Zitero is a well-known brand that produces a revolutionary product known as Zitero magic cloth. This cloth is designed to provide users with multiple benefits and is gaining popularity in the market. Firstly, the Zitero magic cloth is made from a special type of microfiber material that is incredibly soft and gentle on the skin. This makes it perfect for various applications such as cleaning the face, removing makeup, or even as a towel after a shower. The soft texture of the cloth ensures that it doesn't cause any irritation or discomfort, making it suitable for all skin types. Furthermore, the Zitero magic cloth is highly absorbent, allowing it to quickly soak up moisture or liquids.
Personnel have a duty to: 2.1 apply a head cover that encloses all hair, including sideburns and facial hair, and covers the nape of the neck .
, nor which part of the body they came from, just that the number of CFUs from the instrument table and wound orifice were higher when staff didn t wear an impermeable hood and a large mask covering the entire face except for the areas about the eyes compared to when they did. Furthermore, I d be interested to know if hospitals would be able to provide the number of laundering cycles any given item of hospital provided clothing had undergone.
Furthermore, the Zitero magic cloth is highly absorbent, allowing it to quickly soak up moisture or liquids. This feature makes it excellent for use in the kitchen or as a hand towel. It can absorb several times its own weight in liquid, making it incredibly efficient and convenient for everyday use.
A Challenge to Cloth Theatre Caps?
In recent months the “Theatre Cap Challenge” has been picking up steam on Twitter & has had significant coverage on mainstream media as well. In case you’re wondering what all the fuss is about, you can check out my video in this post or check out the twitter feed below.
While it’s been great seeing this initiative gain momentum, it seems that a significant number of people are hitting a hurdle in adopting it because their hospital doesn’t allow reusable cloth caps citing infection control concerns. In Australia, the ACORN standard is usually cited as the reason for not allowing them, though not all hospitals are interpreting the standard in the same way, and the standard itself allows individual hospitals to develop their own policy on cloth caps.
Given this “challenge to the challenge”, I thought I’d dig a bit deeper and see what the ACORN standard actually had to say on this issue and even go right back to the references cited by ACORN to see if they supported the recommendations contained within their standard. It’s not my intention to impugn the authors of the document, as I know how difficult and time consuming it can be to research and develop these sorts of documents. Indeed, as I’ve compiled this blog post, I’m sure there’s things I’ve missed, parts of the standard I’ve misunderstood, or references I’ve misinterpreted. And as already mentioned, the authors have left it up to individual hospitals to develop their own policies that are relevant to their local conditions, so any problems being faced may be due more to local interpretation of the standard, rather than the standard itself.
Now, before I discuss my findings, I also want to say that I whole heartedly agree that surgical site infections (SSIs) are nasty and expensive, and infection control policies are important in trying to minimise them. However it’s because of this importance that we need to make sure the policies are evidence based so our efforts are directed towards interventions that actually make a difference. Otherwise the effective policies get lost in the noise of ineffective policies, and precious time and money is wasted implementing and enforcing these policies that don’t work. Front line staff are then tempted to throw the infection control baby out with the bad policy bathwater. We also need to be aware that no policy is an island, and that implementing any policy, good or bad, may result in goal conflicts and unintended consequences.
So, with the background out of the way, onto my findings. I thought I’d start with a TL;DR summary with a take home message and some key points for those that are time poor, before looking at the policy in more detail (it’s quite long sorry, I wanted to be thorough!). To be clear, I am only addressing “Standard Statement 2” of Perioperative Attire in the 14th edition of the ACORN Standard .
Take home message Despite limited evidence from studies utilising patient-centred outcomes, theatre staff should wear a head cover as part of a strategy to reduce surgical site infections. Any marginal gain from mandating disposable head covers over cloth ones is unwarranted on current evidence as provided in the ACORN Standard, and any clinical difference is unlikely to be detectable using current methods. Surface contamination and SSIs are far more likely to be influenced by factors other than the fabric used in the manufacture of theatre staff head covers. Staff choosing to wear cloth caps should give consideration to how they will launder them, and the need to replace them at appropriate intervals.
Key Points
- The evidence for theatre staff wearing head covers, of any kind, is relatively weak, even less so if trying to discriminate between different types of head covers. Many of the cited theatre based studies are decades old, and complicating factors include type of theatre ventilation (conventional vs laminar), scrubbed vs un-scrubbed staff, and underspecification of the type of head cover used in the study. None of the studies directly compared disposable vs cloth caps. On the whole I believe wearing a head cover is entirely reasonable but mandating a disposable cap over a cloth cap is unsupported by these studies.
- Many of the studies utilised surrogate endpoints such as air sampling, surface contamination and colony forming units (CFU) on “settle plates” rather than surgical site infections themselves. While this is understandable, it means caution is needed when extrapolating these data to patient-centred outcomes.
- Often, data from studies looking at scrubs and surgical gowns is extrapolated to include recommendations about head covers. I’m not convinced this extrapolation is valid.
- Some studies used to support head covers involved interventions where use of head covers was only one component of a multi-pronged strategy to reduce SSIs, so it is difficult to say what role, if any, the head covers played.
- Some of the official standards and legislation quoted don’t apply to head covers.
In addition to its absorbency, the Zitero magic cloth is also known for its quick-drying properties. Unlike traditional towels or cleaning cloths, this cloth dries in a fraction of the time, making it ideal for travel or those on the go. Its quick-drying feature ensures that it doesn't promote the growth of bacteria or develop an odor, making it hygienic and long-lasting. Moreover, the Zitero magic cloth is highly durable and can withstand frequent use and washing without losing its efficiency. It is designed to be reusable, reducing waste and promoting sustainability. This eco-friendly aspect of the product is highly valued by environmentally conscious consumers. Overall, the Zitero magic cloth offers numerous advantages over traditional towels or cleaning cloths. It provides a soft and gentle touch, high absorbency, quick-drying properties, durability, and sustainability. With its versatility and functionality, the Zitero magic cloth is a valuable addition to any household, catering to various cleaning, personal care, and hygiene needs..
Reviews for "The Versatility of Zitero Magic Cloth: From Windows to Mirrors and Everything in Between"
1. Jane - 2 stars - I had high hopes for the Zitero magic cloth, but I was left disappointed. The cloth didn't live up to its claims of magically removing tough stains and grime. It felt like any regular cloth that I could use. Additionally, the cloth started to fray after just a few uses, making it even less effective. I wouldn't recommend this product to anyone looking for a magical cleaning solution.
2. Mark - 1 star - The Zitero magic cloth is a complete waste of money. I purchased it hoping it would make cleaning easier and faster, but it fell short in every way. The cloth didn't effectively remove stains and left streaks behind on surfaces. It also didn't hold up well after a few washes - it became worn out quickly. Save your money and invest in a better cleaning product.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - I purchased the Zitero magic cloth based on the hype, but it didn't meet my expectations. While it did an okay job at cleaning, it wasn't any different from regular microfiber cloths I already owned. The "magic" aspect was definitely lacking, and I didn't see any improvement in cleaning compared to my old cloths. It's overpriced for what it delivers, and I wouldn't recommend it to others.
4. Mike - 1 star - I regret purchasing the Zitero magic cloth. Despite its claims of being able to effortlessly clean various surfaces, I found it to be ineffective. It struggled to remove tough stains and didn't provide any exceptional cleaning power. On top of that, the cloth started to lose its softness after a few uses, making it less pleasant to use. I would advise others to look for alternative cleaning solutions.