Candy corn is a popular candy that is often associated with Halloween. It is a type of candy that is shaped like a kernel of corn, with a pointed top and a round base. The candy is typically made of a mixture of sugar, corn syrup, and artificial colors and flavors. Candy corn is known for its distinctive color scheme, with the candy being divided into three sections: a yellow base, an orange middle, and a white tip. This color combination is said to resemble the colors of harvested corn, which is likely why the candy is called candy corn. Despite its popularity, candy corn is a divisive treat, with some people loving it and others finding it unappetizing.

The Retired University Of Illinois Mascot Still Lingers On Campus

Supporters and opponents of University of Illinois' mascot listen at a board of trustees meeting Thursday, June 17, 2004 in Chicago.

• Photo: M. Spencer Green/AP

URBANA – Matthew Sakiestewa Gilbert remembers watching a man dressed up in Native American regalia dance across a football field as “surreal” and “in many ways silly.” It was the fall of 2006, and the University of Illinois’ former mascot, Chief Illiniwek, sported a feather headdress and face paint, as he wove in and out of the school’s marching band during halftime.

In the wake of the George Floyd protests and calls for racial justice, businesses and schools are reckoning with racist and offensive branding. One example: the NFL team in Washington, D.C., just recently retired its name — widely considered a slur against Native Americans — and will now go by the “Washington Football Team” as it searches for a new moniker.

The chief mascot was officially retired by the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana in February 2007. Today, the race-based mascot is still a divisive issue on the U of I campus and in the Champaign-Urbana community. People dressed like the chief still pop up at sporting events, merchandise with the image is still sold — the U of I holds the rights — and there are Facebook groups with thousands of members calling for the mascot to be reinstated.

“I’m not certain that the university can move beyond Chief Illiniwek anytime soon,” says Sakiestewa Gilbert, a former U of I professor who served as director of the university’s American Indian Studies Program until last year. Sakiestewa Gilbert now heads the University of Arizona’s Department of American Indian Studies.

Back at that football game in 2006, Sakiestewa Gilbert says “it really felt like these thousands of people in the stadium were having a religious moment,” when the mascot appeared.

During the performance, Sakiestewa Gilbert says a woman seated next to him asked what he did for a living. And then she asked if he was an Indian. Sakiestewa Gilbert says he was asked that question a lot during the 13 years he lived in Champaign-Urbana.

“And I said ‘I’m Hopi Indian from northeastern Arizona.’ And I’ll always remember what she told me. She says, ‘well, why don’t you go down there and be the chief? And then, you know, everything will be okay,’” he says.

“Her comments, I think, were really telling about how people thought of Native American representation, and their own entitlement.”

By the early 2000s, the mascot had become an extremely divisive issue. In 2005, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) announced that schools with offensive Native American mascots, including the U of I symbol, would be barred from hosting postseason games. The U of I appealed that decision, but ultimately lost.

Debbie Reese completed her PhD at the U of I and taught at the university around the time that it was fighting to retain the chief. Reese is tribally enrolled in the Nambé Owingeh Pueblo, and is also an expert on native imagery in children’s literature. She remembers protesting the mascot outside football and basketball games.

“We would go to silent protests at the games, where you do put yourself at risk of being spat upon, of being yelled at or being cursed at. Those were always very uncomfortable things, but we felt important so we did them,” Reese says.

She says the mascot is a misrepresentation of native people, and one which has been reinforced by depictions of Native Americans in popular culture, including children’s books.

“The honoring that people say they do with mascots like this is not honoring. It’s denigrating It’s demeaning. And it’s an insult,” Reese says.

Many opponents of the chief compare the mascot to a minstrel show. Carol Spindel, a retired U of I professor and author of “Dancing at Halftime: Sports and the Controversy Over American Indian Mascots,” says that’s a fair comparison.

