The Salem witch hunt was a dark period in American history that took place in the late 17th century in the town of Salem, Massachusetts. It was a time of fear, suspicion, and mass hysteria, where numerous innocent individuals were accused of practicing witchcraft and faced severe consequences, including imprisonment and execution. This brief history aims to explore the events that transpired during this witch hunt and provide insight into the mindset of the people involved. The witch hunt began in January 1692 when a group of young girls, including Betty Parris and Abigail Williams, started exhibiting peculiar behaviors such as fits, seizures, and accusing others of bewitching them. This led to the involvement of local ministers, who firmly believed in the existence of witches and demonic possessions. The trials began with the questioning of Tituba, a slave from the household of Reverend Samuel Parris, who confessed to practicing witchcraft and implicated others.
The Salem witch trials stand as one of the infamous moments in colonial American history. More than 150 people -- primarily women -- from 24 communities were charged with witchcraft; 19 were hanged and others died in prison. In his introduction to this compact yet comprehensive volume, Richard Godbeer explores the beliefs, fears, and historical context that fueled the witch panic of 1692. The documents in this collection illuminate how the Puritans' worldview led them to seek a supernatural explanation for the problems vexing their community. Presented as case studies, the carefully chosen records from several specific trials offer a clear picture of the gender norms and social tensions that underlie the witchcraft accusations. The final documents cover recantations of confessions, the aftermath of the witch hunt, and statements of regret. A chronology of the witchcraft crisis, questions for consideration, and a selected bibliography round out the book's pedagogical support.
His first book, The Devil s Dominion Magic and Religion in Early New England 1992 won the American Historical Association Pacific Coast Branch Award for the Best First Book. Examination of Dorcas Hoar as recorded by Samuel Parris , May 2, 1692 ; Sarah Bibber against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr.
The trials began with the questioning of Tituba, a slave from the household of Reverend Samuel Parris, who confessed to practicing witchcraft and implicated others. As the hysteria grew, more and more individuals were accused of witchcraft. The accused were often marginalized members of society, including women, the elderly, and those who held opposing religious beliefs.
The Salem witch hunt : a brief history with documents
Introduction : explaining the Salem witch hunt. Putting Salem into a larger context ; Puritanism and the supernatural world ; Dangerous women ; Malevolent neighbors ; The witch panic of 1692 ; The afflicted girls ; Trying a witch ; The collapse of the trials - The documents. 1. Signs and assaults from the supernatural world. The arrival of a comet and the death of a star preacher ; Samuel Sewall finds reassurance in a rainbow ; The death of Cotton Mather's infant son ; Strange afflictions in the Goodwin household ; The horseshoe controversy in Newberry, Massachusetts ; Mary Rowlandson's account of the Indian attack on Lancaster ; Cotton Mather on the Quaker threat ; The Dominion of New England ; Cotton Mather on the recent history of New England --^
2. Beginnings. John Hale's account, 1702 ; Deodat Lawson's account, 1692 ; Samuel Parris on the outbreak of witchcraft accusations in Salem village, March 27, 1692 ; Samuel Parris's statement to his congregations about Mary Sibley's use of countermagic, March 27, 1692 --^
3. Witches on trial. Sarah Good. Arrest warrant for Sarah Good, February 29, 1692 ; Examination of Sarah Good (as recorded by Ezekiel Cheever), March 1, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Sarah Good, March 1, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against Sarah Good, March 1, 1692 ; William Allen, John Hughes, William Good, and Samuel Braybrook against Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba, March 5, 1692 ; Abigail Williams against Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba, May 23, 1692 ; Indictment against Sarah Good for afflicting Sarah Bibber, June 28, 1692 ; Sarah Bibber against Sarah Good, June 28, 1692 ; Sarah Gadge and Thomas Gadge against Sarah Good, June 28, 1692 ; Joseph Herrick Sr.^
and Mary Herrick against Sarah Good, June 28, 1692 ; Samuel Abbey and Mary Abbey against Sarah Good, June 29, 1692 ; Henry Herrick and Jonathan Batchelor against Sarah Good, June 29, 1692 ; Samuel Sibley against Sarah Good, June 29, 1692 ; Death warrant for Sarah Good, Rebecca Nurse, Susannah Martin, Elizabeth How, and Sarah Wilds (July 12, 1692) and officer's return (July 19, 1692) - Tituba. First examination of Tituba (as recorded by Jonathan Corwin), March 1, 1692 ; Second examination of Tituba (as recorded by Jonathan Corwin), March 2, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Tituba, March 1, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against Tituba, March 1, 1692 ; Indictment against Tituba for covenanting with the devil, May 9, 1693 - John Proctor.^
Elizabeth Booth against John Proctor, April 11, 1692 ; Abigail Williams against John Proctor, May 31, 1692 ; Physical examination of John Proctor and John Willard, June 2, 1692 ; Mary Warren against John Proctor, June 30, 1692 ; Petition of John Proctor, July 23, 1692 ; John DeRich against John Proctor and others, August 4, 1692 ; Samuel Sibley against John Proctor, August 5, 1692 ; Petition for John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor, August 5, 1692 ; Petition for John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor, August 5, 1692 - Bridget Bishop. Examination of Bridget Bishop (as recorded by Ezekiel Cheever), April 9, 1692 ; William Stacy against Bridget Bishop, May 30, 1692 ; Sarah Churchill and Mary Warren against Bridget Bishop and others, June 1, 1692 ; Physical examinations of Bridget Bishop and others, June 2, 1692 ; John Bly Sr.^
