The Amityville Curse is a supernatural horror film released in 1990. It is the fourth installment in the Amityville franchise and is known for its low-budget production and cheesy special effects. Despite its flaws, the film has gained a cult following over the years. The plot revolves around a group of young adults who move into the infamous Amityville house, which is believed to be cursed. As they settle in, strange and supernatural phenomena begin to occur, leading to a series of terrifying events. The curse of the Amityville house seems to target each individual in the group, causing them to experience horrifying nightmares and hallucinations.
Followers of voudon also believe in a universal energy and a soul that can leave the body during dreams and spirit possession. In Christian theology, spiritual possession is usually considered to be an act of evil, either Satan or some demonic entity trying to enter an unwilling human vessel. In voudon, however, possession by loa is desired. In a ceremony guided by a priest or priestess, this possession is considered a valuable, first-hand spiritual experience and connection with the spirit world.
An 1889 book titled Hayti, or the Black Republic Filiquarian, 2012 falsely attributed human sacrifices, cannibalism and other atrocities to voudon, further spreading fear of the religion. Even today voodoo is often used as an adjective to describe something that is unknowable, mysterious or simply unworkable for example, in 1980 George H.
The curse of the Amityville house seems to target each individual in the group, causing them to experience horrifying nightmares and hallucinations. The players in The Amityville Curse include Kim Coates as Frank, a skeptical writer who investigates the cursed house, and Dawna Wightman as Nancy, a woman with psychic abilities who tries to communicate with the spirits inhabiting the house. Other characters include John Roberston as Dennis, Helen Hughes as Marut, and Anthony Dean Rubes as Father Tom.
Shakespeare on screen : Macbeth
This addition to the Shakespeare on Screen series reveals the remarkable presence of Macbeth in the global Shakespearean screenscape. What is it about Macbeth that is capable of extending beyond Scottish contexts and speaking globally, locally and “glocally”? Does the extensive adaptive reframing ofMacbeth suggest the paradoxical irrelevance of the original play? After examining the evident topic of the supernatural elements—the witches and the ghost—in the films, the essays move from a revisitation of the well-known American screen versions, to an analysis of more recent Anglophone productions and to world cinema (Asia, France, South Africa, India, Japan, etc.). Questions of lineage and progeny are broached, then extended into the wider issues of gender. Finally, ballet remediations, filmic appropriations, citations and mises-en-abyme of Macbeth are examined, and the book ends with an analysis of a Macbeth script that never reached the screen.
Ce nouvel ouvrage de la série « Shakespeare à l’écran » révèle la présence remarquable de Macbeth dans le paysage filmique shakespearien à l’échelle mondiale. Comment expliquer qu’une pièce dont l’intrigue est ancrée dans une nation, l’Écosse, ait pu être absorbée par des cultures aussi diverses ? Les multiples adaptations de Macbeth suggèrent-elles, de manière paradoxale, une moindre pertinence de la pièce originelle ? Après avoir exploré la représentation des éléments surnaturels (les sorcières et le fantôme), le volume revisite les films américains « canoniques », les productions anglophones plus récentes et les versions d’autres aires culturelles (Asie, France, Afrique du Sud, Inde, Japon, etc.) Les questions de lignée et de descendance sont abordées, puis prolongées dans des articles sur la représentation du genre. Les versions dansées, les appropriations, les citations et les mises en abyme de Macbeth sont ensuite analysées, et ce parcours mène à un étrange objet – un scénario non filmé.
When the coronavirus pandemic cancelled all live performances – but the grant still needed to be fulfilled – Lennon and her husband turned their living room into a “navy blue box” theater and, under the supervision of a director from New York she’d never met, recorded a digital version of the show which she has been screening in Zoom sessions ever since. Included in each session is a post-performance live “talk back” with Lennon, which has produced some raw and emotional testimonies from viewers.
The performances in The Amityville Curse are generally criticized for being over-the-top and exaggerated. However, Kim Coates and Dawna Wightman manage to bring some depth and intensity to their roles, elevating the film slightly. The special effects, on the other hand, are dated and often comical, detracting from the overall horror atmosphere. Despite its shortcomings, The Amityville Curse is still enjoyed by fans of the Amityville franchise and those who appreciate cheesy B-movie horror films. It is worth watching for its nostalgic value and as a guilty pleasure. Overall, The Amityville Curse players do their best to navigate the low-budget production and bring some entertainment value to the film..
Reviews for "The Legacy of The Amityville Curse Players in Pop Culture"
1. John - 1/5
I recently watched "The Amityville Curse Players" and was extremely disappointed. The whole movie lacked originality and creativity. The plot was predictable and felt like a rehash of other supernatural horror films. The acting was subpar, with most of the characters delivering their lines in a wooden and unconvincing manner. The scares were cheap and relied heavily on jump scares, rather than building genuine suspense. Overall, "The Amityville Curse Players" failed to deliver any genuine scares or memorable moments, and I would not recommend wasting your time on this film.
2. Mary - 2/5
I had high hopes for "The Amityville Curse Players" but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The story had potential, but the execution felt rushed and poorly developed. The characters lacked depth and their motivations were unclear. Additionally, the special effects were lackluster and did not enhance the horror elements of the film. While there were a few moments of tension, overall, the movie failed to create a truly terrifying atmosphere. If you're a die-hard fan of supernatural horror, you might find some enjoyment in "The Amityville Curse Players," but for me, it was a forgettable and underwhelming experience.
3. Sarah - 1/5
"The Amityville Curse Players" was one of the worst horror movies I've ever seen. The plot was convoluted and made little sense, leaving me confused and frustrated throughout the film. The characters were cardboard cutouts, lacking any depth or relatability. It felt like the filmmakers were more interested in creating jump scares than crafting a compelling story. Unfortunately, even the jump scares were predictable and uninspired. I would highly advise against wasting your time on "The Amityville Curse Players" as it offers nothing new or exciting to the horror genre.