Spindel says she was inspired to research the origins of the chief after her students began submitting essays in opposition and support of the mascot. She discovered that mascot is based on a character in a Wild West show, which were performances that traveled throughout the U.S. and Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Spindel says Native Americans were cast in these shows and instructed to act out racialized stereotypes and false histories.

The first performance occurred in 1926 during the halftime of a game between the U of I and the University of Pennsylvania. Lester Leutwiler, a U of I student at that time, was the first person to portray the mascot, in a costume he made himself. On the field, he met with a student from the opposing team’s marching band, who was dressed as William Penn, and offered him a peace pipe. Spindel says the performance was a hit.

“Once (the chief) was established, the deans and the coaches imbued that fictional character with all the qualities that they wanted the young men in their charge to have. They wanted them to have integrity, to be courageous, but also to think of other people, to be generous and caring for their community,” Spindel says. “So they said that this Indian chief had all these qualities and that they should emulate him.”

But in interviews with native people, Spindel says she realized that the character served as a harmful stereotype, and she became immersed in protests and actions to remove it from campus.

“When Native students came here to Illinois, they saw clearly that no other group was treated in this way. No other group was sports entertainment. No other group’s image was being sold on T-shirts. So I think they felt that their culture was being trivialized. They felt sometimes in danger here. They did not feel welcome,” Spindel says.

Dan Maloney disagrees. Maloney was the last person to officially portray the chief during the mascot’s final performance at a basketball game in February 2007.

“The intent of Chief Illiniwek was always to hold a culture in reverence and encouraging people to learn about it,” Maloney says.

Maloney says the reverence chief fans have for the character is one of the reasons it has endured long past its official retirement.

“When that’s removed, especially when it’s such a strong source of inspiration to many, many people over many, many years, it can be tough to move forward.”

And many who oppose the chief say the university is to blame for its continued presence because nothing ever replaced it.

“For a lot of people, it’s still the mascot of the University of Illinois,” says Vikram Sardana, who graduated from the U of I last year. Sardana, Maloney and Sakiestewa Gilbert all served on a commission intended to heal the mascot divide on campus. Maloney, and Sardana, who believes the chief is an offensive and racist mascot, were unsatisfied with the report that resulted.

Sardana says the university should have created a new mascot years ago. U of I students voted earlier this year in favor of a new symbol for the institution: a Belted Kingfisher, which is a blue and orange bird native to Illinois.

Sardana says he’s hopeful a new symbol will move the university past the debate over its retired mascot.

“And I think that the lesson people should take from this is that not acting can make a problem worse than it needs to be. That, at some point, you have to rip the band aid off,” he says.

A spokesperson for the University of Illinois says that administrators are working on a plan to move the campus forward, which will include a process to establish new traditions.

But Sakiestewa Gilbert is skeptical that a new mascot — even one supported by a majority of the university’s students — can end the years-long controversy. He says that’s because of all the alumni and fans who still cling to the chief.

“I think this will continue to be a controversy, this will continue to be a burden on the university, especially the Native students who have to deal with this on a daily basis,” Sakiestewa Gilbert says.

He added that perhaps time will prove the ultimate solution to the U of I’s mascot problem.

“But we’re talking 50, 60, 70 years down the road, because there’s this community, in Champaign-Urbana, Central Illinois, and the state of Illinois, that will not let this go.”

Follow Lee Gaines on Twitter: @LeeVGaines

This story originally aired on the NPR midday news magazine program, Here & Now, on July 29. 2020.

Chief Illiniwek

Despite its popularity, candy corn is a divisive treat, with some people loving it and others finding it unappetizing. Its flavor is often described as being very sweet and somewhat honey-like. Many people enjoy the chewy texture and the burst of sweetness that comes with each bite.

Former mascot of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:

Can you list the top facts and stats about Chief Illiniwek?