and Rebecca Bly against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; Richard Coman against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; John Louder against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; Samuel Shattuck and Sarah Shattuck against Bridget Bishop, June 2, 1692 ; Susannah Sheldon against Bridget Bishop and others, June 3, 1692 - Dorcas Hoar. Examination of Dorcas Hoar (as recorded by Samuel Parris), May 2, 1692 ; Sarah Bibber against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Elizabeth Hubbard against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Mary Walcott against Dorcas Hoar, July 2, 1692 ; Mary Gage against Dorcas Hoar and others, September 6, 1692 ; John Hale against Dorcas Hoar, September 6, 1692 ; Joseph Morgan and Deborah Morgan against Dorcas Hoar, September 6, 1692 ; John Tuck against Dorcas Hoar, September 6, 1692 ; Petition of John Hale, Nicholas Noyes, Daniel Epes, and John Emerson Jr. September 21, 1692 - George Burroughs.^
Benjamin Hutchinson against George Burroughs and others, April 22, 1692 ; Examination of George Burroughs (as recorded by Samuel Parris), May 9, 1692 ; Elizar Keyser against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Mercy Lewis against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; John Putnam Sr. and Rebecca Putnam against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Mary Walcott against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Simon Willard and William Wormall against George Burroughs, May 9, 1692 ; Abigail Hobbs, Deliverance Hobbs, and Mary Warren against George Burroughs and others, June 1, 1692 ; Mary Webber against George Burroughs, August 2, 1692 ; Ann Putnam Jr. against George Burroughs, August 3, 1692 ; Physical examination of George Burroughs and George Jacobs Jr. August 4, 1692 ; Hannah Harris against George Burroughs, August 5, 1692 ; Sarah Wilson and Martha Tyler against George Burroughs, September 15, 1692
Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2014-07-22 14:08:48.413044 Bookplateleaf 0002 Boxid IA1138801 Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II Containerid S0022 Donor bostonpubliclibrary External-identifier urn:oclc:record:1035757900
urn:lcp:isbn_9780312484552:lcpdf:994b6c2d-9505-4912-ac1c-2919ba9f61d6
urn:lcp:isbn_9780312484552:epub:7a7d1efb-2b85-4441-988f-33b6369c2eaa Extramarc University of Michigan Foldoutcount 0 Identifier isbn_9780312484552 Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t1bk58x29 Invoice 1213 Isbn 9780312484552
0312484550 Lccn 2010933562 Ocr_converted abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.20 Ocr_module_version 0.0.17 Openlibrary_edition OL25886620M Openlibrary_work OL17312854W Page-progression lr Page_number_confidence 88.16 Pages 230 Ppi 500 Republisher_date 20160114013944 Republisher_operator [email protected];[email protected] Scandate 20160107034612 Scanner scribe8.shenzhen.archive.org Scanningcenter shenzhen Source removed
In total, 19 individuals were executed by hanging, and one, Giles Corey, was pressed to death with large stones. Many others were imprisoned under horrendous conditions, which further fueled the panic that gripped Salem. One of the most notable documents from this period is the official court records, known as the Salem Witch Trials Papers. These records document the accusations, testimonies, and judgments passed during the trials. They provide firsthand accounts of the events that unfolded and serve as valuable historical evidence for understanding the mindset of the people involved. Another significant document is the testimony of Ann Putnam Jr., one of the young girls who played a crucial role in the accusations. In her testimony, she accused several prominent members of the community of witchcraft, including Rebecca Nurse and Martha Corey. Ann's testimony reflects the power dynamics and social tensions present in Salem at that time. The aftermath of the Salem witch hunt was marked by a growing realization of the injustices committed. In 1693, the trials were officially declared unlawful, and those who had been accused and imprisoned were gradually released. However, it took several years for the community to recover from the trauma and rebuild its reputation. The Salem witch hunt stands as a cautionary tale of the dangers of mass hysteria and the consequences of unchecked fear and suspicion. It serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and critical thinking, even in times of uncertainty. The documents and records from this dark period in history continue to provide insights into the human psyche and the fragility of civil society..
Reviews for "Witchcraft Beliefs in Colonial America: Setting the Stage for the Salem Witch Hunt"
- Emily - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "The Salem Witch Hunt: A Brief History with Documents". I found the writing style to be dry and monotonous, making it difficult to stay engaged with the material. Additionally, I felt like the author was more focused on presenting facts and primary source documents, rather than providing a comprehensive analysis of the Salem Witch Trials. Overall, I would not recommend this book to someone looking for an in-depth understanding of this historical event.
- John - 1 star - As someone who is fascinated by history, I was very excited to read "The Salem Witch Hunt: A Brief History with Documents". However, I was ultimately let down by the book. The author's arguments were weak and lacked supporting evidence, making it difficult for me to trust the information presented. Additionally, the organization of the book was confusing and disjointed, making it hard for me to follow the timeline of events. Overall, I was left feeling unsatisfied and would not recommend this book to others interested in the Salem Witch Trials.
- Sarah - 3 stars - While "The Salem Witch Hunt: A Brief History with Documents" provided a decent overview of the Salem Witch Trials, I found the inclusion of primary source documents to be excessive and distracting. I would have preferred a more narrative approach, with a stronger emphasis on storytelling and analysis. Additionally, I felt that the book lacked a cohesive thesis or argument, leaving the reader to piece together their own interpretation of the events. Overall, it was an okay read, but not one that I would enthusiastically recommend.