Witchcraft is a topic that has fascinated and terrified people throughout history. Many cultures and societies have believed in the existence of witches and have developed various indicators or signs to identify individuals practicing witchcraft. These indicators can include both physical and behavioral traits. Physical indicators of witchcraft often involve marks or deformities on the body. In some cultures, it was believed that witches had an extra nipple or had a peculiar birthmark. Other physical indicators could include a missing toe or finger, unusually colored eyes, or a hunched back.
Other physical indicators could include a missing toe or finger, unusually colored eyes, or a hunched back. These physical traits were seen as evidence of a pact with the devil or some other supernatural power. Behavioral indicators of witchcraft often involve people's actions or habits.
Salem Witch Trials
A perceptively produced and engaging historical drama, "Salem Witch Trials" is buoyed by its powerful performances. That is, if you can get past the first five minutes.
Plus IconLaura Fries
Latest
A perceptively produced and engaging historical drama, “Salem Witch Trials” is buoyed by its powerful performances. That is, if you can get past the first five minutes.
Director Joseph Sargent makes the confounding decision to begin the mini at the zenith of accusations of witchcraft as young girls, overcome with fear, face the accused who suddenly morph into screeching, green-faced demons.
In the ensuing four hours, however, it is obvious that scribe Maria Nation went to great pains to instill a sense of historical accuracy, weaving in subplots about community infighting, sexual politics and religious oppression in 1691 Salem, Mass. For the most part, her script offers many possible theories as to why a group of young girls would willingly play a part in 19 gruesome deaths without spoon-feeding viewers the answer. So why make with the “Scooby-Doo”-like antics?
As the mini flashes back to impetus of panic in the colony, the mini regains credibility. Night one introduces viewers to the dire circumstances of the time and place. There is no charter from England, so basically there is no written law. The oppressive Puritan religion is used to shame and scare its parishioners into good behavior. Indians, starvation and exposure are also a daily threat.
Even under such harsh conditions, a pall is cast on the community one particular winter. Ann Putnam (Kirstie Alley) gives birth to a third stillborn child. A neighbor’s barn is destroyed by fire and Ann’s husband Thomas (Jay O. Sanders) has lost a good deal of his wealth and standing in the community to some forward thinking businessmen.
With his job and reputation on the line, Rev. Parris (Henry Czerny) seizes on the notion that dark forces are abound in Salem and gets the rapt attention of his congregation. As his sermons become more stern and condemning, all of this fear, shame and stress is absorbed by the children of the town, in particular Annie Putnam (Katie Boland).
Annie, deeply disturbed by the death of her baby brother, senses the tension between her parents and the town. Her father shows more affection to the dog than to his own children, and the more Annie acts out, the more attention is granted to her.
Before long, a whole group of girls, frightened and confused by the mixed messages they receive from the adults, start behaving oddly. The accusations of witchcraft start flying, and with them come a sense of power for the girls.
In night two, panic grabs hold of the town. At first, the girls accuse the women with the lowest social standing in town, including Tituba (Gloria Reuben), beloved servant to the Parris children. Then it becomes anyone who speaks out against the trials. Rev. Parris gains new power with one of the leading roles in the witch trials, even if it further alienates him from his sickly wife, Elizabeth (Rebecca De Mornay).
New Massachusetts Gov. Sir William Phips (Alan Bates) sends his Deputy Governor William Stoughton (Peter Ustinov), a rigid Puritan, to preside over the hearings, but instead of bringing the town back to its senses, he calls for more hangings.
Soon the town is purged of Thomas Putnam’s enemies, as well as formerly respected community elders such as Rebecca Nurse (Shirley MacLaine). It isn’t until Ann, racked with guilt over these deaths, draws Phips back to Salem that order is restored.
Nation should be credited with creating a provocative account of such a shameful and confounding event in history — visual witchcapades notwithstanding. And for the most part, Sargent actualizes her story by creating a plausible climate and inducing believable performances from his actors.
Alley gets top billing as she’s given the biggest and most dramatic role; if this indeed marks a comeback, it’s a worthy start. MacLaine gives a surprisingly restrained effort for most of the movie but really shines when she becomes one of the accused. De Mornay also offers a strong turn as a voice of reason as does Bates as the showy William Phips.
While historically interesting and thought-provoking, the ugly hallucinations and difficult subject matter restrict the mini’s use as any sort of educational entertainment. Technically, the production is very well done. Nancey Pankiw’s sets reflect the cold and foreboding realities of the times while costumes offer viewers a glimpse of Puritan life beyond the big white collars and sacklike black dresses.
One commonly cited indicator is frequenting areas associated with witchcraft, such as cemeteries or crossroads. It was believed that witches would gather in these places to perform their rituals and meet with other witches. Unusual behavior, such as wandering alone at night or having conversations with animals, was also seen as a sign of witchcraft. Additionally, a person who was known to be knowledgeable about herbs or practiced healing arts might be suspected of being a witch. Another common indicator of witchcraft is the ability to perform magic or supernatural feats. This could include things like predicting the future, causing illness or misfortune, or controlling the weather. People believed that witches had the power to harm others through the use of spells and potions, and these abilities were seen as clear signs of witchcraft. In some cases, individuals accused of witchcraft would be subjected to tests or trials to determine their guilt. These tests often involved putting the accused through physically demanding or dangerous situations, such as being thrown into water to see if they would float (a sign of witchcraft) or being pricked with needles to find a "witches' mark." These tests were based on the belief that witches were immune to pain or could perform supernatural acts to escape harm. It is important to note that the indicators of witchcraft discussed here are based on historical and cultural beliefs, and not on any scientific evidence. The belief in witchcraft and the identification of witches has varied widely across different cultures and time periods. In many cases, these indicators were subjective and relied on superstition rather than factual evidence. Today, the idea of witchcraft is often seen as a relic of the past, but it continues to hold a significant place in folklore and popular culture..
Reviews for "Witchcraft and Religion: Interpreting Indicators across Faiths"
1. John - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "Indicators of witchcraft". I was expecting a thrilling and suspenseful story about witchcraft, but instead I got a slow-paced and boring tale. The characters were flat and lacked depth, and the plot was predictable. Overall, it was a letdown and I wouldn't recommend it.
2. Sarah - 1 star - "Indicators of witchcraft" was one of the most tedious books I have ever read. The pace was incredibly slow and the plot was dull. There was no sense of urgency or excitement, and I found myself struggling to stay engaged with the story. The writing style was also lacking, with awkward dialogue and repetitive descriptions. I was really disappointed and regret wasting my time with this book.
3. Emily - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "Indicators of witchcraft", but unfortunately it fell flat for me. The story was scattered and lacked focus, making it difficult to understand what was happening. The characters were forgettable and their motivations were unclear. I found myself constantly confused and disconnected from the story. Overall, it was a confusing and unsatisfying read.
4. Mark - 2 stars - I was expecting a thrilling and suspenseful story about witchcraft, but "Indicators of witchcraft" failed to deliver. The pacing was slow and the plot was predictable. The characters felt one-dimensional and lacked development. I was hoping for more depth and complexity in the story, but it left me wanting more. Overall, it was a disappointing read and I wouldn't recommend it to others.
5. Jessica - 1 star - "Indicators of witchcraft" was a complete waste of time. The story lacked any tension or suspense, and the characters were uninteresting. The writing was dry and lacked creativity, making it difficult to stay engaged. I found myself skimming through pages just to get through the book. It was a major letdown and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.