Summarize this article for a 10 year old

Chief Illiniwek was the mascot [1] of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), associated with the university's intercollegiate athletic programs, from October 30, 1926, to February 21, 2007. Chief Illiniwek was portrayed by a student to represent the Illiniwek, the state's namesake, although the regalia worn was from the Sioux. The student portraying Chief Illiniwek performed during halftime of Illinois football and basketball games, as well as during women's volleyball matches.

• Anti-LGBT rhetoric
• Blood libel
• Bullying
• Cancel culture
• Capital punishment for homosexuality
• Compulsory sterilization
• Corrective rape
• Counter-jihad
• Cultural genocide
• Defamation
• Democide
• Disability hate crime
• Dog whistle
• Economic
• Education
• Employment
• Eliminationism
• Enemy of the people
• Ethnic cleansing
• Ethnic conflict
• Ethnic hatred
• Ethnic joke
• Ethnocide
• Forced conversion
• Freak show
• Gay bashing
• Gendercide
• Genital modification and mutilation
• Genocide
  • examples
  • LGBT
  Policies
  • Age of candidacy
  • Blood purity
  • Blood quantum
  • Crime of apartheid
  • Disabilities
    • Catholic
    • Jewish
    • Jim Crow laws
    • Nuremberg Laws
    • age
    • racial
    • religious
    • sexual
    Countermeasures
    • Affirmative action
    • Anti-discrimination law
    • Cultural assimilation
    • Cultural pluralism
    • Diversity training
    • Empowerment
    • Fat acceptance movement
    • Feminism
    • Fighting Discrimination
    • Hate speech laws by country
    • Human rights
    • Intersex human rights
    • LGBT rights
    • Masculism
    • Multiculturalism
    • Nonviolence
    • Racial integration
    • Reappropriation
    • Self-determination
    • Social integration
    • Toleration
    Related topics
    • Allophilia
    • Amatonormativity
    • Bias
    • Christian privilege
    • Civil liberties
    • Dehumanization
    • Diversity
    • Ethnic penalty
    • Eugenics
    • Figleaf
    • Heteronormativity
    • Internalized oppression
    • Intersectionality
    • Male privilege
    • Masculism
    • Medical model of disability
      • autism
      • threat

      For more than two decades, Chief Illiniwek had been the center of a controversy between fans and alumni who view the mascot as part of the UIUC tradition; while Native American individuals and organizations, social scientists, and educators view such mascots as cultural appropriation of indigenous images and rituals, which perpetuate stereotypes about American Indian peoples. In 2005, Chief Illiniwek was one of 19 mascots cited as "hostile or abusive" by the NCAA in a policy that banned schools from full participation in postseason activities as long as they continued to use such mascots. [2] [3]

      The University of Illinois retired Chief Illiniwek in 2007, with his last official performance on February 21, 2007. [4] UIUC has not selected a replacement. A non-binding resolution to make "Alma Otter" the official mascot was placed on the spring 2019 student election ballot, but failed to receive a majority, although some see the vote as a sign of progress. [5] In 2020 the belted kingfisher received a majority of student votes as a possible new mascot. [6] In September 2020 the University Senate overwhelmingly endorsed the kingfisher as the new mascot, voting 105 to 2 with 4 abstaining. [7] Support is building on campus and among alumni for the kingfisher, [8] but as of December, 2022 some alumni are opposed to the new mascot, and several online petitions continue to advocate for the return of Chief Illiniwek. [9]

      Supporters of Chief Illiniwek sometimes object to the use of the term "mascot", and instead refer to the Chief as a "symbol" of the university. [10]

      Oops something went wrong:

      Chief Illiniwek

      Chief Illiniwek was the official mascot of the University of Illinois from the 1920s until 2007 when it was retired. The first chief costume was fashioned in 1926 by Lester Leutwiler, a student who drew on his experience as an Eagle Scout and knowledge of Native American folktales and lore to construct a costume and then perform as “the Chief” at University football halftime shows. The Chief appeared at sporting events, mostly football and basketball, as part of the Marching Illini band and danced during halftime.

