Examining Samuel Parris' Motivations in the Salem Witch Trials

The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts between February 1692 and May 1693. The trials resulted in the executions of 20 people, 14 of them women, and the imprisonment of many others. One of the key figures involved in these trials was Samuel Parris. Samuel Parris was a Puritan minister who served as the pastor of the Salem Village church during the time of the witch trials. Parris played a significant role in the events that unfolded, as he was the father of one of the afflicted girls and actively promoted the prosecutions. Parris's involvement in the witch trials began when his daughter, Elizabeth Parris, and niece, Abigail Williams, started exhibiting strange behavior in January 1692.

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

In most games I ve played against Eldar the Farseer w ROW is Eldrad, and using strength 6 weapons wont ID him unless you use Enfeeble, but that s risky with the 3d6 psychic test. If he wants to play the keep-away game, use ymargls or hive guard on the war walkers and sit on the objectives the rest of the game while he can barely do any damage to your army.

Parris's involvement in the witch trials began when his daughter, Elizabeth Parris, and niece, Abigail Williams, started exhibiting strange behavior in January 1692. They claimed they were being afflicted by supernatural forces and accused three women of witchcraft: Tituba, Sarah Good, and Sarah Osborne. Parris, along with other members of the community, believed these accusations and the hysteria quickly spread throughout Salem Village.

Greyer rune of wardong

Sothis rune has been my only weakness lately. Being a psychic heavy race, this rune causes most of my units to literally just kill themselves. anyone have advice on how to deal with this?

on a side note, fluff says tyranids psychics dont even deal with the warp. I think this rune shouldnt even affect us Nids. or a least not as much.

Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator

Well, the runes of warding are bad news to each enemy pskers. This is nothing new in the 6th ed. The only thing you could do is to kill the Farseer. But this is not always an easy enterprise.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss

Unfortunately it is the bane of our existence as nids. The only way to deal with it effectively is to bum rush the farseer/eldrad with 2 Flyrants and precision shot him to death.

It would be worthwhile to note that because the TL -Devouerers are S6 you can ID T3 units with them. All he has to do is fail 1 wound. (unless of course I'm forgetting that either of these have EW )

OR I've found devilgants can bring the pain if you've got a Flyrant nearby with OA .

I've had 15 devilgants whittle down a unit with Eldrad to just him in 1 turn of shooting. Follow that up with a Flyrant's shooting and he's toast.

Tzeentch Aspiring Sorcerer Riding a Disc

I do agree from a fluff point but ya this rule hurts us tremendously. I will rarely if ever even attempt power vs eldar. My nid lists are typically strong enough to beat eldar without powers anyways. I would only attempt the powers near the start when you have wounds to "spare". Iron arm and endurance are very important for things like tervigons and tyrants so I'd cast them if I'm at full wounds. It's pretty much a 50/50 they hurt or the go off.

Sometimes worth the risk other times, not so much. Eldar have a lot of weaknesses so having this one over the top rule is ok for now. I don't think it will last into their next codex.

Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator

Well, an Eldar armie can field a Seer Council. Such units are usually fortuned and in general harder to crack than a coconut. Witch blades wound on 2+, so an iron arm will not help.
Eldrad is tougher than a normal Farseer, so S6 will not be sufficient to instantly kill him.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss

Foolproof Falcon Pilot

Seer councils are a joke. Just throw gaunts at them. Seriously, 4+ saves with rerolls arent much harder to kill than marines. If on bikes, he is spending ~600 points on that unit. Counter with 600 points of your army and see how fast they fall.

ROW, fortune, and doom is the only thing the eldar really have left keeping it from irrelevance. Simply dont cast powers, march up, and eat the whole army. Psychic powers are not necessary when almost nothing bar fire dragons have AP3- in the whole codex, and those can be shot to death or assaulted easily. If he wants to play the keep-away game, use ymargls or hive guard on the war walkers and sit on the objectives the rest of the game while he can barely do any damage to your army.

"Ask not the Eldar a question, for they will give you three answers, all of which are true and terrifying to know."
-Inquisitor Czevak
~14k
~10k
~5k corsairs
~3k DKOK

Drone without a Controller

In most games I've played against Eldar the Farseer w/ ROW is Eldrad, and using strength 6 weapons wont ID him unless you use Enfeeble, but that's risky with the 3d6 psychic test. what i usually do is just through a trygon prime or flyrant into close combat and challenge/smash, if he refuses he will probably fail combat and end up getting eaten via sweeping advance

Parris played a pivotal role in fueling the witchcraft accusations by endorsing the actions of the afflicted girls and urging the authorities to pursue the trials. He even delivered sermons that reinforced the idea that witches were in their midst. As the trials progressed, Parris's influence continued to grow. He actively participated in the examinations and interrogations of the accused, often pressing them for confessions. Parris's role as a religious leader further legitimized the proceedings and helped to justify the actions of the court. However, as the number of accused grew and innocent people were being condemned, doubts began to arise about the validity of the trials. Many believed that the afflicted girls were simply acting out for attention or seeking revenge against their perceived enemies. In fact, Parris's own credibility came into question when it was revealed that he had initially withheld information about his daughter's involvement in fortune-telling activities. Despite the growing skepticism, the trials continued for several months until the Governor of Massachusetts, William Phips, disbanded the court in October 1692. The witch hunt had taken a toll on the community, with families torn apart and reputations ruined. Parris himself faced backlash and eventually left Salem Village in 1697. The Salem witch trials, including Samuel Parris's involvement, serve as a reminder of the dangers of mass hysteria and the consequences of unchecked accusations. The trials were a dark chapter in American history and continue to be studied and analyzed to this day..

Reviews for "Samuel Parris: A Father's Role in the Accusations and Trials of the Witch Hysteria"

1. John Smith - 1 star

I found the whole concept of "Salem witch trials involving Samuel Parris" to be utterly ridiculous and a waste of time. The play seemed to glamorize a dark episode in history, turning it into a sensationalized spectacle for entertainment purposes. The acting was subpar, and the dialogue was melodramatic and unbelievable. I was hoping to gain some insight into the historical events, but instead, I left feeling frustrated and disappointed.

2. Mary Johnson - 2 stars

While I appreciate the effort to shed light on the Salem witch trials, I found "Salem witch trials involving Samuel Parris" to be overly confusing and convoluted. The storyline lacked coherence, with too many characters introduced without proper development. The play attempted to explore complex themes but fell short in providing any meaningful depth. Additionally, the pacing was inconsistent, making it difficult to fully engage with the performance. Overall, I was left feeling unsatisfied and wanting more substance.

3. Robert Davis - 2 stars

I was excited to see a play centered around the Salem witch trials, but "Salem witch trials involving Samuel Parris" failed to meet my expectations. The production lacked historical accuracy, taking significant liberties with the events and characters involved. The acting was unconvincing, and the lackluster execution made it difficult to feel invested in the story. The play seemed more interested in shock value and sensationalism rather than providing an authentic glimpse into this dark period of American history.

4. Emily Thompson - 1 star

I found "Salem witch trials involving Samuel Parris" to be a shallow and superficial representation of the Salem witch trials. The play seemed more focused on over-the-top performances and cheap thrills rather than exploring the complexities of the historical events. The dialogue was cliché and lacked nuance, making it hard to connect with the characters. I was hoping for a thought-provoking experience, but instead, I was left with a sense of disappointment and a feeling that the play trivialized the gravity of the real-life tragedy.

Samuel Parris: The Puppet Master of the Salem Witch Trials