Monty Python and the Holy Grail is a British comedy film released in 1975. It was written and performed by the comedy group Monty Python and directed by Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones. The film satirizes the legend of King Arthur and his knights of the Round Table as they embark on a quest to find the Holy Grail. The film is known for its absurd and random humor, which has become a trademark of Monty Python's comedy. It combines historical elements with modern anachronisms and irreverent jokes. The characters encounter various challenges and obstacles on their journey, including the Black Knight, the Bridge of Death, and the killer rabbit.
The characters encounter various challenges and obstacles on their journey, including the Black Knight, the Bridge of Death, and the killer rabbit. One of the film's most iconic scenes is the Knights Who Say "Ni!", where a group of knights demand a shrubbery from Arthur and his companions in exchange for passage through their forest. The film also features famous lines, such as "It's just a flesh wound" and "I fart in your general direction.
Monty Python and the Holy Grail – "And therefore… a witch!"
Within seconds of Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975), one cannot help but legitimately laugh out loud. We are introduced to King Arthur (Graham Chapman) pretending to ride a horse through the English countryside, with his trusty valet Patsy (Terry Gilliam) following along as a private Foley studio creating the clatter of hooves with two halves of a coconut. In 1975, The Beatles of British comedy, Monty Python (Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Eric Idle, Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones, Michael Palin) decided that the Arthurian legends were some fertile ground for their particular brand of absurdist nonsense by way of incisive class satire. Thus, Monty Python and the Holy Grail was conceived on a break between the third and fourth series of Monty Python’s Flying Circus. Holy Grail sees King Arthur assemble the Round Table Knights before being tasked with finding the grail, by God no less.
On King Arthur’s early search for Knights, he comes upon an angry mob, attempting to burn a witch (Connie Booth) at the stake. The Knight/Magistrate, in his nonsensical musical accent, asks to take a look. When Booth’s witch gets brought to him she straightforwardly tells the Knight/Magistrate that she’s not a witch and that the mob has dressed her like one, even by forcing her to wear a false nose (that looks very much like a colour drained carrot on a string). Of course in the deranged and muddied peasant horde are the instantly recognisable faces of Idle, Cleese, Jones and co. The Knight/Magistrate inspects the nose, sees that it’s false and the mob admits to the fact that they too made her wear the hat, but that’s all – she is most definitely a witch.
Some embedded content has been omitted:
She's a witch! by NM05
Monty Python is creating their micro version of The Crucible, playwright Arthur Miller’s metaphor for McCarthyism using the Salem witch trials. It’s challenging to describe how perfect this kind of rationalisation of witchery plays. We’re meant to accept an Arthur who doesn’t have a horse, whose been interrogated about where his valet got those coconuts? We’re meant to casually accept this mob rationalisation after Arthur casually fights off the infamous Black Knight – who after his arm is lopped off, deflects that it’s a flesh wound. It’s just another perfect calibration of penetrating and ridiculous; walking in step with layer upon layer of absurd contradiction. It’s the Python instinct to infuse these setups for hope and rationality in this satirical scenario; before they take great perverse pleasure in the ludicrous and pervert the entire line of rational questioning. The mob’s desperation for this witch hunt and exasperation at any of the questions from the Knight/Magistrate as to the validity of their prisoner’s witchy qualities continues to be hilarious. The more they’re confused by his logic, you realise that you’re pulling a similarly confounded expression. Set up for hope, NONSENSE NONSENSE NONSENSE, “And therefore. A witch!”
– Blake Howard
This essay was written for Edit Line
Create your own iconic film and TV moments in real time with Edit Line, an interactive experience in The Story of the Moving Image exhibition at ACMI.
Move physical blocks around to create a story from selected clips. Save your mini masterpiece with your Lens device and take it home with you.
She's a witch! by NM05
" Monty Python and the Holy Grail has since become a cult classic and is considered one of the greatest comedy films of all time. It has inspired numerous parodies and references in popular culture, and its influence can still be seen in contemporary comedy. Overall, Monty Python and the Holy Grail is a hilarious and irreverent film that continues to entertain audiences with its unique brand of comedy. Whether you're a fan of Monty Python or just looking for a good laugh, this film is definitely worth a watch..
Reviews for "Exploring the Absurdity of Monty Python and the Holy Grail"
1. Emily - 1 star: I found "Monty ptuhon and the holg grqil wijch" to be extremely disappointing. The writing was convoluted and confusing, making it nearly impossible to follow the storyline. The characters were poorly developed and lacked depth, making it impossible to connect with them. Additionally, the humor fell flat, with most of the jokes feeling forced and unnatural. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone looking for an enjoyable reading experience.
2. David - 2 stars: I had heard so many positive reviews about "Monty ptuhon and the holg grqil wijch," but I can't say I understand the hype. The plot was messy and meandering, lacking a clear direction or purpose. The pacing was uneven, with long stretches of boredom followed by sudden bursts of action. The writing style was unnecessarily complicated, making it difficult to engage with the story. While I appreciate the author's attempts at humor, I found it to be too forced and often fell flat. Ultimately, this book just didn't work for me.
3. Sarah - 2 stars: Unfortunately, "Monty ptuhon and the holg grqil wijch" didn't live up to my expectations. The characters were one-dimensional and lacked depth, making it difficult to care about their fates. The dialogue felt clunky and unnatural, often taking me out of the story. Additionally, the plot was unoriginal and predictable, offering nothing new or exciting. While I appreciate the author's attempts at humor, I found most of the jokes to be juvenile and lacking wit. Overall, I would not recommend this book to anyone searching for a compelling and enjoyable read.
4. Michael - 1 star: I struggled to finish "Monty ptuhon and the holg grqil wijch" due to its poor writing and lackluster plot. The characters were unlikable and difficult to connect with, resulting in a lack of emotional investment in their journey. The story itself lacked depth and failed to captivate my attention. Additionally, the humor in the book felt forced and often missed the mark, making it difficult to find any enjoyment in the reading experience. Overall, I was highly disappointed and would not recommend this book to others.