The twelfth book in the Magic Treehouse series by Mary Pope Osborne is titled "Polar Bears Past Bedtime". In this book, the two main characters, Jack and Annie, embark on another magical adventure through time. This time, they are transported to the Arctic, where they encounter polar bears and explore the frozen landscape. The main idea of this book is the importance of facing fears and embracing new experiences. Throughout the story, Jack and Annie are initially afraid of the polar bears and the cold Arctic environment. However, they soon learn to overcome their fears and adapt to their surroundings.
Authors must deposit their data to a data repository as part of the manuscript submission process; manuscripts will not otherwise be sent for review. If data have not been deposited to a repository prior to manuscript submission we offer a service to deposit them at figshare or dryad during the submission process via our article submission platform. Data may also be deposited to these resources temporarily, if the main host repository does not support confidential peer review (see below).
Authors must deposit their data to a data repository as part of the manuscript submission process; manuscripts will not otherwise be sent for review. Blending the worlds of sex work, MMA fighting, and urban menace, 100 asks-is it possible to find love, safety, and hope in this dystopian American megalopolis.
However, they soon learn to overcome their fears and adapt to their surroundings. In addition to this, the book also emphasizes the significance of teamwork and problem-solving. Jack and Annie work together to navigate the challenges they encounter in the Arctic, relying on their communication and cooperation to overcome obstacles.
Data Repository Guidance
Scientific Data mandates the release of datasets accompanying our Data Descriptors, but we do not ourselves host data. Instead, we ask authors to submit datasets to an appropriate public data repository. Data should be submitted to discipline-specific, community-recognized repositories where possible. Where a suitable discipline-specific resource does not exist, data should be submitted to a generalist repository.
Authors must deposit their data to a data repository as part of the manuscript submission process; manuscripts will not otherwise be sent for review. If data have not been deposited to a repository prior to manuscript submission we offer a service to deposit them at figshare or dryad during the submission process via our article submission platform. Data may also be deposited to these resources temporarily, if the main host repository does not support confidential peer review (see below).
Repositories need to meet our requirements for anonymous peer-review, data access, preservation, resource stability, licences and suitability for use by all researchers with the appropriate types of data:
- Use open licences (CC0 and CC-BY, or their equivalents, are required in most cases learn more). Exceptions will only be permitted for human derived data that is considered sensitive (e.g. risk of participant identification, controls on specific uses, etc), where we suggest data are shared under Data Usage Agreements (DUAs). We do not typically support the use of more restrictive CC licences - containing SA, NC or ND clauses - for either sensitive or non-sensitive datasets, other than where applied to third party data that has been re-used and the original licence needs to be retained.
- Allow public access to data without barriers, such as formal application processes, unless required for sensitive human datasets requiring controlled access and Data Usage Agreements. Note that basic login functionalities, where data are captured for analytics purposes only, are accepted for non-sensitive datasets as long as immediate access is granted to the holder of the email address without manual checks, however we encourage login-free https access without registration in most cases.
- All data need to be available for peer review. Where logins or other barriers are required or temporarily applied, routes for confidential peer review of submitted datasets need to be provided that do not reveal the identity of the reviewer to the data owner/author of the associated article. Please consult with the repository to arrange this, or provide the data in a temporary location for peer review.
- Ensure long-term persistence and preservation of datasets in their published form. All Data Descriptors need to be associated with live data, so long term preservation and persistence is required to avoid future correction or other action to ensure the integrity of the paper.
- Provide stable persistent identifiers for submitted datasets. DOIs are the default for most non-omics datasets described in the journal.
- Subject specific repositories that are supported and recognized within their scientific community are strongly encouraged - general repositories should be used where no suitable subject repository is available, or the repository does not meet the requirements above.
The list below is intended as a guide for those who are unsure where to deposit their data, and provides examples of repositories from a number of disciplines. Please note this list does not constitute a formal or exclusive list of repositories accepted by the journal and there are many more repositories that meet our criteria than we are able to track. The list is no longer updated (since 2021), but is retained as a useful list of suggestions.
Authors may also wish to use external resources such as DataCite’s Repository Finder and the FAIRsharing registry to find an appropriate repository for their data.
Please note that certain data types (e.g. most omics and cystallographic data) are subject to mandates on which repository should be used. Please see our policy on mandated data types for further informaton.
As with the other books in the series, "Polar Bears Past Bedtime" is educational as well as entertaining. It provides readers with information about polar bears and their habitat, as well as facts about the Arctic environment. This blend of fiction and non-fiction helps to engage readers and expand their knowledge. Overall, "Polar Bears Past Bedtime" is another exciting installment in the Magic Treehouse series. It encourages readers to face their fears, work together, and explore the world around them..
Reviews for "Exploring Historical Landmarks: A Look into 'The Twelfth Book' of the Magic Treehouse Series"
1. Emily - 2 out of 5 stars - I was quite disappointed with the twelfth book in the Magic Treehouse series. The plot felt repetitive and predictable, lacking the excitement and creativity I had come to expect from the previous books. The characters also seemed to be stagnant and didn't show much growth or development. Overall, I found the storyline to be dull and unengaging, making it a lackluster addition to the series.
2. David - 1 out of 5 stars - As a fan of the Magic Treehouse series, I was incredibly let down by the twelfth book. The writing felt rushed and the plot was incredibly formulaic, as if the author was just going through the motions without putting much thought into it. The lack of depth and character development made it difficult to connect with the story. Overall, it felt like a filler book that didn't offer anything new or exciting to the series.
3. Samantha - 2 out of 5 stars - The twelfth book in the Magic Treehouse series felt like a repetitive and uninspired installment. The time-traveling adventures that were once captivating now felt formulaic and predictable. The plot lacked originality and failed to hold my interest. I was also disappointed with the minimal character development, as the main characters felt like shallow caricatures rather than fully-fleshed individuals. Overall, this book was a letdown and did not meet my expectations for the series.
4. Marcus - 1 out of 5 stars - I found the twelfth book in the Magic Treehouse series to be incredibly boring and unimpressive. The story lacked any real substance and felt like a rehash of previous books. The lack of creativity and originality left me feeling disengaged and uninterested in the plot. I was also disappointed by the lack of character growth and the one-dimensional nature of the main characters. Overall, this book was a huge disappointment and I would not recommend it to fans of the series.
5. Lily - 2 out of 5 stars - The twelfth book in the Magic Treehouse series failed to capture my attention like the previous installments. The plot felt recycled and lacked the excitement and adventure that I had come to love from the series. The writing also lacked depth and failed to immerse me in the story. Overall, I found this book to be a forgettable addition to the series and did not live up to my expectations.