The Magical Metropolis Surplus refers to the phenomenon where a city that relies heavily on magic experiences an excess supply of magical resources and artifacts, leading to various consequences. This surplus can occur due to a variety of reasons, such as an increase in the number of magical beings or the discovery of previously unknown magical sources. One of the primary effects of the Magical Metropolis Surplus is the proliferation of magical goods and services. With an abundance of magical resources available, residents of the city are able to access a wide range of magical products and services. This can lead to an increase in the overall quality of life for the city's inhabitants, as they have access to convenient and powerful magical solutions for various tasks and problems. However, the surplus of magical resources can also have negative consequences.
However, the surplus of magical resources can also have negative consequences. One such consequence is the devaluation of magical artifacts and spells. With an excess supply, the demand for magical items decreases, leading to a decrease in their value.
Share
S ometime during 1996, at the very latest, Latinos surpassed Blacks as the second largest ethno-racial group in New York City. (They long have been the largest census group in the Bronx.) There were no street celebrations in El Barrio or Washington Heights, nor did the mayor hold a press conference from the steps of Gracie Mansion. Indeed, most New Yorkers remain oblivious to this demographic watershed, which was first announced in an academic working paper. footnote 1 Yet it was an epochal event all the same: comparable to the numerical ascendancy of the Irish during the 1870s or the peaking of black migration to New York in the early 1960s. It also mirrors a decisive national trend. Salsa is becoming the predominant ethnic flavour—and rhythm—in other large metropolitan cores. In six of the ten biggest cities—New York, Los Angeles, Houston, San Diego, Phoenix, and
San Antonio, in that order—Latinos now outnumber Blacks; and in Los Angeles, Houston and San Antonio, non-Hispanic whites as well. Within five years, both Dallas and Fort Worth will have Spanish-surname pluralities, while in Chicago—Drake and Cayton’s paradigmatic ‘Black Metropolis’—the surging Latino population, although still only half of the size of the African-American community, now holds the balance of political power in most city elections. Philadelphia’s Latinos may be in distant third place, but they account for a majority of the city’s population influx since 1980. Only Detroit—with the most threadbare private-sector economy of any major central city—clearly bucks the trend. footnote 2 In the broader census of cities of 200,000 inhabitants and over, nearly two-fifths now have larger Latino than Black populations. Although urban centres where Latinos are in the majority, or are the largest minority, are concentrated in the south-western tier of states, Spanish-surname populations have also been growing in hothouse fashion in cities where there is a negligible historical Mexican or Spanish connection, such as Atlanta, Milwaukee, and Washington, dc. Another spectacular example is Las Vegas, the nation’s fastest growing metropolitan area throughout the 1990s. Thirty years ago, the desert glitterdome had hardly any Latino residents, and the casino industry relied upon a segregated Black population for its supply of poorly paid maids and janitors. Today, Latinos outnumber Blacks in both ‘back-of-the-house’ occupations and the general population. Extrapolating from current school-age demographics, Latinos will become the majority in the city of Las Vegas within a decade. footnote 3 This far-reaching ‘Latinization’ of large and medium-sized American central cities is being driven by a formidable demographic engine: a Spanish-surname population that is increasing by one million annually, or five times faster than the general population. footnote 5 While nativist hysteria has focused on supposedly ‘unrestricted’ immigration, the growth of the Latino population (32 million in 2000) is equally the consequence of higher fecundity in the context of larger, more successfully maintained two-parent families, especially amongst those of Mexican origin (two-thirds of all Latinos). Even if all immigration were terminated tomorrow, the dramatically younger Latino population (median age 26) would continue to increase rapidly at the statistical expense of ageing, non-Hispanic whites (median age 37). footnote 6 ‘Jose’, as a result, is now the most popular name for baby boys in both California and Texas, and Southern Californians are more likely to greet each other with ‘Que tal?’ than ‘Hey, dude’. footnote 7 More importantly, Spanish-surname children already account for a bigger share of the national school-age population than African-Americans, and are expected to displace Blacks as the largest minority some time in the year 2000—far ahead of earlier predictions. Indeed, the present demographic momentum will ensure that, by 2025, there will be 16 million more Latinos (59 million) than African-Americans (43 million). From then until the mid-century, according to the Bureau of the Census, Latinos will supply fully two-thirds of us population growth. Shortly after 2050, non-Hispanic whites will become a minority group. These are millennial transformations with truly millennial implications for us politics and culture. footnote 8 Latinos, moreover, have a striking preference for big cities that contrasts with the crabgrass prejudices of an overwhelmingly suburban nation. (Only Asian-Americans are more urbanized.) footnote 9 With the partial exception of Mexicans, who also invigorate small-town life from California—which had 72 Latino-majority cities in 1990 footnote 10 —to Iowa, all major Latino groups are heavily concentrated in the twenty
