Experience the Power of the We Vibe Magic Wand Massager

The We-Vibe Magic Wand Massager is a powerful and versatile device designed for sexual pleasure and relaxation. It provides intense vibrations that can be tailored to individual preferences, making it suitable for both solo use and couples play. The Magic Wand Massager features a soft, flexible head that is designed to caress and stimulate various erogenous zones on the body. It can be used on the clitoris, nipples, or any other sensitive area for enhanced pleasure and sensations. The device offers multiple vibration modes and intensities, allowing users to customize their experience and find the perfect combination that suits their desires. The Magic Wand Massager is made from high-quality, body-safe materials that are hypoallergenic and easy to clean.

The Magic Wand Massager is made from high-quality, body-safe materials that are hypoallergenic and easy to clean. It is also cordless and rechargeable, providing convenience and mobility during use. With its sleek and ergonomic design, this massager is comfortable to hold and user-friendly.

Dancing Lights vs. Light

Both are Evocation Spells, both can be spammed (Orosions/Cantrips), both shed light like a torch, both can be made permanent, both can only have one of itself active at once. Light lasts longer, but they can both be spammed! Light is target: touch, Dancing Lights can be conjured anywhere (as far as 110' at first level). Light is stationary, unless cast on a movable object, and unless the movable object can move on its own, it's still only as mobile as a regular torch. Dancing Lights can move 100'/round. IN ANY DIRECTION. Light is a static shape, Dancing Lights can be molded into many hilarious/spooky shapes.

Can anyone tell me why Light would be taken over Dancing Lights? Am I missing something? The only application I could see Light being used for over Dancing Lights is to give an object with Light cast on it to another player who will be moving far away from you. OR countering/dispelling a Darkness spell of equal level. which is 0. you could always Heighten it?

No, you've pretty much nailed it AFAICT. I've never seen a PC take Light -- they always take Dancing Lights instead.

Well, dancing lights is arcane only. There's also a danger of having the spell suddenly end in the middle of a fight. Other than that, you're absolutely right.

A lot of the cantrips are left over from 3.x, which in turn inherited them from earlier editions. So, they vary quite a bit -- from "pretty cool" and/or "occasionally quite useful" to "this is ridiculous" and "why would anyone ever. "

Incidentally, spammable Dancing Lights + Paizo handing out darkvision to every new PC race = nobody cares about lighting any more. While I'm not particularly nostalgic for 1e, I'm old school enough to enjoy having lighting be an issue sometimes. Yes, mucking around with "who carries the torch?" and "are we running out of lamp oil?" could get faintly tedious. But OTOH, some of my best gaming moments have come when a lantern broke, a wind blew out the torches, or otherwise *someone turned out the lights*. No lights! Something coming! Can you get a torch lit in time?

Between "darkvision for everybody!" and putting a bunch of light-generating spells on the infinitely spammable 0 level list, Paizo has pretty much eliminated this from the game, even in low level play. Oh, well.

I cast light on rocks and throw them down holes, it's come in useful many times.

Duration. If you're spamming dancing lights, you're either doing it VERY frequently (enough to slow your exploration/travel progress) or you risk it winking out a couple of rounds into an encounter and you have to spend a turn in combat restarting your light source. Light, on the other hand, lasts 10min/level, so even at level 1 you can cast it every 8 minutes and never have that risk. I always take light instead of dancing lights.

Duration. If you're spamming dancing lights, you're either doing it VERY frequently (enough to slow your exploration/travel progress) or you risk it winking out a couple of rounds into an encounter and you have to spend a turn in combat restarting your light source.

Dancing Lights lasts for ten rounds. WRT exploration, you're probably moving at half speed anyway, so it doesn't actually slow you down at all. Casting it every minute, well the player just has to *say* "I cast Dancing Lights every minute" and, boom, there it is.

The risk of having it blink out in combat is a thing, I suppose, but (1) the darkvision races (dwarf, 1/2 orc, tiefling, aasimar, dhampir, fetchling, goblin, changeling. ) won't care, and (2) the mobility, power, range and flexibility of Dancing Lights seem to overwhelm that concern for most PCs. I mean, you can make the lights move any distance, at 100' speed, up to the range of the spell! You can send the lights down wells, deep into water, make them go ahead of you. all kinds of things.

Apparently there are people out there still using Light. Good on you. But I've gamed with half a dozen different groups in four different countries, and all of them were using Dancing Lights.

