The witch trials of JK Rowling podcast is an audio series that delves into the controversy surrounding the famous author and her views on gender identity. In recent years, JK Rowling has come under fire for her comments and tweets regarding transgender individuals, leading to widespread criticism and backlash. The podcast aims to explore the impact of Rowling's statements on the trans community and the broader discourse on gender identity. It delves into the history of witch trials and draws parallels between the persecution of witches in the past and the stigmatization faced by transgender individuals today. Throughout the series, various experts, activists, and members of the LGBTQ+ community provide their insights and perspectives on the issue. They discuss the harmful effects of Rowling's comments and the importance of inclusive representation in literature and media.

‘The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling’ is a much-needed dose of sanity

Thanks for contacting us. We've received your submission.

A new podcast looks at the controversies sparked by J.K. Rowling's books -- and her opinions. Getty Images

They discuss the harmful effects of Rowling's comments and the importance of inclusive representation in literature and media. The witch trials of JK Rowling podcast also delves into the complexities of free speech and the responsibility that comes with having a platform like Rowling. It examines the tension between expressing individual opinions and the potential harm caused to marginalized communities.

More From: Kirsten Fleming

Brooklyn pizzeria owner spent $60K of his own money to pick up street trash after city failed to

Give this bingo card of cliched anti-Israel protesters what they need: a rap sheet

Kids think they can bring antisemitic hate to basketball because of pro sports' politics

Good riddance, Claudine Gay — you and Harvard only have yourselves to blame for this putrid swamp

Beer busts, sports moms and a hero named Paulie — the big losers and winners of 2023

J.K. Rowling is a literary hero, an anti-Christian promoter of the occult and now either a transphobic firebrand who uses “dangerous” language — or a woman with the moral courage to speak up for biological truths.

In other words, she is a complex person worthy of closer examination. Enter the new seven-part podcast series, “The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling,” which dropped its first two episodes on Tuesday.

Through interviews with supporters, critics and Rowling herself, it promises a deep dive into her evolution from broke single mother to celebrated “Harry Potter” author to persona non grata. And yet, in this era of shouty, polarizing sound bites, its mere existence is considered treasonous to some. One critic commanded that “we all stop talking about J.K. Rowling,” while another dubbed it “a mind-numbing exercise in digression.”

From Bari Weiss’ the Free Press, the project was created by Megan Phelps-Roper, a writer who knows a bit about wanting to burn heretics at the stake. She is a former member of the virulently homophobic Westboro Baptist Church, founded by her late grandfather Fred Phelps.

“I never set out to upset anyone,” Rowling, 57, tells Phelps-Roper in the inaugural episode. “However, I was not uncomfortable with getting off my pedestal.”

And so she essentially took a Molotov cocktail to that pedestal in 2020 with her tweeted response to a news headline that referred to “People who menstruate.”

“I’m sure there used to be a word for those people,” she wrote. “Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud.”

A New Mexico book burning in 2001 where a pastor urged parishioners to burn “Harry Potter” books. Getty Images

The fallout was swift and intense. Her fans turned on her — some even going so far as to remove their Potter tattoos — while many of the actors who became superstars courtesy of Rowling’s wizarding world disavowed her. It’s because of her daring to publicly debate the changing view of biological sex and its impact on women’s spaces that many of us normies now know the once-esoteric term “TERF,” which stands for “Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist.”

This series tries to untangle this cultural clusterf- -k by rewinding back Rowling’s incredible origin story.

A single mother on the dole in Scotland, Rowling alleged she escaped a violent marriage with a controlling man who punished her by taking her golden manuscript hostage. Little by little, she cleverly started taking a few pages to photocopy and created a duplicate out of his reach. After he physically attacked her, she was able to take her daughter to Edinburgh, Scotland, with the help of the police.

There, she finished the book. It was rejected by 12 publishers before one finally printed a meager 500 copies. This being 1997, it eventually went viral through word of mouth and was picked up by Scholastic.

J.K. Rowling holding “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” which was released in 2005. Getty Images

Her success was a trickle, then a flood. And the flood might as well have been of biblical proportions because of the fire and brimstone it elicited. Evangelical Christians began preaching that “Harry Potter” was promoting witchcraft. A 2000 book signing was even interrupted by a bomb threat from a “far-right Christian,” Rowling explains in the podcast’s second episode, which delves into the ’90s cultural zeitgeist that eventually fueled the moral panic over her books. It’s a theme that feels eerily familiar today as parents and school boards go to the mat over the contents of school libraries.