largest cities, with Los Angeles and New York alone accounting for almost one third of the national Spanish-surname population. Thus, Los Angeles can boast that it is the second largest Mexican, Salvadorean and Guatemalan city in the world, and, over the next generation, as its metropolitan Latino population grows in excess of nine million, will become the third largest Spanish-speaking city in the world after Mexico City and Buenos Aires. footnote 11 New York City, meanwhile, is the true capital of Puerto Rico and the second city of the Dominican Republic. Without this Latino population boom, most big American cities would be dramatically shrinking in the face of accelerated white flight and, since 1990, black out-migration. ‘The Greater Los Angeles and New York City metro areas’, the National Journal notes, ‘each suffered a net loss of more than one million domestic migrants from 1990-95’. Latinos, with help from Asian immigrants, compensated for this exodus to the edge cities. footnote 12 The stubbornly binary discourse of American public culture, however, has yet to register the historical significance of this ethnic transformation of the urban landscape. The living colour of the contemporary big city—dynamically Asian as well as Latino—is still viewed on an old-fashioned black-and-white screen. (This is almost literally true: a recent study found that only one out of every fifty characters on primetime us television is a Latino.) footnote 14 The 1992 Rodney King riots in Los Angeles County, for example, were universally interpreted as Black versus white, or Black versus Korean, despite the fact that a majority of arrested had Spanish surnames and came from immigrant neighbourhoods severely battered by recession. footnote 15 Similarly, when more than 75,000 young Latinos, protesting against anti-immigrant Proposition 187, marched out of their high schools throughout California in 1994—the largest student protest in the state’s history—it was virtually ignored by the media networks, although a comparable uprising by Black or white students would have become a national sensation. footnote 16 Unfortunately, the invisibility of Latinos also extends to ‘high-end’ urban studies. For more than a decade, urban theory has been intensely focused on trying to understand how the new world economy is reshaping the metropolis. Yet most of the literature on ‘globalization’ has paradoxically ignored its most spectacular us expression. This neglect, moreover, is not for want of a richness of data and ideas. Researchers in the fields of Chicano, Puerto Rican and Cuban-American Studies, as well as urban sociologists, anthropologists and immigration specialists, have produced a bumper crop of important findings and conceptual innovations that soi disant urban theory has failed to harvest. footnote 17 Moreover, Latino Studies recently has been capturing broad academic attention with its effective attacks on the Great Wall of us Exceptionalism that has stood for so long between Latin American Studies and ‘American’ Studies. footnote 18 This article explores some of the consequences of putting the new Latino urban populations where they clearly belong: in the centre of debate about the future of the American city.
S ometime during 1996, at the very latest, Latinos surpassed Blacks as the second largest ethno-racial group in New York City. (They long have been the largest census group in the Bronx.) There were no street celebrations in El Barrio or Washington Heights, nor did the mayor hold a press conference from the steps of Gracie Mansion. Indeed, most New Yorkers remain oblivious to this demographic watershed, which was first announced in an academic working paper. footnote 1 Yet it was an epochal event all the same: comparable to the numerical ascendancy of the Irish during the 1870s or the peaking of black migration to New York in the early 1960s. It also mirrors a decisive national trend. Salsa is becoming the predominant ethnic flavour—and rhythm—in other large metropolitan cores. In six of the ten biggest cities—New York, Los Angeles, Houston, San Diego, Phoenix, and
This can cause problems for individuals and businesses that specialize in the production and sale of magical goods. They may experience a decline in profits and face challenges in maintaining their businesses in a competitive market. Additionally, the Magical Metropolis Surplus can also lead to an increase in magical accidents and disturbances. With more magical energy present in the city, there is a greater risk of uncontrolled magical events occurring. These accidents can range from simple inconveniences, such as objects levitating or disappearing, to more serious incidents that can cause harm to individuals and property. To address these challenges, city authorities often need to implement measures to manage the surplus of magic. This can include regulations on the production and sale of magical goods, as well as the establishment of specialized magical response teams to address emergencies and prevent accidents. In conclusion, the Magical Metropolis Surplus can have both positive and negative consequences for a city. While it can lead to an increase in magical goods and services, it can also devalue magical artifacts and spells and increase the risk of magical accidents. It is important for city authorities to implement appropriate measures to manage this surplus and ensure the safety and well-being of their residents..
Reviews for "Unveiling the Exquisite Surplus of a Magical Metropolis"
1. Jane Doe - 2/5 - "I was really disappointed with Magical Metropolis Surplus. The plot was weak and predictable, and the characters were flat and uninteresting. It felt like a 2-dimensional version of other urban fantasy novels I have read. The writing style was also quite lackluster, with no unique voice or flair. Overall, I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for a captivating and engaging read."
2. John Smith - 1/5 - "Magical Metropolis Surplus is one of the worst books I have ever had the misfortune of reading. The world-building was sloppy and inconsistent, with magical elements being introduced without any explanation or logical progression. The dialogue was cringe-worthy, filled with cliches and unnatural exchanges. The main character was also incredibly unlikable and had no depth or development. Save yourself the time and avoid this book at all costs."
3. Emily Johnson - 2/5 - "I had high hopes for Magical Metropolis Surplus, but unfortunately, it fell flat for me. The pacing was off, and the story dragged on without much happening. The magic system was poorly explained, leaving me confused and disconnected from the world. The writing lacked emotion and failed to evoke any sort of excitement or interest. I wanted to enjoy this book, but I just couldn't get into it."
4. Robert Thompson - 1/5 - "Magical Metropolis Surplus was a complete waste of my time. The plot was convoluted and poorly constructed, with holes that were never filled or addressed. The characters were forgettable and lacked any depth or motivation. The writing was choppy and awkward, making it difficult to stay engaged. I regret picking up this book and would not recommend it to anyone."