I cast light on rocks and throw them down holes, it's come in useful many times.

Pretty much that.

Lightrock go down da hoooooole

You can't hide your dancing lights temporarily, but you can cast light on a rock and hide that rock for a little bit - which means light is more practical for use to help you see while sneaking about in the night since you don't have to spend so many actions to cast it again just because you needed to put the light out while a guard passed on patrol.

I cast light on rocks and throw them down holes, it's come in useful many times.

Pretty much that.

Lightrock go down da hoooooole

Or just send the dancing lights down the hole. No rock needed.

You can cast light on a pebble, hand it to someone, then arrange to have them do such-and-such when they get "the signal", which is you casting light again (from anywhere in the world) and thereby causing the light on their pebble to go out.

The fact is that the two spells are different enough that choosing between them is a matter of selecting which things you want to prioritize. Or you could take both and be able to have two magical light sources active at once.

I'm sorry, but there are enough people not playing the Darkvision races, that lighting is still an issue. The first Arcane character I've seen in Pathfinder, almost got his party killed because he had Dancing Lights instead of Light.

The party was going up against a group of Derro (nasty little blighters). The party was doing fine. at first. Then the Dancing Lights winked out in the third round and the Derro jumped up and sneak attacked the Sorcerer to negative hit-points. The Cleric didn't have a light spell prepared, but the Rogue, a Half-Orc, fortunately had a Torch in his backpack that he whipped out and lit up, letting the Barbarian and Cleric crush the Derro while the Rogue dumped a potion down the Sorcerer's throat.

Ever since then, no one in my group ever takes Dancing Lights unless they also have some alternative light source (such as an Everburning Torch).

Dancing Lights is a lot of fun, with lots of flavor, but, frankly, it can get parties killed if they don't have a secondary light source (such as another character with Light prepared).

Dancing Lights and Light are both very useful. Light is more useful to have first because you have it for the entire combat and can cast it on anything. AND you can just cast it on a pebble and stick it in your pocket if you encounter things that are suspicious of magic. Then you go for dancing lights, which has a bunch of utility for illusions and can scout (sort of).

I am all for having both, two light sources I can spam all day? Yes please.

Light also has this extra line at the bottom that Dancing Lights does not

Light can be used to counter or dispel any darkness spell of equal or lower spell level.

Couple that with Heighten Spell and you have an effective way of dealing with Darkness or Deeper Darkness.

Daylight is a better spell for that, but it is useful for Sorcerers that don't have that many 3rd level known spells

Once you get high enough, either cast, or pay for, a Continual Flame Heightened to 4th level. That will overwhelm any and all other Darkness spells, unless the GM specifically counters your Continual Flame, and, since Continual Flame is permanent, you only need it once.

No, you've pretty much nailed it AFAICT. I've never seen a PC take Light -- they always take Dancing Lights instead.

Doug M.

Nobody in my games has taken dancing lights in years, and I can barely remember anybody using it.

Light, on the other hand, is part and parcel of every caster's toolkit. Everybody I play with takes it without question.

I have no doubt light is the more popular and most players take it because they are simply used to it, and/or new players know what it is without having to have it explained in any detail. Dancing lights is probably something people who devote more time to the game eventually take instead. In gaming circles with devoted players, you may see more people taking dancing lights, but the vast majority of players in the world are much more casual than anybody here, and believe me, they are taking light in ways that make you wish you got a nickel every time they did.

Dancing lights also attract much more attention than a glowing pebble or a shining sword (ya know, things that are easy to conceal). Not ideal when trying to NOT alert every beastie lurking in the dungeon to your presence.

We would chop the head of an enemy off, cast light on it and bowl it into the next room so whatever was in there knew we were coming.

Don't forget, dancing lights can be shaped in a humanoid manner that 'swings and misses' at dumb monsters, which can fool dumb monsters to 'swing and miss' at dancing lights.

as a magus its awsome you get all the cantrips :-)

i thought it was the same for wizards and clerics?

Each has its usefulness, IMO. My mages usually know/memorize both. Even when I play a race with darkvision, I at least have Dancing Lights prepped; darkvision is only 60ft, and sometimes it pays to see beyond that range.

For instance, if you ever find yourself underground and exploring a chamber that is higher than your darkvision, cast Dancing Lights and send them up to investigate. Having those babies moving beyond your vision helps spot would-be ambushes.

as a magus its awsome you get all the cantrips :-)

i thought it was the same for wizards and clerics?