Specifically, it looks at a 2002 legal case in Cedarville, Ark., in which a judge ruled in favor of parents who wanted Harry Potter books in the school library after the school board had removed them. In an interview, the board’s losing lawyer David Hogue admits to a conversion after actually reading the books. He stunningly asks Phelps-Roper to “please thank” Rowling for the “joy” the books provide.

It’s unclear if subsequent conversions will come in later episodes when Phelps-Roper interviews Rowling’s current critics. It seems unlikely, since most people’s minds are already made up. An LA Times opinion piece argued that we should simply ignore Rowling if she doesn’t submit to the preferred ideology.

“Since it’s pretty clear that nothing is going to change her mind about the rights and realities of the trans community, perhaps we should just treat her like one of those dinner guests who randomly injects themselves into conversations with inappropriate and disturbing opinions no one requested,” the piece states.

“Just tell her she sounds like one of those fanatics who used to burn ‘Harry Potter’ books and never invite her into your home again.”

But we shouldn’t ignore Rowling. There’s power in her message — particularly that villains and heroes don’t exist in the black and white.

“People can be deeply flawed. People can make mistakes. People can do bad things. In fact, show me the human being who hasn’t,” she says in the podcast. “And they can also be capable of greatness. And I mean greatness in a moral sense. Not in a fame or an achievement sense.”

JK Rowling: Six biggest talking points from the Witch Trials podcast

The first two episodes of a new podcast exploring the life and career of JK Rowling aired on Tuesday (21 February).

Titled The Witch Trials of JK Rowling, the podcast is a seven-part interview conducted by American writer Megan Phelps-Roper, who visited the 57-year-old Harry Potter novelist at her home in Edinburgh in May and August last year.

In the first two episodes, Rowling addressed topics including her traumatic miscarriage, Harry Potter, and her controversial remarks on transgender issues.

Below are the six biggest talking points from the first two episodes of The Witch Trials of JK Rowling.

Rowling opens up about her traumatic miscarriage before having her daughter

Recommended

• JK Rowling brushes off concerns over legacy in wake of trans row: ‘Whatever, I’ll be dead’
• Meghan Markle ‘upset’ after being lampooned in ‘brutal’ episode of South Park
• The Last of Us viewers notice glaring filming blunder in episode six: ‘Something you might want to fix’

JK Rowling reflected on going through a traumatic miscarriage in her twenties, before she gave birth to her daughter Jessica.

The author revealed that she became pregnant “accidentally” a year after moving in with her then-boyfriend.

“While pregnant, he proposed to me. And then I lost the baby,” she recalled. “ I miscarried, which was hugely traumatic. It was traumatic physically and traumatic emotionally, and that was another massive loss. I was certainly not in a balanced state of mind.”

“When I lost the baby, I do remember having a moment, in my grief for the baby, I do remember having a moment where I thought, ‘So we’re not going to get married. That’s clear, right?’ I’m almost speaking to myself, like, ‘That’s clear Jo, we’re not going to marry this guy’.

Rowling added: “But he was putting huge pressure on me to get married. So I went through with it. And then, became pregnant almost immediately after we were married, which is a joyful thing because I cannot imagine a world without my Jessica. So, in with all the bad, there was an amazing, wonderful thing [that] came out with it and that was my daughter.”

Rowling opened up about her mother’s death

Rowling told Phelps-Roper: “I was in a real period of flux at the time, my mother was very ill, I had moved from London to Manchester. And then my mother died, actually on the night of 30 December 1990. But I didn’t realise she died until the early hours of New Year’s Eve.

“She was 45. She’d been ill for a very long time, but none of us realised that death was imminent. That kind of took a wrecking ball to my life, really. To me, this decade now is infused with loss.”

Rowling was 24 when her mother, Anne Volant Rowling, died of complications linked to multiple sclerosis.

Rowling claimed her statements about trans people have been ‘profoundly’ misunderstood

After facing a sustained backlash in recent years for statements she has made about trans people, Rowling said that she “never set out to upset anyone”.

“I never set out to upset anyone. However, I was not uncomfortable with getting off my pedestal,” Rowling said.

Rowling brushed off concerns over legacy in light of trans views

Asked by Phelps-Roper if she thought about her legacy and how things she said impacted how she’d be viewed in years to come, the author said: “Whatever. I’ll be dead.”

