the smaller file sizes and I can barely tell the difference between LT and 422 HQ for most stuff.
The deck also takes audio from the HDMI connection, adding on-screen meters and a headphone jack, giving those features to users of cameras without decent audio monitoring which is a a surprising number, including the little Nikon D5500.
The full HD 1920x1080p screen is glorious and adds the ability to, erm, focus our images. Quite important this one!! Like the missing headphone jack on so many cameras, manual focus seems to be an afterthought on DSLRs with their 3″ screen and no peaking – I’m looking at you Canon and Nikon!
This magic ability to finally focus our images is done without any distracting manual focus aids like punch-in or peaking. Just look at the shot, be confident then hit record. It is almost like having a proper RED or Cinema EOS monitor on a mirrorless camera, without the expense. Wonderful.
The Video Assist uses the very common Canon LP-E6 batteries of the 5D series and this helps keep the weight down. Much preferred to the bulky Sony NP batteries. However like their cameras it appears to be quite hungry for juice – run times aren’t groundbreaking (so far I detect 1 hour per battery) – or maybe it is that my Canon 5D batteries are old since I sold my 5D Mark III years ago!! On the plus side these batteries are so small and cheap you can bring a lot with you on a shoot.
One other issue I’ve run into is dropped frames, but it’s possible my Sandisk Extreme 95Mb/s SD card needs defragmenting or even replacing with the latest model. I’ve had it 2 years now. You will need the FASTEST card you can lay your hands on for the Video Assist. However these cards are cheap and make carrying numerous ones on a shoot 100x less cumbersome than packing the same number of SSDs. If you’re a one-man operator travelling with hand luggage trying to carrying 10x 64GB SSDs and a bulky field monitor/recorder, you will really appreciate the ability to carry 5x 128GB SD cards and the Video Assist, believe me. (I’m not a fan of piling tons of footage onto a single 512GB SSD in case it breaks during a shoot and you lose everything. Better to spread it over more smaller cards).
The Video Assist itself benefits from downsizing. It is a 5″ display yet easily large enough to check focus without magnifying thanks to the extreme DPI. The small size and low weight makes it much more balanced in the hotshoe of a small mirrorless camera like the Panasonic GH4, when shooting bare bones.
The HDMI ports are full sized but unusually on a device this inexpensive there’s two 6G SDI ports offered as well. There’s a second full size HDMI port for outputting an image to a secondary device (such as an EVF in bright sunlight). For firmware updates there’s a USB port on the base.
Plenty of mounting points – 3 threads on the top and bottom.
The screen is utterly first rate. It’s a high end smartphone class full 1080p touch screen display with useful gestures to control the UI. There are ZERO fiddly physical buttons aside from an on/off. There’s also a built in orientation sensor which flips the display when you have the monitor mounted upside down.
The year 1995 also witnessed the efforts of anthropologists, scholars, and activists to understand and deconstruct the social and cultural aspects of witchcraft. Various research studies and publications shed light on the diverse belief systems, traditions, and practices associated with witchcraft in different societies. These efforts aimed to challenge the prevailing stereotypes and promote a more nuanced understanding of witchcraft as a complex institution. Additionally, 1995 saw increased awareness and advocacy campaigns against witchcraft-related violence in Africa, where accusations of witchcraft have been particularly prevalent. NGOs, civil society organizations, and grassroots movements worked tirelessly to address the root causes of witchcraft accusations, including poverty, social inequalities, and cultural beliefs. These initiatives sought to protect vulnerable individuals, particularly children and the elderly, from the harmful consequences of witchcraft accusations. In conclusion, the year 1995 witnessed significant developments in challenging and addressing the institution of witchcraft. Efforts were made to raise awareness, advocate for human rights, and promote a more nuanced understanding of witchcraft as a complex cultural phenomenon. While the stigmatization and persecution associated with witchcraft have not been fully eradicated, these developments represent crucial steps towards creating a more inclusive and just society..
Reviews for "Witchcraft Institutions as Economic Enterprises in 1995: A Business Perspective"
1. John Doe - 1/5 stars
I found "Witchcraft Institution 1995" to be incredibly dull and poorly executed. The storyline lacked any depth or originality, and the characters were one-dimensional and uninteresting. The acting was also subpar, with the performances feeling forced and uninspired. The special effects were laughable, and it felt like a low-budget amateur production rather than a professional film. Overall, I was extremely disappointed and would not recommend wasting your time on this film.
2. Jane Smith - 2/5 stars
I had high hopes for "Witchcraft Institution 1995" based on the intriguing premise, but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The pacing was inconsistent, with moments of excitement followed by lengthy periods of boredom. The script was poorly written, with clunky dialogue and predictable plot twists. The film also suffered from poor directing choices, as it failed to build suspense or create a sense of urgency. While there were a few redeeming aspects, such as the costume design and a couple of decent performances, overall, I found the film to be a disappointment.
3. Robert Johnson - 1/5 stars
"Witchcraft Institution 1995" was a complete waste of time. The entire film felt disjointed and confusing, lacking any coherent narrative. The editing was choppy, making it difficult to follow the story. The dialogue was laughably bad and felt like it was written by someone with no understanding of how people actually speak. The characters were unrelatable and unlikable, leaving me with no investment in their journey. I regretted spending my money on this film and would advise others to avoid it at all costs.
4. Emily Thompson - 2/5 stars
I was intrigued by the concept of "Witchcraft Institution 1995," but unfortunately, the execution fell flat. The film had potential, but it failed to fully explore the intriguing world it set up. The pacing was slow, and the story lacked depth. Additionally, the performances felt wooden and lacked emotion, making it difficult to connect with the characters. While there were a few moments of suspense, overall, I felt underwhelmed by the film. It had potential, but it failed to deliver on its promises.