Yes, but all those classes has limited amount of 0th level slots and still have to decide which exactly spells prepare.

Dancing lights also attract much more attention than a glowing pebble or a shining sword (ya know, things that are easy to conceal). Not ideal when trying to NOT alert every beastie lurking in the dungeon to your presence.

Hiding a Dancing Lights Spell is as simple as consciously ending it, which isn't a huge loss, because I have unlimited charges. Maybe I'd provoke if combat started before I could recast, but how does that compare to being sniped by someone with Darkvision 120' from 120' away? Having a light-up rock wouldn't help me at all. "How many snipers are there? How far away are they? Should we run or attack?" Meanwhile, the sniper has total concealment/cover from you and you're all flat-footed against all his attacks. Does EVERYONE charge forward (you need to stay within 40' of the Light Spell), possibly getting ambushed half-way to the sniper, or does the tank take it and leave the group in darkness? You could proceed forward cautiously as a group in case of ambushes, allowing the sniper a half-dozen rounds of attack rolls. The fact is, outside that light radius, everything is unknown, and the only way to know is to move yourself, or throw the light rock (maybe 20'?), and then you either need to go get it, or recast Light anyway (the problem supposedly only connected to Dancing Lights).

Here's the same situation with Dancing Lights: Round 1 - Sniped. Round 2 - Oh, there he is, let's get him.

My Wizard has a crossbow, I cast light on a crossbow bolt and I have it knocked. If I need to see farther away, I shoot the crossbow bolt, and then see where my targets are.

One thing I see players disregard a lot is that "light" is a touch range spell, you have to touch what your are lighting up.

This thread does a pretty good job of identifying why both are very good spells. For whatever reason my pure wizards tend to take "light" while my sorcerers, bards etc. tend to take "dancing lights" to begin with. It's more a flavor thing than a game mechanics thing.

Sorcerers and Bards should take Dancing Lights as it's a more versatile spell. Since you can't easily change your spells, you have need to take spells that are useful across a broad spectrum of situations.

Light is really only useful for making light, while Dancing Lights has a variety of uses.

However! Any other caster should be packing the Light spell in addition to the Sorcerer/Bard bringing Dancing Lights. Use Dancing Lights to explore high ceilings/dark tunnels while the other caster uses Light to light up the immediate area.

I like partnering my "dancing lights" with another caster's "ghost sounds" to create quite believable illusions of folks moving around in the dark.

No, you've pretty much nailed it AFAICT. I've never seen a PC take Light -- they always take Dancing Lights instead.

Whether used for sensual massage or more intimate moments, the We-Vibe Magic Wand Massager is a versatile tool that delivers intense and satisfying pleasure..

Reviews for "Revolutionize Your Pleasure with the We Vibe Magic Wand Massager"

1. Emily - 2 stars - I had heard great things about the We-Vibe Magic Wand Massager, so I was really excited to try it. However, I was ultimately disappointed. First of all, the vibrations were too intense for me, even on the lowest setting. It was uncomfortable rather than pleasurable. Secondly, the design of the massager was a bit awkward. It was difficult to maneuver and hold in place comfortably. Overall, I would not recommend this product to others.

2. Michael - 1 star - The We-Vibe Magic Wand Massager was a complete letdown for me. The vibrations were weak and did not provide any stimulation whatsoever. I tried adjusting the settings, but it made no difference. Additionally, the battery life was abysmal. It barely lasted through one use before needing to be recharged. Save your money and look for a different massager that actually delivers on its promises.

3. Sarah - 2 stars - I was really excited to try the We-Vibe Magic Wand Massager, as I had heard great things about it. However, I was disappointed with my experience. The vibrations were not as powerful as I had expected, and it didn't do much for me in terms of pleasure. I also had issues with the noise level. It was quite loud, which made it difficult to use discreetly. Overall, I was not impressed with this massager and wouldn't recommend it to others.

4. Adam - 2 stars - The We-Vibe Magic Wand Massager didn't live up to my expectations. The vibrations felt weak and lacked the intensity I was looking for. The material used in the construction of the massager also felt cheap and not very durable. Additionally, I found the controls to be somewhat confusing and not very intuitive. Overall, I would not recommend this product and believe there are better options available on the market.

How the We Vibe Magic Wand Massager Takes Your Pleasure to the Next Level