She added: “I think you could not have misunderstood me more profoundly. I do not walk around my house thinking about my legacy, what a pompous way to live your life thinking about what my legacy will be. Whatever! I’ll be dead, I care about now, the living.”

Rowling describes sneaking the Harry Potter manuscript out of home while preparing to leave her then-husband

On the podcast, Rowling spoke about the period when she was planning to leave her husband, Jorge Arantes, and removed her Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone manuscript from her home, “a few pages” at a time.

Rowling said that she “left [Arantes] twice before I left for good”, and was planning to leave him for the last time while pregnant with her daughter.

“He’s not a stupid person,” she said. “I think he knew, or suspected, that I was going to bolt again. It was a horrible state of tension to live in.”

Rowling said that throughout this period, she kept writing and “the [Harry Potter] manuscript kept growing”.

“He knew what that manuscript meant to me, because at a point, he took the manuscript and hid it, and that was his hostage,” she said. “When I realised that I was going to go – this was it, I was definitely going – I would take a few pages of the manuscript into work every day.

“Just a few pages, so he wouldn’t realise anything was missing, and I would photocopy it. And gradually, in a cupboard in the staff room, bit by bit, a photocopied manuscript grew and grew and grew.”

Rowling described “violence” in her first marriage

JK Rowling spoke in more detail about her experience of domestic abuse in her first marriage.

She said she didn’t have a “key to my own front door because he’s got control of the front door” and alleged that whenever she did leave the house and returned, he would look through her handbag.”

“The only thing beyond that that I prioritised was obviously my daughter, but at that point she’s still inside me, so she’s as safe as can be in that situation.”

Rowling and Arantes’ marriage lasted 18 months between 1992 and 1993.

Anyone who requires help or support can contact the National Domestic Abuse Helpline which is open 24/7 365 days per year on 0808 2000 247 or via their website www.nationaldahelpline.org.uk/

The podcast serves as a platform for healthy discussions and debates on the topic, highlighting the need for empathy, understanding, and open dialogue. It encourages listeners to critically evaluate the impact of their words and actions on others and to advocate for inclusivity and acceptance. By addressing the controversy surrounding JK Rowling, the podcast aims to bring awareness to the issues faced by the transgender community and cultivate a more inclusive society. It prompts listeners to reflect on their own biases and misconceptions, ultimately fostering a space for growth and education. In conclusion, the witch trials of JK Rowling podcast provides a platform for exploring the controversy surrounding the author's views on transgender issues. It seeks to generate meaningful discussions and promote inclusivity and acceptance..

Reviews for "Interpreting the Subtext: Symbolism in J.K. Rowling's Witch Trials Podcast"

1. Emily - 1 star

I was really disappointed with "The Witch Trials of JK Rowling" podcast. As a Harry Potter fan, I was excited to listen to a deep dive into the controversies surrounding JK Rowling, but this podcast fell short. The hosts lacked objectivity and approached the topic with a clear bias against Rowling. It felt like they were just looking for reasons to criticize her instead of having a balanced discussion. I was hoping for a thought-provoking analysis, but instead, I got a one-sided rant. I wouldn't recommend this podcast to anyone looking for an unbiased exploration of the JK Rowling controversies.

2. Daniel - 2 stars

I found "The Witch Trials of JK Rowling" podcast to be quite underwhelming. While the topic itself is interesting, the execution left much to be desired. The hosts spent too much time dwelling on personal opinions and speculation rather than providing solid evidence or conducting meaningful interviews. It felt like a missed opportunity to delve deeper into the complexities of the controversies surrounding JK Rowling. I was hoping for a more investigative approach, but instead, I got a podcast that felt more like gossip and personal attacks. Overall, it left me unsatisfied and wanting more substance.

3. Sarah - 1 star

I had high hopes for "The Witch Trials of JK Rowling" podcast, but it ended up being a major letdown. The hosts seemed more interested in sensationalizing the controversies surrounding JK Rowling rather than providing a fair and balanced analysis. Their lack of objectivity was evident throughout, making it difficult to trust the information presented. I was hoping for a podcast that would explore the nuances of the issue, but instead, I got a shallow and biased portrayal. It's a shame because this topic deserves a more comprehensive and thoughtful examination. I would not recommend this podcast to anyone seeking an in-depth exploration of the JK Rowling controversies.

The Power of the Pen: How J.K. Rowling Reimagined the Witch Trials