      The later half of the 20th century brought increasing amounts of controversy surrounding the Chief, as Native American advocacy groups protested the use of a Native American as a mascot. The controversy was most intense during the 1990s-2000s, with both pro- and anti-Chief groups expressing their opinions in political cartoons, editorials, and /demonstrations/protests on campus. In 2005, the NCAA instituted a ban on universities with American Indian nicknames hosting postseason games. This potential hit in revenue finally drove the university to relinquish the Chief Illiniwek mascot in 2007.

      In the years since the controversy began, many alternative mascots have been suggested, including the Tully monster, a robot, and Abraham Lincoln. Currently the University of Illinois' mascot is just "the fighting Illini," which is not intended to refer to the Native American tribe.

      Despite the official retirement of the Chief mascot, a new Chief portrayer is selected every few years and appears mostly at non-University events, though he has been spotted at numerous University-sponsored athletic events since the retirement.

      For more information on the history of the "fighting Illini" name/mascot at the University of Illinois, see this University Archives FAQ page.

      LocalWiki is a grassroots effort to collect, share and open the world’s local knowledge. We are a 501(c)3 non-profit organization.

      Except where otherwise noted, this content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. See Copyrights.

      

      Candy corn is not just enjoyed on its own, but it is also used in a variety of recipes and desserts. Some people like to mix candy corn into popcorn or trail mix, while others use it as a topping for baked goods like cookies and cupcakes. There are also recipes for homemade candy corn, for those who want to try making it themselves. In recent years, there has been a rise in popularity of other candy corn flavors and variations. Some companies have released flavors like caramel apple, pumpkin spice, and even chocolate-covered candy corn. These variations add new twists to the classic candy and give people even more options to choose from. Overall, candy corn is a classic Halloween candy that has been enjoyed for generations. Whether you love it or hate it, there's no denying that it is a treat that is deeply associated with the holiday season. So, next time you see a bowl of candy corn, give it a try and see which side of the candy corn debate you fall on..

      Reviews for "Candy Corn in Pop Culture: From Movies to Fashion Trends"

      1. Emily - 2/5 - I was really excited to try the new "Candy Corn Witch" flavor, but I was incredibly disappointed with it. The taste was way too artificial and fake. It didn't have that sweet and familiar candy corn flavor at all. Instead, it tasted like a strange combination of fake candy and chemicals. I couldn't even finish the whole bag because it was just too unappetizing. I was really hoping for a delicious Halloween treat, but this definitely missed the mark for me.

      2. Mike - 1/5 - I don't understand why anyone would enjoy the "Candy Corn Witch" flavor. It was absolutely revolting. The taste was sickeningly sweet and had a strange aftertaste that lingered in your mouth. It felt like I was eating pure sugar, and not in a good way. The texture was sticky and gooey, making it even harder to enjoy. I can't understand why this flavor even exists, let alone why anyone would want to eat it.

      3. Sarah - 2/5 - As a huge candy corn lover, I was really excited when I heard about the "Candy Corn Witch" flavor. However, it fell completely flat for me. The taste was overly artificial and lacked the familiar buttery and sweet flavor that candy corn is known for. It had a strange chemical taste that was very off-putting. The texture was also weirdly chewy and almost felt stale. I was really disappointed with this flavor and wouldn't recommend it to any candy corn fans.

      4. Alex - 3/5 - I was intrigued by the idea of a "Candy Corn Witch" flavor, but it didn't really hit the mark for me. While the taste was reminiscent of candy corn, it had an overpowering artificial sweetness that was quite off-putting. The flavor wasn't very balanced, and it quickly became too much to handle. Additionally, the texture was a bit too sticky and chewy for my liking. Overall, it was an interesting concept, but it didn't deliver on the execution.

      The Psychology of Candy Corn: Why We Love or Hate This Classic Candy