The SLR Magic MicroPrime Lens Family is a collection of lenses designed specifically for cinematographers and filmmakers. These lenses are known for their exceptional image quality, allowing filmmakers to capture stunning visuals with ease. One of the standout features of the SLR Magic MicroPrime lenses is their compact and lightweight design. Despite their small size, these lenses are incredibly versatile, offering a wide range of focal lengths to choose from. This makes them perfect for a variety of shooting situations, from wide-angle shots to telephoto close-ups. Another impressive aspect of the SLR Magic MicroPrime Lens Family is their fast maximum apertures.
If the First Wives Club alum is going to stick to the TV screen as her career of choice, her fellow Hocus Pocus co-stars have a few ideas of what the third movie could entail.
It changes tone as casually as the actors don their masquerade costumes, and has no scruples about breaking its own mood altogether as when the three witches suddenly perform I Put a Spell on You at a Halloween party. A cheeky 17th-century prologue sequence in Salem, Massachusetts establishes that whatever Arthur Miller might claim witches with evil power were a real thing and the menfolk of the time were entirely justified in hating and fearing them.
Another impressive aspect of the SLR Magic MicroPrime Lens Family is their fast maximum apertures. With T1.5 being the widest available aperture, these lenses provide excellent low-light performance and the ability to achieve a shallow depth of field.
‘Hocus Pocus 2’ Review: Bette Midler and Sisters Conjure More of the Same in Decades-Later Disney+ Sequel
Aging may have been the witches’ worst enemy in the 1993 cult classic, but here, it doesn't hinder the film's three stars from tapping their inner divas in this straight-to-streaming reunion.
Plus IconPeter Debruge
Chief Film Critic
Latest
Matt KennedyWhat strange sorcery is this that “Hocus Pocus” — a so-so comedy turned campy cult favorite starring Bette Midler, Sarah Jessica Parker and Kathy Najimy as absolutely fabulous Salem witch sisters — should be getting a sequel nearly three decades after its 1993 release? At the time, Variety speculated that, were it not for the film’s three stars, “‘Hocus Pocus’ wouldn’t seem out of place on the Disney Channel, and perhaps belongs there.” (Its director, Kenny Ortega, would go on to helm the “High School Musical” franchise for the cabler.) In a sense, that’s what’s happened with this follow-up, aimed to breathe some life into the graveyard that is Disney+.
The sequel’s existence owes less to popular demand (the original earned a respectable $39.3 million stateside and went on to become a Halloween season staple) than to the realization that the film had tapped into preteens’ fascination with witchcraft before Harry Potter came along. It can be no coincidence that the new feature lifts so much of its look and feel from that franchise — with eye of newt, a dead man’s head and some aspects of “The Craft” tossed in for good measure. In “Hocus Pocus 2,” the three teens called upon to save Salem from the Sanderson sisters’ return are themselves budding witches, which means the movie isn’t about scaring kids away from magic so much as indulging their post-Potter junior wizarding fantasies.
Young’uns needn’t have seen the earlier movie to make sense of things, although it’s just a click away on Disney+ should any of them be curious enough to watch a classic that predates many of their parents. The original did a pretty good job of wrapping up its story (the sisters were blasted into oblivion when the sun rose on All Saints’ Day), but also suggested that the sisters could be brought back easily enough, should a virgin light a black-flame candle on Halloween — and here, Becca (Whitney Peak) is fooled into doing exactly that by Gilbert (Sam Richardson), the owner of the magic shop now operating in the Sandersons’ old home, where much of the earlier film took place.
Before this simple spell happens, however, director Anne Fletcher (“The Proposal”) takes us back to early Salem to offer an origin story for the sisters (playing teenage Winifred in the prologue, Taylor Henderson has fun channeling the Divine Miss M’s more flamboyant mannerisms). The Sandersons were “misunderstood” and “ahead of their time,” the movie explains, demonstrating a kind of have-it-both-ways thinking that’s perfectly consistent with the politics of the moment. On one hand, it implies that charges of witchcraft are one tool the patriarchy has for keeping independent women in check; on the other, it allows the women to be bona fide witches (it’s as if they’re being falsely accused of exactly what they are).
In the woods, they meet the Witch Mother (“Ted Lasso” star Hannah Waddingham), who senses their potential and bequeaths the book that enables all their mischief — and which contains a spell that can make them all-powerful at great personal cost. The book has gotten a CG upgrade here, which is too bad, since the animatronic eye embedded in the cover was such a great old-school trick. This hardcover catalog of spells always seemed to have a mind of its own and in Fletcher’s hands, feels less like a prop than a proper character.
Becca and best friend Izzy (Belissa Escobedo) discover that this Halloween, Cassie (Lilia Buckingham) — the classmate with whom they’d been tight throughout childhood — is throwing a house party without inviting them. (Her dad, played by a daffy Tony Hale, is also in the dark.) The movie misses the opportunity to serve up a useful portrayal of the petty divisions that drive old friends apart, while orienting itself to lecture audiences on the importance of loyalty and the perils of egotism. It’s doubtful that such moral lessons are the reason anyone’s watching “Hocus Pocus 2,” which again blends Midler’s hammy diva persona with details that feel almost too dark for a kids’ movie (but have since been normalized by the likes of Neil Gaiman and Tim Burton).
That mix must be what endeared the original to so many back in the day. Frankly, its success has always been tricky to explain — beyond the basic appeal of watching Midler, Parker and Najimy vamp their way through reams of mock-Victorian dialogue, full of words like “thee“ and “doest.” They’re meant to be menacing, but are cartoonishly broad instead: Winifred (Midler) with her puckered lips and beaver-like overbite, Mary (Najimy) wide-eyed and talking out of the side of her mouth, and Sarah (Parker) cursed to be a dumb blonde cliché. Thinking fast, Becca and Izzy talk the women into raiding the beauty products aisle of the local Walgreens, where they mistake lotions for potions and drink the goop, believing it to contain the children’s souls they crave.
It’s hard to be too intimidated by three women who keep erupting into musical numbers, including a cover of Elton John’s “The Bitch Is Back” (with “witch” swapped in for the b-word) that leaves so many questions — like, “Have they been rehearsing this in hell?” and “How long till this spawns a stage musical?” One senses all involved trying to re-create the earlier film’s sense of camp. “Hocus Pocus 2” is actually the better made film, even if it amounts to little more than a stealth remake, with strategic decisions about the present-day and old-Salem witch trios being engineered to allow for more sequels, whether or not its three stars return.
The Sandersons are of course led by Midler as leader Winifred, her teeth horribly transformed into a chipmunk-dental horror within a kissy lipstick pout. Kathy Najimy plays her sister Mary, who is supposedly able to smell out children but the film doesn’t make much of this wicked childcatcher-like superpower. And finally there is Sarah Jessica Parker as the youngest witch, very atypically playing broad comedy, for which Parker was not really suited, but whose 90s celebrity through starring in Sex and the City has surely played its part in boosting this film. Vinessa Shaw is Max’s cool love interest Alison and legendary director Garry Marshall and his equally legendary sister Penny Marshall have cameos as a grouchy couple who have dressed up for Halloween.
This allows filmmakers to create beautiful bokeh effects and separate their subjects from the background. In terms of construction, the SLR Magic MicroPrime lenses are built to the highest standards. Made from high-quality materials, these lenses are durable and capable of withstanding the demands of professional use. They feature precision-engineered optics that deliver sharpness and clarity throughout the frame, resulting in visually pleasing images. Furthermore, the SLR Magic MicroPrime lenses are designed with video in mind. They feature smooth manual focus and aperture control rings, allowing filmmakers to make precise adjustments easily and seamlessly. Additionally, the lenses have a 13-blade iris, which helps to produce smooth and cinematic-looking bokeh. Overall, the SLR Magic MicroPrime Lens Family is a fantastic choice for cinematographers and filmmakers looking to elevate their work. With their compact size, wide range of focal lengths, fast maximum apertures, and exceptional build quality, these lenses provide everything needed to capture stunning cinematic shots. Whether shooting a feature film, documentary, or commercial, the SLR Magic MicroPrime lenses will undoubtedly deliver outstanding results..
Reviews for "Exploring the Bokeh Aesthetics of Slr Magic Microprimes: Creating Dreamlike Images"
1. John - 2 stars - I was really excited to try out the Slr Magic Microprime lens family, but I was sorely disappointed with the performance. The image quality was subpar, with noticeable distortion and softness around the edges. The focus ring was also quite stiff and difficult to use, making it challenging to achieve sharp focus. Overall, I found these lenses to be overpriced for the mediocre results they produced.
2. Sarah - 1 star - I purchased the Slr Magic Microprimes hoping to get a versatile set of lenses for my filmmaking projects. However, right from the start, I experienced numerous issues with these lenses. The build quality was poor, with loose parts and a flimsy feel. The image quality was inconsistent, with varying levels of sharpness and color reproduction between different lenses in the set. The lack of image stabilization was also a major downside. I ended up returning them and investing in a different lens brand that offered better performance and reliability.
3. David - 2 stars - The Slr Magic Microprime lens family left a lot to be desired. Despite the positive reviews I had read, I found the image quality to be lackluster. There was noticeable chromatic aberration and distortion, especially when shooting at wider apertures. The build quality was also disappointing, as the lenses felt cheap and I was concerned about their durability. Additionally, the lack of autofocus was inconvenient for quick and precise focusing. Overall, I would not recommend these lenses for professional use or for anyone looking for top-notch image quality.